Pages with the most revisions

From The Embassy of Good Science

250 nss ordered by recently added

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  1. AboutCertifiedTrainers‏‎ (118 revisions)
  2. VIRT2UE Training Guide‏‎ (69 revisions)
  3. Modified Dilemma Game‏‎ (54 revisions)
  4. Maintenance‏‎ (46 revisions)
  5. About‏‎ (44 revisions)
  6. Introduction to Research Integrity‏‎ (41 revisions)
  7. Debate and Dialogue‏‎ (39 revisions)
  8. VIRT2UE Certification‏‎ (34 revisions)
  9. The INSPIRE project‏‎ (33 revisions)
  10. Main Page‏‎ (30 revisions)
  11. Introduction of Virtue Ethics to Research Integrity‏‎ (27 revisions)
  12. The Middle Position‏‎ (26 revisions)
  13. Self Declaration Approach - a Reflection on the Varieties of Goodness in Research‏‎ (26 revisions)
  14. Introduction to Responsible Supervision, Mentoring and Role-modeling‏‎ (24 revisions)
  15. AboutMaySymposium‏‎ (24 revisions)
  16. Themes‏‎ (23 revisions)
  17. VIRT2UE Videos‏‎ (23 revisions)
  18. Virtue Ethics under Current Research Conditions‏‎ (23 revisions)
  19. Preparatory Reading: Introduction to Concepts & Themes‏‎ (23 revisions)
  20. AllTrials campaign‏‎ (19 revisions)
  21. Altmetrics‏‎ (19 revisions)
  22. EnTIRE final conference‏‎ (19 revisions)
  23. Virtues in research integrity‏‎ (19 revisions)
  24. Resources‏‎ (18 revisions)
  25. Dilemmas in daily practice‏‎ (18 revisions)
  26. Protection of Research Participants‏‎ (18 revisions)
  27. Virtues and Norms‏‎ (18 revisions)
  28. Practicing Reflection in Dialogue‏‎ (18 revisions)
  29. Prospective registration of clinical trials‏‎ (17 revisions)
  30. Training Informations‏‎ (17 revisions)
  31. Research integrity officers in Europe‏‎ (17 revisions)
  32. VIRT2UE Training Guide in Turkish‏‎ (17 revisions)
  33. Balancing harms and benefits‏‎ (16 revisions)
  34. Research with humans‏‎ (16 revisions)
  35. Ethical and Societal Foundations of Open Science‏‎ (16 revisions)
  36. Cognitive dissonance and moral distress‏‎ (16 revisions)
  37. Preparatory Viewing: Introduction to Concepts & Themes‏‎ (16 revisions)
  38. Dialogue versus debate‏‎ (15 revisions)
  39. Authorship criteria‏‎ (15 revisions)
  40. Terms of service‏‎ (15 revisions)
  41. Rights of Citizen Scientists‏‎ (14 revisions)
  42. Research integrity training for PhD students‏‎ (14 revisions)
  43. The Embassy's Newsletter - July 2021‏‎ (14 revisions)
  44. FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results‏‎ (14 revisions)
  45. Reasonable standards for career advancement‏‎ (14 revisions)
  46. Privacy statement‏‎ (14 revisions)
  47. 02 - The Seven Steps Method: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity‏‎ (14 revisions)
  48. Introduction: Guidelines and Discrepancies‏‎ (13 revisions)
  49. Peer review card game‏‎ (13 revisions)
  50. VIRT2UE final conference‏‎ (13 revisions)
  51. Post-publication peer review‏‎ (13 revisions)
  52. Scientific Misconduct at an Elite Medical Institute: The Role of Competing Institutional Logics and Fragmented Control‏‎ (13 revisions)
  53. Dubious Peer Reviews Lead to 10 Retractions‏‎ (13 revisions)
  54. Interim Practice Work‏‎ (13 revisions)
  55. Data management plans‏‎ (13 revisions)
  56. Handling of Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries: Early stages in the 1990's‏‎ (12 revisions)
  57. Founders‏‎ (12 revisions)
  58. Research Integrity Committees‏‎ (12 revisions)
  59. Values and norms‏‎ (12 revisions)
  60. Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project‏‎ (12 revisions)
  61. Peer review‏‎ (12 revisions)
  62. Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project‏‎ (12 revisions)
  63. The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity‏‎ (12 revisions)
  64. Confidentiality‏‎ (12 revisions)
  65. Research ethics committee members' skills‏‎ (12 revisions)
  66. The impact of the GDPR on scientific data‏‎ (12 revisions)
  67. The Dilemma Game‏‎ (12 revisions)
  68. VIRT2UE train-the-trainer program‏‎ (12 revisions)
  69. The Netherlands‏‎ (11 revisions)
  70. Research misconduct‏‎ (11 revisions)
  71. Moral conflict and moral dilemma‏‎ (11 revisions)
  72. Collaborative working‏‎ (11 revisions)
  73. Journal Impact Factor‏‎ (11 revisions)
  74. Organizing the training‏‎ (11 revisions)
  75. European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI)‏‎ (11 revisions)
  76. Belgian Code of Ethics for Scientific Research‏‎ (11 revisions)
  77. Networks and projects promoting research integrity‏‎ (11 revisions)
  78. Responsible Open Science‏‎ (11 revisions)
  79. Initiatives promoting research integrity‏‎ (11 revisions)
  80. Retractions: correcting the scientific literature‏‎ (11 revisions)
  81. Reflecting on Experiences and Practicing Exercises‏‎ (11 revisions)
  82. European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC)‏‎ (11 revisions)
  83. Science policy‏‎ (11 revisions)
  84. Selective citation‏‎ (11 revisions)
  85. Conflicts of interest in citizen science‏‎ (11 revisions)
  86. The Olivieri Debacle: Where Were the Heroes of Bioethics?‏‎ (10 revisions)
  87. The Saga of Korean Women Who Provided Eggs for Embryonic Stem Cell Research‏‎ (10 revisions)
  88. Grey areas of plagiarism: 10 scenarios to discuss with students‏‎ (10 revisions)
  89. Salami publication‏‎ (10 revisions)
  90. The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing ‘Situated Ethics’ in the Field‏‎ (10 revisions)
  91. Misrepresenting the characteristics of research participants in psychiatric studies‏‎ (10 revisions)
  92. Predatory publishing‏‎ (10 revisions)
  93. The Extent and Causes of Academic Text Recycling or ‘Self-Plagiarism’‏‎ (10 revisions)
  94. Improper data use (a bias distorting research results)‏‎ (10 revisions)
  95. The Netherlands‏‎ (10 revisions)
  96. Informed consent‏‎ (10 revisions)
  97. Quality of research outputs and data sets‏‎ (10 revisions)
  98. Legal rights of accused scientists‏‎ (10 revisions)
  99. Supervision‏‎ (10 revisions)
  100. Privacy in research‏‎ (10 revisions)
  101. High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations‏‎ (10 revisions)
  102. Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity‏‎ (10 revisions)
  103. From Case Management to Prevention of Scientific Dishonesty in Denmark‏‎ (10 revisions)
  104. Mea Culpa: Scientific Misconduct - perspective of a research ethics board chair‏‎ (10 revisions)
  105. Philosopher Earns 14th Retraction for Plagiarism‏‎ (10 revisions)
  106. Final Findings of Scientific Misconduct‏‎ (10 revisions)
  107. Research with animals‏‎ (10 revisions)
  108. Polarized research‏‎ (10 revisions)
  109. Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials‏‎ (10 revisions)
  110. Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science‏‎ (10 revisions)
  111. Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel‏‎ (10 revisions)
  112. Whistleblower protection/rights‏‎ (10 revisions)
  113. Maintenance:ExportThemes‏‎ (10 revisions)
  114. 01 - Value Analysis: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity‏‎ (10 revisions)
  115. The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud‏‎ (9 revisions)
  116. Criticism Swirls Around High-Profile History Book about North Korea‏‎ (9 revisions)
  117. Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity‏‎ (9 revisions)
  118. Aboutcertifiedtrainers‏‎ (9 revisions)
  119. Author Misconduct: Not Just the Editors' Responsibility‏‎ (9 revisions)
  120. The role of moral philosophy in the divide between science and non-science‏‎ (9 revisions)
  121. Self-plagiarism‏‎ (9 revisions)
  122. 05 - REalistiC Decisions: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity‏‎ (9 revisions)
  123. Supervision Guidelines‏‎ (9 revisions)
  124. Risks to the environment, animals, plants, and ecosystems‏‎ (9 revisions)
  125. Research metrics‏‎ (9 revisions)
  126. Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas‏‎ (9 revisions)
  127. Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors‏‎ (9 revisions)
  128. Legal Liabilities in Research: Early lessons From North America‏‎ (9 revisions)
  129. Standards of authorship‏‎ (9 revisions)
  130. H-index‏‎ (9 revisions)
  131. Declaration of Helsinki‏‎ (9 revisions)
  132. The Rotterdam Dilemma Game‏‎ (9 revisions)
  133. Institutional Pathology and the Death of a Mentally Ill Young Man‏‎ (9 revisions)
  134. Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals‏‎ (9 revisions)
  135. Non-reporting of negative findings‏‎ (9 revisions)
  136. Artificial tracheas and severe research misconduct‏‎ (9 revisions)
  137. INTEGRITY‏‎ (9 revisions)
  138. Open access publishing: the new norm?‏‎ (9 revisions)
  139. Good Epidemiological Practice Guidelines‏‎ (9 revisions)
  140. SPOC: RCR through supervision and mentoring course‏‎ (9 revisions)
  141. 3 Ways to Blow the Whistle‏‎ (9 revisions)
  142. The Ethics of Pharmaceutical Research Funding: A Social Organization Approach‏‎ (9 revisions)
  143. Cross-boundary collaborations‏‎ (9 revisions)
  144. Publishers - COPE guidelines‏‎ (9 revisions)
  145. Informed assent‏‎ (9 revisions)
  146. Research Integrity Advisors‏‎ (9 revisions)
  147. Misconduct Ruling is Silent on Intent‏‎ (9 revisions)
  148. Baltimore Case - In Brief‏‎ (9 revisions)
  149. How I Was Nearly Duped into 'Authoring' a Fake Paper‏‎ (9 revisions)
  150. Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity‏‎ (9 revisions)
  151. Imposter Syndrome‏‎ (8 revisions)
  152. The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition‏‎ (8 revisions)
  153. What Universities can Learn from one of Science’s Biggest Frauds‏‎ (8 revisions)
  154. Jesse's Intent‏‎ (8 revisions)
  155. P-value hacking‏‎ (8 revisions)
  156. Researcher Accused of Breaching Research Ethics Faces GMC‏‎ (8 revisions)
  157. Denmark‏‎ (8 revisions)
  158. Court Denies Appeal of HIV Fraudster’s 57-month Prison Sentence‏‎ (8 revisions)
  159. Image Integrity‏‎ (8 revisions)
  160. Funders‏‎ (8 revisions)
  161. 03 - Four Quadrant Approach: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity‏‎ (8 revisions)
  162. EQIPD (Enhancing Quality in Preclinical Data)‏‎ (8 revisions)
  163. Publication bias (positive results)‏‎ (8 revisions)
  164. 'I am really sorry': Peer Reviewer Stole Text for Own Paper‏‎ (8 revisions)
  165. Epistemic virtues‏‎ (8 revisions)
  166. Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project‏‎ (8 revisions)
  167. Open Science‏‎ (8 revisions)
  168. Research ethics committees‏‎ (8 revisions)
  169. German Research Foundation's Recommendations for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice‏‎ (8 revisions)
  170. A Review of the Impact of the TeGenero Trial on the Design, Conduct, and Ethics of FIM Trials‏‎ (8 revisions)
  171. Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project‏‎ (8 revisions)
  172. Research culture survey (University of Glasgow)‏‎ (8 revisions)
  173. Unlicensed usage of medical devices on patients: a case of accusations‏‎ (8 revisions)
  174. Psychology Grad Student Faked Data‏‎ (8 revisions)
  175. Community‏‎ (8 revisions)
  176. Research culture statement (University of Glasgow)‏‎ (8 revisions)
  177. Spin of research results‏‎ (8 revisions)
  178. Translate the VIRT2UE e-learning modules into your own language‏‎ (8 revisions)
  179. Digital humanities‏‎ (8 revisions)
  180. Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project‏‎ (8 revisions)
  181. Guest Authorship, Mortality Reporting, and Integrity in Rofecoxib Studies‏‎ (8 revisions)
  182. 04 - Moral Case Deliberation: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity‏‎ (8 revisions)
  183. The Unfortunate Experiment‏‎ (8 revisions)
  184. Human Rights Education for Legal Professionals (HELP) Online Training‏‎ (8 revisions)
  185. Research collaboration‏‎ (8 revisions)
  186. Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project‏‎ (8 revisions)
  187. Outcome reporting bias‏‎ (8 revisions)
  188. Bothered and Bewildered But not Bewitched‏‎ (8 revisions)
  189. Responsible supervision‏‎ (8 revisions)
  190. Intellectual property rights in research collaborations‏‎ (8 revisions)
  191. Inappropriate study design‏‎ (8 revisions)
  192. Aboutcollaboration‏‎ (8 revisions)
  193. History, Ethics and the Presidential Commission on Research in Guatemala‏‎ (8 revisions)
  194. Path2Integrity Handbooks for Teachers and Trainers‏‎ (7 revisions)
  195. Geology Paper Has a Rocky Road is Now Retracted‏‎ (7 revisions)
  196. Data protection in a global pandemic (COVID-19)‏‎ (7 revisions)
  197. The Legacy of the Hwang Case: Research Misconduct in Biosciences‏‎ (7 revisions)
  198. Finland‏‎ (7 revisions)
  199. Intellectual conflicts of interest‏‎ (7 revisions)
  200. PhD-pizza - Gathering for PhD-candidates to talk freely‏‎ (7 revisions)
  201. Research fraud on MMR vaccines‏‎ (7 revisions)
  202. Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities‏‎ (7 revisions)
  203. Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Finland‏‎ (7 revisions)
  204. The learning curve - theatre play #MeTooAcademia‏‎ (7 revisions)
  205. Research Problems at Australian University Hit the News‏‎ (7 revisions)
  206. Simultaneous Submission Leading to Duplicate Publication‏‎ (7 revisions)
  207. Anonymity Revisited‏‎ (7 revisions)
  208. Bulgaria‏‎ (7 revisions)
  209. Irish National Policy Statement on Ensuring Research Integrity‏‎ (7 revisions)
  210. Diner Pensant Workshop‏‎ (7 revisions)
  211. Plan S‏‎ (7 revisions)
  212. Conflict of interest in peer review‏‎ (7 revisions)
  213. Retracted WHO Reports on Opioid Guidelines‏‎ (7 revisions)
  214. Declaration of Istanbul‏‎ (7 revisions)
  215. Image Manipulation Detection‏‎ (7 revisions)
  216. UK Research Integrity Office's Code of Practice for Research‏‎ (7 revisions)
  217. Path2Integrity Campaign‏‎ (7 revisions)
  218. Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Magazine Surprise‏‎ (7 revisions)
  219. 06 - Teaching Research Ethics Tool : A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics‏‎ (7 revisions)
  220. Research culture group (University of Glasgow)‏‎ (7 revisions)
  221. France‏‎ (7 revisions)
  222. When Sociologists Deceive Their Subjects‏‎ (7 revisions)
  223. European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Code of Practice for Fieldwork Training‏‎ (7 revisions)
  224. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Publication Recommendations‏‎ (7 revisions)
  225. Ethics, Human Rights and HIV Vaccine Trials in Low-Income Settings‏‎ (7 revisions)
  226. Deception by Research Participants‏‎ (7 revisions)
  227. Inaccurate representation of results in the media‏‎ (7 revisions)
  228. A Case Study about Anonymization and Secondary Use of Qualitative Data‏‎ (7 revisions)
  229. Perioperative Mischief: The Price of Academic Misconduct‏‎ (7 revisions)
  230. Implications of a Single Highly Cited Article on a Journal and Its Citation Indexes‏‎ (7 revisions)
  231. UK Research Council's Policy and Guidelines on Governance of Good Research Conduct‏‎ (7 revisions)
  232. The Threat to Scientific Integrity in Environmental and Occupational Medicine‏‎ (7 revisions)
  233. Speculations and Ethical Concerns in the Conduct of Outsourced Clinical Trials in India‏‎ (7 revisions)
  234. Bioethicists Call for Investigation Into Nutritional Experiments on Aboriginal People‏‎ (7 revisions)
  235. Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’)‏‎ (7 revisions)
  236. Research culture‏‎ (7 revisions)
  237. "Met de billen bloot" (airing your dirty laundry)‏‎ (6 revisions)
  238. Local resources on improving science: basic study‏‎ (6 revisions)
  239. The Ethics of Collecting Genetic Data From Indigenous People‏‎ (6 revisions)
  240. Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct‏‎ (6 revisions)
  241. Falsification‏‎ (6 revisions)
  242. Austria‏‎ (6 revisions)
  243. Inferring from P-values‏‎ (6 revisions)
  244. VIRT2UE‏‎ (6 revisions)
  245. Forbidden Knowledge‏‎ (6 revisions)
  246. Conflict of interests‏‎ (6 revisions)
  247. The SOPs4RI project‏‎ (6 revisions)
  248. Research Integrity: Podcast Series‏‎ (6 revisions)
  249. Guidance on the Management of Clinical Trials during the COVID-19 Pandemic‏‎ (6 revisions)
  250. Posing irrelevant research questions‏‎ (6 revisions)
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6