Search by property
From The Embassy of Good Science
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- Supervision Guidelines + (PhD Students)
- Polarized research + (PhD Students)
- Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’) + (Students)
- Research integrity - what is means, why it is important and how we might protect it + (Researchers)
- Peer review card game + (phd students)
- Scientific Research: Dilemmas and Temptations (booklet of cases) + (Bachelor students)
- Sabotage and the Federal Definition of Research Misconduct + (Researchers)
- Posing irrelevant research questions + (Researchers)
- Inadequately handle or store data or (bio)materials + (All stakeholders in research)
- Fake peer-reviewing + (Journal editors)
- Research integrity training for diverse disciplines + (Early career researchers)
- Epistemic virtues + (Postdocs)
- Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity + (PhD students)
- Intellectual conflicts of interest + (Research performing organisations)
- Researcher 'Cherry Picked' Data, University Investigation Finds + (Researchers)
- The impact of the GDPR on scientific data + (Students)
- Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science + (PhD students)
- Center for Open and REproducible Science (CORES) + (Students)
- Selective citation + (Students)
- Reaction to bias + (Women in academia)
- Would You Do a Post Doc with this Guy? + (Researchers)
- The ethics of managing a laboratory or research group + (Academic institutions)
- Virtues in research integrity + (PhD Students)
- Protecting an endangered species: training physicians to conduct clinical research. + (Trainers)
- Development of an institutional curriculum in ethics and public health + (Trainers)
- A meta-analysis of studies of publication misrepresentation by applicants to residency and fellowship programs + (Postgraduate students)
- Path2Integrity Campaign + (Academic institutions)
- Path2Integrity + (Academic institutions)
- Legal rights of accused scientists + (Scientists)
- Training modules and guidelines on mentorship + (Supervisors)
- Declaration of Helsinki + (PhD Students)
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights + (PhD Students)
- Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors + (Students)
- Improper data use (a bias distorting research results) + (Principal investigators)
- Inappropriate authorship + (PhD Students)
- Whistleblower protection/rights + (PhD Students)
- Institutional Pathology and the Death of a Mentally Ill Young Man + (Researchers)
- Responsible Authorship and Peer Review - Columbia RCR Course, Module 3 + (Early career researchers)
- Governance of research integrity: Options for a coordinated approach in Europe + (Principal investigators)
- Long Distance Collaboration + (Researchers)
- Research misconduct + (Students)
- Balancing harms and benefits + (All stakeholders in research)
- Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials + (All stakeholders in research)
- Research integrity officers in Europe + (Students)
- Show Me The Money! + (Early career researchers)
- The influence of pharmaceutical company on drug availability + (Academic staff)
- Ethical guidance for research with a potential for human enhancement + (Academic staff)
- EQIPD (Enhancing Quality in Preclinical Data) + (PhD Students)
- Teaching Controversial Issues + (Teachers)
- History Educators in the Western Balkans Participate in New Training with “Once Upon a Time…We Lived Together. 1900-1945” + (Teachers)
- Quality History Education in the 21st Century Principles and Guidelines + (Policy makers)
- The Teaching of Controversial Issues During Elementary-Level History Instruction: Greek-Cypriot Teachers' Perceptions and Emotions + (Teachers)
- Responsible supervision + (PhD Students)
- Authorship criteria + (PhD students)
- Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity + (Senior researchers)
- The EQUATOR Network: Reporting guidelines + (Researchers)
- Authorship and publication + (PhD Students)
- Medical students' decisions about authorship in disputable situations: intervention study + (All stakeholders in research)
- The qualification portfolio (UMC Utrecht): from output to impact + (Research institutions)
- Turning a blind eye to breaches of integrity + (Researchers)
- Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching + (Academic staff)
- "Met de billen bloot" (airing your dirty laundry) + (Researchers)
- Maintaining Competence + (Academic institutions)
- Duty to Report Ethical Violations of Others + (Academic staff)
- Publication and data ownership + (Collaborating researchers)
- How to be a good lab partner + (Bachelor students)
- Respectable and honest supervision ensures responsible and ethical research in the future. + (Peer reviewers)
- Diner Pensant Workshop + (Researchers)
- The SOPs4RI project + (Policy makers)
- Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- AI Ethics and Governance in Practice: An Introduction + (Everyone)
- AI Sustainability in Practice Part Two: Sustainability Throughout the AI Workflow + (Everyone)
- AI Ethics and Governance in Practice: AI Fairness in Practice + (Public Sector)
- AI Sustainability in Practice Part One: Foundations for Sustainable AI Projects + (Public Sector)
- Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safety: A guide for the responsible design and implementation of AI systems in the public sector + (Civil Service)
- Duplicate publications and secondary publications + (Researchers)
- Predatory publishing + (PhD Students)
- INSPIRE Checklist + (Policy makers)
- Rampant Plagiarism in Two Journals + (Researchers)
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Publication Recommendations + (All stakeholders in research)
- (re)submitting without consent of all authors + (Journal editors)
- Reward campaign + (Researchers)
- Plan S + (Everyone)
- DOAB + (Researchers)
- It’s Still Plagiarism + (Academic staff)
- Connecting researchers through ORCID + (PhD Students)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Copyright Violation + (Researchers)
- Attempting to Assure Accuracy + (Journal publishers)
- Discovery of Error in One's Own Work + (Publishers)
- Evaluating Journals Using Journal Metrics: Find Journal Rankings + (Researchers)
- "A Little Thing Like Plagiarism" + (Academic staff)
- How to make the digital scholarly monograph fit for Open Access by applying smart services and tools + (Researchers)
- High Integration of Research Monographs in the European Open Science (HIRMEOS) + (Researchers)
- Open access Publication in the European Research Area for Social Sciences and Humanities (OPERAS) + (Researchers)
- Author’s Permission Guidelines + (Researchers)
- Consent for publication (Author) + (Researchers)
- What should a journal do when a scientist who committed misconduct submits a new paper? + (Journal publishers)
- Initiative for Open Abstracts (I4OA) + (Publishers)
- Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC) + (Researchers)
- Funding (Sponsorship) bias + (Researchers)
- Government Sanctions Harvard Psychologist + (Academic institutions)
- AI Generated Content + (Academic staff)
- What to communicate in retraction notices? + (Journals)
- Keeping inadequate notes of the research process + (Qualitative researchers)
- Becoming an Ethical Researcher + (Early career researchers)
- Qualitative research + (PhD Students)
- The Limits of Expertise + (Research subjects)
- Respondent Confidentiality + (Researchers)
- Linking Data Sets + (Qualitative researchers)
- Data Sharing and Potential Future Uses + (Researchers)
- Privacy + (Qualitative researchers)
- Legal Requests/Requirements for Confidential Data From Research Field Notes + (Qualitative researchers)
- Legal Requests/Requirements for Confidential Data From Research Field Notes + (Qualitative researchers)
- Vulnerable Populations + (Funding institutions)
- Vulnerable Populations + (Researchers)
- Informed Consent with Pre-Testing Convenience Samples + (Qualitative researchers)
- Informal Surveys for Policy and Planning that "Trigger" Research Projects + (Qualitative researchers)
- Teenage Youth and Coercion + (Qualitative researchers)
- Data Sharing in Ongoing Projects + (Qualitative researchers)
- Data Sharing + (Qualitative researchers)
- Data Sharing, Informed Consent and Confidentiality + (Qualitative researchers)
- Continuing Research and Protecting Confidentiality + (Qualitative researchers)
- False, Fabricated or Misleading Data + (Qualitative researchers)
- Reporting Full Findings + (Professors)
- To Medicate or Not to Medicate + (Qualitative researchers)
- Ethical issues in qualitative research + (Academic staff)
- Research with children + (Ethics committee members)
- Ethical Guidelines for Good Research Practice + (Academic staff)
- Payments to young researchers in Malawi + (researchers)
- PRBB Code of Good Scientific Practice + (All stakeholders in research)
- Copy and paste: A slow university investigation into serious accusations of misconduct benefits no one + (RIO)
- Misconduct: the stars who fell to earth + (Academic staff)
- Misconduct oversight at the DOE: Investigation closed + (RIO)
- Misconduct? It's all academic + (Academic institutions)
- The future of scientific justice: the case of The Sceptical Environmentalist + (Academic institutions)
- Swedish plastics study fabricated, panel finds + (Academic institutions)
- Fresh Misconduct Charges Hit Dutch Social Psychology + (RIO)
- Dual submissions + (Graduate and postgraduate students)
- Honest refereeing + (Researchers)
- Guidelines for Tailoring the Informed Consent Process in Clinical Studies + (Clinical researchers)
- SIENNA - Stakeholder-informed ethics for new technologies with high socio-economic and human rights impact + (Academic institutions)
- MedTech Europe Code of Ethical Business Practice + (Ethics committee members)
- A Data Governance Framework for Ethnography +
- Human rights, democracy, and the rule of law assurance framework for AI systems: A proposal + (Activists)
- German Council of Science and Humanities' Recommendations for Evaluating and Controlling Research Performance + (Research Administrators)
- Good Epidemiological Practice Guidelines + (Researchers)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on continuous research integrity education + (Supervisors)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of institutional research integrity stakeholders + (Research institutions)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of bachelor, master and PhD students + (Research institutions)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of post-doctorate and senior researchers + (Research institutions)
- Infographic - SOPs4RI Research integrity education guidelines for research institutions + (Research institutions)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on Responsible Supervision and Leadership - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI - Guidelines for research institutions on community building for a positive research culture + (Research institutions)
- Guidelines for research institutions on adequate education and skills training + (Research institutions)
- Guidelines for research institutions on managing competition and publication pressure + (Research institutions)
- SOPs4RI - Guidelines for research institutions on diversity and inclusion + (Research institutions)
- NTU (Nanyang Technological University) Responding to Allegations/Complaints of Research Misconduct + (Academic staff)
- Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations + (Research funding organisations)
- Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations + (Research funding organisations)
- 02 - The Seven Steps Method: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Research Ethics Committees)
- 05 - REalistiC Decisions: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Research Ethics Committees)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Copyright Violation + (Research Ethics Committees)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Data Fabrication + (Research Ethics Committees)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Disputes in Authorship (1) + (Research Ethics Committees)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Disputes in Authorship (2) + (Research Ethics Committees)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Editorial Misconduct + (Research Ethics Committees)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Multiple Submissions (1) + (Research Ethics Committees)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Multiple Submissions (2) + (Research Ethics Committees)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Redundant Publication + (Research Ethics Committees)
- A Data Governance Framework for Ethnography + (Research Ethics Committees)
- A Reflection on Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research + (Research Ethics Committees)
- A Review of the Impact of the TeGenero Trial on the Design, Conduct, and Ethics of FIM Trials + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Academic Affiliation and Research in a Personal Capacity + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Authorship Deserved, Not Earned: Research Ethics and Research Integrity Scenario + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Child protection and confidentiality: Surveying children’s experiences of violence, abuse and neglect + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Disclosing Conflicts of Interest in Scientific Advice + (Research Ethics Committees)
- ENERI Classroom + (Research Ethics Committees)
- ENERI Decision Tree + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Ethical Issues in Developing Pharmacogenetic Research Partnerships With American Indigenous Communities + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Ethical guidance for research with a potential for human enhancement + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations + (Research Ethics Committees)
- European Commission Guidance on Research on Refugees, Asylum Seekers & Migrants + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Former Columbia University Graduate Student Engaged in 21 Instances of Research Misconduct + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Former Hwang colleague faked monkey data + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Fraudulent algorithm: A pain too deep for adequate analgesia + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Austria + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Finland + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Switzerland + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Growing Plagiarism Scandal in Iran + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Handling of Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries: Early stages in the 1990's + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Harms and benefits - International research ethics and cultural values + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Harms and benefits - International research ethics and cultural values + (Research Ethics Committees)
- History, Ethics and the Presidential Commission on Research in Guatemala + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Human Research Violations By Eye Doctor Showcase A National Problem + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Image Manipulation Detection - Exercises + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Immediacy of fieldwork in participatory research with children in precarious contexts + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Informal Surveys for Policy and Planning that "Trigger" Research Projects + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Interviewing young people on sensitive topics: An iterative approach + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Introduction: Guidelines and Discrepancies + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Irish National Forum on Research Integrity's Position Paper on Research Integrity & Research Ethics + (Research Ethics Committees)
- It’s Time to Get Serious About Research Fraud + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Jesse's Intent + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Navigating disability identity and language in research involving children and young people. + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Negotiating confidentiality, privacy and consent in focus groups with children and young people. + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Neurogenetics study was unethical says NNI report + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Obstructive sleep apnoea + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Official notice published for chem paper slated for retraction in 2011 + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Online Posts Damage a Researcher's Reputation + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Outsourcing animal experimentation + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Payment in different contexts: How can payment reflect local considerations? + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Philosophical Justifications for Human Subjects Research + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Plagiarism and Fabrication in Public Health Research at Harvard + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Plagiarism, Voluntary Settlement Agreements and Public Health Service Grants + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Position statement of the UKRIO: Statutory regulation of research integrity + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Public Health Practice vs Research + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Publishing complications and patient safety + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Research Integrity in trying times: a scenario on the presentation and dissemination of information + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Research by Students + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Research misconduct and the INTERGROWTH-21st study + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Research misconduct in a grant application for the National Institutes of Health + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Research preparedness for future crises + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Resident physician plagiarises publications supported by 10 National Institutes of Health grants + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Reusing Biopsy Material in New Publications, Image Manipulation and Fraudulent Research Protocols + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Scientists in Chile Protest Mummy Study + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Serious Accusation of Negligence of Ethical Principles in Human Sciences + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: Another Magazine Surprise + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Background Section + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Instant Paper + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Professional Manual + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Review Article + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Spanish Law on Science, Technology and Innovation + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Studying Vulnerable Individuals + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Teenage Youth and Coercion + (Research Ethics Committees)
- The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing ‘Situated Ethics’ in the Field + (Research Ethics Committees)
- The Croatian Committee for Ethics in Science and Higher Education's Rules of Procedure of the Ethics Committee. + (Research Ethics Committees)
- The Dutch anthropologist making up data and papers + (Research Ethics Committees)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2023 Edition (ALLEA Code) + (Research Ethics Committees)
- The French National Research Agency's Policy for Ethics and Research Integrity + (Research Ethics Committees)
- The Ghost Collaborator + (Research Ethics Committees)
- The Norwegian Act on Ethics and Integrity in Research (The Research Ethics Act) + (Research Ethics Committees)
- The Olivieri Debacle: Where Were the Heroes of Bioethics? + (Research Ethics Committees)
- The Three Rs of Animal Research + (Research Ethics Committees)
- The Wild West of Animal Experimentation + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Research Ethics Committees)
- UKRIO's Position statement on research involving security-sensitive material + (Research Ethics Committees)
- UKRIO's Self-Assessment Tool for The Concordat to Support Research Integrity + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Unlicensed usage of medical devices on patients: a case of accusations + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Using data not created for research purposes in the context of collaboration with private companies + (Research Ethics Committees)
- What Universities can Learn from one of Science’s Biggest Frauds + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Withholding Study Purpose + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Conflict of interest: a research integrity and research ethics perspective + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Imputation of missing data in clinical trials + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching + (Research Ethics Committees)
- European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC) + (Research Ethics Committees)
- European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI) + (Research Ethics Committees)
- SIENNA - Stakeholder-informed ethics for new technologies with high socio-economic and human rights impact + (Research Ethics Committees)
- The SOPs4RI project + (Research Ethics Committees)
- Research ethics committee members' skills + (Research Ethics Committees)
- “There can be no justification for such studies”: Paper on artificial eyes for dogs earns expression of concern + (Research Ethics Committees)
- The Ethics Codes Collection + (All stakeholders in research)
- European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI) + (Research Integrity Officers)
- Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct + (Research Integrity Officers)
- Research Integrity Committees + (phd students)
- Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Fabrication + (Students)
- 3 Ways to Blow the Whistle + (Researchers)
- Ethical Issues in Developing Pharmacogenetic Research Partnerships With American Indigenous Communities + (Researchers)
- Public Health Practice vs Research + (Researchers)
- Conflicts with Community Leaders + (Researchers)
- Baltimore Case - In Brief + (Researchers)
- The SOPs4RI project + (Policy makers)
- Reusing Biopsy Material in New Publications, Image Manipulation and Fraudulent Research Protocols + (Researchers)
- Academic Affiliation and Research in a Personal Capacity + (Researchers)
- Disclosing Conflicts of Interest in Scientific Advice + (Researchers)
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Austria + (Researchers)
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Switzerland + (Researchers)
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Finland + (Researchers)
- Online Posts Damage a Researcher's Reputation + (Researchers)
- Serious Accusation of Negligence of Ethical Principles in Human Sciences + (Researchers)
- Sabotage and the Federal Definition of Research Misconduct + (Researchers)
- Governance of research integrity: Options for a coordinated approach in Europe + (Principal investigators)
- Australian Guide to Managing and Investigating Potential Breaches of the Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research + (Researchers)
- Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching + (Academic staff)
- Research Integrity and Conflicts of Interest: The Case of Unethical Research-Misconduct Charges + (Researchers)
- Responsible conduct of biomedical research : collaborative research + (All stakeholders in research)
- The impact of the GDPR on scientific data + (Students)
- Research integrity officers in Europe + (Students)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Magazine Surprise + (Researchers)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Unauthorised Translation + (Researchers)
- Publishing complications and patient safety +
- ENERI Decision Tree + (All stakeholders in research)
- Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct + (Research Integrity Officers)
- PRBB Code of Good Scientific Practice + (All stakeholders in research)
- Psychologist made up sex bias results + (Early career researchers)
- Climategate' scientist speaks out + (Researchers)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Background Section + (Academic staff)
- Research Integrity Advisors + (PhD students)
- Former Hwang colleague faked monkey data + (Researchers)
- Neurogenetics study was unethical says NNI report + (Researchers)
- Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis + (Researchers)
- The Ghost Collaborator + (Researchers)
- Research misconduct in a grant application for the National Institutes of Health + (Researchers)
- Plagiarism and Fabrication in Public Health Research at Harvard + (Researchers)
- Fraudulent algorithm: A pain too deep for adequate analgesia + (Researchers)
- Resident physician plagiarises publications supported by 10 National Institutes of Health grants + (Researchers)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Instant Paper + (Researchers)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Professional Manual + (Researchers)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: Another Magazine Surprise + (Researchers)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Review Article + (Researchers)
- Plagiarism, Voluntary Settlement Agreements and Public Health Service Grants + (Researchers)
- A Reflection on Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research + (Researchers)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Disputes in Authorship (1) + (Researchers)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Disputes in Authorship (2) + (Researchers)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Copyright Violation + (Researchers)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Data Fabrication + (Researchers)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Editorial Misconduct + (Researchers)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Multiple Submissions (1) + (Researchers)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Multiple Submissions (2) + (Researchers)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Redundant Publication + (Researchers)
- Research misconduct and the INTERGROWTH-21st study + (Researchers)
- Growing Plagiarism Scandal in Iran + (Researchers)
- Former Columbia University Graduate Student Engaged in 21 Instances of Research Misconduct + (Researchers)
- Objectivity and Incentives + (All stakeholders in research)
- 04 - Moral Case Deliberation: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Researchers)
- 03 - Four Quadrant Approach: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Researchers)
- Human Research Violations By Eye Doctor Showcase A National Problem + (Academic institutions)
- Handling of Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries: Early stages in the 1990's + (researchers)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity + (All stakeholders in research)
- 06 - Teaching Research Ethics Tool : A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics + (Researchers)
- 05 - REalistiC Decisions: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Researchers)
- 02 - The Seven Steps Method: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Researchers)
- 01 - Value Analysis: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (researchers)
- ENERI Classroom + (Research Integrity Officers)
- Take no full responsibility for the integrity of the research project and its reports + (Researchers)
- Conflict of interest: a research integrity and research ethics perspective + (Researchers)
- Guidelines for Integrity in Scientific Research + (Academic institutions)
- Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences' Guideline on Authorship in Scientific Publications + (Authors)
- University of Tartu Ethics Centre's Codes of Ethics Handbook + (Academic institutions)
- Code of Good Scientific Practices of the Spanish National Research Council (CSIS) + (Research institutions)
- Research Integrity in trying times: a scenario on the presentation and dissemination of information + (Researchers)
- Misconduct? It's all academic + (Academic institutions)
- Croatia's science minister rejects calls to resign amid plagiarism scandal + (Academic institutions)
- A Famous Honesty Researcher Is Retracting A Study Over Fake Data + (Academic institutions)
- BT Cotton Hoax in a University in India + (Academic institutions)
- Development and Value of National Research Integrity Codes + (Research Integrity Officers)
- General Code of Ethics in Scientific Research (Romanian Ministry of Education, Research and Youth) + (Researchers)
- Irish National Forum on Research Integrity's Guidelines for the Investigation of Misconduct in Research + (Research Integrity Officers)
- UKRIO's Self-Assessment Tool for The Concordat to Support Research Integrity + (Academic institutions)
- UKRIO's Position statement on research involving security-sensitive material + (Research Integrity Officers)
- Position statement of the UKRIO: Statutory regulation of research integrity + (Research Integrity Officers)
- UKRIO's Procedure for the investigation of misconduct in research + (Research Integrity Officers)
- UKRIO's Guide to good authorship practice in research + (Researchers)
- The Norwegian Act on Ethics and Integrity in Research (The Research Ethics Act) + (Research institutions)
- Italian National Research Council's Research Ethics and Integrity Documents + (Research institutions)
- Dublin City University's Policy for Responding to Allegations of Research Misconduct + (Researchers)
- Irish National Forum on Research Integrity's Position Paper on Research Integrity Officer Role & Reporting + (Research Integrity Officers)
- Irish National Forum on Research Integrity's Report on Fostering a Climate of Excellence for Irish Research + (Reserchers)
- The French National Research Agency's Policy for Ethics and Research Integrity + (Funding agencies)
- The French CNRS Ethics Committee's Ethical Reflection on Plagiarism in Scientific Research + (Researchers)
- Recommendations of the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK for Research Integrity Advisers and related background organisations1 + (Research Integrity Officers)
- Act on the Danish Council for Research and Innovation Policy + (Academic institutions)
- Alliance of German Science Organisations' Principles for the Handling of Research Data + (Researchers)
- Joint position paper of the General Faculty (AFT) and the German University Association (DHV) + (Researchers)
- The German Council of Science and Humanities ' Recommendations on Academic Integrity + (Academic institutions)
- German Council of Science and Humanities' Requirements for the Quality Assurance of the Doctorate + (PhD Students)
- German Council of Science and Humanities' Recommendations for Evaluating and Controlling Research Performance + (Research Administrators)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on continuous research integrity education + (Supervisors)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of institutional research integrity stakeholders + (Research institutions)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of bachelor, master and PhD students + (Research institutions)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of post-doctorate and senior researchers + (Research institutions)
- Infographic - SOPs4RI Research integrity education guidelines for research institutions + (Research institutions)
- SOPs4RI - Guidelines for research institutions on community building for a positive research culture + (Research institutions)
- Guidelines for research institutions on adequate education and skills training + (Research institutions)
- Guidelines for research institutions on managing competition and publication pressure + (Research institutions)
- SOPs4RI - Guidelines for research institutions on diversity and inclusion + (Research institutions)
- Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations + (Research funding organisations)
- Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations + (Research funding organisations)
- Research preparedness for future crises + (Wider public)
- Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- The Finnish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and Procedures for Handling Alleged Violations of Research Integrity in Finland + (Academic institutions)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition + (All stakeholders in research)
- Research with human subjects + (Advisors of students)
- Duplicate publications and secondary publications + (Researchers)
- AllTrials campaign + (All stakeholders in research)
- Altmetrics + (PhD students)
- INSPIRE Checklist + (Policy makers)
- Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals + (Research funding organisations)
- Monitoring funding processes + (Funders)
- Whistleblower protection/rights + (PhD Students)
- Legal rights of accused scientists + (Scientists)
- Intellectual property rights in research collaborations + (Funders)
- Netherlands Position Paper on the Recognition and Rewards of Academics + (Academic staff)
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity + (Senior researchers)
- The Threat to Scientific Integrity in Environmental and Occupational Medicine + (Policy makers)
- Funders + (Research funding organisations)
- Chinese Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for the National Natural Science Foundation + (Researchers)
- Polish National Science Centre Code on Research Integrity and Applying for Research Financing + (Researchers)
- A Japanese developmental biology center, scientific misconduct and suicide + (Researchers)
- Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations + (Research performing organisations)
- Responsible Research and Innovation - RRI + (Researchers)
- Intellectual conflicts of interest + (Research performing organisations)
- Prospective registration of clinical trials + (PhD students)
- The Suspect Questionnaire + (Academic institutions)
- Power to the People + (Academic institutions)
- Site Unseen + (Collaborating researchers)
- Responsible mentoring + (Researchers)
- Position Paper on Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in Austria + (Research institutions)
- The Flemish Council for Scientific Integrity's Guidelines on Plagiarism in Funding Applications + (Research funding organisations)
- Swiss Academy of Arts and Sciences Code of Conduct for Scientific Integrity r + (Researchers)
- Japan fails to settle university dispute + (Academic institutions)
- Psychologist made up sex bias results + (Academic institutions)
- Suborning science for profit: Monsanto, glyphosate, and private science research misconduct + (Academic institutions)
- Strategy for Gender Equality at the Swedish Research Council + (Academic institutions)
- Swedish Research Council's Conflict of Interest Policy + (Research funding organisations)
- Swedish Research Council's Guidelines on Good Research Practice + (Researchers)
- The Swiss Federal Act on the Promotion of Research and Innovation (RIPA) + (Research funding organisations)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on the selection and evaluation of proposals + (Funders)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on monitoring funded projects + (Funders)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on defining and preventing unjustified interferences from funders, political and commercial actors + (Funders)
- Infographic-SOPs4RI Research integrity guidelines for research funders + (Funders)
- Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity + (PhD students)
- Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations + (All stakeholders in research)
- Publishers - COPE guidelines + (phd students)
- Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors + (Students)
- Perverse incentives + (Students)
- The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) + (Research performing organisations)
- Reasonable standards for career advancement + (Researchers)
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity + (Researchers)
- The EQUATOR Network: Reporting guidelines + (Researchers)
- Danish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity + (researchers)
- Netherlands Standard Evaluation Protocol for Research Assessments + (Research institutions)
- Research culture awards (University of Glasgow) + (Research institutions)
- Research culture survey (University of Glasgow) + (Research institutions)
- Research culture statement (University of Glasgow) + (Policy makers)
- Publication archive (Radboud University) + (Research institutions)
- Research culture group (University of Glasgow) + (Research institutions)
- The ConScience App - theatre play + (Research performing organisations)
- The learning curve - theatre play #MeTooAcademia + (Research institutions)
- Research Integrity champions + (Research performing organisations)
- "Met de billen bloot" (airing your dirty laundry) + (Researchers)
- The qualification portfolio (UMC Utrecht): from output to impact + (Research institutions)
- Data stewardship at TU Delft + (Research institutions)
- Legal Liabilities in Research: Early lessons From North America + (researchers)
- Research misconduct + (Students)
- Inexperienced researcher gives too much caffeine to subjects + (Researchers)
- The Orphan Embryos: A Case Study in Bioethics + (Decision makers)
- Humanities in the European Research Area (HERA) + (Researchers)
- Connecting researchers through ORCID + (PhD Students)
- Empathy in History Research and Education + (Researchers)
- Path2Integrity "RI in Curricula" map + (Educators)