Concept:Activity Stream
From The Embassy of Good Science
Description of concept "Activity Stream"RDF feed
Activity Stream
[[Category:Resource||Guide||Initiative||Instruction||Report||Theme]]
R
- Research ethics training of trainers: Developing capacity of Bolivian health science and civil society leaders +
- Research ethics – why train educators? +
- Research fraud on MMR vaccines +
- Research integrity - what is means, why it is important and how we might protect it +
- Research integrity list at KU Leuven +
- Research metrics +
- Research misconduct +
- Research misconduct +
- Research misconduct and the INTERGROWTH-21st study +
- Research misconduct and the scientific process: continuing quality improvement +
- Research misconduct in a grant application for the National Institutes of Health +
- Research or Services? +
- Research published by Hans Eysenck is unsafe +
- Research with human subjects +
- Researcher 'Cherry Picked' Data, University Investigation Finds +
- Researcher Accused of Breaching Research Ethics Faces GMC +
- Researcher discovers paper published by co-author in another journal +
- Researchers Call For the Release of Findings of a Misconduct Investigation +
- Researchers Pressured to Store Animal Subjects +
- Researcher’s Code of Ethics (1998) +
- Resident physician plagiarises publications supported by 10 National Institutes of Health grants +
- Resolution on the Research and Innovation Strategy of Slovenia +
- Resources for research ethics education +
- Respect - Article 10 +
- Respect - Article 11 +
- Respect - Article 8 +
- Respect - Article 9 +
- Respondent Confidentiality +
- Responsible Authorship and Peer Review - Columbia RCR Course, Module 3 +
- Responsible Conduct in the Global Research Enterprise: A Policy Report +
- Responsible Open Science +
- Responsible Open Science: Video Lectures +
- Responsible Research and Innovation resources for researchers and funders +
- Responsible Research through supervision, mentoring and working together +
- Responsible Research: Recommendations of the Institute of Science and Technology, Austria +
- Responsible authorship quick guide +
- Responsible conduct in research +
- Responsible conduct of biomedical research : collaborative research +
- Responsible conduct of research toolkit +
- Responsible mentoring +
- Responsible science: vol. 1 +
- Responsible science: vol. 2 +
- Retracted WHO Reports on Opioid Guidelines +
- Retracted gay-marriage study debated at misconduct meet-up +
- Retraction notice - fake email peer-review +
- Retraction of Savine, McDaniel, Shelton, and Scullin +
- Reusing Biopsy Material in New Publications, Image Manipulation and Fraudulent Research Protocols +
- Reviewer’s Déjà Vu, French Science Sleuthing Uncover Plagiarized Papers +
- Reviewing the Ethics of AI in health and healthcare +
- Reviewing the Ethics of Biobanking +
- Reviewing the Ethics of Extended Reality +
- Reviewing the Ethics of Genome Editing +
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- Rights of Citizen Scientists +
- Rights of Citizen Scientists - Case Study +
- Rights to Authorship +
- Rising Publication Delays Inflate Journal Impact Factors +
- Risks to the environment, animals, plants, and ecosystems +
- Robbers, Rogues or Revolutionaries: Handling Armed Intimidation +
- Robbing the Grave: Investigator Takes Ownership of Deceased Scholar’s Work +
- Role play: AI in Healthcare +
- Romanian Codul General de Etică în Cercetarea Științifică - General code of ethics in scientific research 2015 +
- Romanian Scientists Fight Plagiarism +
- Rules of Data-Sharing in Collaborative and Non-Collaborative Research +
- Rules of Data-Sharing in Collaborative and Non-Collaborative Research +
S
- SATORI Project Collection of Resources on the Ethical Assessment of Research and Innovation +
- SHERPA +
- SHERPA Final Recommendations +
- SIENNA +
- SIENNA +
- SOPs4RI +
- SOPs4RI - Guidelines for research institutions on community building for a positive research culture +
- SOPs4RI - Guidelines for research institutions on diversity and inclusion +
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Supervision requirements & guidelines +
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Building and leading an effective team +
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on defining and preventing unjustified interferences from funders, political and commercial actors +
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on monitoring funded projects +
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on the selection and evaluation of proposals +
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on Responsible Supervision and Leadership - Supervision requirements & guidelines +
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on continuous research integrity education +
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of bachelor, master and PhD students +
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of institutional research integrity stakeholders +
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of post-doctorate and senior researchers +
- SOPs4RI Guidelines on Supervision - PhD guidelines +
- SPOC: Data in responsible conduct of research +
- SPOC: Integrity in academic publication: authorship and peer review +
- SPOC: RCR through supervision and mentoring course +
- Sabotage and the Federal Definition of Research Misconduct +
- Safe, inclusive, and equitable research fieldwork +
- Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- Salvador Declaration on Open Access: the developing world perspective (2005), Participants of the International Seminar on Open Access +
- Sample records for guideline development processes +
- Saving energy in your lab +
- Scandalous behaviour at Medical University of Innsbruck +
- Scenario #1 +
- Scenario #2 +
- Scenario #3 +
- Scenario #4 +
- Scenario 1: Collaborative working +
- Scenarios for ethics modules in RCR +
- Science Council of Japan on Code of Conduct for Scientists–Revised Version (2013) +
- Science Ethics Code of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (2010), Hungarian Academy of Sciences +
- Science Foundation Ireland, Open Access Policy and Guidance +
- Science and Surveillance: Western Institutions Consider Role in China’s Uighur Crackdown +
- Science as an open enterprise (2012), The Royal Society Science Policy Centre +
- Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science +
- Scientific Misconduct at an Elite Medical Institute: The Role of Competing Institutional Logics and Fragmented Control +
- Scientific Research: Dilemmas and Temptations (booklet of cases) +
- Scientific collaboration during war - PREPARED +
- Scientific collaboration during war_Vid8 +
- Scientific values: Ethical guidelines and procedures (), nan +
- Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel +
- Scientist's code of ethics (2017) +
- Scientists in Chile Protest Mummy Study +
- Selecting Appropriate Material and Effectiveness Measurement Tools for your Target Audience +
- Selection bias in skull measurements +
- Self Declaration Approach - a Reflection on the Varieties of Goodness in Research +
- Self help in medical ethics +
- Self-plagiarism and suspected salami publishing +
- Self-plagiarism case prompts calls for agencies to tighten rules +
- Selling Out? Making Deals with Other Institutions +
- Senario +
- Senario +
- Senario +
- Serbian Journal Lands in Hot Water After Challenge on 24 hour Peer Review That Cost 1785 euros +
- Serious Accusation of Negligence of Ethical Principles in Human Sciences +
- Sertifika +
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: Another Magazine Surprise +
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Background Section +
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Duplicate Publication +
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Instant Paper +
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Magazine Surprise +
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Professional Manual +
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Review Article +
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Unauthorised Translation +
- Sharing Data? +
- Show Me The Money! +
- Simultaneous Submission Leading to Duplicate Publication +
- Singapore Statement on Research Integrity (2010), WCRI +
- Site Unseen +
- Sitting in Judgement +
- Six domains of research ethics. A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research +
- Skewed Research Attention +
- Slovakian Academy of Sciences Ethics Code +
- Slow Code +
- Social Justice, Vulnerability And Inclusion Vid_Step 8 +
- Social Justice, Vulnerability and Inclusion +
- Social Sciences and Humanities Matter. Guidelines on How To Successfully Design and Implement, Mission-Oriented Research Programmes +
- Societal Trust In Science, Research and Innovation (RFOs)-Policy Brief +
- Societal Trust in Science, Research and Innovation (HEIs)- Policy Brief +
- Societal Trust in Science, Research and Innovation (RPOs)- Policy brief +
- South African THE SAN CODE OF RESEARCH ETHICS 2017 +
- Spain +
- Spanish Law on Science, Technology and Innovation +
- Spanish National Statement on Scientific Integrity +
- Spanish National Statement on Scientific Integrity (2015) +
- Specific Research Ethics and Integrity Considerations for Crisis Research +
- Speculations and Ethical Concerns in the Conduct of Outsourced Clinical Trials in India +
- Springer Nature ‘continuing to investigate the concerns raised’ about paper linking obesity and lying +
- Stakeholder involvement in ethical governance of R&I – a guide for HEFRCs +
- Stanford University's Resources on Responsible and Ethical Conduct of Research +
- Statement of Principles and Practices for Research Ethics, Integrity, and Culture in the Context of Rapid-Results Research +
- Statement: Code of Conduct for Scientists, Revised Version (2013), nan +
- Statements About Professional Experience +
- Statistical Forensics. Check Rightmost Digits for Uniform Distribution +
- Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials +
- Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial +
- Statutes and Procedures of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences +
- Strategies for making research more accessible to dental students +
- Strategy for Gender Equality at the Swedish Research Council +
- Studying Vulnerable Individuals +
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity +
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity +
- Suborning science for profit: Monsanto, glyphosate, and private science research misconduct +
- Successful and timely uptake of artificial intelligence in science in the EU +
- Summer School on Responsible Research 2019 +
- Supervision +
- Supervisors’ research ethics and integrity leadership training +
- Supporting Health Data Cooperatives in Europe (Policy brief) +
- Suspected image manipulation involving four journals +
- Suspected image manipulation involving four journals +
- Sustainability and Eco-Justice in Everyday Research - RE4GREEN +
- Sustainability as a wicked problem +
- Sustainable Decision-Making +
- Sweden +
- Swedish Research Council's Conflict of Interest Policy +
- Swedish plastics study fabricated, panel finds +
- Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences' Guideline on Authorship in Scientific Publications +
- Swiss Academy of Arts and Sciences Code of Conduct for Scientific Integrity (2021) +
- Swiss Academy of Arts and Sciences Code of Conduct for Scientific Integrity r +
T
- T or F: Think Green, Meet Clean +
- TEST 251209-GEA +
- THE CONCORDAT TO SUPPORT RESEARCH INTEGRITY (2019), Universities UK +
- THE CONCORDAT TO SUPPORT RESEARCH INTEGRITY (UK, 2025) +
- THE MALAYSIAN CODE OF RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN RESEARCH (2020) +
- THE MALAYSIAN CODE OF RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN RESEARCH 2020 +
- THE PREPARED CODE: A Global Code of Conduct for Research during Pandemics +
- THE SAN CODE OF RESEARCH ETHICS (2017) +
- TIER2 +
- TIME4CS +
- TRESCA +
- TRREE on-line training programme on the ethics and regulation of health research involving human participants +
- TRUST +
- TRUST Code_Video1 +
- Tackling the plastic problem in the lab +
- Taiwan Code of Conduct for Research Integrity 2020 +
- Taiwan Junior Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (?), Chien Chou +
- Taiwan Junior Code of Conduct for Research Integrity 2023 +
- Te Ara Tika Guidelines for Māori research ethics: A framework for researchers and ethics committee members New Zealand, 2010 +
- Te Ara Tika: Guidelines for Māori research ethics: A framework for researchers and ethics committee members +
- Teacher guidelines in early bioethical education +
- Teaching Controversial Issues +
- Teaching Ethics in Research: A Multidisciplinary Model +
- Teaching about the First World War today: Historical empathy and participatory citizenship +
- Teaching and Learning the Techniques of Conflict Resolution for Challenging Ethics Consultations +
- Teaching ethics in nursing curricula. Traditional and contemporary models. +
- Teaching methods for strengthening research ethics and integrity +
- Teaching students to study online communities ethically +
- Teaching the Ethical Principles of Psychology +
- Teaching the ethics of scientific research through novels +
- Team-based learning instruction for responsible conduct of research positively impacts ethical decision-making +
- TechEthos +
- Technician Error Leads to Harm of Animal Subjects +
- Technology Availability and Digital Literacy (policy brief) +
- Technology and sustainability +
- Teenage Youth and Coercion +
- Telemedicine: Bridging Gaps or Creating New Challenges? +
- Ten journals denied 2020 Impact Factors because of excessive self-citation or “citation stacking” +
- Ten short cases on publication ethics +
- Test +
- Test audio +
- Test your knowledge +
- Test your knowledge: Say true or false +
- The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine +
- The ANR's open science policy (2023), Agence Natinale de la Recherche +
- The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose +
- The AVATAR method: historical empathy through imagination +
- The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud +
- The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing ‘Situated Ethics’ in the Field +
- The BIAS FREE Framework: a new analytical tool for global health research +
- The Cape Town Statement on Fostering Research Integrity through Fairness and Equity (2022) +
- The Cape Town Statement on Fostering Research Integrity through Fairness and Equity, 2022 +
- The Case of Falsified Data +
- The Case of the Damaged Baby +
- The Case of the Egyptian Travel Agent +
- The Case of the Missing Artefact +
- The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union +
- The Circularity Approach +
- The Circularity Quest Begins +
- The Code of the National Science Centre on Research Integrity and Applying for Research Funding (2016) +
