Concept:Activity Stream
From The Embassy of Good Science
Description of concept "Activity Stream"RDF feed
Activity Stream
[[Category:Resource||Guide||Initiative||Instruction||Report||Theme]]
R
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 1.3. Main Ethical Challenges in Open Science Implementation (Rosemarie Barnabe) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 2.1. Responsibility of Researchers for the Quality of the Collected, Processed & Stored Data (Panagiotis Kavouras) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 2.2. Responsible Preparation & Management of Quantitative Datasets & Metadata (Olivier Le Gall) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 3.1 Specifics of Informed Consent in the Context of Open Science (Emmi Jennina Kaaya) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 3.2 Responsible Anonymisation & Pseudonymisation (Heidi Beate Bentzen) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 3.3. Tension Between Personal Data Protection & the Aim of Open Science (Heidi Beate Bentzen) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 3.3. Tension Between Personal Data Protection & the Aim of Open Science (Heidi Beate Bentzen) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 4.1 Types of Potential Research Malpractices in Open Science (Søren Holm) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 4.2 Prevention of Research Malpractices in Open Science (Søren Holm) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 5.1. Trust & Trustworthiness in Open Science (Panagiotis Kavouras) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 5.2. Responsible and Critical Use of Open Data & the Research Results (Arild Johan Jansen) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 5.3. Ethical Aspects of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Analysing Open Data (Arild Johan Jansen) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 6.1. Benefits and Risks in Open Peer Review (Olivier Le Gall) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 6.2. Open Access, Open Access Publishing, Predatory Practices (Elina Koivisto) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 6.3. Including Open Science Aspects in Assessing Researchers & Research (Elina Koivisto) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 7.1. Intellectual Property & Fair Competition +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 7.2. Acknowledging Contributions & Authorship in Open Science +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 7.3. Open Licenses +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 8.1 Responsibilities of Citizen Scientists +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 8.2 Responsibilities of Scientists Towards Citizen Scientists +
- RRI tools collection of resources +
- Rainy Days for a Struggling Mentee +
- Raising Open and User-friendly Transparency-Enabling Technologies forPublic Administrations +
- Rampant Plagiarism in Two Journals +
- Randomized consent designs in randomized controlled trials: systematic literature search +
- Re4Green Annex to the ALLEA European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity +
- Re4Green_Micromodule presentation Incorporating gender, health, and climate justice +
- Re4Green Podcast +
- ReGreen_Drag and drop +
- Reaction to bias +
- Recognition and Networking +
- Recognizing scientific artifacts in biomedical literature +
- Recommendation 1/2023, of 16th May, concerning multiple affiliations in scientific journals +
- Recommendation 2/2023, October 17th, on the Institutional affiliation in scientific publications +
- Recommendation on Science and Scientific Researchers (2018) +
- Recommendations to mainstream citizen science in policy +
- Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct +
- Recommendations for the History Teaching of Intergroup Conflicts +
- Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct +
- Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct +
- Recommendations of the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK for Research Integrity Advisers and related background organisations1 +
- Recommendations on the Preparation, Adaptation and Implementation of Academic Ethics Codes by Research and Higher Education Institutions +
- Records From Controversial Twin Study Sealed at Yale Until 2065 +
- Recyclable or Replaceable Plastics +
- Reducing the incidence of plagiarism in an undergraduate course: The role of education +
- Reflect_Consider impacts +
- Reflect_Integrate environmental and climate considerations into everyday research governance +
- Reflect_Practice transparency +
- Reflect_Recognise whose knowledge and perspectives are valued (epistemic and recognitional justice) +
- Reflect and respond +
- Reflect_attend to historical and structural inequalities (restorative justice) +
- Reflect_attend to historical and structural inequalities (restorative justice) +
- Reflect_consider how benefits and burdens are distributed (distributive justice) +
- Reflect_consider your sphere of influence, not only your direct impacts +
- Reflect individually - Incorporating gender, health, and climate justice in your research: A reflexive question card exercise +
- Reflect on how people are involved in the conduct of research +
- Reflect on possible changes researchers can make +
- Reflect on the assumptions embedded in your research +
- Reflect on the “Omelas analogy” in research +
- Reflect on who is included in decision-making (procedural justice) +
- Reflect on your experience with AI +
- Reflect: Linking theory and visual practice +
- Reflecting on Experiences and Practicing Exercises +
- Reflecting with the PEPE Framework +
- Reflection +
- Reflection_Stories Eps1 +
- Reflection_Stories Eps2 +
- Reflection questions +
- Reflections on the Cleveland Clinic Study of The Batista Operation +
- Reflexive Journaling from "disconnection" to "planetary stewardship" +
- Reflexive Principlism as an Effective Approach for Developing Ethical Reasoning in Engineering +
- Reflexive inquiry into research framing +
- Reframing Research +
- Reframing Research Table +
- Reimagining sustainable field research: Doing science without doing harm +
- Replicability +
- Replicability in the Humanities +
- Reported Goals For Knowledge to be Learned in Responsible Conduct of Research Courses +
- Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses +
- Reporting Adverse Effects +
- Reporting Findings in a Timely Manner +
- Reporting Full Findings +
- Reporting censurable conditions for employees at University of Oslo (whistleblowing) +
- Reporting violations +
- Reproducibility +
- Reproducibility and Replicability in Science +
- Reproducibility in Research: Concepts, Tools, and Community +
- Reproducibility of methodology +
- Reproducibility training +
- Research - who benefits_video1 +
- Research Data Management +
- Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- Research Ethics +
- Research Ethics Compass +
- Research Ethics and Integrity Basics +
- Research Ethics and Integrity Games +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step10_Quiz +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step2_Video +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step3_Audio +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step3_Video +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step3_Video Transcript +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step4_Audio +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step5_Video +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step5_Video Transcript +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step6_Video +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step6_Video Interview Transcript +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step7_Video +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step7_Video Interview Transcript +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step8_Audio Transcript +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step9_Audio1 +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step9_Audio2 +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step9_quiz +
- Research Ethics and integrity for the GREEN transition (Policy brief), 2025 +
- Research Ethics in a Global Environment +
- Research Ethics – A guide to ethical review in innovative fields - CHANGER MOOCs +
- Research Ethics – Official GRAD 5104 Blog - Blogs@VT +
- Research Ethics: Zero Tolerance +
- Research Ethics: a guide for responsible research with human subjects +
- Research Integrity +
- Research Integrity & Research Ethics: Guidelines of the Austrian Science Funds +
- Research Integrity - Detecting and determining greyscales +
- Research Integrity - Quiz! +
- Research Integrity Practices in Science Europe Member Organizations +
- Research Integrity and Conflicts of Interest: The Case of Unethical Research-Misconduct Charges +
- Research Integrity and Environmental & Climate Responsibilities +
- Research Integrity flashcards +
- Research Integrity in Retrospective Clinical Studies +
- Research Integrity in trying times: a scenario on the presentation and dissemination of information +
- Research Integrity: Podcast Series +
- Research Integrity: Sabotage! +
- Research Integrity: the Experience of a Doubting Thomas +
- Research Mentoring: An online module +
- Research Problems at Australian University Hit the News +
- Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- Research Reproducibility +
- Research and scientific integrity policy (2018), National Research Council Canada +
- Research and scientific integrity policy (Canada, 2018) +
- Research by Students +
- Research culture +
- Research culture +
- Research ethics committee conditions: Ethical challenges of researching with poor communities in Malawi +
- Research ethics in emerging forms of online learning: Issues arising from a hypothetical study on a MOOC +
- Research ethics training of trainers: Developing capacity of Bolivian health science and civil society leaders +
- Research ethics – why train educators? +
- Research fraud on MMR vaccines +
- Research integrity - what is means, why it is important and how we might protect it +
- Research integrity list at KU Leuven +
- Research metrics +
- Research misconduct +
- Research misconduct +
- Research misconduct and the INTERGROWTH-21st study +
- Research misconduct and the scientific process: continuing quality improvement +
- Research misconduct in a grant application for the National Institutes of Health +
- Research or Services? +
- Research published by Hans Eysenck is unsafe +
- Research with human subjects +
- Researcher 'Cherry Picked' Data, University Investigation Finds +
- Researcher Accused of Breaching Research Ethics Faces GMC +
- Researcher discovers paper published by co-author in another journal +
- Researchers Call For the Release of Findings of a Misconduct Investigation +
- Researchers Pressured to Store Animal Subjects +
- Researcher’s Code of Ethics (1998) +
- Resident physician plagiarises publications supported by 10 National Institutes of Health grants +
- Resolution on the Research and Innovation Strategy of Slovenia +
- Resources for research ethics education +
- Respect - Article 10 +
- Respect - Article 11 +
- Respect - Article 12 +
- Respect - Article 8 +
- Respect - Article 9 +
- Respondent Confidentiality +
- Responsible Authorship and Peer Review - Columbia RCR Course, Module 3 +
- Responsible Conduct in the Global Research Enterprise: A Policy Report +
- Responsible Open Science +
- Responsible Open Science: Video Lectures +
- Responsible Research and Innovation resources for researchers and funders +
- Responsible Research through supervision, mentoring and working together +
- Responsible Research: Recommendations of the Institute of Science and Technology, Austria +
- Responsible authorship quick guide +
- Responsible conduct in research +
- Responsible conduct of biomedical research : collaborative research +
- Responsible conduct of research toolkit +
- Responsible mentoring +
- Responsible science: vol. 1 +
- Responsible science: vol. 2 +
- Retracted WHO Reports on Opioid Guidelines +
- Retracted gay-marriage study debated at misconduct meet-up +
- Retraction notice - fake email peer-review +
- Retraction of Savine, McDaniel, Shelton, and Scullin +
- Reusing Biopsy Material in New Publications, Image Manipulation and Fraudulent Research Protocols +
- Reviewer’s Déjà Vu, French Science Sleuthing Uncover Plagiarized Papers +
- Reviewing the Ethics of AI in health and healthcare +
- Reviewing the Ethics of Biobanking +
- Reviewing the Ethics of Extended Reality +
- Reviewing the Ethics of Genome Editing +
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- Rights of Citizen Scientists +
- Rights of Citizen Scientists - Case Study +
- Rights to Authorship +
- Rising Publication Delays Inflate Journal Impact Factors +
- Risks to the environment, animals, plants, and ecosystems +
- Robbers, Rogues or Revolutionaries: Handling Armed Intimidation +
- Robbing the Grave: Investigator Takes Ownership of Deceased Scholar’s Work +
- Role play: AI in Healthcare +
- Romanian Codul General de Etică în Cercetarea Științifică - General code of ethics in scientific research 2015 +
- Romanian Scientists Fight Plagiarism +
- Rules of Data-Sharing in Collaborative and Non-Collaborative Research +
- Rules of Data-Sharing in Collaborative and Non-Collaborative Research +
S
- SATORI Project Collection of Resources on the Ethical Assessment of Research and Innovation +
- SHERPA +
- SHERPA Final Recommendations +
- SIENNA +
- SIENNA +
- SOPs4RI +
- SOPs4RI - Guidelines for research institutions on community building for a positive research culture +
- SOPs4RI - Guidelines for research institutions on diversity and inclusion +
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Supervision requirements & guidelines +
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Building and leading an effective team +
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on defining and preventing unjustified interferences from funders, political and commercial actors +
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on monitoring funded projects +
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on the selection and evaluation of proposals +
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on Responsible Supervision and Leadership - Supervision requirements & guidelines +
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on continuous research integrity education +
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of bachelor, master and PhD students +
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of institutional research integrity stakeholders +
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of post-doctorate and senior researchers +
- SOPs4RI Guidelines on Supervision - PhD guidelines +
- SPOC: Data in responsible conduct of research +
- SPOC: Integrity in academic publication: authorship and peer review +
- SPOC: RCR through supervision and mentoring course +
- Sabotage and the Federal Definition of Research Misconduct +
- Safe, inclusive, and equitable research fieldwork +
- Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- Salvador Declaration on Open Access: the developing world perspective (2005), Participants of the International Seminar on Open Access +
- Sample records for guideline development processes +
- Saving energy in labs +
- Saving energy in your lab +
- Scandalous behaviour at Medical University of Innsbruck +
- Scenario #1 +
- Scenario #2 +
- Scenario #3 +
- Scenario #4 +
- Scenario 1: Collaborative working +
- Scenarios for ethics modules in RCR +
- Science Council of Japan on Code of Conduct for Scientists–Revised Version (2013) +
- Science Ethics Code of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (2010), Hungarian Academy of Sciences +
- Science Foundation Ireland (SFI): Climate Action Strategy 2024–2027 +
- Science Foundation Ireland, Open Access Policy and Guidance +
- Science and Surveillance: Western Institutions Consider Role in China’s Uighur Crackdown +
