Search by property
From The Embassy of Good Science
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- Questionable Research Practices in Data Collection + (Early career researchers)
- Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and Reporting + (Early career researchers)
- Questionable Research Practices in Collaboration + (All stakeholders in research)
- Data Handling and Record Keeping + (Graduate students)
- Definition of plagiarism: Phrasing + (Authors)
- Duty to Report Ethical Violations of Others + (Academic staff)
- Research Reproducibility + (Junior researchers)
- Selective citation + (Students)
- Research Integrity Advisors + (PhD students)
- Anonymisation and pseudonymisation + (PhD Students)
- Intellectual Rights Involving Multiple Institutions + (Junior researchers)
- Robbing the Grave: Investigator Takes Ownership of Deceased Scholar’s Work + (Junior researchers)
- Research with children + (Ethics committee members)
- Virtues in research integrity + (PhD Students)
- Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) + (Junior researchers)
- SPOC: Integrity in academic publication: authorship and peer review + (PhD Students)
- Responsible Research through supervision, mentoring and working together + (PhD Students)
- SPOC: Data in responsible conduct of research + (PhD Students)
- Araştırma doğruluğu konusuna giriş + (Researchers)
- Confidentiality + (PhD students)
- Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Peer-mentored research development meeting: a model for successful peer mentoring among junior level researchers + (Students)
- Keeping inadequate notes of the research process + (Qualitative researchers)
- The Orphan Embryos: A Case Study in Bioethics + (Decision makers)
- Show Me The Money! + (Early career researchers)
- Fraud, errors and gamesmanship in experimental toxicology: GM potatoes + (Laboratory researchers)
- Ethics of ageing + (Academic institutions)
- Banked Samples and HD Testing + (Clinical researchers)
- Data acquisition + (Laboratory researchers)
- Hazardous materials + (Advisors of students)
- The European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (ECHRBmed) + (All stakeholders in research)
- How to be a good lab partner + (Bachelor students)
- The ethics of managing a laboratory or research group + (Academic institutions)
- Collaboration In Research + (Academic institutions)
- ICH Guidelines + (medical researchers)
- Image Manipulation Detection - Exercises + (Academic institutions)
- Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC) + (Researchers)
- Affiliations + (Academic institutions)
- Open access Publication in the European Research Area for Social Sciences and Humanities (OPERAS) + (Researchers)
- “Five steps to decide what data to keep: a checklist for appraising research data” + (Researchers)
- Predatory publishing + (PhD Students)
- Case-based ethics instruction: the influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making + (Early career researchers)
- Grey areas of plagiarism: 10 scenarios to discuss with students + (All stakeholders in research)
- Scientific Research: Dilemmas and Temptations (booklet of cases) + (Bachelor students)
- EQIPD (Enhancing Quality in Preclinical Data) + (PhD Students)
- Research with humans + (Researchers)
- Inadequately handle or store data or (bio)materials + (All stakeholders in research)
- Path2Integrity Learning Cards + (All stakeholders in research)
- Path2Integrity Campaign + (Academic institutions)
- Path2Integrity + (Academic institutions)
- Ethical issues of involving children with disabilities in research + (Authors)
- Mentoring: expectations + (Supervisors)
- FAIR-Aware: Your first step towards your FAIR data(set). + (Academic staff)
- DATA MINDFULNESS: Making the most of your dissertation + (Bachelor students)
- Integrity Games + (Undergraduate students)
- Ethics defined: a glossary + (All stakeholders in research)
- A Japanese developmental biology center, scientific misconduct and suicide + (Researchers)
- ORI - The Office of Research Integrity + (General public)
- Inaccurate representation of results in the media + (Media)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: Another Magazine Surprise + (Researchers)
- Eforcement Agencies and the Protection of Human Subjects + (All stakeholders in research)
- The future of scientific justice: the case of The Sceptical Environmentalist + (Academic institutions)
- Facebook Manipulated 689,003 Users' Emotions For Science + (Policy-makers)
- Croatia's science minister rejects calls to resign amid plagiarism scandal + (Academic institutions)
- Research Integrity champions + (Research performing organisations)
- PhD and Supervisor charter (KU Leuven) + (PhD Students)
- Superb Supervision: integrity training for supervisors + (Supervisors)
- KU Leuven - Supervisor tips to promote research integrity + (Supervisors)
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching + (Academic staff)
- Reporting violations + (Mentors)
- Mentoring: disabilities + (Mentors)
- The Nutty Professor + (Researchers)
- When is Advanced Training Necessary? + (Students)
- Introduction to Responsible Supervision, Mentoring and Role-modeling + (Research integrity trainers)
- Where are they now? + (Early career researchers)
- The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’ + (Academic institutions)
- Fraud and dishonesty in "scientific" publication + (Mentors)
- Retraction notice - fake email peer-review + (Academic institutions)
- Blinded by Private Conflict – Choosing Ego Over Professionalism + (students)
- Poor mentoring or supervision of early career researcherers + (Academic staff)
- Methods to increase data availability + (Authors)
- Guideline for discussing work-related stress + (Supervisors)
- Unwritten expectations in doctoral training: research integrity scenario + (PhD Students)
- Diner Pensant Workshop + (Researchers)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on continuous research integrity education + (Supervisors)
- Mentoring: minorities + (Minorities in academia)
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity + (Academic institutions)
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity + (Academic institutions)
- Introduction: Guidelines and Discrepancies + (Doctoral students)
- Philosophical Justifications for Human Subjects Research + (Doctoral students)
- Human Research Violations By Eye Doctor Showcase A National Problem + (Academic institutions)
- Psychologist made up sex bias results + (Academic institutions)
- Retraction of Savine, McDaniel, Shelton, and Scullin + (Academic institutions)
- Human Rights Education for Legal Professionals (HELP) Online Training + (Graduate students)
- INSPIRE Checklist + (Policy makers)
- The INSPIRE project + (Policy makers)
- Mantra (research data management training) + (Early career researchers)
- Standards of authorship + (phd students)
- Biologist Spared Jail For Grant Fraud + (Researchers)
- Canaries in the Mines: Children, Risk, Non-Therapeutic Research, and Justice + (Researchers)
- Long Distance Collaboration + (Researchers)
- Posing irrelevant research questions + (Researchers)
- Polish National Science Centre Code on Research Integrity and Applying for Research Financing + (Researchers)
- Responsible conduct of biomedical research : collaborative research + (All stakeholders in research)
- Introduction to Research Integrity and Good Scientific Practices + (Academic staff)
- Reaction to bias + (Women in academia)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines on Supervision - PhD guidelines + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on Responsible Supervision and Leadership - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Academic staff)
- Quality History Education in the 21st Century Principles and Guidelines + (Policy makers)
- Data sharing and dual-use issues + (Researchers)
- Health Care Scheduling and Access: A Report From the IOM + (Patients)
- Improving the informed consent process-a booklet on participants' rights in medical research + (Patients)
- The influence of pharmaceutical company on drug availability + (Academic staff)
- SIENNA - Stakeholder-informed ethics for new technologies with high socio-economic and human rights impact + (Academic institutions)
- European Charter of Patients' Rights + (Clinical ethics consultants)
- The decision on ice + (health care professionals)
- Vulnerable Populations + (Researchers)
- Consent for publication (Participant) + (Researchers)
- Guidance on the Management of Clinical Trials during the COVID-19 Pandemic + (All stakeholders in research)
- Declaration of Geneva + (Clinical ethics consultants)
- Informed consent in psychiatry + (Authors)
- NTU (Nanyang Technological University) Responding to Allegations/Complaints of Research Misconduct + (Academic staff)
- 'I am really sorry': Peer Reviewer Stole Text for Own Paper + (Peer reviewers)
- COPE seminar, webinar and ppt presentation + (Peer reviewers)
- Can a scientific paper be published anonymously? + (Peer reviewers)
- Changing a grant proposal to meet the reviewers requests + (Peer reviewers)
- Committee On Publication Ethics (COPE) Guidelines + (Peer reviewers)
- DOAB + (Peer reviewers)
- Dubious Peer Reviews Lead to 10 Retractions + (Peer reviewers)
- Environmental journal pulls two papers for “compromised” peer review + (Peer reviewers)
- European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) + (Peer reviewers)
- European Network for Research Evaluation in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (ENRESSH) + (Peer reviewers)
- Guidance on the Management of Clinical Trials during the COVID-19 Pandemic + (Peer reviewers)
- Journal calls 2012 paper “deeply offensive to particular minorities” + (Peer reviewers)
- Manuscript Guidelines Journals + (Peer reviewers)
- Multiple submission + (Peer reviewers)
- Organised Crime Against the Academic Peer Review System + (Peer reviewers)
- Peer review + (Peer reviewers)
- Pirated Idea for Research + (Peer reviewers)
- Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers + (Peer reviewers)
- Reproducibility of methodology + (Peer reviewers)
- Research Integrity: the Experience of a Doubting Thomas + (Peer reviewers)
- Responsible Authorship and Peer Review - Columbia RCR Course, Module 3 + (Peer reviewers)
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Peer reviewers)
- SPOC: Integrity in academic publication: authorship and peer review + (Peer reviewers)
- Springer Nature ‘continuing to investigate the concerns raised’ about paper linking obesity and lying + (Peer reviewers)
- The Suspect Questionnaire + (Peer reviewers)
- Want to make sure your paper gets published? Just do your own peer review like this researcher did + (Peer reviewers)
- Conflict of interest: a research integrity and research ethics perspective + (Peer reviewers)
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching + (Peer reviewers)
- Not asking permission from contributors for the wording of the acknowledgement + (Peer reviewers)
- High Integration of Research Monographs in the European Open Science (HIRMEOS) + (Peer reviewers)
- Open access Publication in the European Research Area for Social Sciences and Humanities (OPERAS) + (Peer reviewers)
- Standards of authorship + (Peer reviewers)
- Funding (Sponsorship) bias + (Peer reviewers)
- Hypothesizing after the results are known (HARKing) + (Peer reviewers)
- Unfair reviewing + (Peer reviewers)
- Respectable and honest supervision ensures responsible and ethical research in the future. + (Peer reviewers)
- Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities + (Researchers)
- Insufficiently reported study flaws and limitations + (Researchers)
- Forensic Statistics to detect Data Fabrication + (Researchers)
- Replicability in the Humanities + (Researchers)
- Preprint servers + (Researchers)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity + (All stakeholders in research)
- Divorce study felled by a coding error gets a second chance + (Authors)
- The Tadpole Paper Mill + (Researchers)
- Handling self-admissions of fraud + (Academic institutions)
- Image manipulation as a general practice + (Journal editors)
- New claim to authorship of published paper + (Academic staff)
- The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’ + (Academic institutions)
- Retracted gay-marriage study debated at misconduct meet-up + (Academic institutions)
- Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis regarding logothetis vs. shmuel and leopold + (Academic institutions)
- Author misconduct: Not just the editors' responsibility + (Academic institutions)
- Who Rules the Ruler? On the Misconduct of Journal Editors + (Academic institutions)
- A Famous Honesty Researcher Is Retracting A Study Over Fake Data + (Academic institutions)
- The REAPPRAISED checklist to identify flawed papers + (Academic institutions)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition + (All stakeholders in research)
- Moral conflict and moral dilemma + (PhD Students)
- Responsible supervision + (PhD Students)
- Local resources on improving science: basic study + (PhD Students)
- Predatory publishing + (PhD Students)
- Resources for research ethics education + (Early career researchers)
- Mantra (research data management training) + (Early career researchers)
- Academic Integrity Tutorial with Quiz + (Early career researchers)
- ORI introduction to RCR + (All stakeholders in research)
- Training modules and guidelines on mentorship + (Supervisors)
- The Rotterdam Dilemma Game + (Early career researchers)
- Peer review card exchange game + (Early career researchers)
- Declaration of Helsinki + (PhD Students)
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights + (PhD Students)
- Fiction movies for RCR education + (PhD Students)
- A Plagiarism Adventure (Et Plagieringseventyr) + (Early career researchers)
- Nine pitfalls of research misconduct + (Early career researchers)
- Research Integrity: Podcast Series + (Bachelor students)
- Bioethics: an introduction + (Bachelor students)
- Finnish Guidelines on Doctoral Supervision and Review + (Postdocs)
- Committee on Publication Ethics Guidelines on How to Handle Authorship Disputes + (Early career researchers)
- Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors + (Students)
- Inappropriate authorship + (PhD Students)
- Outcome reporting bias + (Students)
- P-value hacking + (Students)
- Perverse incentives + (Students)
- Self-plagiarism + (Students)
- Spin of research results + (Students)
- Whistleblower protection/rights + (PhD Students)
- Supervision Guidelines + (PhD Students)
- Polarized research + (PhD Students)
- HEIRRI courses + (Research integrity trainers)
- Responsible Authorship and Peer Review - Columbia RCR Course, Module 3 + (Early career researchers)
- Case-based ethics instruction: the influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making + (Early career researchers)
- University of Montana online research ethics course + (Bachelor students)
- Salami publication + (PhD Students)
- Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’) + (Students)
- Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Authorship and publication + (PhD Students)
- Scientific Research: Dilemmas and Temptations (booklet of cases) + (Bachelor students)
- EQIPD (Enhancing Quality in Preclinical Data) + (PhD Students)
- PhD and Supervisor charter (KU Leuven) + (PhD Students)
- Superb Supervision: integrity training for supervisors + (Supervisors)
- Case Study Videos + (Doctoral students)
- U.S. Finds Misconduct by Ex-Researchers at Chicago and UCSF + (Researchers)
- Posing irrelevant research questions + (Researchers)
- Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching + (Academic staff)
- Research misconduct + (Students)
- Balancing harms and benefits + (All stakeholders in research)
- Replicability + (All stakeholders in research)
- Inferring from P-values + (Researchers)
- The impact of the GDPR on scientific data + (Students)
- Research integrity officers in Europe + (Students)
- Non-reporting of negative findings + (Students)
- "Met de billen bloot" (airing your dirty laundry) + (Researchers)
- Case Studies For Small Group Discussion + (Researchers)
- Age-Old Conflicts + (Researchers)
- Publication + (Early career researchers)
- Selective citation + (Students)
- Connecting researchers through ORCID + (PhD Students)
- Carlo Croce: data falsification and other scientific misconduct + (Researchers)
- A Medical Ghostwriter’s Personal View + (Researchers)
- Secondary corrections + (Authors)
- Ethics of ageing + (Academic institutions)
- The influence of pharmaceutical company on drug availability + (Academic staff)
- Anonymisation and pseudonymisation + (PhD Students)
- Feedback of findings in genome-wide association studies + (Authors)
- Academic and research misconduct in the PhD: Issues for students and supervisors + (PhD Students)
- Qualitative research + (PhD Students)
- Ethical issues of involving children with disabilities in research + (Authors)
- Cognitive dissonance and moral distress + (PhD Students)
- Dialogue versus debate + (PhD Students)
- Intellectual property + (PhD Students)
- Whistle blowing + (PhD Students)
- Evaluating Journals Using Journal Metrics: Find Journal Rankings + (Researchers)
- ORI comes down (hard) on Bengu Sezen, Columbia chemist accused of fraud + (PhD Students)
- On Goffman: Ethnography and the Ethics of Care + (Academic institutions)
- Duplicate publication uprooted from plant journal + (Advisors of students)
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity + (Academic institutions)
- FAIR-Aware: Your first step towards your FAIR data(set). + (Academic staff)
- How to be a good lab partner + (Bachelor students)
- Ethical issues in qualitative research + (Academic staff)
- Finnish TENK Guide to Agreeing on Authorship: Recommendation for Research Publications + (Researchers)
- Leibniz Institute's Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice + (PhD Students)
- Max Planck Society's Rules of Good Scientific Practice + (Academic institutions)
- The German Association of University Professors and Lecturers' (DHV) Position Paper on Scientific Self-regulation and Scientific Misconduct + (PhD Students)
- German Council of Science and Humanities' Requirements for the Quality Assurance of the Doctorate + (PhD Students)
- Methods to increase data availability + (Authors)
- CRISPR twins – an unethical practice + (PhD Students)
- SCImago Journal Rankings + (Academic staff)
- https://www.unl.edu/gradstudies/connections/best-practices-collaborating-research + (PhD Students)
- Research collaboration + (PhD Students)
- Virtues in research integrity + (PhD Students)
- Guideline for discussing work-related stress + (Supervisors)
- Unwritten expectations in doctoral training: research integrity scenario + (PhD Students)
- Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) + (Junior researchers)
- SPOC: Integrity in academic publication: authorship and peer review + (PhD Students)
- Responsible Research through supervision, mentoring and working together + (PhD Students)
- SPOC: Data in responsible conduct of research + (PhD Students)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines on Supervision - PhD guidelines + (Academic staff)
- The SOPs4RI project + (Policy makers)
- Image Manipulation Detection - Exercises + (Academic institutions)
- Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Values and norms + (All stakeholders in research)
- AllTrials campaign + (All stakeholders in research)
- Altmetrics + (PhD students)
- Publication bias (positive results) + (Students)
- Psychology Grad Student Faked Data + (Researchers)
- Online course: Teaching the Responsible Conduct of Research in Humans + (PhD students)
- Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content. + (PhD students)
- Cross-boundary collaborations + (PhD students)
- Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity + (PhD students)
- Informed assent + (Junior researchers)
- Informed consent + (Junior researchers)
- Legal rights of accused scientists + (Scientists)
- Research with animals + (Ethics committee members)
- Protecting research subjects + (PhD students)
- Authorship criteria + (PhD students)
- Fabrication + (Students)
- Up, Up, and Away: Clinical Trials Go International + (Researchers)
- A Case Study about Anonymization and Secondary Use of Qualitative Data + (All stakeholders in research)
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity + (Senior researchers)
- Inter Academy Partnership Guidance on Doing Global Science + (Researchers)
- German Research Foundation's Recommendations for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice + (researchers)
- Sabotage and the Federal Definition of Research Misconduct + (Researchers)
- Author Misconduct: Not Just the Editors' Responsibility + (Researchers)
- A University of Liverpool investigation determined that a former researcher there fabricated his data + (Researchers)
- Case Study Collection + (Research integrity trainers)
- Perioperative Mischief: The Price of Academic Misconduct + (Researchers)
- U.S. Gov’t Physicist Sentenced to 18 months in Prison for Fraud + (Researchers)
- UK Guidance on Reproducibility and Reliability of Biomedical Research: Improving Research Practices + (All stakeholders in research)
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- A Japanese developmental biology center, scientific misconduct and suicide + (Researchers)
- Belgian Code of Ethics for Scientific Research + (All stakeholders in research)
- Deception by Research Participants + (Researchers)
- Mental health in academia + (All stakeholders in research)
- How I Was Nearly Duped into 'Authoring' a Fake Paper + (All stakeholders in research)
- Privacy in research + (PhD students)
- Collaborative working + (Researchers)
- Research integrity training for PhD students + (PhD students)
- Serious gaming in research integrity education + (Bachelor students)
- Oviedo Convention + (Ethics committee members)
- Inadequately handle or store data or (bio)materials + (All stakeholders in research)
- Fake peer-reviewing + (Journal editors)
- Research integrity training for diverse disciplines + (Early career researchers)
- Epistemic virtues + (Postdocs)
- H-index + (Funders)
- Journal Impact Factor + (Scientists)
- Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity + (PhD students)
- Intellectual conflicts of interest + (Research performing organisations)
- Researcher 'Cherry Picked' Data, University Investigation Finds + (Researchers)
- Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science + (PhD students)
- FOSTER project workshop + (PhD students)
- Prospective registration of clinical trials + (PhD students)
- Inappropriate study design + (Students)
- COPE Cases + (Editors)
- Research Integrity Advisors + (PhD students)
- Path2Integrity Campaign + (Academic institutions)
- Path2Integrity + (Academic institutions)
- Path2Integrity Learning Cards + (All stakeholders in research)
- Internet Research Ethics + (Researchers)
- Greek Cypriot students’ ideas of historical empathy: a case study exploration of 9 -12 years old students’ ideas about practices in the past + (Researcher)
- Teaching about the First World War today: Historical empathy and participatory citizenship + (Researchers)
- Avoiding bias in qualitative data analysis + (Researchers)
- Hidden for a century, 'fake' is actually a Van Gogh + (Researchers)
- Bias in Historical Description, Interpretation, and Explanation + (Researchers)
- Eigenfactorizer + (Researchers)
- How to make the digital scholarly monograph fit for Open Access by applying smart services and tools + (Researchers)
- High Integration of Research Monographs in the European Open Science (HIRMEOS) + (Researchers)
- OAPEN OA Books Toolkit + (Researchers)
- Your preprint pre-posting checklist + (Researchers)
- Eigenfactor + (Researchers)
- Emerging Infectious Diseases. Author Checklist + (Researchers)
- Conducting research in high risk locations + (Researchers)
- Not acknowledging contributors who do not qualify for authorship + (Researchers)
- Initiative for Open Abstracts (I4OA) + (Publishers)
- Funding (Sponsorship) bias + (Researchers)
- “Five steps to decide what data to keep: a checklist for appraising research data” + (Researchers)
- How to select trustworthy repositories + (Researchers)
- Case Study: Beginning a Collaboration + (PhD students)
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity + (Academic institutions)
- Data management plans + (Researchers)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on Responsible Supervision and Leadership - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Academic staff)
- Confidentiality + (PhD students)
- Guidelines for Tailoring the Informed Consent Process in Clinical Studies + (Clinical researchers)
- Ethics, Human Rights and HIV Vaccine Trials in Low-Income Settings + (Researchers)
- European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) + (All stakeholders in research)
- Guidance on the Management of Clinical Trials during the COVID-19 Pandemic + (All stakeholders in research)
- UK Research Integrity Office's Code of Practice for Research + (All stakeholders in research)
- MedTech Europe Code of Ethical Business Practice + (Ethics committee members)
- Guest Authorship, Mortality Reporting, and Integrity in Rofecoxib Studies + (Researchers)
- Sponsorship of drug and device studies by the manufacturing company + (Clinical researchers)
- ICH Guidelines + (medical researchers)
- The European Union Clinical Trials Directive + (Clinical researchers)
- Declaration of Geneva + (Clinical ethics consultants)
- European Charter of Patients' Rights + (Clinical ethics consultants)
- The decision on ice + (health care professionals)
- INSPIRE Checklist + (Policy makers)
- Integrity roadmap, Delft University of Technology + (Universities)
- Improper data use (a bias distorting research results) + (Principal investigators)
- The Unfortunate Experiment + (Researchers)
- Traver paper: The Unique Case of a Published Delusion + (Researchers)
- Reasonable standards for career advancement + (Researchers)
- The Ethics of Collecting Genetic Data From Indigenous People + (Researchers)
- The Threat to Scientific Integrity in Environmental and Occupational Medicine + (Policy makers)
- The EQUATOR Network: Reporting guidelines + (Researchers)
- Netherlands Standard Evaluation Protocol for Research Assessments + (Research institutions)
- Sample records for guideline development processes + (Policy makers)