Search by property
From The Embassy of Good Science
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Redundant Publication + (Honesty)
- Research misconduct and the INTERGROWTH-21st study + (Respect)
- Former Columbia University Graduate Student Engaged in 21 Instances of Research Misconduct + (Accountability)
- Empathy in History Research and Education + (Honesty)
- Intellectual Rights Involving Multiple Institutions + (Respect)
- Robbing the Grave: Investigator Takes Ownership of Deceased Scholar’s Work + (Respect)
- Protocol Violations Putting Animal Subjects in Harm’s Way + (Respect)
- Researchers Pressured to Store Animal Subjects + (Respect)
- Technician Error Leads to Harm of Animal Subjects + (Respect)
- The Three Rs of Animal Research + (Respect)
- The Wild West of Animal Experimentation + (Respect)
- Authorship and Intellectual Property + (Respect)
- Co-Authorship Conflicts + (Respect)
- Mistaken Claim of Authorship + (Respect)
- Banked Samples and HD Testing + (Respect)
- What happens when an ex-physicist writes about gender identity? + (Respect)
- The publication of controversial views + (Respect)
- The Dutch anthropologist making up data and papers + (Honesty)
- Ten short cases on publication ethics + (Accountability)
- Scandalous behaviour at Medical University of Innsbruck + (Honesty)
- Researcher discovers paper published by co-author in another journal + (Respect)
- Outsourcing animal experimentation + (Respect)
- Dispute Over Primary Authorship + (Respect)
- Inexperienced researcher gives too much caffeine to subjects + (Accountability)
- Research or Services? + (Respect)
- Studying Vulnerable Individuals + (Respect)
- Rainy Days for a Struggling Mentee + (Respect)
- Withholding Study Purpose + (Respect)
- Pirated Idea for Research + (Accountability)
- Teaching sensitive and controversial issues in divided societies + (Respect)
- Attempting to Assure Accuracy + (Reliability)
- Eforcement Agencies and the Protection of Human Subjects + (Respect)
- Respondent Confidentiality + (Respect)
- Linking Data Sets + (Reliability)
- Data Sharing and Potential Future Uses + (Respect)
- Privacy + (Respect)
- Legal Requests/Requirements for Confidential Data From Research Field Notes + (Respect)
- Legal Requests/Requirements for Confidential Data From Research Field Notes + (Respect)
- Vulnerable Populations + (Reliability)
- Vulnerable Populations + (Respect)
- Informed Consent with Pre-Testing Convenience Samples + (Respect)
- Research by Students + (Respect)
- Informal Surveys for Policy and Planning that "Trigger" Research Projects + (Respect)
- Data Sharing + (Reliability)
- Data Sharing, Informed Consent and Confidentiality + (Respect)
- Continuing Research and Protecting Confidentiality + (Accountability)
- Rights to Authorship + (Honesty)
- Confidentiality + (Reliability)
- Hazardous materials + (Accountability)
- Research with human subjects + (Respect)
- Bias in hiring + (Honesty)
- Reaction to bias + (Reliability)
- Mentoring: lack of interest + (Respect)
- Mentoring: disabilities + (Respect)
- Collaboration dispute + (Honesty)
- Honest refereeing + (Honesty)
- The Nutty Professor + (Respect)
- To Medicate or Not to Medicate + (Respect)
- Who Owns the Field Notes + (Accountability)
- Witness to Murder + (Respect)
- Hiding A Suspect + (Respect)
- Using student generated codes of conduct in the classroom to reinforce business ethics education + (Responsibility)
- Collaboration In Research + (Responsibility)
- Data protection in a global pandemic (COVID-19) + (Responsibility)
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching + (Responsibility)
- Research with children + (Responsibility)
- Research with humans + (Responsibility)
- Publication bias (positive results) + (Responsibility)
- Take no full responsibility for the integrity of the research project and its reports + (Responsibility)
- Turning a blind eye to breaches of integrity + (Responsibility)
- ‘And the band played on’ movie fragment no. 3 + (Responsibility)
- Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations + (Respect)
- Research Integrity and Conflicts of Interest: The Case of Unethical Research-Misconduct Charges + (Honesty)
- Industry funded research + (Honesty)
- Editorial conflicts of interest + (Accountability)
- How I Was Nearly Duped into 'Authoring' a Fake Paper + (Honesty)
- The Dilemma Game + (Accountability)
- Fake peer-reviewing + (Honesty)
- Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity + (Honesty)
- Replicability + (Reliability)
- Responsible Research and Innovation - RRI + (Honesty)
- Statistical pre-registration + (Honesty)
- Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities + (Transparency)
- Incidental research findings + (Transparency)
- Reward campaign + (Honesty)
- Inferring from P-values + (Honesty)
- Insufficiently reported study flaws and limitations + (Honesty)
- Intellectual conflicts of interest + (Honesty)
- The impact of the GDPR on scientific data + (Accountability)
- Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science + (Transparency)
- Inaccurate representation of results in the media + (Accuracy)
- "Met de billen bloot" (airing your dirty laundry) + (Accountability)
- Publication planning: promoting an ethics of transparency and integrity in biomedical research + (Transparency)
- Transparify: A tool for transparent reporting of funding sources + (Transparency)
- Five-step authorship framework to improve transparency in disclosing contributors to industry-sponsored clinical trial publications + (Transparency)
- How to Disclose Relationships, Activities, and Potential Conflicts of Interest + (Transparency)
- Center for Open and REproducible Science (CORES) + (Transparency)
- Handbook for Supporting Training Activities on the data protection Reform + (Accountability)
- Raising Open and User-friendly Transparency-Enabling Technologies forPublic Administrations + (Transparency)
- Transparency instruments to quantify the method transparency, analytic robustness, and replicability of empirical research + (Transparency)
- Open data: improving transparency, reproducibility and collaboration in science + (Transparency)
- Publication + (Accountability)
- Digital Trespass: Ethical and Terms-of-Use Violations by Researchers Accessing Data From an Online Patient Community + (Transparency)
- Guidance Document for Conducting Internet Research + (Transparency)
- Internet Research Ethics + (Honesty)
- Empathy in History Research and Education + (Honesty)
- Show Me The Money! + (Accountability)
- Quality History Education in the 21st Century Principles and Guidelines + (Reliability)
- Teaching sensitive and controversial issues in divided societies + (Respect)
- Replicability in the Humanities + (Transparency)
- Innovation under pressure: Implications for data privacy during the Covid-19 pandemic + (Transparency)
- Guidelines 03/2020 on the processing of data concerning health for the purpose of scientific research in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak + (Transparency)
- Data protection in a global pandemic (COVID-19) + (Transparency)
- High Integration of Research Monographs in the European Open Science (HIRMEOS) + (Transparency)
- Open access Publication in the European Research Area for Social Sciences and Humanities (OPERAS) + (Transparency)
- Your preprint pre-posting checklist + (Transparency)
- Preprints. Instructions for Authors + (Transparency)
- Preprint servers + (Transparency)
- Digital humanities + (Availability)
- 04 - Moral Case Deliberation: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Accountability)
- 03 - Four Quadrant Approach: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Accountability)
- Author’s Permission Guidelines + (Transparency)
- Consent for publication (Author) + (Transparency)
- Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers + (Transparency)
- Authors couldn’t find a patient to give consent for case report. Then the patient found the report. + (Transparency)
- COPE Journals’ Best Practices for Ensuring Consent for Publishing Medical Case Reports + (Transparency)
- Misrepresenting the characteristics of research participants in psychiatric studies + (Honesty)
- Everything We Know About Facebook's Secret Mood Manipulation Experiment. It was probably legal. But was it ethical? + (Transparency)
- Scientific Misconduct at an Elite Medical Institute: The Role of Competing Institutional Logics and Fragmented Control + (Honesty)
- 06 - Teaching Research Ethics Tool : A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics + (Fairness)
- 05 - REalistiC Decisions: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Fairness)
- Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage + (Respect)
- MedTech Europe Code of Ethical Business Practice + (Transparency)
- Guest Authorship, Mortality Reporting, and Integrity in Rofecoxib Studies + (Honesty)
- The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing ‘Situated Ethics’ in the Field + (Respect)
- 'I am really sorry': Peer Reviewer Stole Text for Own Paper + (Reliability)
- Court Denies Appeal of HIV Fraudster’s 57-month Prison Sentence + (Honesty)
- The Olivieri Debacle: Where Were the Heroes of Bioethics? + (Respect)
- Conducting research in high risk locations + (Transparency)
- Preregistration of animal study protocols + (Openness)
- Jesse's Intent + (Respect)
- Researcher Accused of Breaching Research Ethics Faces GMC + (Respect)
- Clinical Trials and Drug Promotion: Selective Reporting of Study 329 + (Honesty)
- Ignoring substantial safety risks of the study to participants, workers or environment + (Honesty)
- "Why should I acknowledge writing assistance if I have paid for it?" A case study + (Transparency)
- Not acknowledging contributors who do not qualify for authorship + (Honesty)
- Initiative for Open Abstracts (I4OA) + (Transparency)
- Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC) + (Availability)
- Funding (Sponsorship) bias + (Honesty)
- Hypothesizing after the results are known (HARKing) + (Reproducibility)
- Take no full responsibility for the integrity of the research project and its reports + (Transparency)
- Conflict of interest: a research integrity and research ethics perspective + (Objectivity)
- The Flemish Council for Scientific Integrity's Guidelines on Plagiarism in Funding Applications + (Transparency)
- “Five steps to decide what data to keep: a checklist for appraising research data” + (Transparency)
- Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences' Guideline on Authorship in Scientific Publications + (Resepct)
- How to select trustworthy repositories + (Transparency)
- Sharing and preserving data in repositories + (Transparency)
- Code of Good Scientific Practices of the Spanish National Research Council (CSIS) + (Transparency)
- Research Integrity in trying times: a scenario on the presentation and dissemination of information +
- Case Study: Beginning a Collaboration + (Transparency)
- Communicate results to the general public before a peer reviewed publication is available + (Transparency)
- Be grossly unfair to your collaborators + (Transparency)
- FAIR-Aware: Your first step towards your FAIR data(set). + (Transparency)
- Swedish Research Council's Conflict of Interest Policy + (Transparency)
- Resolution on the Research and Innovation Strategy of Slovenia + (Autonomy)
- Quality Enhancement Handbook for Icelandic Higher Education + (Transparency)
- Quality Enhancement Handbook for Icelandic Higher Education + (Transparency)
- Research collaboration + (Honesty)
- Data management plans + (Transparency)
- Human rights, democracy, and the rule of law assurance framework for AI systems: A proposal + (Accountability)
- The University of Iceland Code of Ethics + (Equality)
- Ethical Guidelines for Good Research Practice + (Confidentiality)
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity + (rigour)
- Research metrics + (Accountability)
- Research integrity - what is means, why it is important and how we might protect it + (Trustworthiness)
- A University of Liverpool investigation determined that a former researcher there fabricated his data + (Diligence)
- Turning a blind eye to breaches of integrity + (Honesty)
- Case Study Videos + (Honesty)
- Perioperative Mischief: The Price of Academic Misconduct + (Reliability)
- Chinese Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for the National Natural Science Foundation + (Confidentiality)
- Declaration of Istanbul + (Dignity)
- Guidelines for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences, Humanities, Law and Theology (NESH, Norway) + (Impartiality)
- The Netherlands Code of Conduct for Academic Practice + (Honesty)
- A systematic approach to instruction in research ethics + (accaunability)
- UK Concordat to Support Research Integrity + (Honesty)
- Integrating Ethics Into a Research Experience for Undergraduates + (honesty)
- Italian National Research Center Guidelines for Integrity in Research + (Dignity)
- ORI introduction to RCR + (Honesty)
- Designing Online Resources in Preparation for Authentic Laboratory Experiences + (diligence)
- The ethics of managing a laboratory or research group + (fairness)
- Doing Global science + (honesty)
- Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials + (honesty)
- Automatic plagiarism detection with PAIRwise 2.0. + (honesty)
- The university and the responsible conduct of research: who is responsible for what? + (honesty)
- Applying Research Findings to Enhance Pre-Practicum Ethics Training + (honesty)
- Nagoya Protocol + (respect)
- Strategy for Gender Equality at the Swedish Research Council + (Gender Equality)
- Conflict of interest disclosure in early education of medical students + (transparency)
- Authorship Deserved, Not Earned: Research Ethics and Research Integrity Scenario + (Fairness)
- Not asking permission from contributors for the wording of the acknowledgement + (Accountability)