Search by property
From The Embassy of Good Science
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- A comparison of online versus on-site training in health research methodology: a randomized study + (All stakeholders in research)
- The Nuremberg Code + (All stakeholders in research)
- FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results + (All stakeholders in research)
- Networks and projects promoting research integrity + (All stakeholders in research)
- Intellectual property rights in research collaborations + (Funders)
- Bioethicists Call for Investigation Into Nutritional Experiments on Aboriginal People + (researchers)
- Fabrication + (Students)
- A Case Study about Anonymization and Secondary Use of Qualitative Data + (All stakeholders in research)
- Science policy + (All stakeholders in research)
- Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics + (All stakeholders in research)
- Research Ethics + (Researchers)
- Baltimore Case - In Brief + (Researchers)
- The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud + (Researchers)
- Five simple rules to avoid plagiarism + (All stakeholders in research)
- Responsible Conduct in the Global Research Enterprise: A Policy Report + (All stakeholders in research)
- The Irreproducibility Crisis of Modern Science + (All stakeholders in research)
- Australian Codes for the Responsible Conduct of Research + (Researchers)
- Inter Academy Partnership Guidance on Doing Global Science + (Researchers)
- FOSTER - Fosteropenscience.eu + (All stakeholders in research)
- The Rotterdam Dilemma Game + (Early career researchers)
- German Research Foundation's Recommendations for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice + (researchers)
- Initiatives promoting research integrity + (All stakeholders in research)
- Ousted: Rule-Breaking Lundbeck CEO and Novartis Scientist Get the Boot + (Researchers)
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Publication Recommendations + (All stakeholders in research)
- Falsification + (All stakeholders in research)
- Belgian Code of Ethics for Scientific Research + (All stakeholders in research)
- Head of research integrity initiative in China alleged of reseach misconduct + (Researchers)
- Mental health in academia + (All stakeholders in research)
- How I Was Nearly Duped into 'Authoring' a Fake Paper + (All stakeholders in research)
- Non-disclosure of changes to the research design + (All stakeholders in research)
- Inadequately handle or store data or (bio)materials + (All stakeholders in research)
- Unfair reviewing + (All stakeholders in research)
- Balancing harms and benefits + (All stakeholders in research)
- Replicability + (All stakeholders in research)
- Companion Guidelines on Replication & Reproducibility in Education Research: + (All stakeholders in research)
- Practical tools and strategies for researchers to increase replicability + (All stakeholders in research)
- The Replication Crisis in Psychology + (All stakeholders in research)
- Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials + (All stakeholders in research)
- Australian Research Council Research Integrity Policy + (All stakeholders in research)
- European Meteorological Society (EMS) Code of Practice for communicating knowledge on climate change to the public + (All stakeholders in research)
- Biomedical Alliance in Europe (Biomed Alliance) Code of Conduct + (All stakeholders in research)
- European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Code of Practice + (Researchers)
- European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Code of Practice for Fieldwork Training + (All stakeholders in research)
- European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Code of Ethics + (All stakeholders in research)
- European Astronomical Society (EAS) Ethics Statement and Guidelines for Good Practice + (All stakeholders in research)
- European Association of Social Psychology (EASP) Code of Conduct + (All stakeholders in research)
- European Cystic Fibrosis Society (ECFS) Patient Registry Code of Conduct + (All stakeholders in research)
- European College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ECNP) Code of Conduct + (All stakeholders in research)
- European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) Code of Conduct + (All stakeholders in research)
- European Geosciences Union (EGU) Code of Conduct + (All stakeholders in research)
- European Nuclear Society (ENS) Ethical Charter + (All stakeholders in research)
- Federation of European Pharmacological Societies (EPHAR) Ethical Code of Conduct + (All stakeholders in research)
- European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA) Standards of Conduct + (All stakeholders in research)
- Federation of European Toxicologists and European Societies of Toxicology (Eurotox) Code of Ethics + (All stakeholders in research)
- European Society for Opinion and Marketing Research (ESOMAR) International Code on Market, Opinion and Social Research and Data Analytics + (All stakeholders in research)
- European Mathematical Society (EMS) Code of Practice + (All stakeholders in research)
- European Federation of Psychologists' Associations (EFPA) Meta-Code of Ethics + (All stakeholders in research)
- European Federation of Psychologists' Associations (EFPA) Model-Code of Ethics + (All stakeholders in research)
- Gender bias + (All stakeholders in research)
- European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Principles of Conduct for Archaeologists involved in Contract Archaeological Work + (All stakeholders in research)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition + (All stakeholders in research)
- Questionable Research Practices in Collaboration + (All stakeholders in research)
- Five vignettes in speech and language research + (All stakeholders in research)
- Five cases considered and concluded by the UK's General Medical Council + (All stakeholders in research)
- Ten short cases on publication ethics + (All stakeholders in research)
- ENERI Decision Tree + (All stakeholders in research)
- PRBB Code of Good Scientific Practice + (All stakeholders in research)
- Path2Integrity Learning Cards + (All stakeholders in research)
- Best Practice Guide for Research Integrity and Ethics + (Academic staff)
- Responsible Research and Innovation resources for researchers and funders + (Academic institutions)
- Open Science + (All stakeholders in research)
- What my retraction taught me + (Academic staff)
- Path2Integrity Campaign + (Academic institutions)
- Path2Integrity + (Academic institutions)
- Digital Trespass: Ethical and Terms-of-Use Violations by Researchers Accessing Data From an Online Patient Community + (All stakeholders in research)
- Guidelines for Tailoring the Informed Consent Process in Clinical Studies + (Clinical researchers)
- The Limits of Expertise + (Research subjects)
- Objectivity and Incentives + (All stakeholders in research)
- Disclosure of Sources of Grant Funds + (All stakeholders in research)
- Eforcement Agencies and the Protection of Human Subjects + (All stakeholders in research)
- Peer review + (All stakeholders in research)
- The Case of Falsified Data + (All stakeholders in research)
- Checklist for higher-risk SSH research + (All stakeholders in research)
- VIRT2UE Videos + (All stakeholders in research)
- SIENNA - Stakeholder-informed ethics for new technologies with high socio-economic and human rights impact + (Academic institutions)
- Preparatory Viewing: Introduction to Concepts & Themes + (All stakeholders in research)
- VIRT2UE Train-the-Trainer program + (All stakeholders in research)
- UK Research Integrity Office's Code of Practice for Research + (All stakeholders in research)
- Guidance on the Management of Clinical Trials during the COVID-19 Pandemic + (All stakeholders in research)
- Declaration of Istanbul + (All stakeholders in research)
- Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct + (All stakeholders in research)
- European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) + (All stakeholders in research)
- The European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (ECHRBmed) + (All stakeholders in research)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity + (All stakeholders in research)
- UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights + (All stakeholders in research)
- Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine + (All stakeholders in research)
- ‘Caught in the act’: Veterinary researcher caught fabricating gene data, resigns from university job + (All stakeholders in research)
- Major indexing service rejects appeals by two suppressed journals + (Editors)
- Preregistration of animal study protocols + (All stakeholders in research)
- The Embassy's Newsletter - July 2021 + (All stakeholders in research)
- Jesse's Intent + (Researchers)
- Sharing and preserving data in repositories + (All stakeholders in research)
- Open Access Policy at Czech Academy of Sciences + (Academic institutions)
- Danish National Strategy for Open Access + (Academic institutions)
- Ethics unwrapped collection + (All stakeholders in research)
- Be grossly unfair to your collaborators + (Research institutions)
- Using data not created for research purposes in the context of collaboration with private companies + (Researchers)
- FAIR-Aware: Your first step towards your FAIR data(set). + (Academic staff)
- Reproducibility and Replicability in Science + (Academic staff)
- An issue with insufficient data in the survey-resulting in a non-representative sample + (Doctoral students)
- Advisory Report of the Committee on Exploration of the Revision of the Dutch Code of Conduct + (All stakeholders in research)
- Law on Science and Studies of the Republic of Lithuania + (Research institutions)
- Irish Council for Bioethics' Recommendations for Promoting Research Integrity + (Academic institutions)
- The Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sports' Law on Scientific Activity and Higher Education' + (All stakeholders in research)
- Framework to Enhance Research Integrity in Research Collaborations + (Academic staff)
- Finnish TJNK Guideline on Bold Communication, Responsible Influence. Science Communication Recommendations + (Researchers)
- Spanish Law on Science, Technology and Innovation + (Researchers)
- The Danish Act on the Innovation Fund + (Academic institutions)
- The Danish National Research Foundation Act + (All stakeholders in research)
- The New Danish Research Misconduct etc. Act + (Research institutions)
- Alliance of German Science Organisations' Principles for the Handling of Research Data + (Researchers)
- Joint position paper of the General Faculty (AFT) and the German University Association (DHV) + (Researchers)
- The German University Association's Recommendations on Academic Publication Behaviour + (All stakeholders in research)
- Statutes and Procedures of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences + (Research institutions)
- Collaboration In Research + (Academic institutions)
- CRISPR twins – an unethical practice + (PhD Students)
- Institutional codes of conduct for research integrity + (Academic staff)
- An issue with insufficient data in the survey-resulting in a non-representative sample + (All stakeholders in research)
- Clarifying the aims of a research study + (Academic institutions)
- Imputation of missing data in clinical trials + (All stakeholders in research)
- Virtues in research integrity + (PhD Students)
- Community's of Practice Datamanagement & Privacy + (Academic staff)
- The ETHNA System. A Guide to the Ethical Governance of RRI in Innovation and Research in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations. + (All stakeholders in research)
- Mapping stakeholders and scoping involvement – a guide for HEFRCs + (All stakeholders in research)
- Gauging the potential societal contributions of research and innovation – a guide for HEFRCs + (All stakeholders in research)
- Stakeholder involvement in ethical governance of R&I – a guide for HEFRCs + (All stakeholders in research)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines on Supervision - PhD guidelines + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on Responsible Supervision and Leadership - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Academic staff)
- NTU (Nanyang Technological University) Research Integrity Policy + (Academic institutions)
- NTU (Nanyang Technological University) Responding to Allegations/Complaints of Research Misconduct + (Academic staff)
- Cape Town Statement on Research Integrity + (All stakeholders in research)
- The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union + (Policy makers)
- Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations + (Research funding organisations)
- Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations + (Research funding organisations)
- Ethics defined: a glossary + (All stakeholders in research)
- UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science + (Academic institutions)
- Ethical and Societal Foundations of Open Science + (All stakeholders in research)
- Rights of Citizen Scientists + (Citizen Scientists)
- CIOMS International guidelines on good governance practice for research institutions + (All stakeholders in research)
- Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations + (All stakeholders in research)
- ROSiE Field-Specific Guidelines on Responsible Open Science + (All stakeholders in research)
- ROSiE General Guidelines on Responsible Open Science + (All stakeholders in research)
- Quality of research outputs and data sets + (Citizen Scientists)
- Conflicts of interest in citizen science + (All stakeholders in research)
- Risks to the environment, animals, plants, and ecosystems + (All stakeholders in research)
- What is Research Integrity? + (All stakeholders in research)
- Successful and timely uptake of artificial intelligence in science in the EU + (Academic institutions)
- Protection of Research Participants + (Citizen Scientists)
- "A Little Thing Like Plagiarism" + (Anthropologists)
- Backstage Maneuvers + (Anthropologists)
- Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage + (Anthropologists)
- Ethical Dilemmas and Moral Responsibilities + (Anthropologists)
- Ethical Guidelines for Good Research Practice + (Anthropologists)
- European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) + (Anthropologists)
- Power to the People + (Anthropologists)
- Slow Code + (Anthropologists)
- The Case of the Damaged Baby + (Anthropologists)
- The European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (ECHRBmed) + (Anthropologists)
- The Hazardous Consent Forms + (Anthropologists)
- The Runaway Wife + (Anthropologists)
- Ethical considerations in dealing with human remains + (Anthropologists)
- Data Privacy & Security Global Coronavirus Toolkit + (Researchers)
- Possible Conflict of Interest + (Attorneys)
- Declaration of Istanbul + (All stakeholders in research)
- European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) + (All stakeholders in research)
- Fake peer-reviewing + (Journal editors)
- Definition of plagiarism: Phrasing + (Authors)
- Multiple submission + (Authors)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Duplicate Publication + (Authors)
- It’s Still Plagiarism + (Academic staff)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Background Section + (Academic staff)
- Secondary corrections + (Authors)
- The influence of pharmaceutical company on drug availability + (Academic staff)
- Feedback of findings in genome-wide association studies + (Authors)
- Ethical issues of involving children with disabilities in research + (Authors)
- Rights to Authorship + (Authors)
- Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers + (Authors)
- Guidance on the Management of Clinical Trials during the COVID-19 Pandemic + (All stakeholders in research)
- Guest Post — Unethical Practices in Research and Publishing: Evidence from Russia + (Journal editors)
- One in six of the papers you cite in a review has been retracted. What do you do? + (Academic staff)
- The rector who resigned after plagiarizing a student’s PhD thesis + (Academic staff)
- Divorce study felled by a coding error gets a second chance + (Authors)
- Itinerant legal scholar who claimed Tufts affiliation up to 10 retractions + (Authors)
- Gluten-free turkeys? Paper on dangers of wheat-based diet in birds retracted + (Authors)
- Ten journals denied 2020 Impact Factors because of excessive self-citation or “citation stacking” + (Authors)
- Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences' Guideline on Authorship in Scientific Publications + (Authors)
- Communicate results to the general public before a peer reviewed publication is available + (Researchers)
- New claim to authorship of published paper + (Academic staff)
- Self-plagiarism case prompts calls for agencies to tighten rules + (Researchers)
- Author misconduct: Not just the editors' responsibility + (Academic institutions)
- Authorship Deserved, Not Earned: Research Ethics and Research Integrity Scenario + (Academic institutions)
- Informed consent in psychiatry + (Authors)
- Methods to increase data availability + (Authors)
- SPOC: Integrity in academic publication: authorship and peer review + (PhD Students)
- Not asking permission from contributors for the wording of the acknowledgement + (Academic staff)
- NTU (Nanyang Technological University) Research Integrity Policy + (Academic institutions)
- NTU (Nanyang Technological University) Responding to Allegations/Complaints of Research Misconduct + (Academic staff)
- Affiliations + (Academic institutions)
- Vulnerable Populations + (Researchers)
- Predatory publishing + (PhD Students)
- Research Integrity: Podcast Series + (Bachelor students)
- Bioethics: an introduction + (Bachelor students)
- HEIRRI courses + (Research integrity trainers)
- University of Montana online research ethics course + (Bachelor students)
- Protecting research subjects + (PhD students)
- Grey areas of plagiarism: 10 scenarios to discuss with students + (All stakeholders in research)
- Criticism Swirls Around High-Profile History Book about North Korea + (Researchers)
- Scientific Research: Dilemmas and Temptations (booklet of cases) + (Bachelor students)
- Serious gaming in research integrity education + (Bachelor students)
- Research with humans + (Researchers)
- Inadequately handle or store data or (bio)materials + (All stakeholders in research)
- Integrity Factor Glossary + (All stakeholders in research)
- Path2Integrity Campaign + (Academic institutions)
- Path2Integrity Learning Card S0: Good research is based on honesty + (Bachelor students)
- Path2Integrity + (Academic institutions)
- Path2Integrity Learning Cards + (All stakeholders in research)
- Mentoring: expectations + (Supervisors)
- DATA MINDFULNESS: Making the most of your dissertation + (Bachelor students)
- Blinded by Private Conflict – Choosing Ego Over Professionalism + (students)
- How to be a good lab partner + (Bachelor students)
- An issue with insufficient data in the survey-resulting in a non-representative sample + (Doctoral students)
- Respectable and honest supervision ensures responsible and ethical research in the future. + (Peer reviewers)
- Collaboration In Research + (Academic institutions)
- Integrity Games - a research based learning platform on academic integrity aimed at undergraduate university students + (Bachelor students)
- An issue with insufficient data in the survey-resulting in a non-representative sample + (All stakeholders in research)
- Clarifying the aims of a research study + (Academic institutions)
- Introduction to Research Integrity and Good Scientific Practices + (Academic staff)
- Community's of Practice Datamanagement & Privacy + (Academic staff)
- Integrity Games + (Undergraduate students)
- Ethics defined: a glossary + (All stakeholders in research)
- Climate science controversies and the demand for access to empirical data + (Citizen Scientists)
- Open science outlook 1: status and trends around the world + (Academic institutions)
- Protection of Research Participants + (Citizen Scientists)
- Rights of Citizen Scientists + (Citizen Scientists)
- Quality of research outputs and data sets + (Citizen Scientists)
- Conflicts of interest in citizen science + (All stakeholders in research)
- Risks to the environment, animals, plants, and ecosystems + (All stakeholders in research)
- Ethical and Societal Foundations of Open Science + (All stakeholders in research)
- AI Ethics and Governance in Practice: An Introduction + (Everyone)
- AI Sustainability in Practice Part Two: Sustainability Throughout the AI Workflow + (Everyone)
- AI Ethics and Governance in Practice: AI Fairness in Practice + (Public Sector)
- AI Sustainability in Practice Part One: Foundations for Sustainable AI Projects + (Public Sector)
- Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safety: A guide for the responsible design and implementation of AI systems in the public sector + (Civil Service)
- Human Rights Education for Legal Professionals (HELP) Online Training + (Graduate students)
- Responsible Research and Innovation - RRI + (Researchers)
- Site Unseen + (Collaborating researchers)
- SIENNA - Stakeholder-informed ethics for new technologies with high socio-economic and human rights impact + (Academic institutions)
- Ethical guidance for research with a potential for human enhancement + (Academic staff)
- The European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (ECHRBmed) + (All stakeholders in research)
- UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights + (All stakeholders in research)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity + (All stakeholders in research)
- Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage + (Administrators)
- European Charter of Patients' Rights + (Clinical ethics consultants)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition + (All stakeholders in research)
- ROSiE General Guidelines on Responsible Open Science + (All stakeholders in research)
- Human rights, democracy, and the rule of law assurance framework for AI systems: A proposal + (Activists)
- Teaching and Learning the Techniques of Conflict Resolution for Challenging Ethics Consultations + (Clinical ethics consultants)
- Publishing complications and patient safety + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Guidelines for Tailoring the Informed Consent Process in Clinical Studies + (Clinical researchers)
- The Case of the Damaged Baby + (Academic staff)
- The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine + (Human rights defenders)
- “There can be no justification for such studies”: Paper on artificial eyes for dogs earns expression of concern + (Ethics committee members)
- You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues + (Clinical ethics consultants)
- You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues + (Clinical ethics consultants)
- You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues + (Clinical ethics consultants)
- Declaration of Geneva + (Clinical ethics consultants)
- UK Research Integrity Office's Code of Practice for Research + (All stakeholders in research)
- It’s Time to Get Serious About Research Fraud + (Academic institutions)
- Macchiarini may be dismissed from Karolinska; dean of research resigns + (Clinical researchers)
- CRISPR twins – an unethical practice + (PhD Students)
- Imputation of missing data in clinical trials + (All stakeholders in research)
- Obstructive sleep apnoea + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Ethics and children's rights: learning from past mistakes + (Clinical researchers)
- Anonymisation and pseudonymisation + (PhD Students)
- Grading the quality of evidence in clinical practice guidelines + (Clinical researchers)
- Failed Patenting Negotiations in Collaborative Research + (Clinical researchers)
- Banked Samples and HD Testing + (Clinical researchers)
- Reporting Adverse Effects + (Clinical researchers)
- Research or Services? + (Clinical researchers)
- Studying Vulnerable Individuals + (Clinical researchers)
- Political points + (Early career researchers)
- The Suspect Questionnaire + (Academic institutions)
- Dutch psychology fraudster avoids trial + (Academic staff)
- The Olivieri Debacle: Where Were the Heroes of Bioethics? + (Researchers)
- Jesse's Intent + (Researchers)
- Possible omission of information essential for conclusions in a research paper + (Academic institutions)
- Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis regarding logothetis vs. shmuel and leopold + (Academic institutions)
- Sponsorship of drug and device studies by the manufacturing company + (Clinical researchers)
- COMET Initiative + (Researchers)
- The decision on ice + (health care professionals)
- ICH Guidelines + (medical researchers)
- International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects + (Clinical researchers)
- The European Union Good Clinical Practice Directive + (Clinical researchers)
- The European Union Clinical Trials Directive + (Clinical researchers)
- Publication and data ownership + (Collaborating researchers)
- Robbers, Rogues or Revolutionaries: Handling Armed Intimidation + (Collaborating researchers)
- The Case of the Missing Artefact + (Collaborating researchers)
- Backstage Maneuvers + (Funding institutions)
- Slow Code +
- Honorary or gift authorship + (Early career researchers)
- Take no full responsibility for the integrity of the research project and its reports + (Researchers)
- The Swiss National Science Foundation and National Research Council's Regulations on scientific misconduct + (Academic institutions)
- Be grossly unfair to your collaborators + (Research institutions)
- https://www.unl.edu/gradstudies/connections/best-practices-collaborating-research + (PhD Students)
- Research collaboration + (PhD Students)
- EQIPD (Enhancing Quality in Preclinical Data) + (PhD Students)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines on Supervision - PhD guidelines + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on Responsible Supervision and Leadership - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Academic staff)
- Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC) + (Researchers)
- Internet Research Ethics + (Researchers)
- Rules of Data-Sharing in Collaborative and Non-Collaborative Research + (Data protection officers)
- Rules of Data-Sharing in Collaborative and Non-Collaborative Research + (Data protection officers)
- A Data Governance Framework for Ethnography + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Reward campaign + (Researchers)
- The Orphan Embryos: A Case Study in Bioethics + (Decision makers)
- The Limits of Expertise + (Research subjects)
- KFPE Guide - 11 Principles & 7 Questions + (Researchers)
- Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Research Ethics + (Researchers)
- Research integrity - what is means, why it is important and how we might protect it + (Researchers)
- The EQUATOR Network: Reporting guidelines + (Researchers)
- Research Ethics: Zero Tolerance + (Researchers)
- 'Climate Skeptic' Journal Shuttered Following 'Malpractice' in 'Nepotistic' Reviewer Selections + (Researchers)
- Case Study Videos + (Doctoral students)
- Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching + (Academic staff)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Magazine Surprise + (Researchers)
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity + (Academic institutions)
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity + (Academic institutions)
- Where are they now? + (Early career researchers)
- The ethics of managing a laboratory or research group + (Academic institutions)
- Poor mentoring or supervision of early career researcherers + (Academic staff)
- SCImago Journal Rankings + (Academic staff)
- Imposter Syndrome + (Academic institutions)
- Introduction: Guidelines and Discrepancies + (Doctoral students)
- Philosophical Justifications for Human Subjects Research + (Doctoral students)
- Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Local resources on improving science: basic study + (PhD Students)
- Long Distance Collaboration + (Researchers)
- Questioning a Mentor + (Researchers)
- European Network of Research Integrity Offices Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct + (Researchers)
- European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI) + (Research Integrity Officers)
- Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct + (Research Integrity Officers)
- PRBB Code of Good Scientific Practice + (All stakeholders in research)
- ENERI Classroom + (Research Integrity Officers)
- Resources for research ethics education + (Early career researchers)
- Mantra (research data management training) + (Early career researchers)
- Academic Integrity Tutorial with Quiz + (Early career researchers)
- ORI introduction to RCR + (All stakeholders in research)
- COPE core practices + (Early career researchers)
- Printeger Upright + (Early career researchers)
- Training modules and guidelines on mentorship + (Supervisors)
- The Rotterdam Dilemma Game + (Early career researchers)
- Peer review card exchange game + (Early career researchers)
- A Plagiarism Adventure (Et Plagieringseventyr) + (Early career researchers)
- Nine pitfalls of research misconduct + (Early career researchers)
- Committee on Publication Ethics Guidelines on How to Handle Authorship Disputes + (Early career researchers)
- Responsible Authorship and Peer Review - Columbia RCR Course, Module 3 + (Early career researchers)
- Case-based ethics instruction: the influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making + (Early career researchers)
- Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content. + (PhD students)
- Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity + (PhD students)
- Informed assent + (Junior researchers)
- Informed consent + (Junior researchers)
- Industry involvement in scientific studies on SSRI's + (Researchers)
- Standards of authorship + (phd students)
- Anonymity Revisited + (Researchers)
- Authorship and publication + (PhD Students)
- Research culture + (Researchers)
- Five simple rules to avoid plagiarism + (All stakeholders in research)
- Handling of Sexual Harassment Case Poses Larger Questions at Yale + (Researchers)
- Research integrity training for diverse disciplines + (Early career researchers)
- A Japanese developmental biology center, scientific misconduct and suicide + (Researchers)
- Belgian Code of Ethics for Scientific Research + (All stakeholders in research)
- Mental health in academia + (All stakeholders in research)
- Responsible conduct of biomedical research : collaborative research + (All stakeholders in research)
- Privacy in research + (PhD students)
- Research integrity training for PhD students + (PhD students)
- H-index + (Funders)
- Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity + (PhD students)
- Peer Review. The nuts and bolts + (Early career researchers)
- Prospective registration of clinical trials + (PhD students)
- Questionable Research Practices in Study Design + (Early career researchers)
- Questionable Research Practices in Data Collection + (Early career researchers)
- Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and Reporting + (Early career researchers)
- Questionable Research Practices in Collaboration + (All stakeholders in research)
- People Studying People: Research Ethics in Society + (Early career researchers)
- Becoming an Ethical Researcher + (Early career researchers)
- Publication + (Early career researchers)
- Show Me The Money! + (Early career researchers)
- Psychologist made up sex bias results + (Early career researchers)
- What my retraction taught me + (Academic staff)
- Research Integrity Advisors + (PhD students)
- Protocol Violations Putting Animal Subjects in Harm’s Way + (Early career researchers)
- Researchers Pressured to Store Animal Subjects + (Academic institutions)
- Co-Authorship Conflicts + (Early career researchers)
- Inconsistent Findings Between Trainee and Researcher + (Early career researchers)
- Procrastinating Researcher Delegates Grant Reviews to Trainee + (Supervisors)
- Rainy Days for a Struggling Mentee + (Early career researchers)
- Selling Out? Making Deals with Other Institutions + (Early career researchers)