Search by property
From The Embassy of Good Science
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- Data protection in a global pandemic (COVID-19) + (Transparency)
- Using data not created for research purposes in the context of collaboration with private companies + (Honesty)
- The Threat to Scientific Integrity in Environmental and Occupational Medicine + (Reliability)
- Informed assent + (Honesty)
- When Sociologists Deceive Their Subjects + (Respect)
- Ethics, Human Rights and HIV Vaccine Trials in Low-Income Settings + (Respect)
- Scientific Misconduct at an Elite Medical Institute: The Role of Competing Institutional Logics and Fragmented Control + (Honesty)
- The Ethics of Public Health Research on Less Expensive, Less Effective Interventions + (Respect)
- The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing ‘Situated Ethics’ in the Field + (Respect)
- Resolution on the Research and Innovation Strategy of Slovenia + (Autonomy)
- Digital humanities + (Availability)
- Publication + (Accountability)
- Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC) + (Availability)
- “Five steps to decide what data to keep: a checklist for appraising research data” + (Transparency)
- How to select trustworthy repositories + (Transparency)
- Sharing and preserving data in repositories + (Transparency)
- Data management plans + (Transparency)
- Research ethics committees + (Care)
- Institutional Pathology and the Death of a Mentally Ill Young Man + (Respect)
- The Unfortunate Experiment + (Respect)
- Conflicts with Community Leaders + (Respect)
- The impact of the GDPR on scientific data + (Accountability)
- Harms and benefits - International research ethics and cultural values + (Care)
- Harms and benefits - International research ethics and cultural values + (Care)
- Who will mentor the mentors? + (Availability)
- Introduction to Responsible Supervision, Mentoring and Role-modeling + (Care)
- Jesse's Intent + (Respect)
- Guideline for discussing work-related stress + (Openness)
- SSH research as part of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research + (Respect)
- Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage + (Respect)
- How to be a good lab partner + (Collaborative spirit)
- Quality Enhancement Handbook for Icelandic Higher Education + (Transparency)
- Quality Enhancement Handbook for Icelandic Higher Education + (Transparency)
- A Data Governance Framework for Ethnography + (Privacy)
- Supervision + (Respect)
- High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations + (Autonomy)
- Working with Research Integrity - Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement + (Accountability)
- Scientific Research: Dilemmas and Temptations (booklet of cases) + (Honesty)
- Dialogue versus debate + (Collegiality)
- Responsible mentoring + (Reliability)
- The University of Oslo's 10 commandements for ethical practice in research + (Honesty)
- Not asking permission from contributors for the wording of the acknowledgement + (Accountability)
- The Olivieri Debacle: Where Were the Heroes of Bioethics? + (Respect)
- Australian Guide to Managing and Investigating Potential Breaches of the Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research + (Proportionality)
- Journal peer review +
- European Cystic Fibrosis Society (ECFS) Patient Registry Code of Conduct + (Confidentiality)
- Publishing complications and patient safety + (Confidentiality)
- European Charter of Patients' Rights + (Privacy)
- Guidelines for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences, Humanities, Law and Theology (NESH, Norway) + (Impartiality)
- A Guide to Internet Research Ethics (NESH, Norway) + (Privacy)
- Good-Practice Guide for Scientific-Academic Publishing (CSIC, Spain) + (Confidentiality)
- The Manchester University's Code of Practice for Investigating Concerns about the Conduct of Research +
- UKRIO's Good practice in internet-mediated research + (Autonomy)
- Reporting censurable conditions for employees at University of Oslo (whistleblowing) +
- Informed consent in psychiatry + (Accuracy)
- Ethical Guidelines for Good Research Practice + (Confidentiality)
- Moral conflict and moral dilemma + (Reliability)
- A virtue ethics guide to best practices for community-based participatory research + (Compassion)
- Honorary or gift authorship + (Accountability)
- FAIR-Aware: Your first step towards your FAIR data(set). + (Transparency)
- Latvian Academy of Sciences' Code of Ethics for Scientists + (Impartiality)
- Clarifying the aims of a research study + (Accountability)
- Serious gaming in research integrity education + (Curiosity)
- Human Rights Education for Legal Professionals (HELP) Online Training + (Dignity)
- Chinese Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for the National Natural Science Foundation + (Confidentiality)
- The Dilemma Game + (Accountability)
- Declaration of Istanbul + (Dignity)
- European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) + (Dignity)
- Declaration of Geneva + (Dignity)
- The European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (ECHRBmed) + (Accountability)
- UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights + (Non-discrimination)
- A Review of the Impact of the TeGenero Trial on the Design, Conduct, and Ethics of FIM Trials + (Respect)
- History, Ethics and the Presidential Commission on Research in Guatemala + (Respect)
- Code of Good Scientific Practices of the Spanish National Research Council (CSIS) + (Transparency)
- The University of Malta's Research Code of Practice + (Respect)
- Research with children + (Care)
- Italian National Research Center Guidelines for Integrity in Research + (Dignity)
- A University of Liverpool investigation determined that a former researcher there fabricated his data + (Diligence)
- Hungarian Academy of Sciences' Science Ethics Code + (Accountability)
- Ethical Code of Scientific Research in Belgium + (Diligence)
- Human rights, democracy, and the rule of law assurance framework for AI systems: A proposal + (Accountability)
- Dilemmas in daily practice + (Morality)
- Responsible Research: Recommendations of the Institute of Science and Technology, Austria + (Responsibility)
- Importance of healthy lifestyle + (Self-discipline)
- The EQUATOR Network: Reporting guidelines + (Accuracy)
- COMET Initiative + (Accuracy)
- The University of Iceland Code of Ethics + (Equality)
- Research collaboration + (Honesty)
- UK Research Integrity Office's Code of Practice for Research + (Accountability)
- Imputation of missing data in clinical trials + (Accountability)
- AI Ethics and Governance in Practice: AI Fairness in Practice + (Accountability)
- "Why should I acknowledge writing assistance if I have paid for it?" A case study + (Fairness)
- 01 - Value Analysis: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Fairness)
- 03 - Four Quadrant Approach: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Fairness)
- 04 - Moral Case Deliberation: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Fairness)
- 05 - REalistiC Decisions: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Fairness)
- 06 - Teaching Research Ethics Tool : A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics + (Fairness)
- AI Ethics and Governance in Practice: AI Fairness in Practice + (Fairness)
- ALLEA Permanent Working Group Science and Ethics + (Fairness)
- Australian Guide to Managing and Investigating Potential Breaches of the Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research + (Fairness)
- Authorship Deserved, Not Earned: Research Ethics and Research Integrity Scenario + (Fairness)
- Chinese Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for the National Natural Science Foundation + (Fairness)
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Fairness)
- Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Fairness)
- Declaration of Istanbul + (Fairness)
- How to be a good lab partner + (Fairness)
- Italian National Research Center Guidelines for Integrity in Research + (Fairness)
- Journal peer review + (Fairness)
- Moral conflict and moral dilemma + (Fairness)
- Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees - General Guidelines for Research Ethics + (Fairness)
- Online course: Teaching the Responsible Conduct of Research in Humans + (Fairness)
- Publication + (Fairness)
- Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Fairness)
- Reporting censurable conditions for employees at University of Oslo (whistleblowing) + (Fairness)
- Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Fairness)
- Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Fairness)
- Research metrics + (Fairness)
- Responsible Authorship and Peer Review - Columbia RCR Course, Module 3 + (Fairness)
- Responsible Conduct in the Global Research Enterprise: A Policy Report + (Fairness)
- Responsible conduct of biomedical research : collaborative research + (Fairness)
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Fairness)
- Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Fairness)
- The Dublin City University's Code of Good Research Practice + (Fairness)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity + (Fairness)
- The Manchester University's Code of Practice for Investigating Concerns about the Conduct of Research + (Fairness)
- Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Fairness)
- Using student generated codes of conduct in the classroom to reinforce business ethics education + (Fairness)
- Working with Research Integrity - Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement + (Fairness)
- Data protection in a global pandemic (COVID-19) + (Fairness)
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching + (Fairness)
- Dilemmas in daily practice + (Fairness)
- Be grossly unfair to your collaborators + (Fairness)
- Not acknowledging contributors who do not qualify for authorship + (Fairness)
- Unfair reviewing + (Fairness)
- Reasonable standards for career advancement + (Fairness)
- Teaching sensitive and controversial issues in divided societies + (Fairness)
- Empathy in History Research and Education + (Fairness)
- Guidance on the Management of Clinical Trials during the COVID-19 Pandemic + (Flexibility)
- Strategy for Gender Equality at the Swedish Research Council + (Gender Equality)
- How to be a good lab partner + (Collaborative spirit)
- The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity + (Honesty)
- Research Integrity Committees + (Good stewardship)
- Administrators and Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) + (Good stewardship)
- Data stewardship at TU Delft + (Good stewardship)
- Case Study Videos + (Honesty)
- Using data not created for research purposes in the context of collaboration with private companies + (Honesty)
- FAIR-Aware: Your first step towards your FAIR data(set). + (Transparency)
- Misconduct Ruling is Silent on Intent + (Reliability)
- The Threat to Scientific Integrity in Environmental and Occupational Medicine + (Reliability)
- Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel + (Reliability)
- From Case Management to Prevention of Scientific Dishonesty in Denmark + (Honesty)
- The Saga of Korean Women Who Provided Eggs for Embryonic Stem Cell Research + (Reliability)
- Global Code of Conduct for Research in Resource-Poor Settings + (Honesty)
- Research fraud on MMR vaccines + (Honesty)
- Duplicate publications and secondary publications + (Honesty)
- Guest Authorship, Mortality Reporting, and Integrity in Rofecoxib Studies + (Honesty)
- Final Findings of Scientific Misconduct + (Honesty)
- Baltimore Case - In Brief + (Reliability)
- Researchers Call For the Release of Findings of a Misconduct Investigation + (Reliability)
- The Extent and Causes of Academic Text Recycling or ‘Self-Plagiarism’ + (Honesty)
- Bothered and Bewildered But not Bewitched + (Honesty)
- Anonymity Revisited + (Respect)
- Forbidden Knowledge + (Honesty)
- The Whistleblower and Penn: A Final Accounting of Study 352 + (Honesty)
- Retracted WHO Reports on Opioid Guidelines + (Honesty)
- Geology Paper Has a Rocky Road is Now Retracted + (Reliability)
- One PhD student, a retraction, and an unconvincing rebuttal + (Honesty)
- Court Denies Appeal of HIV Fraudster’s 57-month Prison Sentence + (Honesty)
- Researcher 'Cherry Picked' Data, University Investigation Finds + (Honesty)
- Unlicensed usage of medical devices on patients: a case of accusations + (Respect)
- Criticism Swirls Around High-Profile History Book about North Korea + (Honesty)
- Industry involvement in scientific studies on SSRI's + (Reliability)
- The Epistemic Integrity of Scientific Research + (Reliability)
- Image Search Triggers Italian Police Probe + (Reliability)
- The Swiss Report on Homeopathy: A Case Study of Research Misconduct + (Honesty)
- The Paroxetine 352 Bipolar Trial: A Study in Medical Ghostwriting + (Reliability)
- Romanian Scientists Fight Plagiarism + (Honesty)
- Research Integrity and Conflicts of Interest: The Case of Unethical Research-Misconduct Charges + (Honesty)
- Reviewer’s Déjà Vu, French Science Sleuthing Uncover Plagiarized Papers + (Honesty)
- Research Ethics: Zero Tolerance + (Reliability)
- Perioperative Mischief: The Price of Academic Misconduct + (Reliability)
- Plagiarism Charge for Romanian Minister + (Honesty)
- Whistle-blower Claims his Accusations Cost him his Job + (Honesty)
- Paxil Study Under Fire + (Honesty)
- Conflicts of Interest in Research on Antipsychotic Treatment + (Reliability)
- Epistemic virtues + (Honesty)
- Predatory publishing + (Honesty)
- Academic Integrity Tutorial with Quiz + (Honesty)
- Open learning research ethics + (Honesty)
- ORI introduction to RCR + (Honesty)
- Printeger Upright + (Reliability)
- ORI Infographics + (Honesty)
- The Lab: Avoiding Research Misconduct + (Honesty)
- 3 things societies can do to promote research integrity + (Honesty)
- Research integrity list at KU Leuven + (Reliability)
- Academic integrity checklist + (Honesty)
- Fostering Integrity in Research + (Honesty)
- Responsible science: vol. 1 + (Respect)
- Responsible science: vol. 2 + (Honesty)
- Canadian Tri-agency framework: Responsible Conduct of Research + (Accountability)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition + (Honesty)
- Austrian Agency for Research Integrity Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice + (Transparency)
- Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals + (Honesty)
- Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity + (Honesty)
- Irish National Policy Statement on Ensuring Research Integrity + (Honesty)
- Age-Old Conflicts + (Honesty)
- Lapses in Oversight Compromise Omics Results + (Honesty)
- Ousted: Rule-Breaking Lundbeck CEO and Novartis Scientist Get the Boot + (Honesty)
- Carlo Croce: data falsification and other scientific misconduct + (Honesty)
- U.S. Finds Misconduct by Ex-Researchers at Chicago and UCSF + (Honesty)
- Questioning a Mentor + (Honesty)
- Valley of Sorrow + (Respect)
- Can a scientific paper be published anonymously? + (Honesty)
- Plagiarism in a PhD Thesis + (Honesty)
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Switzerland + (Accountability)
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Austria + (Accountability)
- Reusing Biopsy Material in New Publications, Image Manipulation and Fraudulent Research Protocols + (Honesty)
- Academic Affiliation and Research in a Personal Capacity + (Honesty)
- Disclosing Conflicts of Interest in Scientific Advice + (Honesty)
- University Investigation Finds Misconduct by Bone Researcher with 23 Retractions + (Reliability)
- Prominent Video Game-Violence Researcher Loses Another Paper to Retraction + (Reliability)
- Serbian Journal Lands in Hot Water After Challenge on 24 hour Peer Review That Cost 1785 euros + (Honesty)
- U.S. Gov’t Physicist Sentenced to 18 months in Prison for Fraud + (Honesty)
- Harvard Scientists Disciplined for Not Declaring Ties to Drug Companies + (Honesty)
- Jailed for Faking Data + (Honesty)
- What is Recklessness in Scientific Research? + (Reliability)
- The Legacy of the Hwang Case: Research Misconduct in Biosciences + (Reliability)
- A Medical Ghostwriter’s Personal View + (Honesty)
- Fraud in Fluid Resuscitation Research + (Honesty)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Unauthorised Translation + (Honesty)
- Research Integrity: Sabotage! + (Respect)
- Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science + (Reliability)
- Sitting in Judgement + (Reliability)
- Artificial tracheas and severe research misconduct + (Honesty)
- UK Concordat to Support Research Integrity + (Honesty)
- Head of research integrity initiative in China alleged of reseach misconduct + (Reliability)
- The Ethics of Pharmaceutical Research Funding: A Social Organization Approach + (Honesty)
- Peer review + (Honesty)
- Supervision Guidelines + (Accountability)
- Traver paper: The Unique Case of a Published Delusion + (Reliability)
- Psychology Grad Student Faked Data + (Honesty)
- Rampant Plagiarism in Two Journals + (Honesty)
- Scientific Misconduct at an Elite Medical Institute: The Role of Competing Institutional Logics and Fragmented Control + (Honesty)
- Simultaneous Submission Leading to Duplicate Publication + (Honesty)
- Responsible Authorship and Peer Review - Columbia RCR Course, Module 3 + (Honesty)
- Medical students' decisions about authorship in disputable situations: intervention study + (Honesty)
- A comparison of online versus on-site training in health research methodology: a randomized study + (Honesty)
- Online course: Teaching the Responsible Conduct of Research in Humans + (Honesty)
- Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content. + (Honesty)
- The Nuremberg Code + (Accountability)
- Declaration of Helsinki + (Honesty)
- Conflict of interests + (Honesty)
- European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC) + (Honesty)
- Informed assent + (Honesty)
- Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct + (Honesty)
- The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud + (Reliability)
- Conflict of interest in peer review + (Honesty)
- Fabrication + (Honesty)
- Inappropriate authorship + (Honesty)
- Outcome reporting bias + (Honesty)
- Perverse incentives + (Accountability)
- Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors + (Honesty)
- Salami publication + (Honesty)
- Spin of research results + (Honesty)
- Self-plagiarism + (Honesty)
- FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results + (Honesty)
- Retractions: correcting the scientific literature + (Honesty)
- Authorship criteria + (Honesty)
- Networks and projects promoting research integrity + (Honesty)
- A Case Study about Anonymization and Secondary Use of Qualitative Data + (Respect)
- Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- Intellectual property rights in research collaborations + (Honesty)
- Standards of authorship + (Honesty)
- Case-based ethics instruction: the influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making + (Accountability)
- Publication bias (positive results) + (Accountability)
- Image Integrity + (Honesty)
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity + (Accountability)
- Research Ethics + (Accountability)
- Research metrics + (Accountability)
- ALLEA Permanent Working Group Science and Ethics + (Accountability)
- Changing a grant proposal to meet the reviewers requests + (Reliability)
- UK Research Council's Policy and Guidelines on Governance of Good Research Conduct + (Honesty)
- Research Integrity: Podcast Series + (Honesty)
- Research Integrity Practices in Science Europe Member Organizations + (Honesty)
- Philosopher Earns 14th Retraction for Plagiarism + (Honesty)
- Danish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity + (Honesty)
- Grey areas of plagiarism: 10 scenarios to discuss with students + (Honesty)
- Committee on Publication Ethics Guidelines on How to Handle Authorship Disputes + (Honesty)
- Research Integrity - Detecting and determining greyscales + (Honesty)
- Five simple rules to avoid plagiarism + (Honesty)
- Responsible Conduct in the Global Research Enterprise: A Policy Report + (Accountability)
- Scientific Research: Dilemmas and Temptations (booklet of cases) + (Honesty)
- The Culture of Scientific Research in the UK + (Honesty)
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Finland + (Accountability)
- Nine pitfalls of research misconduct + (Reliability)
- Funders + (Honesty)
- Online Module: Responsible research and Peer Review + (Honesty)
- Biologist Spared Jail For Grant Fraud + (Reliability)
- A University of Liverpool investigation determined that a former researcher there fabricated his data + (Diligence)
- Dubious Peer Reviews Lead to 10 Retractions + (Accountability)
- Plagiarism + (Honesty)
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Publication Recommendations + (Reliability)
- Turning a blind eye to breaches of integrity + (Honesty)
- Author Misconduct: Not Just the Editors' Responsibility + (Honesty)
- Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- How trustworthy? + (Reliability)
- A Plagiarism Adventure (Et Plagieringseventyr) + (Honesty)
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching +
- A Japanese developmental biology center, scientific misconduct and suicide + (Reliability)
- Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations + (Respect)
- Deception by Research Participants + (Reliability)
- Industry funded research + (Honesty)
- Research misconduct + (Honesty)
- How I Was Nearly Duped into 'Authoring' a Fake Paper + (Honesty)
- Responsible conduct of biomedical research : collaborative research + (Accountability)
- Research integrity training for PhD students + (Accountability)
- The Dilemma Game + (Accountability)
- Non-disclosure of changes to the research design + (Honesty)
- Unfair reviewing + (Honesty)
- Fake peer-reviewing + (Honesty)
- Balancing harms and benefits + (Respect)
- Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity + (Honesty)
- Responsible Research and Innovation - RRI + (Honesty)
- Statistical pre-registration + (Honesty)
- AllTrials campaign + (Reliability)
- Peer review card game + (Respect)
- Serious gaming in research integrity education + (Curiosity)
- Reward campaign + (Honesty)
- Inferring from P-values + (Honesty)
- Insufficiently reported study flaws and limitations + (Honesty)
- Intellectual conflicts of interest + (Honesty)
- The role of moral philosophy in the divide between science and non-science + (Reliability)
- FOSTER project workshop + (Honesty)
- Avoiding Plagiarism, Self-plagiarism, and Other Questionable Writing Practices: A Guide to Ethical Writing + (Honesty)
- Online Learning Tool for Research Integrity and Image Processing + (Accountability)
- Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials + (Reliability)
- Forensic Statistics to detect Data Fabrication + (Honesty)
- Inaccurate representation of results in the media + (Accuracy)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Magazine Surprise + (Honesty)
- Implications of a Single Highly Cited Article on a Journal and Its Citation Indexes + (Reliability)
- Reflexive Principlism as an Effective Approach for Developing Ethical Reasoning in Engineering + (Respect)
- Reducing the incidence of plagiarism in an undergraduate course: The role of education + (Honesty)
- Using student generated codes of conduct in the classroom to reinforce business ethics education + (Honesty)
- Avoiding twisted pixels: ethical guidelines for the appropriate use and manipulation of scientific digital images + (Honesty)
- Publication planning: promoting an ethics of transparency and integrity in biomedical research + (Transparency)
- Responsible conduct in research + (Respect)
- The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes + (Honesty)
- Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition + (Honesty)
- Business Ethics Perspectives: Faculty Plagiarism and Fraud + (Honesty)
- Promoting responsible conduct in research through "survival skills" workshops: some mentoring is best done in a crowd + (Honesty)
- An empirical research study of the efficacy of two plagiarism-detection applications + (Honesty)
- Application of a sensemaking approach to ethics training in the physical sciences and engineering + (Honesty)
- Fostering integrity in postgraduate research: an evidence-based policy and support framework + (Responsibility)
- A Survey of Doctoral Education in Communication Research Ethics + (Honesty)
- Six domains of research ethics. A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research + (Honesty)
- COPE Cases + (Accountability)
- Central statistical monitoring: detecting fraud in clinical trials + (Honesty)
- A virtue ethics guide to best practices for community-based participatory research + (Compassion)
- Outcomes assessment of role-play scenarios for teaching responsible conduct of research + (Honesty)