Pages with the most revisions

From The Embassy of Good Science

250 nss ordered by recently added

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  1. Dubious Peer Reviews Lead to 10 Retractions‏‎ (13 revisions)
  2. Interim Practice Work‏‎ (13 revisions)
  3. Peer review card game‏‎ (13 revisions)
  4. Introduction: Guidelines and Discrepancies‏‎ (13 revisions)
  5. Post-publication peer review‏‎ (13 revisions)
  6. The impact of the GDPR on scientific data‏‎ (12 revisions)
  7. The Dilemma Game‏‎ (12 revisions)
  8. Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project‏‎ (12 revisions)
  9. Founders‏‎ (12 revisions)
  10. VIRT2UE train-the-trainer program‏‎ (12 revisions)
  11. Values and norms‏‎ (12 revisions)
  12. Research Integrity Committees‏‎ (12 revisions)
  13. Handling of Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries: Early stages in the 1990's‏‎ (12 revisions)
  14. Peer review‏‎ (12 revisions)
  15. Confidentiality‏‎ (12 revisions)
  16. The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity‏‎ (12 revisions)
  17. Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project‏‎ (12 revisions)
  18. Research ethics committee members' skills‏‎ (12 revisions)
  19. Retractions: correcting the scientific literature‏‎ (11 revisions)
  20. Initiatives promoting research integrity‏‎ (11 revisions)
  21. Belgian Code of Ethics for Scientific Research‏‎ (11 revisions)
  22. Science policy‏‎ (11 revisions)
  23. European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC)‏‎ (11 revisions)
  24. Responsible Open Science‏‎ (11 revisions)
  25. Selective citation‏‎ (11 revisions)
  26. Reflecting on Experiences and Practicing Exercises‏‎ (11 revisions)
  27. Research misconduct‏‎ (11 revisions)
  28. Conflicts of interest in citizen science‏‎ (11 revisions)
  29. Moral conflict and moral dilemma‏‎ (11 revisions)
  30. Collaborative working‏‎ (11 revisions)
  31. Journal Impact Factor‏‎ (11 revisions)
  32. European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI)‏‎ (11 revisions)
  33. The Netherlands‏‎ (11 revisions)
  34. Networks and projects promoting research integrity‏‎ (11 revisions)
  35. Organizing the training‏‎ (11 revisions)
  36. The Extent and Causes of Academic Text Recycling or ‘Self-Plagiarism’‏‎ (10 revisions)
  37. The Netherlands‏‎ (10 revisions)
  38. Quality of research outputs and data sets‏‎ (10 revisions)
  39. Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials‏‎ (10 revisions)
  40. Research with animals‏‎ (10 revisions)
  41. Polarized research‏‎ (10 revisions)
  42. From Case Management to Prevention of Scientific Dishonesty in Denmark‏‎ (10 revisions)
  43. Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science‏‎ (10 revisions)
  44. Whistleblower protection/rights‏‎ (10 revisions)
  45. Mea Culpa: Scientific Misconduct - perspective of a research ethics board chair‏‎ (10 revisions)
  46. Philosopher Earns 14th Retraction for Plagiarism‏‎ (10 revisions)
  47. Final Findings of Scientific Misconduct‏‎ (10 revisions)
  48. Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel‏‎ (10 revisions)
  49. Maintenance:ExportThemes‏‎ (10 revisions)
  50. 01 - Value Analysis: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity‏‎ (10 revisions)
  51. The Olivieri Debacle: Where Were the Heroes of Bioethics?‏‎ (10 revisions)
  52. Salami publication‏‎ (10 revisions)
  53. Predatory publishing‏‎ (10 revisions)
  54. The Saga of Korean Women Who Provided Eggs for Embryonic Stem Cell Research‏‎ (10 revisions)
  55. Improper data use (a bias distorting research results)‏‎ (10 revisions)
  56. Legal rights of accused scientists‏‎ (10 revisions)
  57. Informed consent‏‎ (10 revisions)
  58. Grey areas of plagiarism: 10 scenarios to discuss with students‏‎ (10 revisions)
  59. The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing ‘Situated Ethics’ in the Field‏‎ (10 revisions)
  60. Misrepresenting the characteristics of research participants in psychiatric studies‏‎ (10 revisions)
  61. Supervision‏‎ (10 revisions)
  62. High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations‏‎ (10 revisions)
  63. Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity‏‎ (10 revisions)
  64. Privacy in research‏‎ (10 revisions)
  65. Institutional Pathology and the Death of a Mentally Ill Young Man‏‎ (9 revisions)
  66. Declaration of Helsinki‏‎ (9 revisions)
  67. The Rotterdam Dilemma Game‏‎ (9 revisions)
  68. INTEGRITY‏‎ (9 revisions)
  69. Cross-boundary collaborations‏‎ (9 revisions)
  70. Publishers - COPE guidelines‏‎ (9 revisions)
  71. Artificial tracheas and severe research misconduct‏‎ (9 revisions)
  72. Good Epidemiological Practice Guidelines‏‎ (9 revisions)
  73. Informed assent‏‎ (9 revisions)
  74. SPOC: RCR through supervision and mentoring course‏‎ (9 revisions)
  75. Research Integrity Advisors‏‎ (9 revisions)
  76. 3 Ways to Blow the Whistle‏‎ (9 revisions)
  77. The Ethics of Pharmaceutical Research Funding: A Social Organization Approach‏‎ (9 revisions)
  78. Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity‏‎ (9 revisions)
  79. Misconduct Ruling is Silent on Intent‏‎ (9 revisions)
  80. Supervision Guidelines‏‎ (9 revisions)
  81. Baltimore Case - In Brief‏‎ (9 revisions)
  82. Self-plagiarism‏‎ (9 revisions)
  83. How I Was Nearly Duped into 'Authoring' a Fake Paper‏‎ (9 revisions)
  84. The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud‏‎ (9 revisions)
  85. Criticism Swirls Around High-Profile History Book about North Korea‏‎ (9 revisions)
  86. Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity‏‎ (9 revisions)
  87. Research metrics‏‎ (9 revisions)
  88. Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors‏‎ (9 revisions)
  89. The role of moral philosophy in the divide between science and non-science‏‎ (9 revisions)
  90. Author Misconduct: Not Just the Editors' Responsibility‏‎ (9 revisions)
  91. Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas‏‎ (9 revisions)
  92. H-index‏‎ (9 revisions)
  93. Standards of authorship‏‎ (9 revisions)
  94. 05 - REalistiC Decisions: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity‏‎ (9 revisions)
  95. Risks to the environment, animals, plants, and ecosystems‏‎ (9 revisions)
  96. Open access publishing: the new norm?‏‎ (9 revisions)
  97. Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals‏‎ (9 revisions)
  98. Non-reporting of negative findings‏‎ (9 revisions)
  99. Legal Liabilities in Research: Early lessons From North America‏‎ (9 revisions)
  100. Aboutcertifiedtrainers‏‎ (9 revisions)
  101. Research collaboration‏‎ (8 revisions)
  102. Translate the VIRT2UE e-learning modules into your own language‏‎ (8 revisions)
  103. Outcome reporting bias‏‎ (8 revisions)
  104. Responsible supervision‏‎ (8 revisions)
  105. Guest Authorship, Mortality Reporting, and Integrity in Rofecoxib Studies‏‎ (8 revisions)
  106. Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project‏‎ (8 revisions)
  107. Inappropriate study design‏‎ (8 revisions)
  108. Intellectual property rights in research collaborations‏‎ (8 revisions)
  109. 04 - Moral Case Deliberation: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity‏‎ (8 revisions)
  110. The Unfortunate Experiment‏‎ (8 revisions)
  111. Human Rights Education for Legal Professionals (HELP) Online Training‏‎ (8 revisions)
  112. Community‏‎ (8 revisions)
  113. Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project‏‎ (8 revisions)
  114. Imposter Syndrome‏‎ (8 revisions)
  115. Bothered and Bewildered But not Bewitched‏‎ (8 revisions)
  116. P-value hacking‏‎ (8 revisions)
  117. Funders‏‎ (8 revisions)
  118. Image Integrity‏‎ (8 revisions)
  119. History, Ethics and the Presidential Commission on Research in Guatemala‏‎ (8 revisions)
  120. Research culture survey (University of Glasgow)‏‎ (8 revisions)
  121. Epistemic virtues‏‎ (8 revisions)
  122. EQIPD (Enhancing Quality in Preclinical Data)‏‎ (8 revisions)
  123. Publication bias (positive results)‏‎ (8 revisions)
  124. Open Science‏‎ (8 revisions)
  125. What Universities can Learn from one of Science’s Biggest Frauds‏‎ (8 revisions)
  126. The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition‏‎ (8 revisions)
  127. Research ethics committees‏‎ (8 revisions)
  128. Jesse's Intent‏‎ (8 revisions)
  129. Researcher Accused of Breaching Research Ethics Faces GMC‏‎ (8 revisions)
  130. Denmark‏‎ (8 revisions)
  131. Court Denies Appeal of HIV Fraudster’s 57-month Prison Sentence‏‎ (8 revisions)
  132. 03 - Four Quadrant Approach: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity‏‎ (8 revisions)
  133. Research culture statement (University of Glasgow)‏‎ (8 revisions)
  134. 'I am really sorry': Peer Reviewer Stole Text for Own Paper‏‎ (8 revisions)
  135. German Research Foundation's Recommendations for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice‏‎ (8 revisions)
  136. Digital humanities‏‎ (8 revisions)
  137. A Review of the Impact of the TeGenero Trial on the Design, Conduct, and Ethics of FIM Trials‏‎ (8 revisions)
  138. Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project‏‎ (8 revisions)
  139. Aboutcollaboration‏‎ (8 revisions)
  140. Spin of research results‏‎ (8 revisions)
  141. Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project‏‎ (8 revisions)
  142. Unlicensed usage of medical devices on patients: a case of accusations‏‎ (8 revisions)
  143. Psychology Grad Student Faked Data‏‎ (8 revisions)
  144. UK Research Integrity Office's Code of Practice for Research‏‎ (7 revisions)
  145. Inaccurate representation of results in the media‏‎ (7 revisions)
  146. Path2Integrity Campaign‏‎ (7 revisions)
  147. Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Magazine Surprise‏‎ (7 revisions)
  148. 06 - Teaching Research Ethics Tool : A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics‏‎ (7 revisions)
  149. France‏‎ (7 revisions)
  150. When Sociologists Deceive Their Subjects‏‎ (7 revisions)
  151. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Publication Recommendations‏‎ (7 revisions)
  152. Research culture group (University of Glasgow)‏‎ (7 revisions)
  153. European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Code of Practice for Fieldwork Training‏‎ (7 revisions)
  154. Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’)‏‎ (7 revisions)
  155. Ethics, Human Rights and HIV Vaccine Trials in Low-Income Settings‏‎ (7 revisions)
  156. Deception by Research Participants‏‎ (7 revisions)
  157. Research culture‏‎ (7 revisions)
  158. A Case Study about Anonymization and Secondary Use of Qualitative Data‏‎ (7 revisions)
  159. Perioperative Mischief: The Price of Academic Misconduct‏‎ (7 revisions)
  160. Data protection in a global pandemic (COVID-19)‏‎ (7 revisions)
  161. Intellectual conflicts of interest‏‎ (7 revisions)
  162. Implications of a Single Highly Cited Article on a Journal and Its Citation Indexes‏‎ (7 revisions)
  163. PhD-pizza - Gathering for PhD-candidates to talk freely‏‎ (7 revisions)
  164. UK Research Council's Policy and Guidelines on Governance of Good Research Conduct‏‎ (7 revisions)
  165. Research fraud on MMR vaccines‏‎ (7 revisions)
  166. Bioethicists Call for Investigation Into Nutritional Experiments on Aboriginal People‏‎ (7 revisions)
  167. Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities‏‎ (7 revisions)
  168. The Threat to Scientific Integrity in Environmental and Occupational Medicine‏‎ (7 revisions)
  169. Speculations and Ethical Concerns in the Conduct of Outsourced Clinical Trials in India‏‎ (7 revisions)
  170. The learning curve - theatre play #MeTooAcademia‏‎ (7 revisions)
  171. Path2Integrity Handbooks for Teachers and Trainers‏‎ (7 revisions)
  172. Geology Paper Has a Rocky Road is Now Retracted‏‎ (7 revisions)
  173. The Legacy of the Hwang Case: Research Misconduct in Biosciences‏‎ (7 revisions)
  174. Finland‏‎ (7 revisions)
  175. Plan S‏‎ (7 revisions)
  176. Conflict of interest in peer review‏‎ (7 revisions)
  177. Retracted WHO Reports on Opioid Guidelines‏‎ (7 revisions)
  178. Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Finland‏‎ (7 revisions)
  179. Anonymity Revisited‏‎ (7 revisions)
  180. Research Problems at Australian University Hit the News‏‎ (7 revisions)
  181. Simultaneous Submission Leading to Duplicate Publication‏‎ (7 revisions)
  182. Bulgaria‏‎ (7 revisions)
  183. Irish National Policy Statement on Ensuring Research Integrity‏‎ (7 revisions)
  184. Diner Pensant Workshop‏‎ (7 revisions)
  185. Image Manipulation Detection‏‎ (7 revisions)
  186. Declaration of Istanbul‏‎ (7 revisions)
  187. Perverse incentives‏‎ (6 revisions)
  188. Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project‏‎ (6 revisions)
  189. Research Integrity: Podcast Series‏‎ (6 revisions)
  190. Ethical Issues in Developing Pharmacogenetic Research Partnerships With American Indigenous Communities‏‎ (6 revisions)
  191. SIENNA - Stakeholder-informed ethics for new technologies with high socio-economic and human rights impact‏‎ (6 revisions)
  192. INTEGRITY Training Guide‏‎ (6 revisions)
  193. Head of research integrity initiative in China alleged of reseach misconduct‏‎ (6 revisions)
  194. Monitoring funding processes‏‎ (6 revisions)
  195. 'Climate Skeptic' Journal Shuttered Following 'Malpractice' in 'Nepotistic' Reviewer Selections‏‎ (6 revisions)
  196. Researchers Call For the Release of Findings of a Misconduct Investigation‏‎ (6 revisions)
  197. A Japanese developmental biology center, scientific misconduct and suicide‏‎ (6 revisions)
  198. Up, Up, and Away: Clinical Trials Go International‏‎ (6 revisions)
  199. Greece‏‎ (6 revisions)
  200. Gender bias‏‎ (6 revisions)
  201. Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees - General Guidelines for Research Ethics‏‎ (6 revisions)
  202. Czech Code of Ethics for Researchers‏‎ (6 revisions)
  203. Biologist Spared Jail For Grant Fraud‏‎ (6 revisions)
  204. Plagiarism‏‎ (6 revisions)
  205. Theme:A22bd155-7f88-4750-aa9c-cba9ad72cbec‏‎ (6 revisions)
  206. Australian Research Council Research Integrity Policy‏‎ (6 revisions)
  207. Global Code of Conduct for Research in Resource-Poor Settings‏‎ (6 revisions)
  208. Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct‏‎ (6 revisions)
  209. Europe‏‎ (6 revisions)
  210. UK Concordat to Support Research Integrity‏‎ (6 revisions)
  211. "Met de billen bloot" (airing your dirty laundry)‏‎ (6 revisions)
  212. Luxembourg‏‎ (6 revisions)
  213. Industry involvement in scientific studies on SSRI's‏‎ (6 revisions)
  214. Conflicts with Community Leaders‏‎ (6 revisions)
  215. Falsification‏‎ (6 revisions)
  216. Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Unauthorised Translation‏‎ (6 revisions)
  217. The Epistemic Integrity of Scientific Research‏‎ (6 revisions)
  218. Inferring from P-values‏‎ (6 revisions)
  219. Contributors‏‎ (6 revisions)
  220. Path2Integrity Learning Cards‏‎ (6 revisions)
  221. Case-based ethics instruction: the influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making‏‎ (6 revisions)
  222. Rampant Plagiarism in Two Journals‏‎ (6 revisions)
  223. Local resources on improving science: basic study‏‎ (6 revisions)
  224. Conflict of interests‏‎ (6 revisions)
  225. Moldova‏‎ (6 revisions)
  226. The SOPs4RI project‏‎ (6 revisions)
  227. Research culture awards (University of Glasgow)‏‎ (6 revisions)
  228. The Ethics of Collecting Genetic Data From Indigenous People‏‎ (6 revisions)
  229. Research with children‏‎ (6 revisions)
  230. Posing irrelevant research questions‏‎ (6 revisions)
  231. VIRT2UE‏‎ (6 revisions)
  232. Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching‏‎ (6 revisions)
  233. Austria‏‎ (6 revisions)
  234. Hostile peer review‏‎ (6 revisions)
  235. Inappropriate authorship‏‎ (6 revisions)
  236. Fabrication‏‎ (6 revisions)
  237. Forbidden Knowledge‏‎ (6 revisions)
  238. Guidance on the Management of Clinical Trials during the COVID-19 Pandemic‏‎ (6 revisions)
  239. Science and Surveillance: Western Institutions Consider Role in China’s Uighur Crackdown‏‎ (6 revisions)
  240. Spain‏‎ (5 revisions)
  241. False results, premature infants and the CNEP trial‏‎ (5 revisions)
  242. Traver paper: The Unique Case of a Published Delusion‏‎ (5 revisions)
  243. Jailed for Faking Data‏‎ (5 revisions)
  244. What is Recklessness in Scientific Research?‏‎ (5 revisions)
  245. Cultural differences and communication in the lab‏‎ (5 revisions)
  246. Academic Integrity Tutorial with Quiz‏‎ (5 revisions)
  247. AI Generated Content‏‎ (5 revisions)
  248. Plagiarism in a PhD Thesis‏‎ (5 revisions)
  249. High Integration of Research Monographs in the European Open Science (HIRMEOS)‏‎ (5 revisions)
  250. The Lab: Avoiding Research Misconduct‏‎ (5 revisions)
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6