Search by property
From The Embassy of Good Science
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- Scandalous behaviour at Medical University of Innsbruck +
- Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science +
- Scientific Misconduct at an Elite Medical Institute: The Role of Competing Institutional Logics and Fragmented Control +
- Scientific Research: Dilemmas and Temptations (booklet of cases) +
- Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel +
- Scientists in Chile Protest Mummy Study +
- Selection bias in skull measurements +
- Self-plagiarism and suspected salami publishing +
- Serbian Journal Lands in Hot Water After Challenge on 24 hour Peer Review That Cost 1785 euros +
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Instant Paper +
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Magazine Surprise +
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Professional Manual +
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Unauthorised Translation +
- Show Me The Money! +
- Simultaneous Submission Leading to Duplicate Publication +
- Site Unseen +
- Sitting in Judgement +
- Six domains of research ethics. A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research +
- Slow Code +
- Statements About Professional Experience +
- Swedish Research Council's Conflict of Interest Policy +
- Swedish plastics study fabricated, panel finds +
- Swiss Academy of Arts and Sciences Code of Conduct for Scientific Integrity r +
- Ten short cases on publication ethics +
- The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud +
- The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing ‘Situated Ethics’ in the Field +
- The Case of Falsified Data +
- The Case of the Damaged Baby +
- The Case of the Missing Artefact +
- The Culture of Scientific Research in the UK +
- The Dublin City University's Code of Good Research Practice +
- The Dutch anthropologist making up data and papers +
- The Epistemic Integrity of Scientific Research +
- The Ethics of Pharmaceutical Research Funding: A Social Organization Approach +
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity +
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition +
- The Extent and Causes of Academic Text Recycling or ‘Self-Plagiarism’ +
- The Hazardous Consent Forms +
- The Lab: Avoiding Research Misconduct +
- The Legacy of the Hwang Case: Research Misconduct in Biosciences +
- The Limits of Expertise +
- The Netherlands Code of Conduct for Academic Practice +
- The Nuremberg Code +
- The Nutty Professor +
- The Olivieri Debacle: Where Were the Heroes of Bioethics? +
- The Paroxetine 352 Bipolar Trial: A Study in Medical Ghostwriting +
- The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes +
- The Saga of Korean Women Who Provided Eggs for Embryonic Stem Cell Research +
- The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity +
- The Suspect Questionnaire +
- The Swiss Report on Homeopathy: A Case Study of Research Misconduct +
- The Threat to Scientific Integrity in Environmental and Occupational Medicine +
- The University of Oslo's 10 commandements for ethical practice in research +
- The Whistleblower and Penn: A Final Accounting of Study 352 +
- The Wild West of Animal Experimentation +
- The role of moral philosophy in the divide between science and non-science +
- Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- Traver paper: The Unique Case of a Published Delusion +
- U.S. Finds Misconduct by Ex-Researchers at Chicago and UCSF +
- U.S. Gov’t Physicist Sentenced to 18 months in Prison for Fraud +
- UK Concordat to Support Research Integrity +
- UK Research Council's Policy and Guidelines on Governance of Good Research Conduct +
- UK Research Integrity Office's Code of Practice for Research +
- Unhelpful retraction notice about a study that received favourable media attention +
- University Investigation Finds Misconduct by Bone Researcher with 23 Retractions +
- Unlicensed usage of medical devices on patients: a case of accusations +
- Using data not created for research purposes in the context of collaboration with private companies +
- Using student generated codes of conduct in the classroom to reinforce business ethics education +
- Valley of Sorrow +
- Veterinary scientist fabricates data and manipulates images +
- Vulnerable Populations +
- Vulnerable Populations +
- What Universities can Learn from one of Science’s Biggest Frauds +
- What do journal editors do when they suspect research misconduct? +
- What is Recklessness in Scientific Research? +
- When Sociologists Deceive Their Subjects +
- Whistle blowing +
- Whistle-blower Claims his Accusations Cost him his Job +
- Who Owns the Field Notes +
- Withholding Study Purpose +
- Conflict of interest in peer review +
- Intellectual conflicts of interest +
- FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results +
- Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals +
- Industry funded research +
- Intellectual property rights in research collaborations +
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching +
- Reward campaign +
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity +
- European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC) +
- Networks and projects promoting research integrity +
- Balancing harms and benefits +
- Confidentiality +
- Informed assent +
- Internet Research Ethics +
- Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials +
- Authorship criteria +
- Consent for publication (Author) +
- Retractions: correcting the scientific literature +
- Standards of authorship +
- Duplicate publications and secondary publications +
- Funding (Sponsorship) bias +
- Hypothesizing after the results are known (HARKing) +
- Inaccurate representation of results in the media +
- Inferring from P-values +
- Insufficiently reported study flaws and limitations +
- Outcome reporting bias +
- Publication bias (positive results) +
- Salami publication +
- Spin of research results +
- Fake peer-reviewing +
- Honorary or gift authorship +
- Inappropriate authorship +
- Not acknowledging contributors who do not qualify for authorship +
- Research collaboration +
- Self-plagiarism +
- Turning a blind eye to breaches of integrity +
- Unfair reviewing +
- Ignoring substantial safety risks of the study to participants, workers or environment +
- Non-disclosure of changes to the research design +
- Perverse incentives +
- Predatory publishing +
- Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors +
- AllTrials campaign +
- Forensic Statistics to detect Data Fabrication +
- Statistical pre-registration +
- Image Integrity +
- Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct +
- Responsible Research and Innovation - RRI +
- Journal Impact Factor based on the date of electronic publication +
- Fabrication +
- Plagiarism +
- Peer review card game +
- Research integrity training for PhD students +
- Serious gaming in research integrity education +
- Supervision Guidelines +
- The Dilemma Game +
- Empathy in History Research and Education +
- ‘Caught in the act’: Veterinary researcher caught fabricating gene data, resigns from university job +