Search results
From The Embassy of Good Science
- research response in times of crises. Duration (hours) 2 For whom is this important? FundersPolicy-makersResearch Ethics CommitteesResearch Integrity Officers3 KB (344 words) - 17:13, 27 February 2024
- as public sources. Industry, or commerical organisations, are important private funders. Collaborations between academia and industry can be beneficial6 KB (757 words) - 15:03, 13 October 2020
- recognises the Code as the reference document for research integrity for all EU-funded research projects and as a model for organisations and researchers across2 KB (228 words) - 12:28, 10 April 2024
- participants. Researchers from LMICs potentially benefit from access to funding, international networks and opportunities for local capacity building. Collaborations5 KB (579 words) - 15:23, 10 April 2024
- Authorship criteria (section Why is this important?)data for the work,’’’’Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content,’’ ‘‘Final approval of the version to be published8 KB (1,039 words) - 18:49, 25 March 2021
- Why a virtue approach? - Daniel Pizzolato (KU Leuven) Which virtues are important in research? - Vicko Tomić (University of Split School of Medicine) With3 KB (370 words) - 12:42, 22 November 2021
- Conflict of interests (section Why is this important?)could be seen as examples of non-financial conflict of interests. It is important to note that conflict of interest includes the potential for conflict as6 KB (656 words) - 17:07, 20 October 2020
- results Authors acknowledge important work and intellectual contributions of others, including collaborators, assistants, and funders, who have influenced the4 KB (465 words) - 16:47, 25 March 2021
- experience in research in the past. Duration (hours) 25 For whom is this important? Research integrity trainersTrainers in training Method Face to Face Participatory8 KB (821 words) - 16:40, 16 April 2024
- if you have any further questions. Duration (hours) 1 For whom is this important? Research integrity trainersResearchersTrainers in training Method eLearning14 KB (1,837 words) - 16:28, 16 April 2024
- Open Science (section Why is this important?)political review and discussion. For instance, beneficiaries of the European funding scheme called Horizon 2020, “must ensure open access (free of charge, online5 KB (787 words) - 15:14, 22 October 2021
- Debate and Dialogue (section Why is this important?)research in the past. Duration (hours) 1 Participants 20 For whom is this important? Research integrity trainersResearchersTrainers in training Method Face18 KB (2,144 words) - 16:34, 16 April 2024
- if you have any further questions. Duration (hours) 1 For whom is this important? Junior researchersResearch integrity trainersResearchersTrainers in training15 KB (1,900 words) - 16:27, 16 April 2024
- if you have any further questions. Duration (hours) 1 For whom is this important? Research integrity trainersResearchersTrainers in training Method eLearning15 KB (1,841 words) - 16:29, 16 April 2024
- real interest in, research integrity. Duration (hours) 9 For whom is this important? Research integrity trainers Method Blended learning Part of VIRT2UE Steps9 KB (1,123 words) - 17:24, 28 October 2020
- 06 - Teaching Research Ethics Tool : A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics (section Why is this important?)research integrity regulatory documents. Duration (hours) 2 For whom is this important? ResearchersEthics committee membersResearch Integrity Officers Method6 KB (728 words) - 13:21, 8 August 2021
- Introduction to Responsible Supervision, Mentoring and Role-modeling (section Why is this important?)if you have any further questions. Duration (hours) 1 For whom is this important? MentorsResearch integrity trainersResearchersSupervisorsTrainers in training10 KB (1,195 words) - 16:31, 16 April 2024
- Self Declaration Approach - a Reflection on the Varieties of Goodness in Research (section Why is this important?)research in the past. Duration (hours) 1 Participants 20 For whom is this important? Research integrity trainersResearchersTrainers in training Method Face12 KB (1,530 words) - 16:39, 16 April 2024
- research in the past. Duration (hours) 18 Participants 20 For whom is this important? Research integrity trainersTrainers in training Method Face to Face Participatory8 KB (1,057 words) - 16:34, 16 April 2024
- in the context of citizen science. Duration (hours) 2 For whom is this important? All stakeholders in researchCitizen Scientists Method Blended learning Individual10 KB (1,415 words) - 15:17, 18 April 2024
- to PhD students. Duration (hours) 12.5 Participants 25 For whom is this important? PhD StudentsJunior researchers Method eLearning Participatory sessions7 KB (929 words) - 15:29, 6 October 2022
- 04 - Moral Case Deliberation: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity (section Why is this important?)research integrity regulatory documents. Duration (hours) 2 For whom is this important? ResearchersEthics committee membersResearch Integrity OfficersResearch9 KB (1,319 words) - 13:20, 8 August 2021
- institutional, national, regional and international levels. Academic institutionsFunding agenciesAll stakeholders in researchResearch institutions Openness Open1 KB (129 words) - 18:22, 11 March 2024
- 01 - Value Analysis: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity (section Why is this important?)research integrity regulatory documents. Duration (hours) 2 For whom is this important? researchersEthics committee membersResearch Integrity Officers Method10 KB (1,002 words) - 13:05, 8 August 2021
- trainees involved in the training. Duration (hours) 1 For whom is this important? Research integrity trainersTrainers in training Method Blended learning8 KB (1,082 words) - 16:40, 16 April 2024
- Integrity Games (section Why is this important?)faculties and all disciplinary fields. Duration (hours) 0.5 For whom is this important? Undergraduate studentsBachelor studentsMaster studentsTeachers Part of2 KB (292 words) - 14:59, 6 October 2022
- European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. These guidelines are important as open science is now considered as standard in the practice of science1 KB (181 words) - 15:38, 10 April 2024
- Modified Dilemma Game (section Why is this important?)research in the past. Duration (hours) 2 Participants 20 For whom is this important? Research integrity trainersResearchersTrainers in training Method Face20 KB (2,632 words) - 16:38, 16 April 2024
- Virtues and Norms (section Why is this important?)virtue which is supposed to be the most important in this situation? If so, why is this virtue the most important? o Putting yourselves in the case21 KB (2,618 words) - 16:35, 16 April 2024
- 03 - Four Quadrant Approach: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity (section Why is this important?)research integrity regulatory documents. Duration (hours) 2 For whom is this important? ResearchersEthics committee membersResearch Integrity OfficersResearch8 KB (1,118 words) - 10:15, 11 October 2021
- experience in research in the past. Duration (hours) 8 For whom is this important? Research integrity trainersTrainers in training Method Face to Face Participatory7 KB (935 words) - 16:40, 16 April 2024
- experience in research in the past. Duration (hours) 3 For whom is this important? Trainers in training Method Blended learning Individual learning Part4 KB (377 words) - 16:32, 16 April 2024
- 05 - REalistiC Decisions: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity (section Why is this important?)research integrity regulatory documents. Duration (hours) 2 For whom is this important? ResearchersEthics committee membersResearch Ethics CommitteesResearch12 KB (1,620 words) - 13:20, 8 August 2021
- research integrity regulatory documents. Duration (hours) 2 For whom is this important? ResearchersResearch Ethics CommitteesResearch Integrity Officers Method7 KB (856 words) - 13:19, 8 August 2021
- course is destined to PhD students. Duration (hours) 7 For whom is this important? Junior researchersPhD Students Method eLearning Individual learning Part4 KB (470 words) - 15:32, 6 October 2022
- to PhD students. Duration (hours) 10 Participants 25 For whom is this important? PhD StudentsJunior researchersPeer reviewersAuthors Method eLearning Part6 KB (780 words) - 16:41, 21 September 2022
- The Middle Position (section Why is this important?)research in the past. Duration (hours) 2 Participants 20 For whom is this important? Research integrity trainersResearchersTrainers in training Method Face24 KB (3,403 words) - 16:38, 16 April 2024
- and ethical way (research integrity) is now more important than ever, and likely to be even more important over the coming years as the technology advances9 KB (1,311 words) - 16:27, 21 September 2022
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on monitoring funded projects (section Why is this important?)users’ specific needs. FundersFunding agenciesFunding institutionsResearch funding organisations Monitoring funding processes Funders The SOPs4RI project2 KB (213 words) - 15:52, 1 December 2022
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on the selection and evaluation of proposals (section Why is this important?)meet users’ specific needs. FundersFunding agenciesFunding institutionsPolicy makersResearch funding organisations Funders The SOPs4RI project SOPs4RI2 KB (226 words) - 15:53, 1 December 2022
- Funders (section Why is this important?)or extramural (e.g. from funding agencies) sources. Funders have some responsibility for ensuring that the research they fund is conducted in accordance7 KB (942 words) - 16:28, 25 March 2021
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on defining and preventing unjustified interferences from funders, political and commercial actors (section Why is this important?)adapted to meet users’ specific needs. FundersFunding agenciesFunding institutionsResearch funding organisations Funders Conflict of interest in peer review2 KB (274 words) - 15:52, 1 December 2022
- Find out Themes As funders are an important stakeholder in many research projects, they often monitor the research process. The funder can decide to monitor5 KB (727 words) - 15:41, 10 June 2021
- Infographic-SOPs4RI Research integrity guidelines for research funders (section For whom is this important?)useful for research funding organization during the entire funding process. FundersFunding agenciesFunding institutionsResearch funding organisations Guidelines810 bytes (50 words) - 15:53, 1 December 2022
- clinical trials in the form of wages or consultancy fees. This raises important questions like, should those who have a financial interest in clinical7 KB (1,013 words) - 13:23, 9 February 2023
- The Flemish Council for Scientific Integrity's Guidelines on Plagiarism in Funding Applications (section Why is this important?)integrity support to research funding organizations by addressing a specific theme: how to handle misconduct in funding proposals. In the context of competitive2 KB (163 words) - 12:03, 18 October 2021
- this guidelines. Research institutions, supervisors, and mentors have an important role when it comes to research integrity. Responsible supervision and mentorship3 KB (353 words) - 16:34, 5 December 2022
- Infographic - SOPs4RI Guidelines on Responsible Supervision and Leadership (section Why is this important?)should be valued. Research institutions, supervisors, and mentors have an important role when it comes to research integrity. Responsible supervision and leadership3 KB (285 words) - 16:30, 5 December 2022
- this guidelines. Research institutions, supervisors, and mentors have an important role when it comes to research integrity. Responsible supervision and mentorship3 KB (363 words) - 17:05, 5 December 2022
- SOPs4RI - Guidelines for research institutions on community building for a positive research culture (section Why is this important?)open resource EditView sourceHistory Find out Resources Guidelines This guideline offers recommendations that can help research institutions create an2 KB (195 words) - 10:42, 20 December 2022
- open resource EditView sourceHistory Find out Resources Guidelines This guideline presents a set of recommendations for research institutions on building3 KB (366 words) - 16:49, 5 December 2022
- Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations (section For whom is this important?)Research funding organisationsAcademic institutionsAcademic staffAdministratorsAll stakeholders in researchEthics committee membersFundersFunding agenciesFunding3 KB (307 words) - 16:46, 27 September 2023
- Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations (section For whom is this important?)Research funding organisationsAcademic institutionsAcademic staffAdministratorsAll stakeholders in researchEthics committee membersFundersFunding agenciesFunding3 KB (307 words) - 16:46, 27 September 2023
- Plan S (section Why is this important?)2019;6(2):206-7. EveryoneJournal publishersFunding institutionsPublishers The main principle of Plan S states that all research funded from public or private grants3 KB (424 words) - 15:15, 22 October 2021
- Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations (section Why is this important?)implementation, and evaluation of participatory processes in research funding and (applied) research & innovation (R&I). It helps the user understand2 KB (185 words) - 15:10, 10 April 2024
- Resources Guidelines This act establishes the Innovation Fund, an independent research funding body within the government, whose activities are tailored736 bytes (59 words) - 11:11, 2 March 2022
- Transparify: A tool for transparent reporting of funding sources (section For whom is this important?)present your funding. It is especially important for institutions which aim to get five stars for their transparency. Openness on their funding would make789 bytes (83 words) - 09:52, 3 November 2020
- The Ethics of Pharmaceutical Research Funding: A Social Organization Approach (section Why is this important?)unethical behaviour in pharmaceutical industry-sponsored studies. Researchers Funders Honesty Conflict of interest Clinical medicine1 KB (143 words) - 14:56, 5 August 2021
- Responsible Research and Innovation resources for researchers and funders (section For whom is this important?)research-performing and research-funding organizations from the RRI-Practice H2020 project Academic institutionsFunding institutionsAll stakeholders in638 bytes (46 words) - 15:02, 28 January 2021
- Reward campaign (section Why is this important?)review of literature should be done, funders should make their criteria for funding transparent, and research funders should develop sources of information4 KB (505 words) - 15:26, 22 October 2021
- The ETHNA System. A Guide to the Ethical Governance of RRI in Innovation and Research in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations. (section Why is this important?)Guidelines The EU project “Ethics Governance System for RRI in Higher Education, Funding and Research Centres”, in short ETHNA System, is to implement and enforce1 KB (136 words) - 14:28, 24 April 2023
- a grant proposal needs to be declared Research funding organisationsFundersReviewers The Dutch funding agencies ZonMw and NWO have set up guidelines for3 KB (428 words) - 17:15, 28 October 2020
- agreement concerning ownership of IP rights. Research funding organizations and private companies are important stakeholders, when it comes to research that may4 KB (500 words) - 14:58, 13 October 2020
- Stakeholder involvement in ethical governance of R&I – a guide for HEFRCs (section For whom is this important?)activities in the context of strategic development in Higher Education, Funding and Research Centres (HEFRCs) wishing to implement an ETHNA System. The1 KB (163 words) - 15:21, 16 November 2022
- The Threat to Scientific Integrity in Environmental and Occupational Medicine (section Why is this important?)" Occupational and environmental medicine 62.12 (2005): 843-846. It is important for environmental and occupational medicine professionals and their societies2 KB (234 words) - 16:32, 19 October 2020
- Mapping stakeholders and scoping involvement – a guide for HEFRCs (section For whom is this important?)sourceHistory Find out Resources Guidelines This guide enables Higher Education, Funding and Research Centres (HEFRCs) to explore possible stakeholder engagement1 KB (130 words) - 15:23, 16 November 2022
- Data management plans (section Why is this important?)such as grant applications, and six major UK research funding bodies recommended that all funding bodies should mandate submission of DMPs with grant applications6 KB (797 words) - 17:29, 20 July 2022
- Gauging the potential societal contributions of research and innovation – a guide for HEFRCs (section For whom is this important?)sourceHistory Find out Resources Guidelines With this guide, Higher Education, Funding and Research Centres (HEFRCs) wishing to implement an ETHNA System will2 KB (204 words) - 15:22, 16 November 2022
- SOPs4RI - Guidelines for research institutions on diversity and inclusion (section Why is this important?)open resource EditView sourceHistory Find out Resources Guidelines This guideline offers recommendations that can help research institutions foster diversity2 KB (152 words) - 10:59, 20 December 2022
- Other HERA is a network that includes 26 national funding agencies with aim of leading and developing funding opportunities for humanities researchers in Europe574 bytes (51 words) - 12:01, 15 January 2021
- ICH Guidelines (section Why is this important?)open resource EditView sourceHistory Find out Resources Guidelines The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals3 KB (333 words) - 20:49, 28 December 2022
- Research Integrity & Research Ethics: Guidelines of the Austrian Science Funds (section Why is this important?)sourceHistory Find out Resources Guidelines The Austrian Science Fund (FWF) is the largest funding agency for basic research in Austria that contributes to cutting-edge2 KB (266 words) - 15:41, 21 September 2021
- Perverse incentives (section Why is this important?)reviewers, universities, and funding agencies may also be confronted with incentives that do not promote good science. It is important that scientists are incentivized3 KB (343 words) - 12:04, 23 October 2020
- Sponsorship of drug and device studies by the manufacturing company (section Why is this important?)Clinical researchersFundersPharma Industry To manage conflict of interests, which is inevitable and must always be declared, it is important to maximize transparency5 KB (632 words) - 23:50, 28 February 2022
- everybody. It is important how to react when your proposal as a researcher is rejected for funding without deception. ResearchersFundersPeer reviewers Peer841 bytes (84 words) - 21:26, 22 October 2020
- Polish National Science Centre Code on Research Integrity and Applying for Research Financing (section Why is this important?)restrictions to funding and through re-training of individuals. ResearchersAdministratorsFundersPIResearch institutionsResearch funding organisations National2 KB (169 words) - 17:31, 20 October 2020
- researcher should agree to this condition. All stakeholders in researchFunding institutionsFunders American Sociological Association Honesty Misrepresentation communication799 bytes (71 words) - 13:53, 23 April 2021
- The French National Research Agency's Policy for Ethics and Research Integrity (section Why is this important?)Resources Guidelines As France's largest public research funding organization, the ANR plays an important role in setting the tone of research and scientific987 bytes (90 words) - 16:56, 1 March 2022
- organizations to help them attain the funding and regulatory requirements. Besides, the code guarantees that important issues are considered and is endorsed2 KB (198 words) - 10:32, 27 July 2021
- Chinese Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for the National Natural Science Foundation (section Why is this important?)managing an increasing quantity of funds. ResearchersAdministratorsFundersResearch funding organisations Ministry of Science and Technology 2009 China Confidentiality1 KB (161 words) - 14:26, 20 October 2020
- Misrepresenting the characteristics of research participants in psychiatric studies (section Why is this important?)data fabrication and stealing of funding money for personal use may lead to the waste of precious research funding budgets on unscientific research. Researchers1 KB (140 words) - 18:13, 28 June 2021
- digital data repository for sharing and preserving research data is an important task because different repositories are suited for different kinds of data4 KB (562 words) - 09:59, 19 October 2021
- project, and therefore cannot make an impartial decision. Thus, it is important to be aware of and declare such conflicts in order to avoid them. This2 KB (180 words) - 12:37, 12 January 2022
- Ireland (section Research funding)Ethics Committee . The National Office for Research Ethics Committees is an important new addition to the research environment in Ireland. While they dealt exclusively22 KB (1,855 words) - 19:08, 24 October 2021
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (section Why is this important?)biology, 18(7), e3000737. The assessment of researchers is considered important for research integrity practices. However, the current research metrics4 KB (424 words) - 15:26, 22 October 2021
- should be recognized appropriately, fairly and transparently. This is important as sometimes it can be quite challenging to identify authors’ contributions2 KB (331 words) - 14:35, 22 October 2021
- Swiss Academy of Arts and Sciences Code of Conduct for Scientific Integrity r (section Why is this important?)process - Private funding Guidelines Open About Collaborative working Data Practices and Management Authorship criteria Industry funded research Research2 KB (192 words) - 12:35, 18 October 2021
- been asked to delay her (developed) funding application with one organisation in order to faciliatate the other Funding institutionsAnthropologistsCollaborating708 bytes (53 words) - 00:12, 4 May 2021
- thier job training and placement program. The offer is tied to $125,000 in funding for the purposes of the project, regardless of the results, and a promise1 KB (105 words) - 16:09, 18 June 2021
- the grant proposals. It shows that important tasks should not be delegated. SupervisorsEarly career researchersFunders Cases Open About Fake peer-reviewing875 bytes (61 words) - 13:56, 6 April 2021
- Northern Ireland Higher Education Funding Council for Wales National Institute for Health Research Scottish Funding Council UK Research and Innovation1 KB (156 words) - 16:16, 28 September 2022
- Austria (section Research funding)informing the general public of important scientific insights and they form committees to discuss questions which are important for the science and society25 KB (1,857 words) - 18:21, 22 October 2021
- The Swiss Federal Act on the Promotion of Research and Innovation (RIPA) (section For whom is this important?)Governmental actions and through laying down rules for other funding agencies. Research funding organisationsResearch performing organisationsPolicy makers665 bytes (45 words) - 13:25, 2 March 2022
- about wages and cooperation in food processing industry. The state which funded her research called on her to testify about safety standards and practices1 KB (99 words) - 12:09, 12 April 2021
- Native Americans. Academic institutionsAdministratorsAnthropologistsFundersResearch funding organisations North America Accountability Honesty Respect Conflict895 bytes (91 words) - 00:17, 4 May 2021
- Estonia (section Research funding)Estonia. All Estonian universities offer introductory courses in ethics . Important resource for RE and RI training is Estonian Code of Conduct for Research21 KB (1,817 words) - 11:49, 22 October 2021
- ethical and secure manner, both during and after the project. Thus, it is important to be aware of the standards for good data management. The University also1 KB (135 words) - 13:30, 28 February 2022
- Plagiarism (section Why is this important?)There are, however, currently no known initiatives for funders to check plagiarism in funding applications. The Embassy Editorial team, Iris Lechner,3 KB (389 words) - 11:50, 27 March 2021
- support research integrity and safeguard confidence in the value of publicly funded research by: - making transparent the ARC’s role in ensuring research integrity2 KB (184 words) - 16:18, 21 October 2020
- The Swiss National Science Foundation and National Research Council's Regulations on scientific misconduct (section Why is this important?)Guidelines The Swiss National Science Foundation (SNCF) is a private research funding organization that supports fundamental research in diverse fields. Their1 KB (149 words) - 11:15, 19 October 2021
- The Netherlands (section Research funding)gegevensbescherming’ contains the most important rules for handling personal data in the Netherlands. It is important that it is clear and transparent how32 KB (1,866 words) - 12:13, 5 November 2021
- The federal agency funding him wanted him to turn over the notes so they could get a second opinion. Academic staffResearchersFunding institutionsfunding907 bytes (97 words) - 17:51, 30 April 2021
- outlined in the handbook. ENERI is a pan-European network receiving funding receiving funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation5 KB (644 words) - 15:33, 22 October 2021
- Governance of research integrity: Options for a coordinated approach in Europe (section Why is this important?)body, as well as the pros and cons of different possible structures and funding sources. It also looks at the implementation of a possible European body5 KB (698 words) - 15:13, 22 October 2021
- Netherlands Position Paper on the Recognition and Rewards of Academics (section For whom is this important?)developed by a coalition of Dutch public knowledge institutions and research funders (VSNU, FNU, KNAW, NWO and ZonMw). It calls for changes in the recognition691 bytes (66 words) - 17:45, 20 October 2020
- Vulnerable Populations (section Why is this important?)internal use only. What should Professor McGorty do in this situation? It is important to include mental health patients into society and so this study is very2 KB (240 words) - 09:41, 9 February 2023
- within its domains. As a Government-supported research funding agency, the Council plays an important role in the enabling excellence in research. Through2 KB (181 words) - 12:23, 12 January 2022
- ethnography. Ethnography is a pillar of social-scientific research, and it is important to provide stakeholders with guidelines on how ethnographic research complies1 KB (133 words) - 12:06, 21 June 2022
- Position Paper on Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in Austria (section Why is this important?)directions and goals. Importantly, the platform provides recommendations to promote research integrity in universities and among funding organizations (Section2 KB (253 words) - 16:31, 21 September 2021
- hide their conflicting interests for years without funding agencies and journals realising that. FundersResearchersJournal editors Conflict of interests Marty1,023 bytes (85 words) - 21:13, 8 December 2020
- Resources Guidelines The FNRS (Funds for Scientific Research) is a research funding organization that has focused on encouraging fundamental research in Belgium1 KB (149 words) - 15:04, 28 September 2022
- indirectly fund scientific research) with an assurance of the ethical quality and social responsibility of scientific research. Besides publicly funded research2 KB (182 words) - 09:55, 18 October 2021
- independent research integrity bodies. Either way, the courses have the same important goal, and that is to teach young researchers how to adhere to research4 KB (574 words) - 14:21, 22 October 2021
- findings because they are more interested in securing future funding. ResearchersFunders Education Open About Cases Open About Standards of authorship759 bytes (54 words) - 12:35, 6 April 2021
- the funding body and the instiutional ethics committee). The case study asks whether such incentive is appropriate. Qualitative researchersFunding institutionsResearch843 bytes (69 words) - 14:18, 23 April 2021
- related to data stewardship or if it is good promotion. Any tips? “The most important thing is to really translate the objectives into the perspective of the6 KB (887 words) - 21:08, 23 October 2020
- Social Sciences and Humanities Matter. Guidelines on How To Successfully Design and Implement, Mission-Oriented Research Programmes (section For whom is this important?)cooperation when designing a research funding programme and fostering cooperation while implementing a research funding programme. Researchers Thomas König848 bytes (63 words) - 15:07, 25 May 2021
- Boyes B. What is the Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC), and why is it important? 2018 Sept 25. [cited 2021 Sept 13]. Real KM Evidence based. Practical4 KB (412 words) - 13:56, 13 September 2021
- Altmetrics (section Why is this important?)Twitter, LinkedIn or Facebook. Measuring that part of online impact is important as it offers different insights into popularity and use of published articles2 KB (313 words) - 17:28, 26 March 2021
- various institutions and groups, including research performing and research funding institutions, as well as journals and governmental bodies, initiatives to3 KB (431 words) - 15:20, 22 October 2021
- Lithuania (section Research funding)equal opportunities for all, which aim to consistently form the values important for the progress of society and to promote the desired changes in attitudes26 KB (1,980 words) - 11:46, 22 October 2021
- his colleague in terms of recommending him for a promotion Academic staffFunding institutionsFaculty members North America Egypt Respect Mentoring Training680 bytes (59 words) - 23:49, 3 May 2021
- organisationsResearch funding organisationsJunior researchersSenior researchersGeneral publicResearch integrity trainers Whistleblower protections are an important element5 KB (539 words) - 15:11, 22 October 2021
- Unfair reviewing (section Why is this important?)an unfavourable review, a manuscript might not be published, a grant not funded, or a promotion not awarded. In relation to grant applications, there are3 KB (453 words) - 10:41, 28 October 2020
- Finland (section Research funding)development were €6.7 billion, which comprises 2.79% of the country’s GDP . Most funding was spent in the business enterprise sector (65.6%), higher education (2524 KB (2,121 words) - 11:14, 10 April 2024
- Denmark (section Research funding)active in the field of responsible research and innovations since it is important for the creation of a dialogue between researchers and citizens. Danish25 KB (2,401 words) - 18:58, 24 October 2021
- The SOPs4RI project (section Why is this important?)entail important topics such as Research Integrity Education, Supervision and mentoring of researchers, Research Environment, and Research funders. SOPs4RI7 KB (844 words) - 13:59, 20 December 2022
- With the increasing pace of scientific publications, an RIO's job is more important than ever. They serve an essential role in the scientific community. They4 KB (606 words) - 15:11, 22 October 2021
- or the use thereof. If the suspected misconduct concerns the use of SNSF funding, then the Commission assists the institution where the misconduct is believed3 KB (316 words) - 16:33, 21 October 2020
- researchersJunior researchersSenior researchersFundersResearch performing organisationsResearch funding organisations In 2004, the International Committee5 KB (713 words) - 16:59, 25 March 2021
- EditView sourceHistory Find out Themes Pressures to excel, obtain grants and funding and publish in prestigious journals can take its toll on even the most resilient4 KB (524 words) - 13:00, 14 June 2022
- German Council of Science and Humanities' Recommendations for Evaluating and Controlling Research Performance (section For whom is this important?)research is of great importance as it could determine the allocation of funding. It is also, however, a difficult task, and various factors need to be taken828 bytes (80 words) - 13:17, 2 March 2022
- Norway (section Research funding)July 1]. Available from: https://www.forskningsradet.no/en/apply-for-funding/funding-from-the-research-council/fme/ In 2018, the gross domestic expenditures31 KB (2,889 words) - 11:43, 22 October 2021
- Croatia (section Research funding)core of the Croatian research strategy are universities which play an important role in the creation and implementation of the research and educational16 KB (1,767 words) - 17:53, 21 October 2021
- Considering intellectual, in addition to financial, conflicts of interest proved important in a clinical practice guideline: a descriptive study. Journal of clinical7 KB (986 words) - 12:03, 22 October 2020
- AllTrials campaign (section Why is this important?)become discovered too late to prevent their impact. That is why it is important that all of the results are published, and not necessarily in journals4 KB (531 words) - 16:52, 25 March 2021
- Gender bias (section Why is this important?)minority of senior professors are female. It is thought that one of the important causes of this is gender bias: women not being given the same professional7 KB (940 words) - 10:46, 28 October 2020
- boundaries and cultures. The 11 principles are meant to underscore what is important in the process of developing these partnerships, while the 7 questions1 KB (86 words) - 13:04, 9 May 2023
- Peer review (section For whom is this important?)of another research group, with whom you are in direct competition for funding. The student recognizes the conflict on interest at play. The professor874 bytes (94 words) - 22:14, 27 April 2021
- potential misuse of researcher NSF grant and his undisclosed dual employment. Funding institutions Accountability Corruption547 bytes (48 words) - 15:45, 29 January 2021
- meet the grant agreements). What should the researchers do in this case? Funding institutionsResearchersQualitative researchers American Sociological Association952 bytes (90 words) - 14:10, 23 April 2021
- out Resources Cases A student enters graduate school with two years of funding. She easily finds a faculty member to work with. After the two years, the618 bytes (53 words) - 21:46, 27 April 2021
- Danish research through grants and other forms of support. The composition, funding and duties of the foundation are described in this document. All stakeholders708 bytes (65 words) - 11:15, 2 March 2022
- Harvard Scientists Disciplined for Not Declaring Ties to Drug Companies (section Why is this important?)follow from a lack of transparency about the received funds. ResearchersFunders Conflict of interests 4-7-2011 United States Harvard Medical School Massachusetts2 KB (172 words) - 18:37, 25 October 2020
- Otherwise, the paper will be retracted soon after publication and a lot of funding and hard work is wasted, as this case proves. The journal discussed here1 KB (193 words) - 14:50, 5 August 2021
- INSPIRE Checklist (section Why is this important?)leadersfundersAdministratorsAll stakeholders in researchEditorsOtherPublishersResearch funding organisationsResearch performing organisationsUniversities The INSPIRE project1 KB (152 words) - 21:21, 29 October 2020
- situations similar to the one described. Early career researchersResearchersFunding institutionsGraduate and postgraduate students American Sociological Association870 bytes (71 words) - 13:58, 23 April 2021
- experiments and they threaten to cancel the collaboration, retracting all funding. collaborating groupsResearchers fictional fictional fictional Reliability1 KB (121 words) - 22:04, 27 April 2021
- Academic institutionsAcademic staffClinical researchersPeer reviewersResearch funding organisations Plagiarism Honesty Respect Accountability Plagiarism Misuse760 bytes (59 words) - 23:40, 3 May 2021
- Affiliations (section For whom is this important?)institutional scientific output, which may affect an institution's ranking and funding. Academic institutionsAcademic staffAuthorsEarly career researchersLibrarians954 bytes (115 words) - 11:17, 8 February 2023
- Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (section For whom is this important?)Resources Education This study addresses perverse incentives and decreased funding as potential causes for unethical behavior. The authors conclude that academia728 bytes (54 words) - 11:35, 30 October 2020
- Replicability (section Why is this important?)they are based should be infinitely replicable. This concept is highly important to medicine. Being able to replicate, for example, an epidemiologic study7 KB (1,058 words) - 12:17, 21 October 2020
- with codes that apply to themselves. As important as moral values and integrity are, it's also very important to regulate what a researcher's legal limitations2 KB (275 words) - 10:34, 11 August 2022
- obtaining a doctorate. Ethical approval for scientific research is extremely important. Otherwise, the health of research participants may be harmed. Similarly1 KB (153 words) - 17:33, 19 August 2021
- authors for other reasons, such as enhanced funding and publication opportunities. Authorship has important academic implications and authors are accountable6 KB (738 words) - 13:40, 7 October 2021
- Code of Good Scientific Practices of the Spanish National Research Council (CSIS) (section Why is this important?)Resources Guidelines The Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) is a publicly funded autonomous research body that focuses on scientific and technological advancement2 KB (179 words) - 13:33, 21 October 2021
- European Code of Conduct for Research Integrityhttps://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/european-code-of-1 KB (136 words) - 12:51, 28 June 2021
- Harvard School for Public Health engaged in scientific misconduct in research funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National1 KB (153 words) - 13:59, 5 March 2021
- system for managing research and innovation in Slovenia, including planning, funding, conduct of research, ethical dimensions and collaborations. It also makes980 bytes (97 words) - 15:39, 28 February 2022
- France Integrity Impartiality Neutrality Institutional Responsibilities Funders’ responsibilities974 bytes (89 words) - 17:02, 17 September 2020
- scientific qualifications. These roles are set out in detail, as well as the funding mechanisms and appointment of members. Research institutionsResearchersAll1 KB (114 words) - 14:12, 2 March 2022
- sentenced to 18 months in prison for faking data and ordered to pay back the funding. The article may be used as a case study in the context of research integrity1 KB (104 words) - 19:26, 25 October 2020
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form (section Why is this important?)integrity. All stakeholders in research Following should be disclosed: Funding received from government, commercial, private foundation, etc. for conducting929 bytes (87 words) - 13:35, 20 October 2020
- society and to address societal challenges. Research and innovation are often funded by society and even if they are not, it is reasonable to expect that they6 KB (814 words) - 15:15, 22 October 2021
- health and safety . Furthermore, because biomedical research is largely funded by the public – the National Institutes of Health (NIH) within the U.S.6 KB (855 words) - 22:36, 24 October 2020
- The German Association of University Professors and Lecturers' (DHV) Position Paper on Scientific Self-regulation and Scientific Misconduct (section For whom is this important?)acknowledging that various pressures exist such as competition, pressure from funders or industry and state influence, it emphasized that research misconduct921 bytes (76 words) - 12:35, 2 March 2022
- Texas home declined to discuss the case. Academic institutionsResearch funding organisationsORI Karen Ruggiero 2001 USA1 KB (164 words) - 15:22, 2 December 2021
- Ousted: Rule-Breaking Lundbeck CEO and Novartis Scientist Get the Boot (section For whom is this important?)Novartis researcher - Igor Dzura - committed research misconduct in 6 papers funded by various federal agencies in the USA. ResearchersAll stakeholders in research982 bytes (82 words) - 18:51, 25 October 2020
- Using data not created for research purposes in the context of collaboration with private companies (section For whom is this important?)of results, reliability of data ResearchersAll stakeholders in researchFundersResearch Ethics CommitteesAdministrators Honesty Reliabiity Accuracy Good1 KB (118 words) - 15:33, 4 November 2021
- Site Unseen (section For whom is this important?)not be lost. Collaborating researchersCivil society organisationsResearch funding organisations North America Honesty Respect Accountability Consent Academic911 bytes (94 words) - 00:27, 4 May 2021
- Make research misconduct involving agri inputs a criminal fraud: CCFI (section For whom is this important?)of vegetable samples from around Delhi, analysed them at the government funded laboratory in the JNU using undisclosed testing methods. Academic insti906 bytes (87 words) - 17:04, 2 December 2021
- EditView sourceHistory Find out Resources Education The European Commission funded project RRI tools has an extensive collection of resources on Responsible363 bytes (32 words) - 18:21, 20 October 2020
- SATORI Project Collection of Resources on the Ethical Assessment of Research and Innovation (section For whom is this important?)EditView sourceHistory Find out Resources Education The European Commission funded SATORI project has complied a page of resources on the ethical assessment414 bytes (30 words) - 18:03, 20 October 2020
- Der Balanceakt (section Why is this important?)der Wissenschaft). Duration (hours) 2 Participants 20 For whom is this important? Trainers in trainingResearchersResearch integrity trainers Method Face24 KB (3,148 words) - 15:34, 25 October 2022
- conflict or countries with authoritarian regimes. In these situations it is important to find a strategy to keep the research participants safe and meet the8 KB (1,095 words) - 14:08, 20 August 2021
- Plagiarism, Voluntary Settlement Agreements and Public Health Service Grants (section For whom is this important?)publications related to two Public Health Service (PHS) grants. ResearchersFundersResearch Ethics CommitteesResearch Integrity Officers The researcher entered1 KB (119 words) - 16:49, 8 March 2021
- Ethical guidance for research with a potential for human enhancement (section For whom is this important?)staffCivil society organisationsClinical ethics consultantsClinical researchersFunding agenciesPolicy makersPrincipal investigatorsResearch Ethics CommitteesR2 KB (237 words) - 16:50, 12 July 2021
- his papers (see Nature 470, 446–447; 2011). Academic institutionsResearch funding organisationsJournal editors Akihisa Inoue 2012 Japan Reliability Honesty1 KB (139 words) - 14:54, 2 December 2021
- Academic medical centers and medical research: the challenges ahead (section For whom is this important?)the public trust as well as consider the gap between research costs and funding sources. The authors examined these and other challenges and offered recommendations952 bytes (92 words) - 15:30, 27 October 2020
- researcher must face a review board when he has not finished his assignment. FundersSupervisorsReviewers Cases Open About Fake peer-reviewing Reliability Accountability567 bytes (34 words) - 14:19, 6 April 2021
- revealing that Hauser fabricated and falsified methods and data in six federally funded studies. Academic institutionsPublishers Marc Hauser 2011 USA1 KB (135 words) - 15:20, 2 December 2021
- initiative covering all scholarly disciplines and all key stakeholders including funders, publishers, professional societies, institutions, and researchers. We encourage965 bytes (107 words) - 22:34, 4 August 2020
- participants and to society at large. Thus, while performing research, it is important to have an understanding of not only the technical aspects, but also the2 KB (202 words) - 12:55, 12 January 2022
- several institutions and/or researchers in different countries? Why is it important to have a formal research integrity system in each European country to2 KB (193 words) - 11:27, 22 December 2020
- German Research Foundation's Recommendations for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice (section Why is this important?)on both national and international levels. The DFG considers it highly important to safeguard good scientific practice as an essential prerequisite for2 KB (180 words) - 12:26, 19 October 2021
- Researchers Call For the Release of Findings of a Misconduct Investigation (section Why is this important?)individual researcher. With cases of scientific misconduct such as these, it is important that details about the investigation are given. As mentioned by scientists2 KB (183 words) - 16:51, 30 April 2021
- their genome from direct-to-consumer testing companies. According to NHGRI-funded genome-sequencing groups, the cost to generate a high-quality 'draft' whole2 KB (346 words) - 13:47, 5 July 2023
- statement is addressed to all staff and students involved in research, funders and collaborators and is an expression of how the university expects its2 KB (217 words) - 15:30, 22 October 2021
- priorities that do not always match. researchersindustry stakeholders Industry funded research Orexigen Steve Nissen 2015 Cleveland Clinic United States Reliability923 bytes (78 words) - 20:56, 8 December 2020
- A Japanese developmental biology center, scientific misconduct and suicide (section Why is this important?)career researchersPhD studentsResearch performing organisationsResearch funding organisationsMedia Cases Open About "Met de billen bloot" (airing your dirty2 KB (163 words) - 16:12, 5 October 2020
- ‘Caught in the act’: Veterinary researcher caught fabricating gene data, resigns from university job (section Why is this important?)such examples. All stakeholders in researchresearchersAcademic institutionsFunding agencies Ryan Evanoff 16/12/2020 USA Honesty data fabrication LS 06.13 -960 bytes (74 words) - 12:54, 6 July 2021
- Science policy (section Why is this important?)Edit EditView sourceHistory Find out Themes Through the determination of funding and goals of the scientific community, science policy influences core aspects2 KB (292 words) - 15:13, 22 October 2021
- the responsibilities that researchers have with research participants, funders, sponsors, employers, host governments and the discipline of anthropology2 KB (161 words) - 16:01, 21 June 2022
- the universities, IoTI, DIT, Teagasc, RCSI and the main Irish research funding agencies;in particular, the Health Research Board, Science Foundation Ireland2 KB (234 words) - 21:48, 22 October 2020
- prospects for a reproducible scholarly record. Academic institutionspublishersFunding agenciesResearchers 10 Things for Curating Reproducible and FAIR Research1 KB (140 words) - 21:37, 20 June 2023
- Outcome reporting bias (section Why is this important?)statistical hypothesis testing, such as P values, which fail to convey important information about effect size and precision of estimates. References for4 KB (551 words) - 11:36, 27 March 2021
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (section Why is this important?)rvisorsUniversitiesIndustryindustry stakeholdersPrincipal investigatorsFunders The aim of all eight scenarios is to allow researchers, research ethics5 KB (466 words) - 15:21, 19 October 2021
- Nanyang Technological University's Research Data Policy (Singapore) (section Why is this important?)researchers in meeting the university as well as funders’ requirements. Research data is an important component of research. It has evidentiary value which2 KB (187 words) - 15:31, 28 September 2022
- bioethical community in this case. Publication of clinical trial results is important, especially if the drug under investigation is potentially harmful to the2 KB (221 words) - 17:03, 19 August 2021
- it is important to think about the effect the results can have on the research population and to . ResearchersEthics committee membersFundersGeneral publicResearch2 KB (180 words) - 11:35, 11 August 2020
- Practical Guide to the International Alignment of Research Data Management (section For whom is this important?)Education This guide is intended for researchers, research organizations and funding organizations. It is divided into three parts. First part contains six aspects901 bytes (82 words) - 10:11, 13 November 2020
- Suborning science for profit: Monsanto, glyphosate, and private science research misconduct (section For whom is this important?)science and the public's trust in science. Academic institutionsResearch funding organisationsPolicy-makers Monsanto LS 09.05 - Agriculture related to crop1 KB (116 words) - 16:52, 2 December 2021
- Guidelines for Tailoring the Informed Consent Process in Clinical Studies (section For whom is this important?)i-CONSENT consortium. i-CONSENT (H2020, Grant Agreement number 741856) is an EU-funded H2020 project that aims to improve the information that individuals receive1 KB (103 words) - 12:22, 31 March 2021
- Former Columbia University Graduate Student Engaged in 21 Instances of Research Misconduct (section For whom is this important?)(ORI) during its oversight review to have engaged in misconduct in research funded by National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), National Institutes1 KB (115 words) - 18:03, 8 March 2021
- Find out Resources Cases Geneticists working on groundbreaking research and funded by a large NIH grant fail to find a safe place to store their lab rats.860 bytes (64 words) - 11:42, 6 April 2021
- apology from the researchers. Pharmaceutical companies and drug manufactures "fund such studies hoping to show that their drugs cause fewer side effects or1 KB (143 words) - 10:41, 17 September 2020
- H-index (section Why is this important?)self-citations-in-response-to-promotion-policy. Accessed 29 May, 2019. FundersSenior researchersJunior researchersEarly career researchersPhD students2 KB (288 words) - 17:41, 20 October 2020
- challenges and technological developments. The European Commission and all EU-funded research projects take the code as a core reference, that serves as a model2 KB (186 words) - 12:33, 29 June 2021
- virtuous researcher deals with problematic situations. Conflict of interests Funders 2015 Sweden Honesty Transparency Authorship Conflict of interest Duty to2 KB (211 words) - 10:10, 14 October 2020
- responsibility of their employers, professional associations and research funders to support them in making these decisions. Researchers Cases Open About1 KB (136 words) - 16:09, 28 September 2022
- Research Ethics (section Why is this important?)ethics screening and ethics assessment is explained. For all activities funded by the European Union, ethics is an integral part of research from beginning1 KB (140 words) - 09:52, 12 August 2020
- studentsresearchersDoctoral studentsEarly career researchersEducatorsMentorsFunders The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity defines good practices2 KB (270 words) - 21:02, 1 March 2022
- Resources Education Path2Integrity is a project on research integrity education, funded by the EU's Horizon 2020 program. Under the headline #MyPath2Integrity,2 KB (214 words) - 10:53, 8 April 2021
- Everything We Know About Facebook's Secret Mood Manipulation Experiment. It was probably legal. But was it ethical? (section Why is this important?)and ethical. Issues around informed consent, the role of the IRB and the funding of the study are also discussed. Ethics committee members Facebook 20121 KB (119 words) - 10:38, 22 June 2021
- Research metrics (section Why is this important?)studentsScientistsResearchersJournal editors On an individual level, the most important research metrics are the H-index and the i-10 index. The H-index, also3 KB (433 words) - 17:27, 26 March 2021
- reproducibility of research data and the low drug development success rates are important concerns in the scientific community. It was shown over the last years3 KB (400 words) - 22:40, 9 June 2022
- Institutional Responsibilities Allegation of Misconduct Whistleblowing Funders’ responsibilities Good Practice Investigation Research Misconduct Investigation2 KB (277 words) - 16:31, 21 October 2020
- The Extent and Causes of Academic Text Recycling or ‘Self-Plagiarism’ (section Why is this important?)number of publications of an individual researcher and awards grants and funding accordingly. In this system, scientists that engage in text recycling are2 KB (272 words) - 14:48, 5 August 2021
- and Attitude Guidance for Living Environment (BEAGLE) project, and was co-funded by the Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union. The rapid development of1 KB (146 words) - 16:39, 21 October 2020
- managing data produced or re-used in a research project is required by funders and publishers, and supports open scholarship. The outcomes of good RDM1 KB (175 words) - 09:05, 20 August 2020
- involve other researchers, users, research subjects, including animals, funding agencies as well as society at large, including future generations. Research2 KB (293 words) - 16:16, 21 October 2020
- SIENNA - Stakeholder-informed ethics for new technologies with high socio-economic and human rights impact (section Why is this important?)researchersCollaborating researchersDecision makersEthics committee membersFundersIndustryPatientsPolicy makersRegulatorsResearch Ethics Committees Giulia2 KB (293 words) - 15:36, 22 October 2021
- Promoting responsible conduct in research through "survival skills" workshops: some mentoring is best done in a crowd (section For whom is this important?)writing research articles, making oral presentations, obtaining employment or funding, supervising and teaching. The authors concluded that this would lead to1 KB (98 words) - 15:34, 30 October 2020
- studentsResearch funding organisationsResearch performing organisations The European Code of Conduct states that fairness and integrity are most important for procedures2 KB (174 words) - 15:07, 22 October 2021
- Review, 1(1), p.17. Integrity in analysis and reporting of results is important to fully understand your data. Misbehaviors related to analysis and reporting4 KB (556 words) - 10:06, 28 October 2020
- research questions is considered a problem because it leads to research waste. Funding in the scientific community is limited, and research waste uses valuable4 KB (588 words) - 22:50, 27 October 2020
- commissioning, conduct and appraisal of global health research. ResearchersFundersResearch Administrators The BRIDGE guidelines are the proposed best practices3 KB (334 words) - 10:17, 13 June 2022
- regard to that, they should meet one of the following criteria: -provide funding -supervise a research group or provide general administrative support -assist4 KB (415 words) - 10:44, 6 September 2021
- Salami publication (section Why is this important?)scientists with more papers are likely to get more citations and probably more funding. The second, more serious, consequence is that results will be over-represented3 KB (373 words) - 11:43, 27 March 2021
- Furthermore, the paper lacked in detail information, for example, the funding sources. Finally, there is uncertainty about when the twins were born. Jiankui3 KB (418 words) - 00:42, 9 March 2022
- Preprint servers (section Why is this important?)pioneer in this method of dissemination of research results. It played an important role in physics, astronomy and mathematics, and later was implemented into10 KB (1,346 words) - 11:20, 26 May 2021
- SSH research as part of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research (section Why is this important?)interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary research. Our global society faces important and difficult challenges today, such as climate change, COVID-19 pandemic9 KB (1,201 words) - 14:57, 26 May 2021
- Edit EditView sourceHistory Find out Themes For some, an important aspect of research integrity (RI) training is to make clear links between educational3 KB (435 words) - 15:25, 22 October 2021
- scientific journal publishes his or her own work in the same journal. It is important to note that this is a potential conflict of interest and not an actual4 KB (479 words) - 17:32, 13 October 2020
- 21;23(39):7198-7200. ResearchersResearch performing organisationsResearch funding organisationsEditorsPublishersGeneral public This is the definition of duplicate4 KB (553 words) - 17:43, 26 March 2021
- paramount. This is important within the biomedical sciences, physics, chemistry, computer science, etc. Laboratory notebooks are important to use when performing5 KB (613 words) - 23:29, 27 October 2020
- reasonable request to the corresponding author. Data access is extremely important for transparent modern science. The rising number of research studies impedes4 KB (589 words) - 00:24, 1 March 2023
- Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations (section Why is this important?)or when expectations are not met. Collaborative work has become more important over the past few decades, partially due to the rise of interdisciplinary3 KB (428 words) - 16:32, 5 October 2020
- researchers and the public. How and if results should be shared is an important point to consider here. https://ori.hhs.gov/images/ddblock/data.pdf https://www4 KB (533 words) - 23:28, 27 October 2020
- stakeholdersJunior researchersSenior researchersGeneral publicResearch Integrity OfficersFundersPhD Students Researchers that work with personal data can consult the GDPR3 KB (392 words) - 15:16, 22 October 2021
- Institutional Responsibilities Allegation of Misconduct Whistleblowing Funders’ responsibilities Good Practice Investigation Research Misconduct Investigation4 KB (441 words) - 16:34, 21 October 2020
- About Other Open About Guidelines Open About Research culture Monitoring funding processes The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering2 KB (189 words) - 15:40, 10 June 2021
- Open access Publication in the European Research Area for Social Sciences and Humanities (OPERAS) (section Why is this important?)discover open resources such as data, publications and other materials important to their research that are currently dispersed across local repositories5 KB (650 words) - 10:06, 19 October 2021
- Path2Integrity (section Why is this important?)out Themes Path2Integrity is a project on research integrity education, funded by the EU's Horizon 2020 program. The project has developed formal and informal4 KB (469 words) - 15:34, 22 October 2021
- of Conflicts of Interest in the Peer Review of Basic Biomedical Research Funding Applications: Self-Reporting Versus Manual Detection. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016;22(1):189-973 KB (439 words) - 17:41, 26 March 2021
- Fostering responsible research and preventing questionable practices is important. However, the causes behind the variability in engagement in responsible6 KB (778 words) - 16:33, 29 November 2022
- “Five steps to decide what data to keep: a checklist for appraising research data” (section Why is this important?)Keeping research data is beneficial on many different levels – it is important for replication, checking validity and proving intellectual property, and5 KB (797 words) - 15:30, 18 October 2021
- studies that are not concordant with related studies, and Checking for funding or investigator biases. Convenience, dichotomization, stratification, regression4 KB (549 words) - 21:44, 1 February 2021
- investigatorsResearchersResearch institutionsSupervisorsPostdocsUniversitiesFundersJunior researchersSenior researchers According to research integrity experts5 KB (632 words) - 14:42, 20 March 2022
- pre-registered. Journals and research funders support pre-registration and some organizations promote it as an important step towards openness and transparency7 KB (970 words) - 22:10, 24 October 2020