All pages (Resource namespace)
From The Embassy of Good Science
- Online Module: Responsible research and Peer Review
- Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content.
- Limitations are not properly acknowledged in the scientific literature
- Canadian Tri-agency framework: Responsible Conduct of Research
- Romanian Scientists Fight Plagiarism
- Journal peer review
- European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Principles of Conduct for Archaeologists involved in Contract Archaeological Work
- Code of Ethics of the Croatian Committee on Ethics in Science and Higher Education
- The Ghost Collaborator
- ‘Caught in the act’: Veterinary researcher caught fabricating gene data, resigns from university job
- Data sharing and dual-use issues
- Medical students' decisions about authorship in disputable situations: intervention study
- Who Owns the Field Notes
- The Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland's Guidelines on Good Research Practice
- Animal research: IACUC Inspection Virtual Walkthrough
- Data anonymity
- Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications
- Want to make sure your paper gets published? Just do your own peer review like this researcher did
- New claim to authorship of published paper
- Retraction notice - fake email peer-review
- Chinese 'Opinions' on Strengthening Research Integrity
- Working with Research Integrity - Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement
- Center for Open and REproducible Science (CORES)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Editorial Misconduct
- Leibniz Institute's Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice
- Declaration of Helsinki
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Building and leading an effective team
- People Studying People: Research Ethics in Society
- Promoting responsible conduct in research through "survival skills" workshops: some mentoring is best done in a crowd
- Authorship and Intellectual Property
- Inconsistent Findings Between Trainee and Researcher
- SOPs4RI Guidelines on Supervision - PhD guidelines
- Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct
- Faulty Drug Trials Tarnish Japan's Clinical Research
- UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
- Whistle-blower Claims his Accusations Cost him his Job
- Responsible Conduct in the Global Research Enterprise: A Policy Report
- Virtue ethics, positive psychology, and a new model of science and engineering ethics education.
- Online Module: Research Misconduct
- Psychology Grad Student Faked Data
- The Wild West of Animal Experimentation
- Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees - General Guidelines for Research Ethics
- Criminologist to have four papers retracted following months of scrutiny
- The Croatian Committee for Ethics in Science and Higher Education's Rules of Procedure of the Ethics Committee.
- DOAB
- Fostering Integrity in Research
- Valley of Sorrow
- Cases. Research Ethics Training Virtual Course
- Research misconduct and the scientific process: continuing quality improvement
- European Charter of Patients' Rights
- Reducing the incidence of plagiarism in an undergraduate course: The role of education
- Finnish Guidelines on Doctoral Supervision and Review
- Vulnerable Populations
- What happens when an ex-physicist writes about gender identity?
- The Swiss Report on Homeopathy: A Case Study of Research Misconduct
- French National Charter for Research Integrity
- Possible Conflict of Interest
- Meta-assessment of bias in science
- INSPIRE
- University of Montana online research ethics course
- Academic medical centers and medical research: the challenges ahead
- The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’
- The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity
- Research Mentoring: An online module
- Manchester University's Data Protection Policy
- AI Sustainability in Practice Part Two: Sustainability Throughout the AI Workflow
- A Reflection on Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Austria
- Intellectual property
- Dublin City University's Position Statement on Open Access to Research Publications
- Irish National Forum on Research Integrity's Position Paper on Research Integrity Officer Role & Reporting
- Witness to Murder
- Research Ethics – Official GRAD 5104 Blog - Blogs@VT
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Multiple Submissions (2)
- What do journal editors do when they suspect research misconduct?
- Academic research record-keeping: best practices for individuals, group leaders, and institutions
- UKRIO's Self-Assessment Tool for The Concordat to Support Research Integrity
- Make research misconduct involving agri inputs a criminal fraud: CCFI
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on Responsible Supervision and Leadership - Supervision requirements & guidelines
- Integrity in Scientific Research Video Series
- Fraud, errors and gamesmanship in experimental toxicology: GM potatoes
- The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud
- The Croatian Committee on Ethics in Science and Higher Education's Amendments to the Ethics Code of Ethics Committee in Science and Higher Education
- The future of scientific justice: the case of The Sceptical Environmentalist
- Jailed for Faking Data
- General Code of Ethics in Scientific Research (Romanian Ministry of Education, Research and Youth)
- Tutorial: PHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals
- Guidelines for Tailoring the Informed Consent Process in Clinical Studies
- Fostering integrity in postgraduate research: an evidence-based policy and support framework
- Reviewing the Ethics of Extended Reality
- Researcher Accused of Breaching Research Ethics Faces GMC
- The Case of the Missing Artefact
- The Ethics of Pharmaceutical Research Funding: A Social Organization Approach
- The Reward Alliance
- Case Studies For Small Group Discussion
- European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) Code of Conduct
- Withholding Study Purpose
- You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues
- Path2Integrity Campaign
- University of Tartu Ethics Centre's Codes of Ethics Handbook
- Transpose
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity
- University Investigation Finds Misconduct by Bone Researcher with 23 Retractions
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project
- Contemporary Science, Values and Animal Subjects in Research
- Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials
- Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct
- Navigating disability identity and language in research involving children and young people.
- A New Challenge to Research Ethics: Patients-Led Research (PLR) and the Role of Internet Based Social Networks
- Perioperative Mischief: The Price of Academic Misconduct
- Stakeholder involvement in ethical governance of R&I – a guide for HEFRCs
- Honest refereeing
- Prominent Video Game-Violence Researcher Loses Another Paper to Retraction
- The French CNRS Ethics Committee's Guide to Integrity and Responsibility in Research Practices
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Professional Manual
- Peer Review. The nuts and bolts
- Dual submissions
- The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine
- “There can be no justification for such studies”: Paper on artificial eyes for dogs earns expression of concern
- Biologist Spared Jail For Grant Fraud
- Divorce study felled by a coding error gets a second chance
- Polish Ministry of Science and Information Society Technologies' Good Scientific Research Practice Recommendations
- Procedures of the Science Ethics Committee of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
- The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA)
- Case Study: Beginning a Collaboration
- The Norwegian Act on Ethics and Integrity in Research (The Research Ethics Act)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Supervision requirements & guidelines
- European Geosciences Union (EGU) Code of Conduct
- Resource:22290809-0b2e-47d3-9824-06b5aa3fb95e
- Teaching students to study online communities ethically
- Agriculture researcher up to 15 retractions for fake peer review
- Misconduct and Fraud in clinical research
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on defining and preventing unjustified interferences from funders, political and commercial actors
- University of Oslo's Policy on Fraudulent Documents
- Interviewing young people on sensitive topics: An iterative approach
- Reported Goals For Knowledge to be Learned in Responsible Conduct of Research Courses
- Research Data Management
- Responsible Research: Recommendations of the Institute of Science and Technology, Austria
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Copyright Violation
- Nutrition researcher selling supplements
- Potential figure manipulation with corresponding author uncontactable
- Evaluating Journals Using Journal Metrics: Find Journal Rankings
- Integrity Factor Glossary
- The Swiss National Science Foundation and National Research Council's Regulations on scientific misconduct
- A Guide to Internet Research Ethics (NESH, Norway)
- Dublin City University's Policy for Responding to Allegations of Research Misconduct
- UK Research Integrity Office Resources on Research Integrity
- Privacy
- Speculations and Ethical Concerns in the Conduct of Outsourced Clinical Trials in India
- Data manipulation and institute’s internal review
- Rights to Authorship
- Pirated Idea for Research
- Responsible conduct of biomedical research : collaborative research
- Records From Controversial Twin Study Sealed at Yale Until 2065
- Wellcome Open Research
- Researcher 'Cherry Picked' Data, University Investigation Finds
- Beyond "compliance": the role of institutional culture in promoting research integrity.
- Site Unseen
- Advisory Report of the Committee on Exploration of the Revision of the Dutch Code of Conduct
- Infographics on research integrity
- The Orphan Embryos: A Case Study in Bioethics
- A Medical Ghostwriter’s Personal View
- Materials scientist up to nine retractions
- Ethical issues in research and publication
- UKRIO Code of Practice for Research: Promoting good practice and preventing misconduct (2023)
- Case report: incidental finding of a giant cardiac mass
- Local resources on improving science: basic study
- Science and Surveillance: Western Institutions Consider Role in China’s Uighur Crackdown
- Everything We Know About Facebook's Secret Mood Manipulation Experiment. It was probably legal. But was it ethical?
- COPE Journals’ Best Practices for Ensuring Consent for Publishing Medical Case Reports
- UKRIO's Procedure for the investigation of misconduct in research
- VLIR Mind the GAP Podcast
- Online Posts Damage a Researcher's Reputation
- Inexperienced researcher gives too much caffeine to subjects
- Who will mentor the mentors?
- Data Sharing, Informed Consent and Confidentiality
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form
- The Rotterdam Dilemma Game
- Resource:31919f32-ed1b-4e05-a57f-6b6a41bcfaaa
- Human Research Violations By Eye Doctor Showcase A National Problem
- ENERI Decision Tree
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Duplicate Publication
- Reporting Findings in a Timely Manner
- "A Little Thing Like Plagiarism"
- Introduction to Research Integrity and Good Scientific Practices
- Disclosing Research Findings
- Manchester University's Code of Good Research Conduct
- Case-based ethics instruction: the influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making
- Data Privacy & Security Global Coronavirus Toolkit
- Doing Global science
- Australian Research Council Research Integrity Policy
- Procrastinating Reviewer
- Responsible authorship quick guide
- The Legacy of the Hwang Case: Research Misconduct in Biosciences
- What should a journal do when a scientist who committed misconduct submits a new paper?
- European Commission Guidance on H2020 Program Ethics Self-assessment
- Use Historical Empathy to Help Students Process the World Today
- The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes
- Reproducibility of methodology
- Blinded by Private Conflict – Choosing Ego Over Professionalism
- A Case Study about Anonymization and Secondary Use of Qualitative Data
- Incorporating principles and practical wisdom in research ethics education: a preliminary study
- Addressing the socio-economic consequences of research misconduct
- COPE core practices
- Pressure to disclose confidential research findings
- Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity
- Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Failures Lessons Learned from Cautionary Tales
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2023 Edition (ALLEA Code)
- Integrating a peer-taught module on practical research ethics into the graduate student orientation curriculum
- Multiple submission
- The Replication Crisis in Psychology
- A Survey of Doctoral Education in Communication Research Ethics
- Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial
- An author realized a paper had plagiarized his thesis. It took the journal four years to retract it.
- Research by Students
- UK Research Integrity Office's Case Study Collection
- Who Rules the Ruler? On the Misconduct of Journal Editors
- Federation of European Toxicologists and European Societies of Toxicology (Eurotox) Code of Ethics
- Research Problems at Australian University Hit the News
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity
- PRINTEGER
- Misconduct: the stars who fell to earth
- The Saga of Korean Women Who Provided Eggs for Embryonic Stem Cell Research
- Swedish Research Council's Conflict of Interest Policy
- Peer review card exchange game
- Vulnerable Populations
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on continuous research integrity education
- The Case of Falsified Data
- Research published by Hans Eysenck is unsafe
- The Extent and Causes of Academic Text Recycling or ‘Self-Plagiarism’
- The EQUATOR Network: Reporting guidelines
- Failed Patenting Negotiations in Collaborative Research
- Power to the People
- Committee on Publication Ethics Guidelines on How to Handle Authorship Disputes
- Grey areas of plagiarism: 10 scenarios to discuss with students
- A 24-year-old sociology paper found to have plagiarised a 1975 article
- Reviewing the Ethics of Genome Editing
- In the matter of J Hendrik Schön
- Banked Samples and HD Testing
- European Network for Research Evaluation in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (ENRESSH)
- FOSTER project workshop
- Path2Integrity Learning Card S0: Good research is based on honesty
- Research Integrity & Research Ethics: Guidelines of the Austrian Science Funds
- What are the major ethical issues in conducting research? is there a conflict between the research ethics and the nature of nursing?
- UKRIO's Good practice in internet-mediated research
- A qualitative approach to Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) training development: identification of metacognitive strategies
- Research Integrity: the Experience of a Doubting Thomas
- Disclosure of Sources of Grant Funds
- Casuistry – is this RM, QRP or RCR? Three cases with dilemmas
- The Three Rs of Animal Research
- RCR online course: build an online course to augment RCR training using evidenced-based learning theory
- Scientists in Chile Protest Mummy Study
- What to communicate in retraction notices?
- European Astronomical Society (EAS) Ethics Statement and Guidelines for Good Practice
- Anonymity Revisited
- Duplicate publication uprooted from plant journal
- Rising Publication Delays Inflate Journal Impact Factors
- Harms and benefits - International research ethics and cultural values
- Community's of Practice Datamanagement & Privacy
- Instilling scholarly integrity
- It’s Still Plagiarism
- Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project
- Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Background Section
- Slow Code
- Investigation ends in 6th retraction for Voinnet
- Responsible science: vol. 2
- Community consultation and public disclosure: preliminary results from a new model
- Code of Ethics of the Croatian Science Foundation (April 2018)
- Credit for work
- Code of Good Scientific Practices of the Spanish National Research Council (CSIS)
- Reproducibility training
- Protecting Research Subjects
- Integrating Ethics Into a Research Experience for Undergraduates
- Open science outlook 1: status and trends around the world
- Open Access Policy at Czech Academy of Sciences
- UKRIO's Guidance for researchers on retractions in academic journals
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on the selection and evaluation of proposals
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity
- An issue with insufficient data in the survey-resulting in a non-representative sample
- Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage
- Fraud in Fluid Resuscitation Research
- The Dutch anthropologist making up data and papers
- Guidelines for Evaluating Work in Digital Humanities and Digital Media
- Eigenfactorizer
- Bioethicists Call for Investigation Into Nutritional Experiments on Aboriginal People
- Conflicts with Community Leaders
- Ousted: Rule-Breaking Lundbeck CEO and Novartis Scientist Get the Boot
- Declaration of Geneva
- Irish Council for Bioethics' Recommendations for Promoting Research Integrity
- PhD and Supervisor charter (KU Leuven)
- Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel
- Designing Online Resources in Preparation for Authentic Laboratory Experiences
- A Review of the Impact of the TeGenero Trial on the Design, Conduct, and Ethics of FIM Trials
- Research ethics committee conditions: Ethical challenges of researching with poor communities in Malawi
- A Japanese developmental biology center, scientific misconduct and suicide
- Bias in hiring
- SOPs4RI - Guidelines for research institutions on community building for a positive research culture
- Responsible conduct in research
- Data Handling and Record Keeping
- The Paroxetine 352 Bipolar Trial: A Study in Medical Ghostwriting
- European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Code of Practice for Fieldwork Training
- The value of respect in human research ethics: a conceptual analysis and a practical guide
- Collaboration dispute
- Irish Universities Quality Board's Good Practice for Institutional Research in Irish Higher Education
- Training overview
- PRBB Code of Good Scientific Practice
- Hidden for a century, 'fake' is actually a Van Gogh
- Writing usable qualitative health research findings
- Paxil Study Under Fire
- Psychologist made up sex bias results
- Overview: underserved areas of education in the responsible conduct of research: authorship
- Research ethics in emerging forms of online learning: Issues arising from a hypothetical study on a MOOC
- Guidelines for Responsible Data Management in Scientific Research
- Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials
- The New Danish Research Misconduct etc. Act
- The French National Research Agency's Policy for Ethics and Research Integrity
- Outsourcing animal experimentation
- Spanish National Statement on Scientific Integrity
- To Accept or Not to Accept
- Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis regarding logothetis vs. shmuel and leopold
- When is Advanced Training Necessary?
- Team-based learning instruction for responsible conduct of research positively impacts ethical decision-making
- The German Association of University Professors and Lecturers' (DHV) Position Paper on Scientific Self-regulation and Scientific Misconduct
- Business Ethics Perspectives: Faculty Plagiarism and Fraud
- Self help in medical ethics
- Policy documents of the German Rectors’ Conference (HRK)
- Journal calls 2012 paper “deeply offensive to particular minorities”
- Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses
- Japan fails to settle university dispute
- Image Search Triggers Italian Police Probe
- Act on the Danish Council for Research and Innovation Policy
- Self-plagiarism and suspected salami publishing
- You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues
- Official notice published for chem paper slated for retraction in 2011
- Good scientific practice for courses in science and medicine
- A University of Liverpool investigation determined that a former researcher there fabricated his data
- Informed Consent with Pre-Testing Convenience Samples
- Path2Integrity "RI in Curricula" map
- Statistical Forensics. Check Rightmost Digits for Uniform Distribution
- Publication planning: promoting an ethics of transparency and integrity in biomedical research
- Child protection and confidentiality: Surveying children’s experiences of violence, abuse and neglect
- OAPEN OA Books Toolkit
- Plagiarism Charge for Romanian Minister
- COPE Cases
