Concept:Activity Stream
From The Embassy of Good Science
Description of concept "Activity Stream"RDF feed
Activity Stream
[[Category:Resource||Guide||Initiative||Instruction||Report||Theme]]
U
- UNE in Row Over Bullying Survey +
- UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science +
- UNESCO Recommendation on Science and Scientific Researchers 2018 +
- US Office of Research Integrity +
- Understanding Ecofeminist Principles +
- Understanding Ecofeminist Principles +
- Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safety: A guide for the responsible design and implementation of AI systems in the public sector +
- Understanding the Systemic Impacts of Generative AI +
- Unhelpful retraction notice about a study that received favourable media attention +
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights +
- University Investigation Finds Misconduct by Bone Researcher with 23 Retractions +
- University of Montana online research ethics course +
- University of Oslo's Ethical Guidelines +
- University of Oslo's Policy on Fraudulent Documents +
- University of Split School of Medicine (MEFST) +
- University of Tartu Ethics Centre's Codes of Ethics Handbook +
- Unlicensed usage of medical devices on patients: a case of accusations +
- Unwritten expectations in doctoral training: research integrity scenario +
- Up, Up, and Away: Clinical Trials Go International +
- Use Historical Empathy to Help Students Process the World Today +
- Using Different Learning Taxonomies +
- Using Learning Cards to teach Research Ethics and Integrity +
- Using cases with contrary facts to illustrate and facilitate ethical analysis +
- Using data not created for research purposes in the context of collaboration with private companies +
- Using student generated codes of conduct in the classroom to reinforce business ethics education +
- Using the irecs training modules in your practice – Catherine Dean +
- Using the irecs training modules in your practice – Maruxa Martinez Campos +
- Using the irecs training modules in your practice – Maruxa Martinez Campos +
- Utilitarianism: Crash Course Philosophy +
- Uyarlanmış ikilem oyunu +
V
- VERITY +
- VERITY Last Webinar - Do we Trust Science? Building an Ecosystem of Trust in a Changing World +
- VERITY Project Webinar: Do We Trust Science? Building an Ecosystem of Trust in a Changing World +
- VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science +
- VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Communicators +
- VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Educators +
- VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Funders +
- VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Implementers +
- VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Oversight and Protection Actors +
- VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Policymakers +
- VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Producers +
- VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science-Society Facilitators +
- VERITY Scenario-Building Training for Effective Implementation of Recommendations +
- VERITY Scenario-Building Training for Effective Implementation of Recommendations +
- VIRT2UE +
- VIRT2UE Certification +
- VIRT2UE Train-the-Trainer program +
- VIRT2UE Training Guide +
- VIRT2UE Training Guide in Turkish +
- VIRT2UE Videos +
- VIRT2UE train-the-trainer program +
- VLIR Mind the GAP Podcast +
- VLIR Mind the GAP Podcast +
- Validated model of key OS Impact pathways and recommendations +
- Valley of Sorrow +
- Values and norms +
- Valuing Citizen Engagement in Science Governance (policy brief) +
- Valuing Voices Tool +
- Valuing Voices Tool +
- Varieties of goodness in research - a rotary style exercise (variation to original VIRT2UE exercise)) +
- Veterinary scientist fabricates data and manipulates images +
- Video Transcript (2 case study mexico) +
- Virtue Ethics under Current Research Conditions +
- Virtue ethics, positive psychology, and a new model of science and engineering ethics education. +
- Virtues and Norms +
- Virtues in research integrity +
- Vulnerable Populations +
- Vulnerable Populations +
W
- WHO Policy on Open Access +
- WIFO AI Guidelines on the Proper Use of Generative Models of Artificial Intelligence +
- Want to make sure your paper gets published? Just do your own peer review like this researcher did +
- Watch: The Circularity Approach! +
- Wellcome Open Research +
- Wellcome – Open Access Policy and Guidance (2025) +
- Werte/Tugenden und Normen +
- What Universities can Learn from one of Science’s Biggest Frauds +
- What are the major ethical issues in conducting research? is there a conflict between the research ethics and the nature of nursing? +
- What can we do? +
- What do journal editors do when they suspect research misconduct? +
- What funders can do +
- What happens when an ex-physicist writes about gender identity? +
- What is Life Cycle Assessment +
- What is Recklessness in Scientific Research? +
- What is Research Integrity? +
- What is ethics? +
- What is reproducibility? +
- What is research integrity? +
- What is the evidence for reproducibility in different epistemic contexts? +
- What my retraction taught me +
- What publishers and editors can do +
- What researchers and research ethics committees can do +
- What should a journal do when a scientist who committed misconduct submits a new paper? +
- What to communicate in retraction notices? +
- What's in That Bottle? What's in That Pipe? +
- When Sociologists Deceive Their Subjects +
- When is Advanced Training Necessary? +
- Where are they now? +
- Whistle blowing +
- Whistle-blower Claims his Accusations Cost him his Job +
- Who Owns the Field Notes +
- Who Rules the Ruler? On the Misconduct of Journal Editors +
- Who can make a difference? +
- Who is missing from the design +
- Who will mentor the mentors? +
- Why do we have to think about ethics during research? 5 Controversial Psychology Experiments +
- Wiki functionalities +
- Withholding Study Purpose +
- Witness to Murder +
- Working with Research Integrity - Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement +
- WorldFAIR +
- Would You Do a Post Doc with this Guy? +
- Write your story +
- Writing usable qualitative health research findings +
X
- XR and General Purpose AI: from values and principles to norms and standards (policy brief) +
- XR in Research: A Case Study +
- XR4Human +
Y
- You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues +
- You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues +
- You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues +
- Your preprint pre-posting checklist +
[
- [OLD] Swedish Research Council's Guidelines on Good Research Practice +
- Collaboration In Research +
- Cross-boundary collaborations +
- High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations +
- Confidentiality +
- Consent and assent for research on children +
- Conflict of interest in peer review +
- Conflict of interest: a research integrity and research ethics perspective +
- Editorial conflicts of interest +
- Intellectual conflicts of interest +
- The influence of pharmaceutical company on drug availability +
- Connecting Researchers Through ORCID +
- Ethical Principles of Informed Consent in Research with Children +
- Anonymisation and pseudonymisation +
- Data management plans +
- FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results +
- Feedback of findings in genome-wide association studies +
- How to select trustworthy repositories +
- Imputation of missing data in clinical trials +
- Methods to increase data availability +
- Sharing and preserving data in repositories +
- Responsible Use of AI in Research: Balancing Innovation and Integrity +
- Paper Mills +
- Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals +
- Industry funded research +
- Industry-funded continuing medical education – ethical conundrums +
- Intellectual property rights in research collaborations +
- Monitoring funding processes +
- The ethics of managing a laboratory or research group +
- Sponsorship of drug and device studies by the manufacturing company +
- Consent and Assent for Research on Children +
- Informed consent in psychiatry +
- "Met de billen bloot" (airing your dirty laundry) +
- Initiatives promoting research integrity +
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching +
- Research Integrity champions +
- Research Integrity lunch meetings +
- Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas +
- Reward campaign +
- Secondary corrections +
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity +
- Importance of healthy lifestyle +
- Imposter Syndrome +
- Dilemmas in daily practice +
- Networks and projects promoting research integrity +
- Not asking permission from contributors for the wording of the acknowledgement +
- Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science +
- Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities +
- Post-publication peer review +
- Responsible use of AI in peer review +
- AI Generated Content +
- AI use in scientific writing +
- Prioritising interventions and reproducibility measures to improve research reproducibility: a Delphi consultation method +
- Balancing harms and benefits +
- Clarifying the aims of a research study +
- Conducting research in high risk locations +
- Confidentiality +
- Ethical considerations in dealing with human remains +
- Ethical issues in qualitative research +
- Ethical issues of involving children with disabilities in research +
- Incidental research findings +
- Informed assent +
- Informed consent +
- Internet Research Ethics +
- Privacy in research +
- Research with animals +
- Research with children +
- Research with humans +
- Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials +
- Affiliations +
- Anonymous Authorship +
- Authorship criteria +
- Consent for publication (Author) +
- Consent for publication (Participant) +
- High Integration of Research Monographs in the European Open Science (HIRMEOS) +
- Initiative for Open Abstracts (I4OA) +
- Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC) +
- Open access publishing: the new norm? +
- Publishers - COPE guidelines +
- Retractions: correcting the scientific literature +
- Standards of authorship +
- Communicate results to the general public before a peer reviewed publication is available +
- Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’) +
- Duplicate publications and secondary publications +
- Funding (Sponsorship) bias +
- Hypothesizing after the results are known (HARKing) +
- Improper data use (a bias distorting research results) +
- Inaccurate representation of results in the media +
- Inferring from P-values +
- Insufficiently reported study flaws and limitations +
- Non-reporting of negative findings +
- Outcome reporting bias +
- P-value hacking +
- Publication bias (positive results) +
- Salami publication +
- Selective citation +
- Spin of research results +
- (re)submitting without consent of all authors +
- Being grossly unfair to your collaborators +
- Fake peer-reviewing +
- Gender bias +
- Honorary or gift authorship +
- Hostile peer review +
- Inappropriate authorship +
- Not acknowledging contributors who do not qualify for authorship +
- Research collaboration +
- Self-plagiarism +
- Take no full responsibility for the integrity of the research project and its reports +
- Turning a blind eye to breaches of integrity +
- Unfair reviewing +
- Convenience sampling as an ethical concern +
- Inadequately handle or store data or (bio)materials +
- Keeping inadequate notes of the research process +
- Ignoring substantial safety risks of studies +
- Inappropriate study design +
- Non-disclosure of changes to the research design +
- Posing irrelevant research questions +
- Perverse incentives +
- Polarized research +
- Predatory publishing +
- Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors +
- Forensic Statistics to detect Data Fabrication +
- Preregistration of animal study protocols +
- Prospective registration of clinical trials +
- Statistical pre-registration +
- Connecting researchers through ORCID +
- Digital humanities +
- Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity +
- Governance of research integrity: Options for a coordinated approach in Europe +
- Grading the quality of evidence in clinical practice guidelines +
