Search by property
From The Embassy of Good Science
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- Connecting researchers through ORCID + (PhD Students)
- Plagiarism, Voluntary Settlement Agreements and Public Health Service Grants + (Researchers)
- Reporting Findings in a Timely Manner + (Researchers)
- Procrastinating Researcher Delegates Grant Reviews to Trainee + (Supervisors)
- Procrastinating Reviewer + (Funders)
- Objectivity and Incentives + (All stakeholders in research)
- Power to the People + (Academic institutions)
- How to select trustworthy repositories + (Researchers)
- Using data not created for research purposes in the context of collaboration with private companies + (Researchers)
- Sponsorship of drug and device studies by the manufacturing company + (Clinical researchers)
- Poor mentoring or supervision of early career researcherers + (Academic staff)
- Good Epidemiological Practice Guidelines + (Researchers)
- A Data Governance Framework for Ethnography + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Data management plans + (Researchers)
- Research preparedness for future crises + (Wider public)
- Open access Publication in the European Research Area for Social Sciences and Humanities (OPERAS) + (Researchers)
- Ethical guidance for research with a potential for human enhancement + (Academic staff)
- SSH research as part of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research + (Researchers)
- ‘Caught in the act’: Veterinary researcher caught fabricating gene data, resigns from university job + (All stakeholders in research)
- Conducting research in high risk locations + (Researchers)
- Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC) + (Researchers)
- Funding (Sponsorship) bias + (Researchers)
- The French National Research Agency's Policy for Ethics and Research Integrity + (Funding agencies)
- KFPE Guide - 11 Principles & 7 Questions + (Researchers)
- 10 Things for Curating Reproducible and FAIR Research + (Academic institutions)
- UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science + (Academic institutions)
- Reward campaign + (Researchers)
- Plan S + (Everyone)
- Responsible Research and Innovation resources for researchers and funders + (Academic institutions)
- Misuse of grant money for personal purposes + (Funding institutions)
- The Limits of Expertise + (Research subjects)
- Disclosure of Sources of Grant Funds + (All stakeholders in research)
- Vulnerable Populations + (Funding institutions)
- Vulnerable Populations + (Researchers)
- Teenage Youth and Coercion + (Qualitative researchers)
- Who Owns the Field Notes + (Academic staff)
- The Case of the Egyptian Travel Agent + (Academic staff)
- Backstage Maneuvers + (Funding institutions)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on the selection and evaluation of proposals + (Funders)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on monitoring funded projects + (Funders)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on defining and preventing unjustified interferences from funders, political and commercial actors + (Funders)
- Infographic-SOPs4RI Research integrity guidelines for research funders + (Funders)
- Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations + (Research funding organisations)
- Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations + (Research funding organisations)
- Duplicate publications and secondary publications + (Researchers)
- Spin of research results + (Students)
- Whistleblower protection/rights + (PhD Students)
- Polarized research + (PhD Students)
- Cross-boundary collaborations + (PhD students)
- Bioethicists Call for Investigation Into Nutritional Experiments on Aboriginal People + (researchers)
- Conflicts with Community Leaders + (Researchers)
- Baltimore Case - In Brief + (Researchers)
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Austria + (Researchers)
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Switzerland + (Researchers)
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Finland + (Researchers)
- Herbicide Resistant Rice + (Teachers)
- Research misconduct + (Students)
- ORI - The Office of Research Integrity + (General public)
- The impact of the GDPR on scientific data + (Students)
- Nagoya Protocol + (Scientists)
- Accuracy of Credentials and Competence in Public Communications + (Researchers)
- Possible Conflict of Interest + (Attorneys)
- UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights + (All stakeholders in research)
- Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage + (Administrators)
- Communicate results to the general public before a peer reviewed publication is available + (Researchers)
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity + (Academic institutions)
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity + (Academic institutions)
- Plagiarism charge for Romanian minister - Scandal adds to fears that country’s research reform is in peril + (Academic institutions)
- Finnish TJNK Guideline on Bold Communication, Responsible Influence. Science Communication Recommendations + (Researchers)
- Hungarian Decree on the system of integrity management at public administration bodies and the procedural rules of receiving lobbyists + (Researchers in public institutions)
- Clarifying the aims of a research study + (Academic institutions)
- Test + (Gono)
- Position Paper on Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in Austria + (Research institutions)
- The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes + (Trainers)
- Show Me The Money! + (Early career researchers)
- Integrity Factor Glossary + (All stakeholders in research)
- Qualitative research + (PhD Students)
- Statements About Professional Experience + (Early career researchers)
- Privacy + (Qualitative researchers)
- Research by Students + (Graduate and postgraduate students)
- Data Sharing in Ongoing Projects + (Qualitative researchers)
- False, Fabricated or Misleading Data + (Qualitative researchers)
- Rights to Authorship + (Authors)
- Pressure to disclose confidential research findings + (Graduate and postgraduate students)
- Dual submissions + (Graduate and postgraduate students)
- Errata + (Graduate and postgraduate students)
- Credit for work + (Graduate and postgraduate students)
- Publication and data ownership + (Collaborating researchers)
- Fabrication and falsification + (Graduate and postgraduate students)
- How to be a good lab partner + (Bachelor students)
- The ethics of managing a laboratory or research group + (Academic institutions)
- Collaboration In Research + (Academic institutions)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines on Supervision - PhD guidelines + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on Responsible Supervision and Leadership - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Academic staff)
- Fiction movies for RCR education + (PhD Students)
- Nine pitfalls of research misconduct + (Early career researchers)
- Research Integrity: Podcast Series + (Bachelor students)
- Psychology Grad Student Faked Data + (Researchers)
- HEIRRI courses + (Research integrity trainers)
- University of Montana online research ethics course + (Bachelor students)
- Informed assent + (Junior researchers)
- Protecting research subjects + (PhD students)
- Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Authorship and publication + (PhD Students)
- Case Study Collection + (Research integrity trainers)
- U.S. Finds Misconduct by Ex-Researchers at Chicago and UCSF + (Researchers)
- U.S. Gov’t Physicist Sentenced to 18 months in Prison for Fraud + (Researchers)
- Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Inadequately handle or store data or (bio)materials + (All stakeholders in research)
- Researcher 'Cherry Picked' Data, University Investigation Finds + (Researchers)
- Development of Role-Play Scenarios for Teaching Responsible Conduct of Research + (Graduate students)
- Using cases with contrary facts to illustrate and facilitate ethical analysis + (Graduate students)
- Avoiding twisted pixels: ethical guidelines for the appropriate use and manipulation of scientific digital images + (Graduate students)
- Integrating a peer-taught module on practical research ethics into the graduate student orientation curriculum + (Graduate students)
- Evaluating teaching and students' learning of academic research ethic + (Graduate students)
- Promoting responsible conduct in research through "survival skills" workshops: some mentoring is best done in a crowd + (Graduate students)
- Teaching the Ethical Principles of Psychology + (Graduate students)
- Data Handling and Record Keeping + (Graduate students)
- Greek Cypriot students’ ideas of historical empathy: a case study exploration of 9 -12 years old students’ ideas about practices in the past + (Researcher)
- Teaching about the First World War today: Historical empathy and participatory citizenship + (Researchers)
- Intellectual property and power imbalance + (Academic institutions)
- Mentoring: lack of interest + (Supervisors)
- Mentoring: failure + (Graduate students)
- Blinded by Private Conflict – Choosing Ego Over Professionalism + (students)
- Respectable and honest supervision ensures responsible and ethical research in the future. + (Peer reviewers)
- Introduction to Research Integrity and Good Scientific Practices + (Academic staff)
- Imposter Syndrome + (Academic institutions)
- Confidentiality + (PhD students)
- Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Teacher guidelines in early bioethical education + (Teachers)
- Grey areas of plagiarism: 10 scenarios to discuss with students + (All stakeholders in research)
- Scientific Research: Dilemmas and Temptations (booklet of cases) + (Bachelor students)
- Path2Integrity Campaign + (Academic institutions)
- Path2Integrity Learning Card S0: Good research is based on honesty + (Bachelor students)
- Path2Integrity + (Academic institutions)
- Path2Integrity Learning Cards + (All stakeholders in research)
- Importance of healthy lifestyle + (Academic institutions)
- INTEGRITY High School Research Integrity Course + (High school students)
- Ethics defined: a glossary + (All stakeholders in research)
- Human Rights Education for Legal Professionals (HELP) Online Training + (Graduate students)
- The Orphan Embryos: A Case Study in Bioethics + (Decision makers)
- The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine + (Human rights defenders)
- Human Research Violations By Eye Doctor Showcase A National Problem + (Academic institutions)
- Declaration of Istanbul + (All stakeholders in research)
- Declaration of Geneva + (Clinical ethics consultants)
- The European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (ECHRBmed) + (All stakeholders in research)
- Mad Scientist: The Unique Case of a Published Delusion + (Academic institutions)
- Retracted gay-marriage study debated at misconduct meet-up + (Academic institutions)
- The decision on ice + (health care professionals)
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching + (Academic staff)
- Legal Liabilities in Research: Early lessons From North America + (researchers)
- Portuguese National Council of Ethics for the Life Sciences Recommendation on Integrity in Scientific Research + (Researchers)
- Responsible Research and Innovation - RRI + (Researchers)
- Age-Old Conflicts + (Researchers)
- Ethics of ageing + (Academic institutions)
- SIENNA - Stakeholder-informed ethics for new technologies with high socio-economic and human rights impact + (Academic institutions)
- Investigation ends in 6th retraction for Voinnet + (Academic institutions)
- UK Research Integrity Office's Code of Practice for Research + (All stakeholders in research)
- MedTech Europe Code of Ethical Business Practice + (Ethics committee members)
- The Olivieri Debacle: Where Were the Heroes of Bioethics? + (Researchers)
- Ethical Code of Scientific Research in Belgium + (Academic institutions)
- EQIPD (Enhancing Quality in Preclinical Data) + (PhD Students)
- Human rights, democracy, and the rule of law assurance framework for AI systems: A proposal + (Activists)
- AI Ethics and Governance in Practice: An Introduction + (Everyone)
- AI Sustainability in Practice Part Two: Sustainability Throughout the AI Workflow + (Everyone)
- AI Ethics and Governance in Practice: AI Fairness in Practice + (Public Sector)
- AI Sustainability in Practice Part One: Foundations for Sustainable AI Projects + (Public Sector)
- Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safety: A guide for the responsible design and implementation of AI systems in the public sector + (Civil Service)
- Bias in hiring + (Women in academia)
- "A Little Thing Like Plagiarism" + (Journal editors)
- A 24-year-old sociology paper found to have plagiarised a 1975 article + (Journal editors)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Disputes in Authorship (1) + (Journal editors)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Disputes in Authorship (2) + (Journal editors)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Editorial Misconduct + (Journal editors)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Multiple Submissions (1) + (Journal editors)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Multiple Submissions (2) + (Journal editors)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Redundant Publication + (Journal editors)
- A Reflection on Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research + (Journal editors)
- A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals. + (Journal editors)
- Agriculture researcher up to 15 retractions for fake peer review + (Journal editors)
- Author accused of stealing research and publishing under their name + (Journal editors)
- Authors couldn’t find a patient to give consent for case report. Then the patient found the report. + (Journal editors)
- COPE Journals’ Best Practices for Ensuring Consent for Publishing Medical Case Reports + (Journal editors)
- Can a scientific paper be published anonymously? + (Journal editors)
- Collaboration dispute + (Journal editors)
- Data anonymity + (Journal editors)
- Data fabrication in a rejected manuscript + (Journal editors)
- Data manipulation and institute’s internal review + (Journal editors)
- Definition of plagiarism: Phrasing + (Journal editors)
- Divorce study felled by a coding error gets a second chance + (Journal editors)
- Eigenfactorizer + (Journal editors)
- Environmental journal pulls two papers for “compromised” peer review + (Journal editors)
- Evaluating Journals Using Journal Metrics: Find Journal Rankings + (Journal editors)
- Fabrication and falsification + (Journal editors)
- Favoritism in the Editing Room + (Journal editors)
- Fourth retraction for neuroscientist sentenced for fraud + (Journal editors)
- Fresh Misconduct Charges Hit Dutch Social Psychology + (Journal editors)
- Guest Authorship, Mortality Reporting, and Integrity in Rofecoxib Studies + (Journal editors)
- Guest Post — Unethical Practices in Research and Publishing: Evidence from Russia + (Journal editors)
- Handling self-admissions of fraud + (Journal editors)
- Honest refereeing + (Journal editors)
- Image manipulation as a general practice + (Journal editors)
- Implications of a Single Highly Cited Article on a Journal and Its Citation Indexes + (Journal editors)
- Institution alleges that paper includes fabricated data + (Journal editors)
- Japan fails to settle university dispute + (Journal editors)
- Long Distance Collaboration + (Journal editors)
- Mad Scientist: The Unique Case of a Published Delusion + (Journal editors)
- Major indexing service rejects appeals by two suppressed journals + (Journal editors)
- Manuscript Guidelines Journals + (Journal editors)
- Multiple submission + (Journal editors)
- New claim to authorship of published paper + (Journal editors)
- Nutrition researcher selling supplements + (Journal editors)
- Obstructive sleep apnoea + (Journal editors)
- One in six of the papers you cite in a review has been retracted. What do you do? + (Journal editors)
- Peer review + (Journal editors)
- Possible omission of information essential for conclusions in a research paper + (Journal editors)
- Potential figure manipulation with corresponding author uncontactable + (Journal editors)
- Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers + (Journal editors)
- Preprint servers + (Journal editors)
- Prominent Video Game-Violence Researcher Loses Another Paper to Retraction + (Journal editors)
- Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis regarding logothetis vs. shmuel and leopold + (Journal editors)
- Publication + (Journal editors)
- Publication and data ownership + (Journal editors)
- Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Journal editors)
- Publishing complications and patient safety + (Journal editors)
- Replicability + (Journal editors)
- Research Integrity: the Experience of a Doubting Thomas + (Journal editors)
- Research Problems at Australian University Hit the News + (Journal editors)
- Research metrics + (Journal editors)
- Research misconduct + (Journal editors)
- Retraction notice - fake email peer-review + (Journal editors)
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Journal editors)
- Rising Publication Delays Inflate Journal Impact Factors + (Journal editors)
- Scientists in Chile Protest Mummy Study + (Journal editors)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Duplicate Publication + (Journal editors)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Review Article + (Journal editors)
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity + (Journal editors)
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity + (Journal editors)
- Suspected image manipulation involving four journals + (Journal editors)
- Suspected image manipulation involving four journals + (Journal editors)
- Swedish plastics study fabricated, panel finds + (Journal editors)
- Ten journals denied 2020 Impact Factors because of excessive self-citation or “citation stacking” + (Journal editors)
- The EQUATOR Network: Reporting guidelines + (Journal editors)
- The REAPPRAISED checklist to identify flawed papers + (Journal editors)
- The Tadpole Paper Mill + (Journal editors)
- The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’ + (Journal editors)
- The future of scientific justice: the case of The Sceptical Environmentalist + (Journal editors)
- The publication of controversial views + (Journal editors)
- Transpose + (Journal editors)
- Traver paper: The Unique Case of a Published Delusion + (Journal editors)
- U.S. gov’t researchers withdraw climate paper after using pseudonyms + (Journal editors)
- Unhelpful retraction notice about a study that received favourable media attention + (Journal editors)
- Want to make sure your paper gets published? Just do your own peer review like this researcher did + (Journal editors)
- What do journal editors do when they suspect research misconduct? + (Journal editors)
- What happens when an ex-physicist writes about gender identity? + (Journal editors)
- What should a journal do when a scientist who committed misconduct submits a new paper? + (Journal editors)
- What to communicate in retraction notices? + (Journal editors)
- Who Rules the Ruler? On the Misconduct of Journal Editors + (Journal editors)
- Conflict of interest in peer review + (Journal editors)
- Conflict of interest: a research integrity and research ethics perspective + (Journal editors)
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching + (Journal editors)
- Platform for Responsible Editorial Policies (PREP) + (Journal editors)
- Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities + (Journal editors)
- Post-publication peer review + (Journal editors)
- Consent for publication (Author) + (Journal editors)
- Consent for publication (Participant) + (Journal editors)
- Publishers - COPE guidelines + (Journal editors)
- Retractions: correcting the scientific literature + (Journal editors)
- Standards of authorship + (Journal editors)
- Funding (Sponsorship) bias + (Journal editors)
- Hypothesizing after the results are known (HARKing) + (Journal editors)
- Improper data use (a bias distorting research results) + (Journal editors)
- Insufficiently reported study flaws and limitations + (Journal editors)
- Outcome reporting bias + (Journal editors)
- P-value hacking + (Journal editors)
- Publication bias (positive results) + (Journal editors)
- Salami publication + (Journal editors)
- Selective citation + (Journal editors)
- Spin of research results + (Journal editors)
- (re)submitting without consent of all authors + (Journal editors)
- Fake peer-reviewing + (Journal editors)
- Hostile peer review + (Journal editors)
- Self-plagiarism + (Journal editors)
- Perverse incentives + (Journal editors)
- Forensic Statistics to detect Data Fabrication + (Journal editors)
- Statistical pre-registration + (Journal editors)
- Image Integrity + (Journal editors)
- The impact of the GDPR on scientific data + (Journal editors)
- Eigenfactor + (Journal editors)
- Journal Impact Factor based on the date of electronic publication + (Journal editors)
- SCImago Journal Rankings + (Journal editors)
- Plagiarism + (Journal editors)
- Publishers - COPE guidelines + (phd students)
- Retractions: correcting the scientific literature + (phd students)
- Conflict of interest in peer review + (Researchers)
- Improper data use (a bias distorting research results) + (Principal investigators)
- Outcome reporting bias + (Students)
- Perverse incentives + (Students)
- Polarized research + (PhD Students)
- Rampant Plagiarism in Two Journals + (Researchers)
- Post-publication peer review +
- Salami publication + (PhD Students)
- Standards of authorship + (phd students)
- The EQUATOR Network: Reporting guidelines + (Researchers)
- Research Ethics: Zero Tolerance + (Researchers)
- Peer review + (Scientists)
- Platform for Responsible Editorial Policies (PREP) +
- Research misconduct + (Students)
- Fake peer-reviewing +
- The impact of the GDPR on scientific data + (Students)
- Non-reporting of negative findings + (Students)
- Plan S + (Everyone)
- Publication + (Early career researchers)
- Definition of plagiarism: Phrasing + (Authors)
- Selective citation + (Students)
- The influence of pharmaceutical company on drug availability + (Academic staff)
- Attempting to Assure Accuracy + (Journal publishers)
- Rights to Authorship + (Authors)
- Collaboration dispute + (Academic staff)
- "A Little Thing Like Plagiarism" + (Academic staff)
- Environmental journal pulls two papers for “compromised” peer review + (Editors)
- Major indexing service rejects appeals by two suppressed journals + (Editors)
- Agriculture researcher up to 15 retractions for fake peer review + (Reserchers)
- What should a journal do when a scientist who committed misconduct submits a new paper? + (Journal publishers)
- Guest Post — Unethical Practices in Research and Publishing: Evidence from Russia +
- Ten journals denied 2020 Impact Factors because of excessive self-citation or “citation stacking” + (Authors)
- Guest Authorship, Mortality Reporting, and Integrity in Rofecoxib Studies + (Researchers)
- Research Problems at Australian University Hit the News + (Researchers)
- Conflict of interest: a research integrity and research ethics perspective + (Researchers)
- Data fabrication in a rejected manuscript + (Academic institutions)
- Potential figure manipulation with corresponding author uncontactable +
- Data manipulation and institute’s internal review +
- Author accused of stealing research and publishing under their name +
- Data anonymity +
- Suspected image manipulation involving four journals +
- Institution alleges that paper includes fabricated data + (Academic institutions)
- Author misconduct: Not just the editors' responsibility + (Academic institutions)
- Covering Controversial Science: Improving Reporting on Science and Public Policy + (Journalists)
- Fake science: Who's to blame when the media gets research wrong? + (Researchers)
- Unhelpful retraction notice about a study that received favourable media attention +
- Journalist who fabricated his reports + (Journalists)
- Altmetrics + (PhD students)
- Can a scientific paper be published anonymously? + (Researchers)
- Baltimore Case - In Brief + (Researchers)
- The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud + (Researchers)
- Transpose +
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching + (Academic staff)
- Inferring from P-values + (Researchers)
- Secondary corrections + (Authors)
- Replicability in the Humanities + (Researchers)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity + (All stakeholders in research)
- Handling self-admissions of fraud + (Academic institutions)
- AI Generated Content + (Academic staff)
- What to communicate in retraction notices? + (Journals)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition + (All stakeholders in research)
- Responsible supervision + (PhD Students)
- Values and norms + (All stakeholders in research)
- AllTrials campaign + (All stakeholders in research)
- Predatory publishing + (PhD Students)
- ORI introduction to RCR + (All stakeholders in research)
- The Rotterdam Dilemma Game + (Early career researchers)
- Peer review card exchange game + (Early career researchers)
- Nine pitfalls of research misconduct + (Early career researchers)
- Research Integrity: Podcast Series + (Bachelor students)
- Bioethics: an introduction + (Bachelor students)
- Research Integrity Committees + (phd students)
- Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas + (phd students)
- Research with animals + (Ethics committee members)
- Committee on Publication Ethics Guidelines on How to Handle Authorship Disputes + (Early career researchers)
- Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors + (Students)
- P-value hacking + (Students)
- Publication bias (positive results) + (Students)
- Spin of research results + (Students)
- Whistleblower protection/rights + (PhD Students)
- Supervision Guidelines + (PhD Students)
- Responsible Authorship and Peer Review - Columbia RCR Course, Module 3 + (Early career researchers)
- Cross-boundary collaborations + (PhD students)
- Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity + (PhD students)
- High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations + (Senior researchers)
- Informed assent + (Junior researchers)
- Informed consent + (Junior researchers)
- Supervision + (phd students)
- Authorship criteria + (PhD students)
- LIRIcs - Leuven Institutional Research Integrity culture and self-reflection on-line course + (Junior researchers)
- Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Case-based ethics instruction: the influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making + (Early career researchers)
- Fabrication + (Students)
- A Case Study about Anonymization and Secondary Use of Qualitative Data + (All stakeholders in research)
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity + (Senior researchers)
- PhD and Supervisor charter (KU Leuven) + (PhD Students)
- Superb Supervision: integrity training for supervisors + (Supervisors)
- Handling of Sexual Harassment Case Poses Larger Questions at Yale + (Researchers)
- Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Mental health in academia + (All stakeholders in research)
- Privacy in research + (PhD students)
- Serious gaming in research integrity education + (Bachelor students)
- Introduction to Research Integrity + (Junior researchers)
- Oviedo Convention + (Ethics committee members)
- H-index + (Funders)
- Prospective registration of clinical trials + (PhD students)
- Research Integrity: Sabotage! + (Researchers)
- Questionable Research Practices in Study Design + (Early career researchers)
- Questionable Research Practices in Data Collection + (Early career researchers)
- Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and Reporting + (Early career researchers)
- Questionable Research Practices in Collaboration + (All stakeholders in research)
- Data Handling and Record Keeping + (Graduate students)
- Duty to Report Ethical Violations of Others + (Academic staff)
- Path2Integrity Learning Cards + (All stakeholders in research)
- Research Reproducibility + (Junior researchers)
- Research Integrity Advisors + (PhD students)
- Anonymisation and pseudonymisation + (PhD Students)
- Path2Integrity Campaign + (Academic institutions)
- Path2Integrity + (Academic institutions)
- Intellectual Rights Involving Multiple Institutions + (Junior researchers)
- Robbing the Grave: Investigator Takes Ownership of Deceased Scholar’s Work + (Junior researchers)
- Blinded by Private Conflict – Choosing Ego Over Professionalism + (students)
- How to be a good lab partner + (Bachelor students)
- Methods to increase data availability + (Authors)
- Research with children + (Ethics committee members)
- Virtues in research integrity + (PhD Students)
- Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) + (Junior researchers)
- SPOC: Integrity in academic publication: authorship and peer review + (PhD Students)
- Responsible Research through supervision, mentoring and working together + (PhD Students)
- SPOC: Data in responsible conduct of research + (PhD Students)
- Araştırma doğruluğu konusuna giriş + (Researchers)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines on Supervision - PhD guidelines + (Academic staff)
- Confidentiality + (PhD students)
- Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Peer-mentored research development meeting: a model for successful peer mentoring among junior level researchers + (Students)
- Keeping inadequate notes of the research process + (Qualitative researchers)
- The Orphan Embryos: A Case Study in Bioethics + (Decision makers)
- Show Me The Money! + (Early career researchers)
- Fraud, errors and gamesmanship in experimental toxicology: GM potatoes + (Laboratory researchers)
- Ethics of ageing + (Academic institutions)
- Banked Samples and HD Testing + (Clinical researchers)
- Data acquisition + (Laboratory researchers)
- Hazardous materials + (Advisors of students)
- Guidance on the Management of Clinical Trials during the COVID-19 Pandemic + (All stakeholders in research)
- The European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (ECHRBmed) + (All stakeholders in research)
- The ethics of managing a laboratory or research group + (Academic institutions)
- Collaboration In Research + (Academic institutions)
- ICH Guidelines + (medical researchers)
- Image Manipulation Detection - Exercises + (Academic institutions)
- Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC) + (Researchers)
- FAIR-Aware: Your first step towards your FAIR data(set). + (Academic staff)
- Affiliations + (Academic institutions)
- Open access Publication in the European Research Area for Social Sciences and Humanities (OPERAS) + (Researchers)
- “Five steps to decide what data to keep: a checklist for appraising research data” + (Researchers)
- Grey areas of plagiarism: 10 scenarios to discuss with students + (All stakeholders in research)
- Scientific Research: Dilemmas and Temptations (booklet of cases) + (Bachelor students)
- EQIPD (Enhancing Quality in Preclinical Data) + (PhD Students)
- Research with humans + (Researchers)
- Inadequately handle or store data or (bio)materials + (All stakeholders in research)
- Ethical issues of involving children with disabilities in research + (Authors)
- Mentoring: expectations + (Supervisors)
- DATA MINDFULNESS: Making the most of your dissertation + (Bachelor students)
- Integrity Games + (Undergraduate students)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on Responsible Supervision and Leadership - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Academic staff)
- Ethics defined: a glossary + (All stakeholders in research)
- A Japanese developmental biology center, scientific misconduct and suicide + (Researchers)
- ORI - The Office of Research Integrity + (General public)
- Inaccurate representation of results in the media + (Media)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: Another Magazine Surprise + (Researchers)
- Eforcement Agencies and the Protection of Human Subjects + (All stakeholders in research)
- The future of scientific justice: the case of The Sceptical Environmentalist + (Academic institutions)
- Facebook Manipulated 689,003 Users' Emotions For Science + (Policy-makers)
- Croatia's science minister rejects calls to resign amid plagiarism scandal + (Academic institutions)
- Research Integrity champions + (Research performing organisations)
- KU Leuven - Supervisor tips to promote research integrity + (Supervisors)
- Reporting violations + (Mentors)
- Mentoring: disabilities + (Mentors)
- The Nutty Professor + (Researchers)
- When is Advanced Training Necessary? + (Students)
- Introduction to Responsible Supervision, Mentoring and Role-modeling + (Research integrity trainers)
- Where are they now? + (Early career researchers)