Search by property
From The Embassy of Good Science
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- A Plagiarism Adventure (Et Plagieringseventyr) + (Early career researchers)
- Nine pitfalls of research misconduct + (Early career researchers)
- Research Integrity: Podcast Series + (Bachelor students)
- Bioethics: an introduction + (Bachelor students)
- Committee on Publication Ethics Guidelines on How to Handle Authorship Disputes + (Early career researchers)
- Responsible Authorship and Peer Review - Columbia RCR Course, Module 3 + (Early career researchers)
- Case-based ethics instruction: the influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making + (Early career researchers)
- University of Montana online research ethics course + (Bachelor students)
- Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content. + (PhD students)
- Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity + (PhD students)
- Informed assent + (Junior researchers)
- Informed consent + (Junior researchers)
- Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Industry involvement in scientific studies on SSRI's + (Researchers)
- Standards of authorship + (phd students)
- Anonymity Revisited + (Researchers)
- Research Ethics + (Researchers)
- Research integrity - what is means, why it is important and how we might protect it + (Researchers)
- Authorship and publication + (PhD Students)
- Research culture + (Researchers)
- Research Ethics: Zero Tolerance + (Researchers)
- Five simple rules to avoid plagiarism + (All stakeholders in research)
- Scientific Research: Dilemmas and Temptations (booklet of cases) + (Bachelor students)
- Handling of Sexual Harassment Case Poses Larger Questions at Yale + (Researchers)
- Long Distance Collaboration + (Researchers)
- Questioning a Mentor + (Researchers)
- Case Study Videos + (Doctoral students)
- Research integrity training for diverse disciplines + (Early career researchers)
- Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching + (Academic staff)
- A Japanese developmental biology center, scientific misconduct and suicide + (Researchers)
- Belgian Code of Ethics for Scientific Research + (All stakeholders in research)
- Mental health in academia + (All stakeholders in research)
- Responsible conduct of biomedical research : collaborative research + (All stakeholders in research)
- Privacy in research + (PhD students)
- Research integrity training for PhD students + (PhD students)
- Serious gaming in research integrity education + (Bachelor students)
- H-index + (Funders)
- Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity + (PhD students)
- Peer Review. The nuts and bolts + (Early career researchers)
- Prospective registration of clinical trials + (PhD students)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Magazine Surprise + (Researchers)
- Questionable Research Practices in Study Design + (Early career researchers)
- Questionable Research Practices in Data Collection + (Early career researchers)
- Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and Reporting + (Early career researchers)
- Questionable Research Practices in Collaboration + (All stakeholders in research)
- People Studying People: Research Ethics in Society + (Early career researchers)
- Becoming an Ethical Researcher + (Early career researchers)
- Publication + (Early career researchers)
- Definition of plagiarism: Phrasing + (Authors)
- Path2Integrity Learning Cards + (All stakeholders in research)
- Show Me The Money! + (Early career researchers)
- Psychologist made up sex bias results + (Early career researchers)
- What my retraction taught me + (Academic staff)
- Research Integrity Advisors + (PhD students)
- Path2Integrity Campaign + (Academic institutions)
- Path2Integrity + (Academic institutions)
- Protocol Violations Putting Animal Subjects in Harm’s Way + (Early career researchers)
- Researchers Pressured to Store Animal Subjects + (Academic institutions)
- Co-Authorship Conflicts + (Early career researchers)
- Inconsistent Findings Between Trainee and Researcher + (Early career researchers)
- Political points + (Early career researchers)
- Procrastinating Researcher Delegates Grant Reviews to Trainee + (Supervisors)
- Rainy Days for a Struggling Mentee + (Early career researchers)
- Selling Out? Making Deals with Other Institutions + (Early career researchers)
- Accuracy of Credentials and Competence in Public Communications + (Researchers)
- Statements About Professional Experience + (Early career researchers)
- Research by Students + (Graduate and postgraduate students)
- ORI comes down (hard) on Bengu Sezen, Columbia chemist accused of fraud + (PhD Students)
- On Goffman: Ethnography and the Ethics of Care + (Academic institutions)
- Guidance on the Management of Clinical Trials during the COVID-19 Pandemic + (All stakeholders in research)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity + (All stakeholders in research)
- Honorary or gift authorship + (Early career researchers)
- Policy documents of the German Rectors’ Conference (HRK) + (Academic institutions)
- Case Study: Beginning a Collaboration + (PhD students)
- FAIR-Aware: Your first step towards your FAIR data(set). + (Academic staff)
- Where are they now? + (Early career researchers)
- Poor mentoring or supervision of early career researcherers + (Academic staff)
- Institutional codes of conduct for research integrity + (Academic staff)
- Introduction to Research Integrity and Good Scientific Practices + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines on Supervision - PhD guidelines + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on Responsible Supervision and Leadership - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Academic staff)
- NTU (Nanyang Technological University) Research Integrity Policy + (Academic institutions)
- NTU (Nanyang Technological University) Responding to Allegations/Complaints of Research Misconduct + (Academic staff)
- Affiliations + (Academic institutions)
- Ethics defined: a glossary + (All stakeholders in research)
- Confidentiality + (PhD students)
- Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition + (All stakeholders in research)
- 'Climate Skeptic' Journal Shuttered Following 'Malpractice' in 'Nepotistic' Reviewer Selections + (Editors)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Disputes in Authorship (1) + (Editors)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Disputes in Authorship (2) + (Editors)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Editorial Misconduct + (Editors)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Multiple Submissions (1) + (Editors)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Multiple Submissions (2) + (Editors)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Redundant Publication + (Editors)
- A Reflection on Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research + (Editors)
- Baltimore Case - In Brief + (Editors)
- COPE Cases + (Editors)
- Can a scientific paper be published anonymously? + (Editors)
- Data fabrication in a rejected manuscript + (Editors)
- Dubious Peer Reviews Lead to 10 Retractions + (Editors)
- Environmental journal pulls two papers for “compromised” peer review + (Editors)
- Good-Practice Guide for Scientific-Academic Publishing (CSIC, Spain) + (Editors)
- INSPIRE Checklist + (Editors)
- Implications of a Single Highly Cited Article on a Journal and Its Citation Indexes + (Editors)
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Publication Recommendations + (Editors)
- Itinerant legal scholar who claimed Tufts affiliation up to 10 retractions + (Editors)
- It’s Still Plagiarism + (Editors)
- Journal calls 2012 paper “deeply offensive to particular minorities” + (Editors)
- Major indexing service rejects appeals by two suppressed journals + (Editors)
- Misconduct: the stars who fell to earth + (Editors)
- Organised Crime Against the Academic Peer Review System + (Editors)
- Peer review + (Editors)
- Philosopher Earns 14th Retraction for Plagiarism + (Editors)
- Plagiarism scandal grows in Iran + (Editors)
- Publication + (Editors)
- Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Editors)
- Reproducibility of methodology + (Editors)
- Retracted gay-marriage study debated at misconduct meet-up + (Editors)
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Editors)
- Self-plagiarism and suspected salami publishing + (Editors)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: Another Magazine Surprise + (Editors)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Magazine Surprise + (Editors)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Review Article + (Editors)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Unauthorised Translation + (Editors)
- Ten journals denied 2020 Impact Factors because of excessive self-citation or “citation stacking” + (Editors)
- The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud + (Editors)
- Editorial conflicts of interest + (Editors)
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching + (Editors)
- Platform for Responsible Editorial Policies (PREP) + (Editors)
- The INSPIRE project + (Editors)
- The SOPs4RI project + (Editors)
- Not asking permission from contributors for the wording of the acknowledgement + (Editors)
- Post-publication peer review + (Editors)
- Duplicate publications and secondary publications + (Editors)
- Honorary or gift authorship + (Editors)
- Not acknowledging contributors who do not qualify for authorship + (Editors)
- Turning a blind eye to breaches of integrity + (Editors)
- Unfair reviewing + (Editors)
- Predatory publishing + (Editors)
- Altmetrics + (Editors)
- SCImago Journal Rankings + (Editors)
- Digital humanities + (Researchers)
- Research Reproducibility + (Junior researchers)
- Show Me The Money! + (Early career researchers)
- Path2Integrity Campaign + (Academic institutions)
- Path2Integrity Learning Card S0: Good research is based on honesty + (Bachelor students)
- Path2Integrity + (Academic institutions)
- Path2Integrity Learning Cards + (All stakeholders in research)
- Path2Integrity Handbooks for Teachers and Trainers + (Research integrity trainers)
- Use Historical Empathy to Help Students Process the World Today + (Researchers)
- The AVATAR method: historical empathy through imagination + (Researchers)
- Greek Cypriot students’ ideas of historical empathy: a case study exploration of 9 -12 years old students’ ideas about practices in the past + (Researcher)
- Teaching about the First World War today: Historical empathy and participatory citizenship + (Researchers)
- Empathy in History Research and Education + (Researchers)
- Path2Integrity "RI in Curricula" map + (Educators)
- Teaching sensitive and controversial issues in divided societies + (Researchers)
- Bias in Historical Description, Interpretation, and Explanation + (Researchers)
- The Tadpole Paper Mill + (Researchers)
- Manuscript Guidelines Journals + (Researchers)
- Clinical Trials and Drug Promotion: Selective Reporting of Study 329 + (Researchers)
- Ignoring substantial safety risks of the study to participants, workers or environment + (Researchers)
- Developing an ethical and reflexive mindset in emerging childhood researchers. + (Ethics committee members)
- Plagiarism charge for Romanian minister - Scandal adds to fears that country’s research reform is in peril + (Academic institutions)
- Where are they now? + (Early career researchers)
- The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’ + (Academic institutions)
- Fraud and dishonesty in "scientific" publication + (Mentors)
- Retraction notice - fake email peer-review + (Academic institutions)
- Respectable and honest supervision ensures responsible and ethical research in the future. + (Peer reviewers)
- Poor mentoring or supervision of early career researcherers + (Academic staff)
- The decision on ice + (health care professionals)
- Integrity Games - a research based learning platform on academic integrity aimed at undergraduate university students + (Bachelor students)
- Ethical considerations in dealing with human remains + (Educators)
- Vulnerable Populations + (Researchers)
- Imposter Syndrome + (Academic institutions)
- ROSiE General Guidelines on Responsible Open Science + (All stakeholders in research)
- Declaration of Helsinki + (PhD Students)
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights + (PhD Students)
- Research with animals + (Ethics committee members)
- Whistleblower protection/rights + (PhD Students)
- Conflicts with Community Leaders + (Researchers)
- Research ethics committees + (Ethics committee members)
- Protecting research subjects + (PhD students)
- Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Industry involvement in scientific studies on SSRI's + (Researchers)
- The Unfortunate Experiment + (Researchers)
- Reusing Biopsy Material in New Publications, Image Manipulation and Fraudulent Research Protocols + (Researchers)
- Disclosing Conflicts of Interest in Scientific Advice + (Researchers)
- Lapses in Oversight Compromise Omics Results + (Researchers)
- Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Hungarian Academy of Sciences' Science Ethics Code + (Researchers)
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching + (Academic staff)
- European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI) + (Research Integrity Officers)
- Research misconduct + (Students)
- Oviedo Convention + (Ethics committee members)
- Balancing harms and benefits + (All stakeholders in research)
- The impact of the GDPR on scientific data + (Students)
- European Commission Guidance on Research on Refugees, Asylum Seekers & Migrants + (Researchers)
- Research ethics committee members' skills + (Ethics committee members)
- Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials + (phd students)
- The Orphan Embryos: A Case Study in Bioethics + (Decision makers)
- Publishing complications and patient safety + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct + (Research Integrity Officers)
- Research Integrity Advisors + (PhD students)
- Guidelines for Tailoring the Informed Consent Process in Clinical Studies + (Clinical researchers)
- Slow Code + (Anthropologists)
- 04 - Moral Case Deliberation: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Researchers)
- 03 - Four Quadrant Approach: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Researchers)
- SIENNA - Stakeholder-informed ethics for new technologies with high socio-economic and human rights impact + (Academic institutions)
- Ethics, Human Rights and HIV Vaccine Trials in Low-Income Settings + (Researchers)
- Springer Nature ‘continuing to investigate the concerns raised’ about paper linking obesity and lying + (Peer reviewers)
- “There can be no justification for such studies”: Paper on artificial eyes for dogs earns expression of concern + (Ethics committee members)
- Everything We Know About Facebook's Secret Mood Manipulation Experiment. It was probably legal. But was it ethical? + (Ethics committee members)
- Criminologist to have four papers retracted following months of scrutiny + (Ethics committee members)
- Handling of Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries: Early stages in the 1990's + (researchers)
- Declaration of Istanbul + (All stakeholders in research)
- European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) + (All stakeholders in research)
- Investigation ends in 6th retraction for Voinnet + (Academic institutions)
- Declaration of Geneva + (Clinical ethics consultants)
- The European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (ECHRBmed) + (All stakeholders in research)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity + (All stakeholders in research)
- 06 - Teaching Research Ethics Tool : A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics + (Researchers)
- 05 - REalistiC Decisions: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Researchers)
- European Charter of Patients' Rights + (Clinical ethics consultants)
- MedTech Europe Code of Ethical Business Practice + (Ethics committee members)
- 01 - Value Analysis: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (researchers)
- ENERI Classroom + (Research Integrity Officers)
- ENERI Decision Tree + (All stakeholders in research)
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity + (Academic institutions)
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity + (Academic institutions)
- Research ethics committee conditions: Ethical challenges of researching with poor communities in Malawi + (Ethics committee members)
- Facebook Manipulated 689,003 Users' Emotions For Science + (Policy-makers)
- Research with children + (Ethics committee members)
- Clarifying the aims of a research study + (Academic institutions)
- Imputation of missing data in clinical trials + (All stakeholders in research)