Search by property
From The Embassy of Good Science
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- The Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland's Guidelines on Good Research Practice + (Researchers)
- The Croatian Committee on Ethics in Science and Higher Education's Amendments to the Ethics Code of Ethics Committee in Science and Higher Education + (Research institutions)
- The French National Research Agency's Policy for Ethics and Research Integrity + (Funding agencies)
- The French CNRS Ethics Committee's Ethical Reflection on Plagiarism in Scientific Research + (Researchers)
- The French Vademecum on Scientific Integrity + (Research institutions)
- The French CNRS Ethics Committee's Guide to Integrity and Responsibility in Research Practices + (Researchers)
- Recommendations of the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK for Research Integrity Advisers and related background organisations1 + (Research Integrity Officers)
- Finnish TJNK Guideline on Bold Communication, Responsible Influence. Science Communication Recommendations + (Researchers)
- Finnish TENK Guide to Agreeing on Authorship: Recommendation for Research Publications + (Researchers)
- Spanish Law on Science, Technology and Innovation + (Researchers)
- Act on the Danish Council for Research and Innovation Policy + (Academic institutions)
- The Danish Act on the Research Advisory System + (Research institutions)
- The New Danish Research Misconduct etc. Act + (Research institutions)
- Alliance of German Science Organisations' Principles for the Handling of Research Data + (Researchers)
- Leibniz Institute's Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice + (PhD Students)
- Max Planck Society's Rules of Good Scientific Practice + (Academic institutions)
- The German Association of University Professors and Lecturers' (DHV) Position Paper on Scientific Self-regulation and Scientific Misconduct + (PhD Students)
- Joint position paper of the General Faculty (AFT) and the German University Association (DHV) + (Researchers)
- The German Council of Science and Humanities ' Recommendations on Academic Integrity + (Academic institutions)
- The Larnaca College (Cyprus) Statement on Research Integrity + (Students)
- Procedures of the Science Ethics Committee of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences + (Researchers)
- Statutes and Procedures of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences + (Research institutions)
- The University of Malta's Research Code of Practice + (Academic staff)
- COMET Initiative + (Researchers)
- Importance of healthy lifestyle + (Academic institutions)
- SCImago Journal Rankings + (Academic staff)
- Research collaboration + (PhD Students)
- Guideline for discussing work-related stress + (Supervisors)
- Data management plans + (Researchers)
- SPOC: RCR through supervision and mentoring course + (Researchers)
- Diner Pensant Workshop + (Researchers)
- Araştırma doğruluğu konusuna giriş + (Researchers)
- Erdem etiği ve araştırma doğruluğu + (Research integrity trainers)
- Mevcut araştırma koşulları altında erdem etiğinin uygulanması + (Researchers)
- Erdemler ve Normlar + (Researchers)
- Orta Yol + (Trainers in training)
- Öz beyan yaklaşımı, araştırmada iyiliğin farklı şekilleri üzerine fikir yürütme + (Researchers)
- Der Balanceakt + (Trainers in training)
- The SOPs4RI project + (Policy makers)
- ICH Guidelines + (medical researchers)
- Self Declaration Approach - a Reflection on the Varieties of Goodness in Research + (Researchers)
- AI Generated Content + (Academic staff)
- KFPE Guide - 11 Principles & 7 Questions + (Researchers)
- What to communicate in retraction notices? + (Journals)
- 10 Things for Curating Reproducible and FAIR Research + (Academic institutions)
- Research preparedness for future crises + (Wider public)
- Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2023 Edition (ALLEA Code) + (Academic institutions)
- The Finnish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and Procedures for Handling Alleged Violations of Research Integrity in Finland + (Academic institutions)
- Human rights, democracy, and the rule of law assurance framework for AI systems: A proposal + (Activists)
- Virtues and Norms + (Researchers)
- Hungarian Decree on the system of integrity management at public administration bodies and the procedural rules of receiving lobbyists + (Researchers in public institutions)
- The Reward Alliance + (Reserchers)
- Questionable Research Practices in Study Design + (Early career researchers)
- Agriculture researcher up to 15 retractions for fake peer review + (Reserchers)
- The University of Oslo's 10 commandements for ethical practice in research + (Reserchers)
- The Dublin City University's Code of Good Research Practice + (Academic staff)
- Irish National Forum on Research Integrity's Report on Fostering a Climate of Excellence for Irish Research + (Reserchers)
- The decision on ice + (health care professionals)
- 'I am really sorry': Peer Reviewer Stole Text for Own Paper + (Reviewers)
- Attempting to Assure Accuracy + (Reviewers)
- Ethical guidance for research with a potential for human enhancement + (Reviewers)
- Good-Practice Guide for Scientific-Academic Publishing (CSIC, Spain) + (Reviewers)
- Peer review + (Reviewers)
- Procrastinating Reviewer + (Reviewers)
- Research misconduct + (Reviewers)
- Ten journals denied 2020 Impact Factors because of excessive self-citation or “citation stacking” + (Reviewers)
- Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals + (Reviewers)
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity + (Reviewers)
- Post-publication peer review + (Reviewers)
- Selective citation + (Reviewers)
- Hostile peer review + (Reviewers)
- Self-plagiarism + (Reviewers)
- Turning a blind eye to breaches of integrity + (Reviewers)
- Perverse incentives + (Reviewers)
- Image Integrity + (Reviewers)
- Peer review card game + (Reviewers)
- Predatory publishing + (PhD Students)
- Altmetrics + (PhD students)
- Legal rights of accused scientists + (Scientists)
- Declaration of Helsinki + (PhD Students)
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights + (PhD Students)
- Peer review + (Scientists)
- Research metrics + (phd students)
- On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research + (Researchers)
- Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors + (Students)
- Hostile peer review + (Scientists)
- P-value hacking + (Students)
- Perverse incentives + (Students)
- Self-plagiarism + (Students)
- Whistleblower protection/rights + (PhD Students)
- Polarized research + (PhD Students)
- Supervision + (phd students)
- Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’) + (Students)
- Authorship criteria + (PhD students)
- German Research Foundation's Recommendations for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice + (researchers)
- Research misconduct + (Students)
- Balancing harms and benefits + (All stakeholders in research)
- Journal Impact Factor + (Scientists)
- Research integrity officers in Europe + (Students)
- Questionable Research Practices in Study Design + (Early career researchers)
- Inappropriate study design + (Students)
- Questionable Research Practices in Data Collection + (Early career researchers)
- Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and Reporting + (Early career researchers)
- Non-reporting of negative findings + (Students)
- The INSPIRE project + (Policy makers)
- Selective citation + (Students)
- Nagoya Protocol + (Scientists)
- Ethical guidance for research with a potential for human enhancement + (Academic staff)
- Dilemmas in daily practice + (Scientists)
- FAIR-Aware: Your first step towards your FAIR data(set). + (Academic staff)
- Human rights, democracy, and the rule of law assurance framework for AI systems: A proposal + (Activists)
- Successful and timely uptake of artificial intelligence in science in the EU + (Academic institutions)
- Path2Integrity Campaign + (Academic institutions)
- Path2Integrity Learning Card S0: Good research is based on honesty + (Bachelor students)
- Path2Integrity + (Academic institutions)
- Path2Integrity Learning Cards + (All stakeholders in research)
- Responsible supervision + (PhD Students)