Search by property
From The Embassy of Good Science
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- Research Ethics – Official GRAD 5104 Blog - Blogs@VT + (Researchers)
- Confronting Research Misconduct in Citizen Science + (Academic staff)
- The Middle Position + (Trainers in training)
- Modified Dilemma Game + (Research integrity trainers)
- What Universities can Learn from one of Science’s Biggest Frauds + (Researchers)
- The Olivieri Debacle: Where Were the Heroes of Bioethics? + (Researchers)
- Conducting research in high risk locations + (Researchers)
- Data Practices and Management + (Academic staff)
- The Tadpole Paper Mill + (Researchers)
- Manuscript Guidelines Journals + (Researchers)
- Clinical Trials and Drug Promotion: Selective Reporting of Study 329 + (Researchers)
- Ignoring substantial safety risks of the study to participants, workers or environment + (Researchers)
- "Why should I acknowledge writing assistance if I have paid for it?" A case study + (Researchers)
- Not acknowledging contributors who do not qualify for authorship + (Researchers)
- Initiative for Open Abstracts (I4OA) + (Publishers)
- Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC) + (Researchers)
- Responsible mentoring + (Researchers)
- Responsible Research: Recommendations of the Institute of Science and Technology, Austria + (Researchers)
- Research Integrity & Research Ethics: Guidelines of the Austrian Science Funds + (Researchers)
- Funding (Sponsorship) bias + (Researchers)
- Honorary or gift authorship + (Early career researchers)
- Hypothesizing after the results are known (HARKing) + (Researchers)
- ENERI Decision Tree + (All stakeholders in research)
- Take no full responsibility for the integrity of the research project and its reports + (Researchers)
- Conflict of interest: a research integrity and research ethics perspective + (Researchers)
- Ethical Code of Scientific Research in Belgium + (Academic institutions)
- Swiss Academy of Arts and Sciences Code of Conduct for Scientific Integrity r + (Researchers)
- “Five steps to decide what data to keep: a checklist for appraising research data” + (Researchers)
- How to select trustworthy repositories + (Researchers)
- The Swiss National Science Foundation and National Research Council's Regulations on scientific misconduct + (Academic institutions)
- Danish National Strategy for Open Access + (Academic institutions)
- University of Tartu Ethics Centre's Codes of Ethics Handbook + (Academic institutions)
- Code of Good Scientific Practices of the Spanish National Research Council (CSIS) + (Research institutions)
- Research Integrity in trying times: a scenario on the presentation and dissemination of information + (Researchers)
- Communicate results to the general public before a peer reviewed publication is available + (Researchers)
- Using data not created for research purposes in the context of collaboration with private companies + (Researchers)
- FAIR-Aware: Your first step towards your FAIR data(set). + (Academic staff)
- Research ethics committee conditions: Ethical challenges of researching with poor communities in Malawi + (Ethics committee members)
- Negotiating confidentiality, privacy and consent in focus groups with children and young people. + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Immediacy of fieldwork in participatory research with children in precarious contexts + (Researchers)
- Tongan children’s involvement in research + (Researchers)
- Child protection and confidentiality: Surveying children’s experiences of violence, abuse and neglect + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Where are they now? + (Early career researchers)
- Self-plagiarism case prompts calls for agencies to tighten rules + (Researchers)
- Retraction of Savine, McDaniel, Shelton, and Scullin + (Academic institutions)
- Development and Value of National Research Integrity Codes + (Research Integrity Officers)
- Swedish Research Council's Guidelines on Good Research Practice + (Researchers)
- General Code of Ethics in Scientific Research (Romanian Ministry of Education, Research and Youth) + (Researchers)
- Guidelines for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences, Humanities, Law and Theology (NESH, Norway) + (Researchers)
- Guidelines for Research Ethics in Science and Technology (NENT, Norway) + (Researchers)
- A Guide to Internet Research Ethics (NESH, Norway) + (Research institutions)
- Latvian Academy of Sciences' Code of Ethics for Scientists + (Researchers)
- Code of Ethics of the Croatian Committee on Ethics in Science and Higher Education + (Researchers)
- Good-Practice Guide for Scientific-Academic Publishing (CSIC, Spain) + (Researchers)
- Conflicts of Interest (CSIC, Spain) + (Researchers)
- Position statement of the UKRIO: Statutory regulation of research integrity + (Research Integrity Officers)
- UKRIO's Guidance for researchers on retractions in academic journals + (Researchers)
- UKRIO's Good practice in internet-mediated research + (Researchers)
- UKRIO's Guide to good authorship practice in research + (Researchers)
- Resolution on the Research and Innovation Strategy of Slovenia + (Research institutions)
- Polish Ministry of Science and Information Society Technologies' Good Scientific Research Practice Recommendations + (Research institutions)
- University of Oslo's Ethical Guidelines + (Researchers)
- Reporting censurable conditions for employees at University of Oslo (whistleblowing) + (Researchers)
- The Norwegian Act on Ethics and Integrity in Research (The Research Ethics Act) + (Research institutions)
- The Netherlands Code of Conduct for Academic Practice + (Researchers)
- The Dutch Code on Prevention of Undue Influence through Conflicts of Interest + (Research institutions)
- Italian National Research Council's Research Ethics and Integrity Documents + (Research institutions)
- Law on Science and Studies of the Republic of Lithuania + (Research institutions)
- The University of Iceland Code of Ethics + (Academic staff)
- Dublin City University's Policy for Responding to Allegations of Research Misconduct + (Researchers)
- Dublin City University's Position Statement on Open Access to Research Publications + (Researchers)
- Irish National Forum on Research Integrity's Position Paper on Research Integrity Officer Role & Reporting + (Research Integrity Officers)
- Irish Universities Quality Board's Good Practice for Institutional Research in Irish Higher Education + (Research institutions)
- Irish National Principles for Open Access Policy Statement + (Researchers)
- Irish Council for Bioethics' Recommendations for Promoting Research Integrity + (Academic institutions)
- The Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland's Guidelines on Good Research Practice + (Researchers)
- The Croatian Committee on Ethics in Science and Higher Education's Amendments to the Ethics Code of Ethics Committee in Science and Higher Education + (Research institutions)
- The French National Research Agency's Policy for Ethics and Research Integrity + (Funding agencies)
- The French CNRS Ethics Committee's Ethical Reflection on Plagiarism in Scientific Research + (Researchers)
- The French Vademecum on Scientific Integrity + (Research institutions)
- The French CNRS Ethics Committee's Guide to Integrity and Responsibility in Research Practices + (Researchers)
- Recommendations of the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK for Research Integrity Advisers and related background organisations1 + (Research Integrity Officers)
- Finnish TJNK Guideline on Bold Communication, Responsible Influence. Science Communication Recommendations + (Researchers)
- Finnish TENK Guide to Agreeing on Authorship: Recommendation for Research Publications + (Researchers)
- Spanish Law on Science, Technology and Innovation + (Researchers)
- Act on the Danish Council for Research and Innovation Policy + (Academic institutions)
- The Danish Act on the Research Advisory System + (Research institutions)
- The New Danish Research Misconduct etc. Act + (Research institutions)
- Alliance of German Science Organisations' Principles for the Handling of Research Data + (Researchers)
- Leibniz Institute's Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice + (PhD Students)
- Max Planck Society's Rules of Good Scientific Practice + (Academic institutions)
- The German Association of University Professors and Lecturers' (DHV) Position Paper on Scientific Self-regulation and Scientific Misconduct + (PhD Students)
- Joint position paper of the General Faculty (AFT) and the German University Association (DHV) + (Researchers)
- The German Council of Science and Humanities ' Recommendations on Academic Integrity + (Academic institutions)
- The Larnaca College (Cyprus) Statement on Research Integrity + (Students)
- Procedures of the Science Ethics Committee of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences + (Researchers)
- Statutes and Procedures of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences + (Research institutions)
- The University of Malta's Research Code of Practice + (Academic staff)
- COMET Initiative + (Researchers)
- Importance of healthy lifestyle + (Academic institutions)
- SCImago Journal Rankings + (Academic staff)
- Research collaboration + (PhD Students)
- Guideline for discussing work-related stress + (Supervisors)
- Data management plans + (Researchers)
- SPOC: RCR through supervision and mentoring course + (Researchers)
- Diner Pensant Workshop + (Researchers)
- Araştırma doğruluğu konusuna giriş + (Researchers)
- Erdem etiği ve araştırma doğruluğu + (Research integrity trainers)
- Mevcut araştırma koşulları altında erdem etiğinin uygulanması + (Researchers)
- Erdemler ve Normlar + (Researchers)
- Orta Yol + (Trainers in training)
- Öz beyan yaklaşımı, araştırmada iyiliğin farklı şekilleri üzerine fikir yürütme + (Researchers)
- Der Balanceakt + (Trainers in training)
- The SOPs4RI project + (Policy makers)
- ICH Guidelines + (medical researchers)
- Self Declaration Approach - a Reflection on the Varieties of Goodness in Research + (Researchers)
- AI Generated Content + (Academic staff)
- KFPE Guide - 11 Principles & 7 Questions + (Researchers)
- What to communicate in retraction notices? + (Journals)
- 10 Things for Curating Reproducible and FAIR Research + (Academic institutions)
- Research preparedness for future crises + (Wider public)
- Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2023 Edition (ALLEA Code) + (Academic institutions)
- The Finnish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and Procedures for Handling Alleged Violations of Research Integrity in Finland + (Academic institutions)
- Human rights, democracy, and the rule of law assurance framework for AI systems: A proposal + (Activists)
- Virtues and Norms + (Researchers)
- Hungarian Decree on the system of integrity management at public administration bodies and the procedural rules of receiving lobbyists + (Researchers in public institutions)
- The Reward Alliance + (Reserchers)
- Questionable Research Practices in Study Design + (Early career researchers)
- Agriculture researcher up to 15 retractions for fake peer review + (Reserchers)
- The University of Oslo's 10 commandements for ethical practice in research + (Reserchers)
- The Dublin City University's Code of Good Research Practice + (Academic staff)
- Irish National Forum on Research Integrity's Report on Fostering a Climate of Excellence for Irish Research + (Reserchers)
- The decision on ice + (health care professionals)
- 'I am really sorry': Peer Reviewer Stole Text for Own Paper + (Reviewers)
- Attempting to Assure Accuracy + (Reviewers)
- Ethical guidance for research with a potential for human enhancement + (Reviewers)
- Good-Practice Guide for Scientific-Academic Publishing (CSIC, Spain) + (Reviewers)
- Peer review + (Reviewers)
- Procrastinating Reviewer + (Reviewers)
- Research misconduct + (Reviewers)
- Ten journals denied 2020 Impact Factors because of excessive self-citation or “citation stacking” + (Reviewers)
- Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals + (Reviewers)
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity + (Reviewers)
- Post-publication peer review + (Reviewers)
- Selective citation + (Reviewers)
- Hostile peer review + (Reviewers)
- Self-plagiarism + (Reviewers)
- Turning a blind eye to breaches of integrity + (Reviewers)
- Perverse incentives + (Reviewers)
- Image Integrity + (Reviewers)
- Peer review card game + (Reviewers)
- Predatory publishing + (PhD Students)
- Altmetrics + (PhD students)
- Legal rights of accused scientists + (Scientists)
- Declaration of Helsinki + (PhD Students)
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights + (PhD Students)
- Peer review + (Scientists)
- Research metrics + (phd students)
- On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research + (Researchers)
- Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors + (Students)
- Hostile peer review + (Scientists)
- P-value hacking + (Students)
- Perverse incentives + (Students)
- Self-plagiarism + (Students)
- Whistleblower protection/rights + (PhD Students)
- Polarized research + (PhD Students)
- Supervision + (phd students)
- Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’) + (Students)
- Authorship criteria + (PhD students)
- German Research Foundation's Recommendations for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice + (researchers)
- Research misconduct + (Students)
- Balancing harms and benefits + (All stakeholders in research)
- Journal Impact Factor + (Scientists)
- Research integrity officers in Europe + (Students)
- Questionable Research Practices in Study Design + (Early career researchers)
- Inappropriate study design + (Students)
- Questionable Research Practices in Data Collection + (Early career researchers)
- Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and Reporting + (Early career researchers)
- Non-reporting of negative findings + (Students)
- The INSPIRE project + (Policy makers)
- Selective citation + (Students)
- Nagoya Protocol + (Scientists)
- Ethical guidance for research with a potential for human enhancement + (Academic staff)
- Dilemmas in daily practice + (Scientists)
- FAIR-Aware: Your first step towards your FAIR data(set). + (Academic staff)
- Human rights, democracy, and the rule of law assurance framework for AI systems: A proposal + (Activists)
- Successful and timely uptake of artificial intelligence in science in the EU + (Academic institutions)
- Path2Integrity Campaign + (Academic institutions)
- Path2Integrity Learning Card S0: Good research is based on honesty + (Bachelor students)
- Path2Integrity + (Academic institutions)
- Path2Integrity Learning Cards + (All stakeholders in research)
- Responsible supervision + (PhD Students)
- Values and norms + (All stakeholders in research)
- AllTrials campaign + (All stakeholders in research)
- Publishers - COPE guidelines + (phd students)
- Research Integrity Committees + (phd students)
- Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas + (phd students)
- Research with animals + (Ethics committee members)
- Conflict of interest in peer review + (Researchers)
- Outcome reporting bias + (Students)
- Publication bias (positive results) + (Students)
- Spin of research results + (Students)
- Supervision Guidelines + (PhD Students)
- Cross-boundary collaborations + (PhD students)
- Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity + (PhD students)
- High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations + (Senior researchers)
- Informed assent + (Junior researchers)
- Informed consent + (Junior researchers)
- Salami publication + (PhD Students)
- LIRIcs - Leuven Institutional Research Integrity culture and self-reflection on-line course + (Junior researchers)
- Human Rights Education for Legal Professionals (HELP) Online Training + (Graduate students)
- Fabrication + (Students)
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity + (Senior researchers)
- The EQUATOR Network: Reporting guidelines + (Researchers)
- The Rotterdam Dilemma Game + (Early career researchers)
- Mantra (research data management training) + (Early career researchers)
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching + (Academic staff)
- Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations + (Research performing organisations)
- Belgian Code of Ethics for Scientific Research + (All stakeholders in research)
- Deception by Research Participants + (Researchers)
- How I Was Nearly Duped into 'Authoring' a Fake Paper + (All stakeholders in research)
- Privacy in research + (PhD students)
- Research culture + (Academic staff)
- Oviedo Convention + (Ethics committee members)
- Inadequately handle or store data or (bio)materials + (All stakeholders in research)
- H-index + (Funders)
- Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity + (PhD students)
- Intellectual conflicts of interest + (Research performing organisations)
- The impact of the GDPR on scientific data + (Students)
- European Commission Guidance on Research on Refugees, Asylum Seekers & Migrants + (Researchers)
- Prospective registration of clinical trials + (PhD students)
- Research Integrity: Sabotage! + (Researchers)
- Questionable Research Practices in Collaboration + (All stakeholders in research)
- People Studying People: Research Ethics in Society + (Early career researchers)
- Becoming an Ethical Researcher + (Early career researchers)
- Is the famous emeritus professor self-plagiarising? + (Senior researchers)
- Chemistry professor faces criminal charges after researcher's death + (Senior researchers)
- Maintaining Competence + (Academic institutions)
- Show Me The Money! + (Early career researchers)
- Who will mentor the mentors? + (Academic institutions)
- Dutch psychology fraudster avoids trial + (Academic staff)
- Virtues in research integrity + (PhD Students)
- SPOC: RCR through supervision and mentoring course + (Researchers)
- Confidentiality + (PhD students)
- The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing ‘Situated Ethics’ in the Field + (Researchers)
- AI Ethics and Governance in Practice: An Introduction + (Everyone)
- AI Ethics and Governance in Practice: AI Fairness in Practice + (Public Sector)
- Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safety: A guide for the responsible design and implementation of AI systems in the public sector + (Civil Service)
- Strategies for making research more accessible to dental students + (Student)
- Academic integrity at MIT, a handbook for students + (All stakeholders in research)
- Academic integrity checklist + (All stakeholders in research)
- Peer review card game + (phd students)
- The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud + (Researchers)
- Medical students' decisions about authorship in disputable situations: intervention study + (All stakeholders in research)
- Online Module: Responsible research and Peer Review + (Researchers)
- A Short Guide to the Digital Humanities + (Researchers)
- Digital humanities + (Researchers)
- The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose + (Researchers)
- Online Module: Research Misconduct + (Researchers)
- Research Mentoring: An online module + (Researchers)
- Avoiding Plagiarism, Self-plagiarism, and Other Questionable Writing Practices: A Guide to Ethical Writing + (Researchers)
- Online Learning Tool for Research Integrity and Image Processing + (Researchers)
- Evaluating the effects that existing instruction on responsible conduct of research has on ethical decision making + (Trainers)
- Instilling scholarly integrity + (Researchers)
- Making Choices: Ethical Decisions in a Global Context + (Trainers)
- Reducing the incidence of plagiarism in an undergraduate course: The role of education + (Students)
- Using student generated codes of conduct in the classroom to reinforce business ethics education + (Students)