Search by property
From The Embassy of Good Science
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- Ethics and children's rights: learning from past mistakes +
- Ethics defined: a glossary +
- Failed Patenting Negotiations in Collaborative Research +
- Finnish Guidelines on Doctoral Supervision and Review +
- Five cases considered and concluded by the UK's General Medical Council +
- Former Columbia University Graduate Student Engaged in 21 Instances of Research Misconduct +
- Fostering Integrity in Research +
- Fraudulent algorithm: A pain too deep for adequate analgesia +
- Funders +
- General Code of Ethics in Scientific Research (Romanian Ministry of Education, Research and Youth) +
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Austria +
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Finland +
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Switzerland +
- Guidelines for Responsible Data Management in Scientific Research +
- HEADT Centre: An Introduction to Research Integrity +
- Handbook for Supporting Training Activities on the data protection Reform +
- Hazardous materials +
- Herbicide Resistant Rice +
- How Earnest Research Into Gay Genetics Went Wrong +
- Human rights, democracy, and the rule of law assurance framework for AI systems: A proposal +
- Human subject research +
- Hungarian Academy of Sciences' Science Ethics Code +
- Image Search Triggers Italian Police Probe +
- Industry involvement in scientific studies on SSRI's +
- Inexperienced researcher gives too much caffeine to subjects +
- Innovation under pressure: Implications for data privacy during the Covid-19 pandemic +
- Institutional Pathology and the Death of a Mentally Ill Young Man +
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Publication Recommendations +
- It’s Still Plagiarism +
- Jesse's Intent +
- Journal calls 2012 paper “deeply offensive to particular minorities” +
- Legal Liabilities in Research: Early lessons From North America +
- Legal Requests/Requirements for Confidential Data From Research Field Notes +
- Legal Requests/Requirements for Confidential Data From Research Field Notes +
- Linking Data Sets +
- Maintaining Competence +
- Mea Culpa: Scientific Misconduct - perspective of a research ethics board chair +
- Medical students' decisions about authorship in disputable situations: intervention study +
- Mentoring: disabilities +
- Mentoring: failure +
- Mentoring: minorities +
- Misuse of grant money for personal purposes +
- Nanyang Technological University's Research Data Policy (Singapore) +
- Online Learning Tool for Research Integrity and Image Processing +
- Online Module: Responsible research and Peer Review +
- Open learning research ethics +
- Outcomes assessment of role-play scenarios for teaching responsible conduct of research +
- Paxil Study Under Fire +
- Peer review +
- Peer review card exchange game +
- Peer-mentored research development meeting: a model for successful peer mentoring among junior level researchers +
- Perioperative Mischief: The Price of Academic Misconduct +
- Philosopher Earns 14th Retraction for Plagiarism +
- Pirated Idea for Research +
- Plagiarism and Fabrication in Public Health Research at Harvard +
- Plain Language Summaries of Publications Toolkit +
- Polish National Science Centre Code on Research Integrity and Applying for Research Financing +
- Political points +
- Poor mentoring or supervision of early career researcherers +
- Possible Conflict of Interest +
- Postdoc randomly chose data during figure assembly +
- Power to the People +
- Preprint servers +
- Printeger Upright +
- Procrastinating Researcher Delegates Grant Reviews to Trainee +
- Procrastinating Reviewer +
- Prominent Video Game-Violence Researcher Loses Another Paper to Retraction +
- Protecting research subjects +
- Publication +
- Publication planning: promoting an ethics of transparency and integrity in biomedical research +
- Records From Controversial Twin Study Sealed at Yale Until 2065 +
- Reflections on the Cleveland Clinic Study of The Batista Operation +
- Replicability +
- Replicability in the Humanities +
- Research Data Management +
- Research Ethics +
- Research Ethics: Zero Tolerance +
- Research Integrity in trying times: a scenario on the presentation and dissemination of information +
- Research Integrity: Podcast Series +
- Research Problems at Australian University Hit the News +
- Research by Students +
- Research fraud on MMR vaccines +
- Research metrics +
- Research misconduct +
- Research misconduct and the INTERGROWTH-21st study +
- Research misconduct in a grant application for the National Institutes of Health +
- Research with human subjects +
- Researcher Accused of Breaching Research Ethics Faces GMC +
- Respondent Confidentiality +
- Responsible Authorship and Peer Review - Columbia RCR Course, Module 3 +
- Responsible Conduct in the Global Research Enterprise: A Policy Report +
- Responsible conduct of biomedical research : collaborative research +
- Responsible mentoring +
- Retracted WHO Reports on Opioid Guidelines +
- Rules of Data-Sharing in Collaborative and Non-Collaborative Research +
- Rules of Data-Sharing in Collaborative and Non-Collaborative Research +
- Scandalous behaviour at Medical University of Innsbruck +
- Science and Surveillance: Western Institutions Consider Role in China’s Uighur Crackdown +
- Scientific Misconduct at an Elite Medical Institute: The Role of Competing Institutional Logics and Fragmented Control +
- Selection bias in skull measurements +
- Selling Out? Making Deals with Other Institutions +
- Serious Accusation of Negligence of Ethical Principles in Human Sciences +
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: Another Magazine Surprise +
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Professional Manual +
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Review Article +
- Show Me The Money! +
- Site Unseen +
- Slow Code +
- Speculations and Ethical Concerns in the Conduct of Outsourced Clinical Trials in India +
- Swiss Academy of Arts and Sciences Code of Conduct for Scientific Integrity r +
- Ten short cases on publication ethics +
- The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine +
- The Case of Falsified Data +
- The Case of the Damaged Baby +
- The Dublin City University's Code of Good Research Practice +
- The Epistemic Integrity of Scientific Research +
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity +
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition +
- The European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (ECHRBmed) +
- The Ghost Collaborator +
- The Hazardous Consent Forms +
- The Nuremberg Code +
- The Paroxetine 352 Bipolar Trial: A Study in Medical Ghostwriting +
- The Runaway Wife +
- The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity +
- The Suspect Questionnaire +
- The University of Oslo's 10 commandements for ethical practice in research +
- The Whistleblower and Penn: A Final Accounting of Study 352 +
- The role of moral philosophy in the divide between science and non-science +
- Training modules and guidelines on mentorship +
- Traver paper: The Unique Case of a Published Delusion +
- U.S. gov’t researchers withdraw climate paper after using pseudonyms +
- UK Research Integrity Office's Code of Practice for Research +
- Up, Up, and Away: Clinical Trials Go International +
- VIRT2UE train-the-trainer program +
- Vulnerable Populations +
- What Universities can Learn from one of Science’s Biggest Frauds +
- Whistle blowing +
- Whistle-blower Claims his Accusations Cost him his Job +
- Who Owns the Field Notes +
- Working with Research Integrity - Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement +
- Collaboration In Research +
- Cross-boundary collaborations +
- Editorial conflicts of interest +
- Intellectual conflicts of interest +
- Data protection in a global pandemic (COVID-19) +
- Imputation of missing data in clinical trials +
- Intellectual property rights in research collaborations +
- Monitoring funding processes +
- "Met de billen bloot" (airing your dirty laundry) +
- Reward campaign +
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity +
- European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC) +
- Networks and projects promoting research integrity +
- Not asking permission from contributors for the wording of the acknowledgement +
- Post-publication peer review +
- Clarifying the aims of a research study +
- Conducting research in high risk locations +
- Internet Research Ethics +
- Research with animals +
- Authorship criteria +
- Consent for publication (Author) +
- Publishers - COPE guidelines +
- Standards of authorship +
- Communicate results to the general public before a peer reviewed publication is available +
- Publication bias (positive results) +
- Selective citation +
- Honorary or gift authorship +
- Inappropriate authorship +
- Turning a blind eye to breaches of integrity +
- Keeping inadequate notes of the research process +
- Perverse incentives +
- Polarized research +
- Predatory publishing +
- Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors +
- AllTrials campaign +
- Prospective registration of clinical trials +
- Research Integrity Advisors +
- Research ethics committees +
- Research integrity officers in Europe +
- Teaching sensitive and controversial issues in divided societies +
- The impact of the GDPR on scientific data +
- Altmetrics +
- Eigenfactor +
- Journal Impact Factor +
- SCImago Journal Rankings +
- Peer review card game +
- Research integrity training for PhD students +
- Responsible supervision +
- Serious gaming in research integrity education +
- Supervision Guidelines +
- The Dilemma Game +
- ‘And the band played on’ movie fragment no. 3 +