Search by property
From The Embassy of Good Science
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- Feedback of findings in genome-wide association studies + (Authors)
- Rights to Authorship + (Authors)
- Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers + (Authors)
- Guidance on the Management of Clinical Trials during the COVID-19 Pandemic + (All stakeholders in research)
- Guest Post — Unethical Practices in Research and Publishing: Evidence from Russia + (Journal editors)
- One in six of the papers you cite in a review has been retracted. What do you do? + (Academic staff)
- The rector who resigned after plagiarizing a student’s PhD thesis + (Academic staff)
- Divorce study felled by a coding error gets a second chance + (Authors)
- Itinerant legal scholar who claimed Tufts affiliation up to 10 retractions + (Authors)
- Gluten-free turkeys? Paper on dangers of wheat-based diet in birds retracted + (Authors)
- Ten journals denied 2020 Impact Factors because of excessive self-citation or “citation stacking” + (Authors)
- Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences' Guideline on Authorship in Scientific Publications + (Authors)
- Communicate results to the general public before a peer reviewed publication is available + (Researchers)
- New claim to authorship of published paper + (Academic staff)
- Self-plagiarism case prompts calls for agencies to tighten rules + (Researchers)
- Author misconduct: Not just the editors' responsibility + (Academic institutions)
- Authorship Deserved, Not Earned: Research Ethics and Research Integrity Scenario + (Academic institutions)
- SPOC: Integrity in academic publication: authorship and peer review + (PhD Students)
- Not asking permission from contributors for the wording of the acknowledgement + (Academic staff)
- Affiliations + (Academic institutions)
- Predatory publishing + (PhD Students)
- Research Integrity: Podcast Series + (Bachelor students)
- Bioethics: an introduction + (Bachelor students)
- HEIRRI courses + (Research integrity trainers)
- University of Montana online research ethics course + (Bachelor students)
- Protecting research subjects + (PhD students)
- Grey areas of plagiarism: 10 scenarios to discuss with students + (All stakeholders in research)
- Criticism Swirls Around High-Profile History Book about North Korea + (Researchers)
- Scientific Research: Dilemmas and Temptations (booklet of cases) + (Bachelor students)
- Serious gaming in research integrity education + (Bachelor students)
- Research with humans + (Researchers)
- Inadequately handle or store data or (bio)materials + (All stakeholders in research)
- Integrity Factor Glossary + (All stakeholders in research)
- Path2Integrity Campaign + (Academic institutions)
- Path2Integrity Learning Card S0: Good research is based on honesty + (Bachelor students)
- Path2Integrity + (Academic institutions)
- Path2Integrity Learning Cards + (All stakeholders in research)
- Ethical issues of involving children with disabilities in research + (Authors)
- Mentoring: expectations + (Supervisors)
- DATA MINDFULNESS: Making the most of your dissertation + (Bachelor students)
- An issue with insufficient data in the survey-resulting in a non-representative sample +
- Respectable and honest supervision ensures responsible and ethical research in the future. + (Peer reviewers)
- Integrity Games - a research based learning platform on academic integrity aimed at undergraduate university students + (Bachelor students)
- An issue with insufficient data in the survey-resulting in a non-representative sample + (All stakeholders in research)
- Integrity Games + (Undergraduate students)
- NTU (Nanyang Technological University) Responding to Allegations/Complaints of Research Misconduct + (Academic staff)
- Ethics defined: a glossary + (All stakeholders in research)
- Climate science controversies and the demand for access to empirical data + (Citizen Scientists)
- Open science outlook 1: status and trends around the world + (Academic institutions)
- Protection of Research Participants + (Citizen Scientists)
- Rights of Citizen Scientists + (Citizen Scientists)
- Quality of research outputs and data sets + (Citizen Scientists)
- Conflicts of interest in citizen science + (All stakeholders in research)
- Risks to the environment, animals, plants, and ecosystems + (All stakeholders in research)
- Ethical and Societal Foundations of Open Science + (All stakeholders in research)
- AI Sustainability in Practice Part Two: Sustainability Throughout the AI Workflow + (Everyone)
- AI Ethics and Governance in Practice: AI Fairness in Practice + (Public Sector)
- AI Sustainability in Practice Part One: Foundations for Sustainable AI Projects + (Public Sector)
- Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safety: A guide for the responsible design and implementation of AI systems in the public sector + (Civil Service)
- Human Rights Education for Legal Professionals (HELP) Online Training + (Graduate students)
- Responsible Research and Innovation - RRI + (Researchers)
- Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage + (Administrators)
- ROSiE General Guidelines on Responsible Open Science + (All stakeholders in research)
- AI Ethics and Governance in Practice: An Introduction + (Everyone)
- Teaching and Learning the Techniques of Conflict Resolution for Challenging Ethics Consultations + (Clinical ethics consultants)
- Publishing complications and patient safety + (Research Ethics Committees)
- The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine + (Human rights defenders)
- “There can be no justification for such studies”: Paper on artificial eyes for dogs earns expression of concern + (Ethics committee members)
- It’s Time to Get Serious About Research Fraud + (Academic institutions)
- Blinded by Private Conflict – Choosing Ego Over Professionalism + (students)
- Obstructive sleep apnoea + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Ethics and children's rights: learning from past mistakes + (Clinical researchers)
- The influence of pharmaceutical company on drug availability + (Academic staff)
- Anonymisation and pseudonymisation + (PhD Students)
- Guidelines for Tailoring the Informed Consent Process in Clinical Studies + (Clinical researchers)
- Failed Patenting Negotiations in Collaborative Research + (Clinical researchers)
- Banked Samples and HD Testing + (Clinical researchers)
- Reporting Adverse Effects + (Clinical researchers)
- Research or Services? + (Clinical researchers)
- Studying Vulnerable Individuals + (Clinical researchers)
- Political points + (Early career researchers)
- The Suspect Questionnaire + (Academic institutions)
- Ethical guidance for research with a potential for human enhancement + (Academic staff)
- Dutch psychology fraudster avoids trial + (Academic staff)
- You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues + (Clinical ethics consultants)
- You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues + (Clinical ethics consultants)
- You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues + (Clinical ethics consultants)
- Declaration of Geneva + (Clinical ethics consultants)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity + (All stakeholders in research)
- European Charter of Patients' Rights + (Clinical ethics consultants)
- Macchiarini may be dismissed from Karolinska; dean of research resigns + (Clinical researchers)
- The Olivieri Debacle: Where Were the Heroes of Bioethics? + (Researchers)
- Jesse's Intent + (Researchers)
- Possible omission of information essential for conclusions in a research paper + (Academic institutions)
- Sponsorship of drug and device studies by the manufacturing company + (Clinical researchers)
- Informed consent in psychiatry + (Authors)
- Methods to increase data availability + (Authors)
- CRISPR twins – an unethical practice + (PhD Students)
- ICH Guidelines + (medical researchers)
- International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects + (Clinical researchers)
- The European Union Good Clinical Practice Directive + (Clinical researchers)
- The European Union Clinical Trials Directive + (Clinical researchers)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition + (All stakeholders in research)
- Publication and data ownership + (Collaborating researchers)
- Robbers, Rogues or Revolutionaries: Handling Armed Intimidation + (Collaborating researchers)
- The Case of the Missing Artefact + (Collaborating researchers)
- The Case of the Damaged Baby + (Academic staff)
- Backstage Maneuvers + (Funding institutions)
- Slow Code + (Anthropologists)
- Site Unseen + (Collaborating researchers)
- Honorary or gift authorship + (Early career researchers)
- Take no full responsibility for the integrity of the research project and its reports + (Researchers)
- The Swiss National Science Foundation and National Research Council's Regulations on scientific misconduct + (Academic institutions)
- Be grossly unfair to your collaborators + (Research institutions)
- How to be a good lab partner + (Bachelor students)
- Collaboration In Research + (Academic institutions)
- https://www.unl.edu/gradstudies/connections/best-practices-collaborating-research + (PhD Students)
- Research collaboration + (PhD Students)
- Clarifying the aims of a research study + (Academic institutions)
- EQIPD (Enhancing Quality in Preclinical Data) + (PhD Students)
- Community's of Practice Datamanagement & Privacy + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines on Supervision - PhD guidelines + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on Responsible Supervision and Leadership - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Academic staff)
- Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC) + (Researchers)
- Imputation of missing data in clinical trials + (All stakeholders in research)
- Introduction to Research Integrity and Good Scientific Practices + (Academic staff)
- Internet Research Ethics + (Researchers)
- Rules of Data-Sharing in Collaborative and Non-Collaborative Research + (Data protection officers)
- Rules of Data-Sharing in Collaborative and Non-Collaborative Research + (Data protection officers)
- UK Research Integrity Office's Code of Practice for Research + (All stakeholders in research)
- Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis regarding logothetis vs. shmuel and leopold + (Academic institutions)
- A Data Governance Framework for Ethnography + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Vulnerable Populations + (Researchers)
- Reward campaign + (Researchers)
- The Orphan Embryos: A Case Study in Bioethics + (Decision makers)
- Grading the quality of evidence in clinical practice guidelines + (Clinical researchers)
- The Limits of Expertise + (Research subjects)
- Possible Conflict of Interest + (Attorneys)
- SIENNA - Stakeholder-informed ethics for new technologies with high socio-economic and human rights impact + (Academic institutions)
- Declaration of Istanbul + (All stakeholders in research)
- European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) + (All stakeholders in research)
- The European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (ECHRBmed) + (All stakeholders in research)
- UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights + (All stakeholders in research)
- COMET Initiative + (Researchers)
- The decision on ice + (health care professionals)
- NTU (Nanyang Technological University) Research Integrity Policy + (Academic institutions)
- Human rights, democracy, and the rule of law assurance framework for AI systems: A proposal + (Activists)
- KFPE Guide - 11 Principles & 7 Questions + (Researchers)
- 'Climate Skeptic' Journal Shuttered Following 'Malpractice' in 'Nepotistic' Reviewer Selections + (Doctoral students)
- An issue with insufficient data in the survey-resulting in a non-representative sample + (Doctoral students)
- An issue with insufficient data in the survey-resulting in a non-representative sample + (Doctoral students)
- Case Study Videos + (Doctoral students)
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Doctoral students)
- DATA MINDFULNESS: Making the most of your dissertation + (Doctoral students)
- Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Doctoral students)
- Ethics defined: a glossary + (Doctoral students)
- Guidance on the Management of Clinical Trials during the COVID-19 Pandemic + (Doctoral students)
- How to be a good lab partner + (Doctoral students)
- Introduction to Research Integrity and Good Scientific Practices + (Doctoral students)
- Introduction: Guidelines and Discrepancies + (Doctoral students)
- NTU (Nanyang Technological University) Research Integrity Policy + (Doctoral students)
- NTU (Nanyang Technological University) Responding to Allegations/Complaints of Research Misconduct + (Doctoral students)
- Path2Integrity Campaign + (Doctoral students)
- Philosophical Justifications for Human Subjects Research + (Doctoral students)
- Poor mentoring or supervision of early career researcherers + (Doctoral students)
- Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Doctoral students)
- Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Doctoral students)
- Research Ethics + (Doctoral students)
- Research Ethics: Zero Tolerance + (Doctoral students)
- Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Doctoral students)
- Research integrity - what is means, why it is important and how we might protect it + (Doctoral students)
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Doctoral students)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Doctoral students)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on Responsible Supervision and Leadership - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Doctoral students)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines on Supervision - PhD guidelines + (Doctoral students)
- Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Doctoral students)
- Scientific Research: Dilemmas and Temptations (booklet of cases) + (Doctoral students)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Background Section + (Doctoral students)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Magazine Surprise + (Doctoral students)
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity + (Doctoral students)
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity + (Doctoral students)
- The EQUATOR Network: Reporting guidelines + (Doctoral students)
- Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Doctoral students)
- Vulnerable Populations + (Doctoral students)
- Where are they now? + (Doctoral students)
- The influence of pharmaceutical company on drug availability + (Doctoral students)
- Methods to increase data availability + (Doctoral students)
- The ethics of managing a laboratory or research group + (Doctoral students)
- Informed consent in psychiatry + (Doctoral students)
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching + (Doctoral students)
- Imposter Syndrome + (Doctoral students)
- Path2Integrity + (Doctoral students)
- Clarifying the aims of a research study + (Doctoral students)
- SCImago Journal Rankings + (Doctoral students)
- Respectable and honest supervision ensures responsible and ethical research in the future. + (Doctoral students)
- Local resources on improving science: basic study + (PhD Students)
- Long Distance Collaboration + (Researchers)
- Questioning a Mentor + (Researchers)
- Introduction to Research Integrity and Good Scientific Practices + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines on Supervision - PhD guidelines + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on Responsible Supervision and Leadership - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Academic staff)
- European Network of Research Integrity Offices Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct + (Researchers)
- European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI) + (Research Integrity Officers)
- Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct + (Research Integrity Officers)
- PRBB Code of Good Scientific Practice + (All stakeholders in research)
- ENERI Classroom + (Research Integrity Officers)
- Resources for research ethics education + (Early career researchers)
- Mantra (research data management training) + (Early career researchers)
- Academic Integrity Tutorial with Quiz + (Early career researchers)
- ORI introduction to RCR + (All stakeholders in research)
- COPE core practices + (Early career researchers)
- Printeger Upright + (Early career researchers)
- Training modules and guidelines on mentorship + (Supervisors)
- The Rotterdam Dilemma Game + (Early career researchers)
- Peer review card exchange game + (Early career researchers)
- A Plagiarism Adventure (Et Plagieringseventyr) + (Early career researchers)
- Nine pitfalls of research misconduct + (Early career researchers)
- Research Integrity: Podcast Series + (Bachelor students)
- Bioethics: an introduction + (Bachelor students)
- Committee on Publication Ethics Guidelines on How to Handle Authorship Disputes + (Early career researchers)
- Responsible Authorship and Peer Review - Columbia RCR Course, Module 3 + (Early career researchers)
- Case-based ethics instruction: the influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making + (Early career researchers)
- University of Montana online research ethics course + (Bachelor students)
- Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content. + (PhD students)
- Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity + (PhD students)
- Informed assent + (Junior researchers)
- Informed consent + (Junior researchers)
- Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Industry involvement in scientific studies on SSRI's + (Researchers)
- Standards of authorship + (phd students)
- Anonymity Revisited + (Researchers)
- Research Ethics + (Researchers)
- Research integrity - what is means, why it is important and how we might protect it + (Researchers)
- Authorship and publication + (PhD Students)
- Research culture + (Researchers)
- Research Ethics: Zero Tolerance + (Researchers)
- Five simple rules to avoid plagiarism + (All stakeholders in research)
- Scientific Research: Dilemmas and Temptations (booklet of cases) + (Bachelor students)
- Handling of Sexual Harassment Case Poses Larger Questions at Yale + (Researchers)
- Case Study Videos +
- Research integrity training for diverse disciplines + (Early career researchers)
- Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching + (Academic staff)
- A Japanese developmental biology center, scientific misconduct and suicide + (Researchers)
- Belgian Code of Ethics for Scientific Research + (All stakeholders in research)
- Mental health in academia + (All stakeholders in research)
- Responsible conduct of biomedical research : collaborative research + (All stakeholders in research)
- Privacy in research + (PhD students)
- Research integrity training for PhD students + (PhD students)
- Serious gaming in research integrity education + (Bachelor students)
- H-index + (Funders)
- Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity + (PhD students)
- Peer Review. The nuts and bolts + (Early career researchers)
- Prospective registration of clinical trials + (PhD students)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Magazine Surprise + (Researchers)
- Questionable Research Practices in Study Design + (Early career researchers)
- Questionable Research Practices in Data Collection + (Early career researchers)
- Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and Reporting + (Early career researchers)
- Questionable Research Practices in Collaboration + (All stakeholders in research)
- People Studying People: Research Ethics in Society + (Early career researchers)
- Becoming an Ethical Researcher + (Early career researchers)
- Publication + (Early career researchers)
- Definition of plagiarism: Phrasing + (Authors)
- Path2Integrity Learning Cards + (All stakeholders in research)
- Show Me The Money! + (Early career researchers)
- Psychologist made up sex bias results + (Early career researchers)
- What my retraction taught me + (Academic staff)
- Research Integrity Advisors + (PhD students)
- Path2Integrity Campaign + (Academic institutions)
- Path2Integrity + (Academic institutions)
- Protocol Violations Putting Animal Subjects in Harm’s Way + (Early career researchers)
- Researchers Pressured to Store Animal Subjects + (Academic institutions)
- Co-Authorship Conflicts + (Early career researchers)
- Inconsistent Findings Between Trainee and Researcher + (Early career researchers)
- Political points + (Early career researchers)
- Procrastinating Researcher Delegates Grant Reviews to Trainee + (Supervisors)
- Rainy Days for a Struggling Mentee + (Early career researchers)
- Selling Out? Making Deals with Other Institutions + (Early career researchers)
- Accuracy of Credentials and Competence in Public Communications + (Researchers)
- Statements About Professional Experience + (Early career researchers)
- Research by Students + (Graduate and postgraduate students)
- ORI comes down (hard) on Bengu Sezen, Columbia chemist accused of fraud + (PhD Students)
- On Goffman: Ethnography and the Ethics of Care + (Academic institutions)
- Guidance on the Management of Clinical Trials during the COVID-19 Pandemic + (All stakeholders in research)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity + (All stakeholders in research)
- Honorary or gift authorship + (Early career researchers)
- Policy documents of the German Rectors’ Conference (HRK) + (Academic institutions)
- Case Study: Beginning a Collaboration + (PhD students)
- FAIR-Aware: Your first step towards your FAIR data(set). + (Academic staff)
- Where are they now? + (Early career researchers)
- Poor mentoring or supervision of early career researcherers + (Academic staff)
- Institutional codes of conduct for research integrity + (Academic staff)
- NTU (Nanyang Technological University) Research Integrity Policy + (Academic institutions)
- NTU (Nanyang Technological University) Responding to Allegations/Complaints of Research Misconduct + (Academic staff)
- Affiliations + (Academic institutions)
- Ethics defined: a glossary + (All stakeholders in research)
- Confidentiality + (PhD students)
- Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition + (All stakeholders in research)
- Duplicate publications and secondary publications + (Researchers)
- Organised Crime Against the Academic Peer Review System + (Editors)
- Predatory publishing + (PhD Students)
- Altmetrics + (PhD students)
- INSPIRE Checklist + (Policy makers)
- Post-publication peer review + (Journal editors)
- Can a scientific paper be published anonymously? + (Researchers)
- Baltimore Case - In Brief + (Researchers)
- The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud + (Researchers)
- Peer review + (Scientists)
- Philosopher Earns 14th Retraction for Plagiarism + (Researchers)
- The SOPs4RI project + (Policy makers)
- Platform for Responsible Editorial Policies (PREP) + (Journal editors)
- 'Climate Skeptic' Journal Shuttered Following 'Malpractice' in 'Nepotistic' Reviewer Selections + (Researchers)
- Dubious Peer Reviews Lead to 10 Retractions + (Researchers)
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Publication Recommendations + (All stakeholders in research)
- Turning a blind eye to breaches of integrity + (Researchers)
- Editorial conflicts of interest + (Editors)
- Unfair reviewing + (All stakeholders in research)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Unauthorised Translation + (Researchers)
- Implications of a Single Highly Cited Article on a Journal and Its Citation Indexes + (Researchers)
- COPE Cases + (Editors)
- The INSPIRE project + (Policy makers)
- Reproducibility of methodology + (Editors)
- Self-plagiarism and suspected salami publishing + (Researchers)
- It’s Still Plagiarism + (Academic staff)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: Another Magazine Surprise + (Researchers)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Review Article + (Researchers)
- A Reflection on Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research + (Researchers)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Disputes in Authorship (1) + (Researchers)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Disputes in Authorship (2) + (Researchers)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Editorial Misconduct + (Researchers)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Multiple Submissions (1) + (Researchers)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Multiple Submissions (2) + (Researchers)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Redundant Publication + (Researchers)
- Environmental journal pulls two papers for “compromised” peer review + (Editors)
- Major indexing service rejects appeals by two suppressed journals + (Editors)
- Journal calls 2012 paper “deeply offensive to particular minorities” + (Researchers)
- Itinerant legal scholar who claimed Tufts affiliation up to 10 retractions + (Authors)
- Ten journals denied 2020 Impact Factors because of excessive self-citation or “citation stacking” + (Authors)
- Not acknowledging contributors who do not qualify for authorship + (Researchers)
- Data fabrication in a rejected manuscript + (Academic institutions)
- Misconduct: the stars who fell to earth + (Academic staff)
- Plagiarism scandal grows in Iran + (Academic institutions)
- Retracted gay-marriage study debated at misconduct meet-up + (Academic institutions)
- Good-Practice Guide for Scientific-Academic Publishing (CSIC, Spain) + (Researchers)
- SCImago Journal Rankings + (Academic staff)
- Not asking permission from contributors for the wording of the acknowledgement + (Academic staff)
- Digital humanities + (Researchers)
- Research Reproducibility + (Junior researchers)
- Path2Integrity Learning Card S0: Good research is based on honesty + (Bachelor students)
- Path2Integrity Handbooks for Teachers and Trainers + (Research integrity trainers)
- Use Historical Empathy to Help Students Process the World Today + (Researchers)
- The AVATAR method: historical empathy through imagination + (Researchers)
- Greek Cypriot students’ ideas of historical empathy: a case study exploration of 9 -12 years old students’ ideas about practices in the past + (Researcher)
- Teaching about the First World War today: Historical empathy and participatory citizenship + (Researchers)
- Empathy in History Research and Education + (Researchers)
- Path2Integrity "RI in Curricula" map + (Educators)
- Teaching sensitive and controversial issues in divided societies + (Researchers)
- Bias in Historical Description, Interpretation, and Explanation + (Researchers)
- The Tadpole Paper Mill + (Researchers)
- Manuscript Guidelines Journals + (Researchers)
- Clinical Trials and Drug Promotion: Selective Reporting of Study 329 + (Researchers)
- Ignoring substantial safety risks of the study to participants, workers or environment + (Researchers)
- Developing an ethical and reflexive mindset in emerging childhood researchers. + (Ethics committee members)
- Plagiarism charge for Romanian minister - Scandal adds to fears that country’s research reform is in peril + (Academic institutions)
- The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’ + (Academic institutions)
- Fraud and dishonesty in "scientific" publication + (Mentors)
- Retraction notice - fake email peer-review + (Academic institutions)
- Respectable and honest supervision ensures responsible and ethical research in the future. + (Peer reviewers)
- The decision on ice + (health care professionals)
- Integrity Games - a research based learning platform on academic integrity aimed at undergraduate university students + (Bachelor students)
- Ethical considerations in dealing with human remains + (Educators)
- Vulnerable Populations + (Researchers)
- Imposter Syndrome + (Academic institutions)
- ROSiE General Guidelines on Responsible Open Science + (All stakeholders in research)
- Declaration of Helsinki + (PhD Students)
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights + (PhD Students)
- Research with animals + (Ethics committee members)
- Whistleblower protection/rights + (PhD Students)
- Conflicts with Community Leaders + (Researchers)
- Research ethics committees + (Ethics committee members)
- Protecting research subjects + (PhD students)
- The Unfortunate Experiment + (Researchers)
- Reusing Biopsy Material in New Publications, Image Manipulation and Fraudulent Research Protocols + (Researchers)
- Disclosing Conflicts of Interest in Scientific Advice + (Researchers)
- Lapses in Oversight Compromise Omics Results + (Researchers)
- Hungarian Academy of Sciences' Science Ethics Code + (Researchers)
- Research misconduct + (Students)
- Oviedo Convention + (Ethics committee members)
- Balancing harms and benefits + (All stakeholders in research)
- The impact of the GDPR on scientific data + (Students)
- European Commission Guidance on Research on Refugees, Asylum Seekers & Migrants + (Researchers)
- Research ethics committee members' skills + (Ethics committee members)
- Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials + (phd students)
- The Orphan Embryos: A Case Study in Bioethics + (Decision makers)
- Publishing complications and patient safety + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Guidelines for Tailoring the Informed Consent Process in Clinical Studies + (Clinical researchers)
- Slow Code + (Anthropologists)
- 04 - Moral Case Deliberation: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Researchers)
- 03 - Four Quadrant Approach: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Researchers)
- SIENNA - Stakeholder-informed ethics for new technologies with high socio-economic and human rights impact + (Academic institutions)
- Ethics, Human Rights and HIV Vaccine Trials in Low-Income Settings + (Researchers)
- Springer Nature ‘continuing to investigate the concerns raised’ about paper linking obesity and lying + (Peer reviewers)
- “There can be no justification for such studies”: Paper on artificial eyes for dogs earns expression of concern + (Ethics committee members)
- Everything We Know About Facebook's Secret Mood Manipulation Experiment. It was probably legal. But was it ethical? + (Ethics committee members)
- Criminologist to have four papers retracted following months of scrutiny + (Ethics committee members)
- Handling of Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries: Early stages in the 1990's + (researchers)
- Declaration of Istanbul + (All stakeholders in research)
- European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) + (All stakeholders in research)
- Investigation ends in 6th retraction for Voinnet + (Academic institutions)
- Declaration of Geneva + (Clinical ethics consultants)
- The European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (ECHRBmed) + (All stakeholders in research)
- 06 - Teaching Research Ethics Tool : A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics + (Researchers)
- 05 - REalistiC Decisions: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Researchers)
- European Charter of Patients' Rights + (Clinical ethics consultants)
- MedTech Europe Code of Ethical Business Practice + (Ethics committee members)