Search by property
From The Embassy of Good Science
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- Collaboration dispute + (Academic staff)
- Long distance collaboration + (collaborating groups)
- Research culture awards (University of Glasgow) + (Research institutions)
- "Met de billen bloot" (airing your dirty laundry) + (Researchers)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines on Supervision - PhD guidelines + (Academic staff)
- Mertonian norms + (everyone)
- Climate science controversies and the demand for access to empirical data + (Citizen Scientists)
- INSPIRE Checklist + (Policy makers)
- Computational reproducibility: safeguarding the backbone of science + (Researchers)
- Who Owns the Field Notes + (Academic staff)
- Data protection in a global pandemic (COVID-19) + (Researchers)
- The university and the responsible conduct of research: who is responsible for what? + (graduate students)
- Conflict of interests + (Researchers)
- Institutional Pathology and the Death of a Mentally Ill Young Man + (Researchers)
- Ethics and children's rights: learning from past mistakes + (Clinical researchers)
- Qualitative research + (PhD Students)
- The decision on ice + (health care professionals)
- Inappropriate authorship + (PhD Students)
- Spin of research results + (Students)
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Research misconduct + (Students)
- The impact of the GDPR on scientific data + (Students)
- Premature release of clinical trials data + (researchers)
- A bullshit excuse? My lab notebook “was blown into a manure pit” + (Research institutions)
- The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine + (Human rights defenders)
- Unlicensed usage of medical devices on patients: a case of accusations + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Responsible conduct of biomedical research : collaborative research + (All stakeholders in research)
- Intellectual conflicts of interest + (Research performing organisations)
- The Orphan Embryos: A Case Study in Bioethics + (Decision makers)
- Publishing complications and patient safety + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Fraud, errors and gamesmanship in experimental toxicology: GM potatoes + (Laboratory researchers)
- A Medical Ghostwriter’s Personal View + (Researchers)
- Guidelines for Tailoring the Informed Consent Process in Clinical Studies + (Clinical researchers)
- Handling of Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries: Early stages in the 1990's + (researchers)
- The European Union Good Clinical Practice Directive + (Clinical researchers)
- Introduction: Guidelines and Discrepancies + (Doctoral students)
- Philosophical Justifications for Human Subjects Research + (Doctoral students)
- CIOMS International guidelines on good governance practice for research institutions + (All stakeholders in research)
- Respectable and honest supervision ensures responsible and ethical research in the future. + (Peer reviewers)
- SPOC: RCR through supervision and mentoring course + (Researchers)
- The SOPs4RI project + (Policy makers)
- Peer review card game + (phd students)
- Publishers - COPE guidelines + (phd students)
- Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas + (phd students)
- Research metrics + (phd students)
- Retractions: correcting the scientific literature + (phd students)
- PhD-pizza - Gathering for PhD-candidates to talk freely + (phd students)
- Misconduct Ruling is Silent on Intent + (researchers)
- Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel + (researchers)
- Researcher Accused of Breaching Research Ethics Faces GMC + (Researchers)
- Research Integrity Committees + (phd students)
- Open access publishing: the new norm? + (phd students)
- Scientific Misconduct at an Elite Medical Institute: The Role of Competing Institutional Logics and Fragmented Control + (researchers)
- Simultaneous Submission Leading to Duplicate Publication + (researchers)
- Supervision + (phd students)
- Standards of authorship + (phd students)
- Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials + (phd students)
- Protecting Research Subjects + (phd students)
- Blinded by Private Conflict – Choosing Ego Over Professionalism + (students)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on Responsible Supervision and Leadership - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Academic staff)
- Eforcement Agencies and the Protection of Human Subjects + (All stakeholders in research)
- Respondent Confidentiality + (Researchers)
- Legal Requests/Requirements for Confidential Data From Research Field Notes + (Qualitative researchers)
- Legal Requests/Requirements for Confidential Data From Research Field Notes + (Qualitative researchers)
- Continuing Research and Protecting Confidentiality + (Qualitative researchers)
- Responsible mentoring + (Researchers)
- ICH Guidelines + (medical researchers)
- 10 Things for Curating Reproducible and FAIR Research + (publishers)
- Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences' Guideline on Authorship in Scientific Publications + (publishers)
- The Ethics Codes Collection + (All stakeholders in research)
- European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI) + (Research Integrity Officers)
- Industry involvement in scientific studies on SSRI's + (Researchers)
- Anonymity Revisited + (Researchers)
- Research Integrity lunch meetings + (research integrity researchers)
- Sabotage and the Federal Definition of Research Misconduct + (Researchers)
- Integrity in scientific research videos + (All stakeholders in research)
- Online course: Teaching the Responsible Conduct of Research in Humans + (PhD students)
- Publishing complications and patient safety + (Research Ethics Committees)
- ENERI Decision Tree + (All stakeholders in research)
- What Universities can Learn from one of Science’s Biggest Frauds + (Researchers)
- ENERI Classroom + (Research Integrity Officers)
- INTEGRITY High School Research Integrity Course + (High school students)
- PhD-pizza - Gathering for PhD-candidates to talk freely + (phd students)
- Artificial tracheas and severe research misconduct + (researchers)
- Misconduct Ruling is Silent on Intent + (researchers)
- Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel + (researchers)
- From Case Management to Prevention of Scientific Dishonesty in Denmark + (researchers)
- The Saga of Korean Women Who Provided Eggs for Embryonic Stem Cell Research + (researchers)
- Researcher Accused of Breaching Research Ethics Faces GMC + (Researchers)
- INSPIRE Checklist + (Policy makers)
- Scientific Misconduct at an Elite Medical Institute: The Role of Competing Institutional Logics and Fragmented Control + (researchers)
- Simultaneous Submission Leading to Duplicate Publication + (researchers)
- The qualification portfolio (UMC Utrecht): from output to impact + (Research institutions)
- Grading the quality of evidence in clinical practice guidelines + (Clinical researchers)
- Handling of Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries: Early stages in the 1990's + (researchers)
- Guideline for discussing work-related stress + (Supervisors)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on continuous research integrity education + (Supervisors)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of institutional research integrity stakeholders + (Research institutions)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of bachelor, master and PhD students + (Research institutions)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of post-doctorate and senior researchers + (Research institutions)
- Infographic - SOPs4RI Research integrity education guidelines for research institutions + (Research institutions)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines on Supervision - PhD guidelines + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI - Guidelines for research institutions on community building for a positive research culture + (Research institutions)
- Guidelines for research institutions on adequate education and skills training + (Research institutions)
- Guidelines for research institutions on managing competition and publication pressure + (Research institutions)
- SOPs4RI - Guidelines for research institutions on diversity and inclusion + (Research institutions)
- The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine + (Human rights defenders)
- Criminologist to have four papers retracted following months of scrutiny + (Ethics committee members)
- SCImago Journal Rankings + (Academic staff)
- Integrity Games - a research based learning platform on academic integrity aimed at undergraduate university students + (Bachelor students)
- Austrian Agency for Research Integrity Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice + (researchers)
- Czech Code of Ethics for Researchers + (researchers)
- Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity + (researchers)
- German Research Foundation's Recommendations for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice + (researchers)
- Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees - General Guidelines for Research Ethics + (researchers)
- Irish National Policy Statement on Ensuring Research Integrity + (researchers)
- Danish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity + (researchers)
- Estonian Code of Conduct for Research Integrity + (researchers)
- Spanish National Statement on Scientific Integrity + (researchers)
- French National Charter for Research Integrity + (researchers)
- Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct + (researchers)
- Bioethicists Call for Investigation Into Nutritional Experiments on Aboriginal People + (researchers)
- Legal Liabilities in Research: Early lessons From North America + (researchers)
- Research ethics training of trainers: Developing capacity of Bolivian health science and civil society leaders + (researchers)
- Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials + (researchers)
- Automatic plagiarism detection with PAIRwise 2.0. + (researchers)
- Institutional review board approval and publication of human research results + (researchers)
- ORI - The Office of Research Integrity + (General public)
- Kairos – A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy + (researchers)
- Protecting Research Subjects + (phd students)
- Postdoc randomly chose data during figure assembly + (researchers)
- Premature release of clinical trials data + (researchers)
- Ethics of ageing + (Academic institutions)
- The Limits of Expertise + (Research subjects)
- ‘Caught in the act’: Veterinary researcher caught fabricating gene data, resigns from university job + (All stakeholders in research)
- Investigation ends in 6th retraction for Voinnet + (Academic institutions)
- 01 - Value Analysis: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (researchers)
- Guidelines for Integrity in Scientific Research + (Academic institutions)
- Payment in different contexts: How can payment reflect local considerations? + (researchers)
- Payments to young researchers in Malawi + (researchers)
- Ethics Code of the Slovak Academy of Sciences: Addendum + (researchers)
- Poor mentoring or supervision of early career researcherers + (Academic staff)
- Methods to increase data availability + (Authors)
- EQIPD (Enhancing Quality in Preclinical Data) + (PhD Students)
- Introduction to Research Integrity and Good Scientific Practices + (Academic staff)
- Münazara ve Diyalog + (researchers)
- Münazara ve Diyalog + (researchers)
- Münazara ve Diyalog + (researchers)
- Uyarlanmış ikilem oyunu + (Research integrity trainers)
- Debatte und Dialog + (researchers)
- Werte/Tugenden und Normen + (researchers)
- Der Selbstauskunfts-Ansatz: Eine Reflexion über das Konzept des Guten in der Wissenschaft + (researchers)
- Interviewing young people on sensitive topics: An iterative approach + (Research Ethics Committees)
- French plant biologist cleared of misconduct in new inquiry + (Academic institutions)
- Guidelines for Tailoring the Informed Consent Process in Clinical Studies + (Clinical researchers)
- Image Integrity + (Researchers)
- Integrating Ethics Into a Research Experience for Undergraduates + (students)
- Conflict of interest disclosure in early education of medical students + (students)
- Contentious problems in bioscience and biotechnology: a pilot study of an approach to ethics education + (students)
- Blinded by Private Conflict – Choosing Ego Over Professionalism + (students)
- Institutional codes of conduct for research integrity + (Academic staff)
- Respectable and honest supervision ensures responsible and ethical research in the future. + (Peer reviewers)
- Computational reproducibility: safeguarding the backbone of science + (Researchers)
- The influence of pharmaceutical company on drug availability + (Academic staff)
- FAIR-Aware: Your first step towards your FAIR data(set). + (Academic staff)
- Training overview + (Researchers)
- Designing Online Resources in Preparation for Authentic Laboratory Experiences + (trainers)
- Applying Research Findings to Enhance Pre-Practicum Ethics Training + (trainers)
- A systematic approach to instruction in research ethics + (trainers)
- Ethics unwrapped collection + (All stakeholders in research)