Search by property
From The Embassy of Good Science
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- The Case of the Egyptian Travel Agent + (Respect)
- What's in That Bottle? What's in That Pipe? + (Respect)
- The Case of the Damaged Baby + (Honesty)
- "A Little Thing Like Plagiarism" + (Honesty)
- Backstage Maneuvers + (Honesty)
- Power to the People + (Accountability)
- Ethical Dilemmas and Moral Responsibilities + (Respect)
- Slow Code + (Accountability)
- Site Unseen + (Honesty)
- The Runaway Wife + (Respect)
- A Letter of "Non-Recommendation" + (Respect)
- When is Advanced Training Necessary? + (Respect)
- Would You Do a Post Doc with this Guy? + (Respect)
- 03 - Four Quadrant Approach: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Accountability)
- SSH research as part of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research + (Respect)
- Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers +
- Authors couldn’t find a patient to give consent for case report. Then the patient found the report. +
- COPE Journals’ Best Practices for Ensuring Consent for Publishing Medical Case Reports +
- Consent for publication (Participant) + (Respect)
- Misrepresenting the characteristics of research participants in psychiatric studies + (Honesty)
- Journal calls 2012 paper “deeply offensive to particular minorities” + (Respect)
- A Letter of Resignation + (Respect)
- You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues + (Respect)
- You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues + (Respect)
- You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues + (Respect)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity + (Accountability)
- 06 - Teaching Research Ethics Tool : A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics + (Fairness)
- 05 - REalistiC Decisions: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Fairness)
- 02 - The Seven Steps Method: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Accountability)
- Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage + (Respect)
- European Charter of Patients' Rights + (Privacy)
- The Olivieri Debacle: Where Were the Heroes of Bioethics? + (Respect)
- 01 - Value Analysis: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Fairness)
- Responsible mentoring + (Reliability)
- Take no full responsibility for the integrity of the research project and its reports +
- Swiss Academy of Arts and Sciences Code of Conduct for Scientific Integrity r + (Reliability)
- Poor mentoring or supervision of early career researcherers + (Accountability)
- The University of Malta's Research Code of Practice + (Respect)
- Collaboration In Research + (Accountability)
- Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Fairness)
- Digital Trespass: Ethical and Terms-of-Use Violations by Researchers Accessing Data From an Online Patient Community +
- Belgian Code of Ethics for Scientific Research + (Accountability)
- Italian National Research Center Guidelines for Integrity in Research + (Dignity)
- HEIRRI courses + (Responsibility)
- Online course: Teaching the Responsible Conduct of Research in Humans + (Honesty)
- LIRIcs - Leuven Institutional Research Integrity culture and self-reflection on-line course + (Responsibility)
- Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Fairness)
- Institutional Pathology and the Death of a Mentally Ill Young Man + (Respect)
- Anonymity Revisited + (Respect)
- Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content. + (Honesty)
- Publication bias (positive results) + (Accountability)
- Can a scientific paper be published anonymously? + (Honesty)
- Moral conflict and moral dilemma + (Reliability)
- Research Integrity: Podcast Series + (Honesty)
- Inter Academy Partnership Guidance on Doing Global Science + (Responsibility)
- Turning a blind eye to breaches of integrity + (Honesty)
- Case Study Videos + (Honesty)
- Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Fairness)
- Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Fairness)
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Fairness)
- Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Fairness)
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Fairness)
- Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Fairness)
- Polish National Science Centre Code on Research Integrity and Applying for Research Financing + (Accountability)
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching + (Fairness)
- Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees - General Guidelines for Research Ethics + (Respect)
- Research with humans + (Respect)
- Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity + (Honesty)
- Imagine RRI. A card-based method for reflecting on responsibility in life science research + (Responsibility)
- Interactive Guide: Basic research Concepts + (Responsibility)
- Responsible authorship quick guide + (Responsibility)
- ‘And the band played on’ movie fragment no. 3 + (Accountability)
- Publication planning: promoting an ethics of transparency and integrity in biomedical research + (Transparency)
- Quality Enhancement Handbook for Icelandic Higher Education + (Transparency)
- Quality Enhancement Handbook for Icelandic Higher Education + (Transparency)
- Quality History Education in the 21st Century Principles and Guidelines + (Transparency)
- Raising Open and User-friendly Transparency-Enabling Technologies forPublic Administrations + (Transparency)
- Replicability + (Transparency)
- Replicability in the Humanities + (Transparency)
- Research Integrity and Conflicts of Interest: The Case of Unethical Research-Misconduct Charges + (Transparency)
- Research Integrity in trying times: a scenario on the presentation and dissemination of information + (Transparency)
- Research Problems at Australian University Hit the News + (Transparency)
- Researcher Accused of Breaching Research Ethics Faces GMC + (Transparency)
- Resolution on the Research and Innovation Strategy of Slovenia + (Transparency)
- Scientific Misconduct at an Elite Medical Institute: The Role of Competing Institutional Logics and Fragmented Control + (Transparency)
- Show Me The Money! + (Transparency)
- Swedish Research Council's Conflict of Interest Policy + (Transparency)
- Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences' Guideline on Authorship in Scientific Publications + (Transparency)
- The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing ‘Situated Ethics’ in the Field + (Transparency)
- The EQUATOR Network: Reporting guidelines + (Transparency)
- The Flemish Council for Scientific Integrity's Guidelines on Plagiarism in Funding Applications + (Transparency)
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity + (Transparency)
- The Olivieri Debacle: Where Were the Heroes of Bioethics? + (Transparency)
- Transparency instruments to quantify the method transparency, analytic robustness, and replicability of empirical research + (Transparency)
- Transparify: A tool for transparent reporting of funding sources + (Transparency)
- UK Concordat to Support Research Integrity + (Transparency)
- Working with Research Integrity - Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement + (Transparency)
- Your preprint pre-posting checklist + (Transparency)
- Conflict of interest: a research integrity and research ethics perspective + (Transparency)
- Editorial conflicts of interest + (Transparency)
- Intellectual conflicts of interest + (Transparency)
- Data management plans + (Transparency)
- Data protection in a global pandemic (COVID-19) + (Transparency)
- FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results + (Transparency)
- How to select trustworthy repositories + (Transparency)
- Sharing and preserving data in repositories + (Transparency)
- “Five steps to decide what data to keep: a checklist for appraising research data” + (Transparency)
- Industry funded research + (Transparency)
- Intellectual property rights in research collaborations + (Transparency)
- "Met de billen bloot" (airing your dirty laundry) + (Transparency)
- Computational reproducibility: safeguarding the backbone of science + (Transparency)
- Publication archive (Radboud University) + (Transparency)
- Reward campaign + (Transparency)
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity + (Transparency)
- Platform for Responsible Editorial Policies (PREP) + (Transparency)
- Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science + (Transparency)
- Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities + (Transparency)
- Conducting research in high risk locations + (Transparency)
- Incidental research findings + (Transparency)
- Internet Research Ethics + (Transparency)
- Consent for publication (Author) + (Transparency)
- High Integration of Research Monographs in the European Open Science (HIRMEOS) + (Transparency)
- Initiative for Open Abstracts (I4OA) + (Transparency)
- Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC) + (Transparency)
- Open access Publication in the European Research Area for Social Sciences and Humanities (OPERAS) + (Transparency)
- Open access publishing: the new norm? + (Transparency)
- Retractions: correcting the scientific literature + (Transparency)
- Communicate results to the general public before a peer reviewed publication is available + (Transparency)
- Funding (Sponsorship) bias + (Transparency)
- Hypothesizing after the results are known (HARKing) + (Transparency)
- Inaccurate representation of results in the media + (Transparency)
- Inferring from P-values + (Transparency)
- Insufficiently reported study flaws and limitations + (Transparency)
- Publication bias (positive results) + (Transparency)
- Be grossly unfair to your collaborators + (Transparency)
- Fake peer-reviewing + (Transparency)
- Not acknowledging contributors who do not qualify for authorship + (Transparency)
- Research collaboration + (Transparency)
- Take no full responsibility for the integrity of the research project and its reports + (Transparency)
- Ignoring substantial safety risks of the study to participants, workers or environment + (Transparency)
- Preregistration of animal study protocols + (Transparency)
- Statistical pre-registration + (Transparency)
- Digital humanities + (Transparency)
- Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity + (Transparency)
- Legal rights of accused scientists + (Transparency)
- Responsible Research and Innovation - RRI + (Transparency)
- Teaching sensitive and controversial issues in divided societies + (Transparency)
- The impact of the GDPR on scientific data + (Transparency)
- The Dilemma Game + (Transparency)
- Empathy in History Research and Education + (Transparency)