Most linked-to pages
From The Embassy of Good Science
500 agess ordered by recently added
- Important For:Researchers (654 links)
- Honesty (394 links)
- Respect (268 links)
- Accountability (245 links)
- Important For:All stakeholders in research (225 links)
- Reliability (195 links)
- LS - Life Sciences (149 links)
- Important For:Research institutions (135 links)
- Transparency (131 links)
- SH - Social Sciences and Humanities (131 links)
- Important For:Research Integrity Officers (128 links)
- Important For:Journal editors (123 links)
- Important For:PhD Students (107 links)
- Important For:Research Ethics Committees (107 links)
- Important For:Academic institutions (105 links)
- United States (105 links)
- Important For:Early career researchers (104 links)
- Important For:Academic staff (103 links)
- Important For:Research integrity trainers (102 links)
- Authorship (100 links)
- Important For:Supervisors (94 links)
- Plagiarism (91 links)
- US (90 links)
- Important For:Junior researchers (89 links)
- Important For:PhD students (84 links)
- Important For:Students (84 links)
- LS 07.08 - Health services, health care research (83 links)
- Europe (79 links)
- Important For:Ethics committee members (70 links)
- Important For:Policy makers (68 links)
- Important For:Senior researchers (68 links)
- Fabrication (67 links)
- Responsibility (63 links)
- PE - Physical Sciences and Engineering (61 links)
- Falsification (59 links)
- USA (59 links)
- Important For:Postdocs (58 links)
- Data management (56 links)
- Conflict of interest (56 links)
- Important For:researchers (53 links)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition (53 links)
- Important For:Editors (53 links)
- Important For:Administrators (52 links)
- Fairness (52 links)
- Research misconduct (50 links)
- Collaborative research (50 links)
- Important For:Research performing organisations (50 links)
- Consent (49 links)
- Important For:Funders (48 links)
- Important For:Doctoral students (47 links)
- 2017 (47 links)
- Publication ethics (47 links)
- Research misconduct (47 links)
- United Kingdom (46 links)
- Important For:Journal publishers (45 links)
- Important For:Graduate students (45 links)
- Clinical medicine (45 links)
- Confidentiality (45 links)
- Important For:Research funding organisations (44 links)
- Important For:Clinical researchers (43 links)
- Important For:Trainers in training (42 links)
- 2015 (42 links)
- Informed consent (40 links)
- Plagiarism (40 links)
- Conflict of interests (39 links)
- INSPIRE (39 links)
- Research with humans (38 links)
- 2014 (38 links)
- Important For:Trainers (37 links)
- Important For:Peer reviewers (36 links)
- 2018 (36 links)
- Informed consent (36 links)
- Important For:Scientists (36 links)
- The Netherlands (35 links)
- VIRT2UE (35 links)
- 2016 (34 links)
- 2011 (34 links)
- Mentor/trainee relationship (34 links)
- Important For:Authors (34 links)
- Important For:Educators (34 links)
- Peer review (33 links)
- Authorship criteria (33 links)
- Important For:Bachelor students (33 links)
- Important For:Universities (32 links)
- Integrity (32 links)
- Research ethics committees (32 links)
- RCR (32 links)
- Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity (32 links)
- Fabrication (31 links)
- Research with humans (31 links)
- Collaborative working (30 links)
- Standards of authorship (29 links)
- Research with Humans (29 links)
- Authorship and publication (28 links)
- Important For:Graduate and postgraduate students (28 links)
- Falsification (28 links)
- Important For:Professors (28 links)
- Important For:Publishers (28 links)
- American Sociological Association (27 links)
- SomeProperty:: (27 links)
- Important For:Principal investigators (27 links)
- Fictional (27 links)
- Important For:General public (27 links)
- Open access (26 links)
- Data Management (26 links)
- 2019 (26 links)
- Important For:Research subjects (26 links)
- Has Method:Participatory sessions (26 links)
- 2010 (26 links)
- Important For:Qualitative researchers (25 links)
- Important For:Mentors (25 links)
- 2012 (25 links)
- Has Method:Face to Face (25 links)
- Questionable research practice (25 links)
- Important For:Teachers (24 links)
- Important For:research leaders (24 links)
- Good Practice (24 links)
- Conflict of Interest (24 links)
- Publication Ethics (24 links)
- 2009 (24 links)
- Important For:Collaborating researchers (23 links)
- Virtues in research integrity (23 links)
- Safety (23 links)
- 2020 (23 links)
- Responsible supervision (22 links)
- Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct (22 links)
- Important For:Clinical ethics consultants (22 links)
- European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI) (22 links)
- 2013 (22 links)
- Germany (22 links)
- Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors (22 links)
- Research Integrity Committees (21 links)
- Peer review (21 links)
- 2008 (21 links)
- Privacy (21 links)
- Objectivity (21 links)
- Research Misconduct (20 links)
- Important For:Master students (20 links)
- Important For:phd students (20 links)
- Important For:Funding institutions (20 links)
- Important For:Industry (20 links)
- Important For:Advisors of students (19 links)
- Balancing harms and benefits (19 links)
- FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results (19 links)
- Retractions: correcting the scientific literature (19 links)
- Moral conflict and moral dilemma (19 links)
- Data sharing (19 links)
- Bias (19 links)
- Important For:Peer-reviewers (19 links)
- Improper data use (a bias distorting research results) (18 links)
- Autonomy (18 links)
- VIRT2UE (18 links)
- Whistleblowing (18 links)
- Research with Animals (18 links)
- Research misconduct (18 links)
- Important For:Journals (18 links)
- Important For:Reviewers (18 links)
- Allegation of Misconduct (18 links)
- Important For:Funding agencies (18 links)
- ORI (18 links)
- Care (18 links)
- Peer Review (18 links)
- Funders’ responsibilities (17 links)
- Confidentiality (17 links)
- Protecting research subjects (17 links)
- Supervision (17 links)
- Whistleblower protection/rights (17 links)
- Vulnerable and non-competent subjects (16 links)
- Important For:Civil society organisations (16 links)
- Research integrity training for PhD students (16 links)
- Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas (16 links)
- Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (16 links)
- 2006 (16 links)
- Data management (16 links)
- Important For:Policy-makers (16 links)
- Important For:Research Administrators (16 links)
- UK (16 links)
- Mentoring (16 links)
- Research culture (16 links)
- Important For:Laboratory researchers (16 links)
- Privacy in research (16 links)
- Norway (16 links)
- Funders (16 links)
- Conflict of interest in peer review (16 links)
- Reproducibility training (16 links)
- Declaration of Helsinki (15 links)
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (15 links)
- Has Method:eLearning (15 links)
- Is there a reproducibility crisis in science? (15 links)
- Grant applications (15 links)
- SH 04.05 - Social and clinical psychology (15 links)
- Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (15 links)
- 2005 (15 links)
- Supervision Guidelines (15 links)
- The SOPs4RI project (15 links)
- Canada (15 links)
- Ireland (15 links)
- Publication/Authorship (15 links)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (14 links)
- Australian Research Council Research Integrity Policy (14 links)
- Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (14 links)
- Reproducibility (14 links)
- Important For:medical researchers (14 links)
- 2004 (14 links)
- Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (14 links)
- United States Office of Research Integrity (14 links)
- Human subject research (14 links)
- Ethical decision making (14 links)
- Open Science (14 links)
- Impartiality (14 links)
- Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (14 links)
- Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (14 links)
- Australia (14 links)
- Non-reporting of negative findings (14 links)
- Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’) (14 links)
- Important For:Undergraduate students (14 links)
- Has Method:Individual learning (14 links)
- ENERI manual-research integrity and ethics (14 links)
- Important For:Decision makers (14 links)
- SOPs4RI (14 links)
- Research ethics (14 links)
- Inappropriate authorship (14 links)
- Croatia (14 links)
- Dignity (14 links)
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (14 links)
- Reproducability (13 links)
- Misrepresentation (13 links)
- European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC) (13 links)
- Research with animals (13 links)
- Important For:Anthropologists (13 links)
- Authorship and Contribution (13 links)
- Finland (13 links)
- Open access publishing: the new norm? (13 links)
- Cross-boundary collaborations (13 links)
- Outcome reporting bias (13 links)
- Allegations of misconduct (13 links)
- The impact of the GDPR on scientific data (13 links)
- Important For:research integrity researchers (13 links)
- Supervision (12 links)
- Ghost authorship (12 links)
- Image Integrity (12 links)
- RE in general (12 links)
- Mentor-trainee relationship (12 links)
- Cognitive dissonance and moral distress (12 links)
- Has Method:Blended learning (12 links)
- Balancing harms and benefits (12 links)
- Accuracy (12 links)
- Social responsibilities (12 links)
- Misconduct (12 links)
- 2007 (12 links)
- Belgium (12 links)
- Data management checklist (12 links)
- Misconduct and Fraud in clinical research (12 links)
- High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations (12 links)
- Self-plagiarism (12 links)
- Journal peer review (12 links)
- REC approval (12 links)
- COPE core practices (12 links)
- Denmark (12 links)
- P-value hacking (11 links)
- Irish National Policy Statement on Ensuring Research Integrity (11 links)
- Responsible research (11 links)
- 2000 (11 links)
- Image manipulation (11 links)
- AllTrials campaign (11 links)
- The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) (11 links)
- Work environment (11 links)
- Interim Practice Work (11 links)
- Trustworthiness (11 links)
- Infographic - SOPs4RI Research integrity education guidelines for research institutions (11 links)
- Intellectual property (11 links)
- Important For:Pharma Industry (11 links)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on continuous research integrity education (11 links)
- France (11 links)
- North America (11 links)
- Data Practices and Management (11 links)
- Research with animals (11 links)
- Patient safety (11 links)
- Sweden (11 links)
- COPE (11 links)
- Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials (11 links)
- Important For:Human rights defenders (11 links)
- Monitoring funding processes (11 links)
- FFP (11 links)
- ALLEA (11 links)
- The Nuremberg Code (11 links)
- Iran (11 links)
- Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science (11 links)
- Replicability (11 links)
- Institutional Responsibilities (11 links)
- Animal resources (11 links)
- Collegiality (11 links)
- Institutional responsibilities (11 links)
- The INSPIRE project (11 links)
- Research Integrity (11 links)
- Peer review (10 links)
- Collaborative science (10 links)
- Introduction of Virtue Ethics to Research Integrity (10 links)
- Adherence to Regulations (10 links)
- Protection of sources (10 links)
- Resource:7fcb92c2-8d04-4106-875f-166af054c161 (10 links)
- Important For:PI (10 links)
- Important For:RIO (10 links)
- Science policy (10 links)
- China (10 links)
- Theme:A22bd155-7f88-4750-aa9c-cba9ad72cbec (10 links)
- Communication (10 links)
- Important For:High school students (10 links)
- Research Integrity Advisors (10 links)
- Gender bias (10 links)
- Misconduct Investigations (10 links)
- 'I am really sorry': Peer Reviewer Stole Text for Own Paper (10 links)
- Italy (10 links)
- Finnish Guidelines on Doctoral Supervision and Review (10 links)
- Openness (10 links)
- Austria (10 links)
- Intellectual property rights in research collaborations (10 links)
- Publication bias (positive results) (10 links)
- Superb Supervision: integrity training for supervisors (10 links)
- Switzerland (10 links)
- Fraud (10 links)
- LS 07.01 - Medical engineering and technology (10 links)
- Publishers - COPE guidelines (9 links)
- Virtue Ethics under Current Research Conditions (9 links)
- Duplication (9 links)
- Up, Up, and Away: Clinical Trials Go International (9 links)
- Dubious Peer Reviews Lead to 10 Retractions (9 links)
- Theme:F3ddbf9b-e3c4-47b7-97cd-6239ce7a32c3 (9 links)
- Important For:Everyone (9 links)
- Research Misconduct Investigation (9 links)
- Nine pitfalls of research misconduct (9 links)
- European Network of Research Integrity Offices Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct (9 links)
- Clinical Medicine (9 links)
- Research integrity officers in Europe (9 links)
- The Rotterdam Dilemma Game (9 links)
- Peer review card exchange game (9 links)
- Retraction (9 links)
- Availability (9 links)
- Deception (9 links)
- Retraction Watch (9 links)
- UK Guidance on Reproducibility and Reliability of Biomedical Research: Improving Research Practices (9 links)
- Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities (9 links)
- Prospective registration of clinical trials (9 links)
- Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct (9 links)
- LS 02 - Genetics, Genomics, Bioinformatics and Systems Biology (9 links)
- COPE Cases (9 links)
- Peer review card game (9 links)
- Research Environments (9 links)
- Important For:students (9 links)
- Post-publication peer review (9 links)
- Data Protection (9 links)
- Spain (9 links)
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (9 links)
- Industry funded research (9 links)
- Important For:health care professionals (9 links)
- 04 - Moral Case Deliberation: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity (9 links)
- UKRIO (9 links)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of bachelor, master and PhD students (9 links)
- LS 07.11 - Medical ethics (9 links)
- University Investigation Finds Misconduct by Bone Researcher with 23 Retractions (9 links)
- Computational reproducibility: safeguarding the backbone of science (9 links)
- COPE flowcharts (9 links)
- Introduction to Research Integrity (9 links)
- Mantra (research data management training) (9 links)
- Preparatory Reading: Introduction to Concepts & Themes (9 links)
- The Ethics of Pharmaceutical Research Funding: A Social Organization Approach (8 links)
- RI in general (8 links)
- Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals (8 links)
- Reasonable standards for career advancement (8 links)
- Research Data Management (8 links)
- Statistical pre-registration (8 links)
- Initiatives promoting research integrity (8 links)
- Resepct (8 links)
- Important For:trainers (8 links)
- 2021 (8 links)
- ENRIO Collection (8 links)
- Inappropriate study design (8 links)
- Predatory publishing (8 links)
- Vulnerable population (8 links)
- Self Declaration Approach - a Reflection on the Varieties of Goodness in Research (8 links)
- Netherlands (8 links)
- Important For:Media (8 links)
- Balancing Harm and Benefits (8 links)
- Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations (8 links)
- Informed assent (8 links)
- Resource:1e1d90cf-ca7e-45d6-b9ba-c5e4791f6e8a (8 links)
- Practicing Reflection in Dialogue (8 links)
- Austrian Agency for Research Integrity Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice (8 links)
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights (8 links)
- Research ethics committee members' skills (8 links)
- Digital humanities (8 links)
- Fostering Integrity in Research (8 links)
- INTEGRITY (8 links)
- Open science (8 links)
- Good research practices (8 links)
- Journal Impact Factor (8 links)
- Virtues and Norms (8 links)
- Training Informations (8 links)
- Clinical trials (8 links)
- Copyright (8 links)
- Professionalism (8 links)
- Faulty Drug Trials Tarnish Japan's Clinical Research (8 links)
- Important For:Patients (8 links)
- Networks and projects promoting research integrity (8 links)
- 02 - The Seven Steps Method: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity (8 links)
- 01 - Value Analysis: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity (8 links)
- Et al. (8 links)
- Pre-registrations (8 links)
- Important For:Data protection officers (8 links)
- Safeguards (8 links)
- Research Ethics (8 links)
- The Ethics Codes Collection (8 links)
- 05 - REalistiC Decisions: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity (8 links)
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Publication Recommendations (8 links)
- Important For:Citizen Scientists (8 links)
- Dialogue versus debate (8 links)
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (8 links)
- Grey areas of plagiarism: 10 scenarios to discuss with students (8 links)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of post-doctorate and senior researchers (8 links)
- Complaints procedure (8 links)
- Important For:Ethnographers (7 links)
- Questionable research practices (7 links)
- Spin of research results (7 links)
- Data fabrication and falsification (7 links)
- 3 Ways to Blow the Whistle (7 links)
- The Dilemma Game (7 links)
- Online Module: Responsible research and Peer Review (7 links)
- Important For:Government (7 links)
- Responsible conduct of biomedical research : collaborative research (7 links)
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form (7 links)
- Instruction:46bc703d-8d43-42a3-8fc8-1d246f97f152 (7 links)
- Fenneke Blom (7 links)
- Research culture group (University of Glasgow) (7 links)
- Hostile peer review (7 links)
- Professional courtesy and fairness (7 links)
- Important For:ECR (7 links)
- 06 - Teaching Research Ethics Tool : A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics (7 links)
- The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity (7 links)
- The Middle Position (7 links)
- Resource:C473b44b-f01c-4873-bbf0-f9562aab275b (7 links)
- Plagiarism in a PhD Thesis (7 links)
- Animal ethics (7 links)
- Netherlands Standard Evaluation Protocol for Research Assessments (7 links)
- PhD and Supervisor charter (KU Leuven) (7 links)
- Values and norms (7 links)
- Psychology (7 links)
- Important For:Reserchers (7 links)
- Research involving animals (7 links)
- Insufficiently reported study flaws and limitations (7 links)
- Research culture awards (University of Glasgow) (7 links)
- 2001 (7 links)
- Image manipulation research (7 links)
- Beneficence (7 links)
- Modified Dilemma Game (7 links)
- Resource:Cfc3db56-7a32-4f2d-8485-2f14a12c7109 (7 links)
- Training (7 links)
- Can a scientific paper be published anonymously? (7 links)
- Ethics (7 links)
- Public Communication (7 links)
- Important For:Regulators (7 links)
- Training materials (7 links)
- Implications of a Single Highly Cited Article on a Journal and Its Citation Indexes (7 links)
- Japan (7 links)
- Power abuse (7 links)
- Good stewardship (7 links)
- Reusing Published Data (7 links)
- Organizing the training (7 links)
- Negligence (7 links)
- Authorship: video (7 links)
- Collaborative spirit (7 links)
- Responsible Research and Innovation - RRI (7 links)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of institutional research integrity stakeholders (7 links)
- Altmetrics (7 links)
- PE 06 - Computer Science and Informatics (7 links)
- Important For:industry stakeholders (7 links)
- Research culture statement (University of Glasgow) (7 links)
- 03 - Four Quadrant Approach: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity (7 links)
- Disclosing Conflicts of Interest in Scientific Advice (7 links)
- Debate and Dialogue (7 links)
- Author Misconduct: Not Just the Editors' Responsibility (7 links)
- Institutional dealing with scientific misconduct (7 links)
- Salami publication (6 links)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on monitoring funded projects (6 links)
- Data stewardship at TU Delft (6 links)
- Research culture survey (University of Glasgow) (6 links)
- Protection of Research Participants (6 links)
- ROSiE (6 links)
- Speculations and Ethical Concerns in the Conduct of Outsourced Clinical Trials in India (6 links)
- Reliabiity (6 links)
- Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (6 links)
- H-index (6 links)
- Ethical and Societal Foundations of Open Science (6 links)
- Senior Researcher (6 links)
- "Met de billen bloot" (airing your dirty laundry) (6 links)
- Image Manipulation (6 links)
- VIRT2UE Certification (6 links)
- Instruction:1dcc08f4-54f6-4841-bf90-c43311924292 (6 links)
- Diligence (6 links)
- 3 things societies can do to promote research integrity (6 links)
- Selection bias (6 links)