Search by property
From The Embassy of Good Science
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- Collaborative working + (Good Practices)
- Data Practices and Management + (Good Practices)
- Funders + (Good Practices)
- How to be a good lab partner + (Good Practices)
- Peer review + (Good Practices)
- Protecting research subjects + (Good Practices)
- Publication + (Good Practices)
- Replicability + (Good Practices)
- Research culture + (Good Practices)
- Research metrics + (Good Practices)
- Responsible mentoring + (Good Practices)
- Collaboration In Research + (Good Practices)
- Cross-boundary collaborations + (Good Practices)
- High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations + (Good Practices)
- SSH research as part of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research + (Good Practices)
- Anonymisation and pseudonymisation + (Good Practices)
- Data management plans + (Good Practices)
- Data protection in a global pandemic (COVID-19) + (Good Practices)
- FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results + (Good Practices)
- Feedback of findings in genome-wide association studies + (Good Practices)
- How to select trustworthy repositories + (Good Practices)
- Imputation of missing data in clinical trials + (Good Practices)
- Methods to increase data availability + (Good Practices)
- Sharing and preserving data in repositories + (Good Practices)
- “Five steps to decide what data to keep: a checklist for appraising research data” + (Good Practices)
- Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals + (Good Practices)
- Industry funded research + (Good Practices)
- Intellectual property rights in research collaborations + (Good Practices)
- Monitoring funding processes + (Good Practices)
- The ethics of managing a laboratory or research group + (Good Practices)
- Sponsorship of drug and device studies by the manufacturing company + (Good Practices)
- Informed consent in psychiatry + (Good Practices)
- "Met de billen bloot" (airing your dirty laundry) + (Good Practices)
- Computational reproducibility: safeguarding the backbone of science + (Good Practices)
- Data stewardship at TU Delft + (Good Practices)
- Initiatives promoting research integrity + (Good Practices)
- Integrity roadmap, Delft University of Technology + (Good Practices)
- PhD-pizza - Gathering for PhD-candidates to talk freely + (Good Practices)
- Publication archive (Radboud University) + (Good Practices)
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching + (Good Practices)
- Research Integrity champions + (Good Practices)
- Research Integrity lunch meetings + (Good Practices)
- Research culture awards (University of Glasgow) + (Good Practices)
- Research culture group (University of Glasgow) + (Good Practices)
- Research culture statement (University of Glasgow) + (Good Practices)
- Research culture survey (University of Glasgow) + (Good Practices)
- Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas + (Good Practices)
- Reward campaign + (Good Practices)
- Secondary corrections + (Good Practices)
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity + (Good Practices)
- Importance of healthy lifestyle + (Good Practices)
- Imposter Syndrome + (Good Practices)
- COMET Initiative + (Good Practices)
- EQIPD (Enhancing Quality in Preclinical Data) + (Good Practices)
- European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC) + (Good Practices)
- European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI) + (Good Practices)
- Networks and projects promoting research integrity + (Good Practices)
- Path2Integrity + (Good Practices)
- Platform for Responsible Editorial Policies (PREP) + (Good Practices)
- SIENNA - Stakeholder-informed ethics for new technologies with high socio-economic and human rights impact + (Good Practices)
- The INSPIRE project + (Good Practices)
- The SOPs4RI project + (Good Practices)
- The TETRIAS project + (Good Practices)
- Workgroup of developers of RI training (NRIN) + (Good Practices)
- Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science + (Good Practices)
- Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities + (Good Practices)
- Post-publication peer review + (Good Practices)
- Balancing harms and benefits + (Good Practices)
- Clarifying the aims of a research study + (Good Practices)
- Conducting research in high risk locations + (Good Practices)
- Confidentiality + (Good Practices)
- Ethical considerations in dealing with human remains + (Good Practices)
- Ethical issues in qualitative research + (Good Practices)
- Ethical issues of involving children with disabilities in research + (Good Practices)
- Incidental research findings + (Good Practices)
- Informed assent + (Good Practices)
- Informed consent + (Good Practices)
- Internet Research Ethics + (Good Practices)
- Privacy in research + (Good Practices)
- Research with animals + (Good Practices)
- Research with children + (Good Practices)
- Research with humans + (Good Practices)
- Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials + (Good Practices)
- Affiliations + (Good Practices)
- Authorship criteria + (Good Practices)
- Consent for publication (Author) + (Good Practices)
- Consent for publication (Participant) + (Good Practices)
- High Integration of Research Monographs in the European Open Science (HIRMEOS) + (Good Practices)
- Initiative for Open Abstracts (I4OA) + (Good Practices)
- Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC) + (Good Practices)
- Open access Publication in the European Research Area for Social Sciences and Humanities (OPERAS) + (Good Practices)
- Open access publishing: the new norm? + (Good Practices)
- Publishers - COPE guidelines + (Good Practices)
- Retractions: correcting the scientific literature + (Good Practices)
- Standards of authorship + (Good Practices)
- AllTrials campaign + (Good Practices)
- Forensic Statistics to detect Data Fabrication + (Good Practices)
- Preregistration of animal study protocols + (Good Practices)
- Prospective registration of clinical trials + (Good Practices)
- Statistical pre-registration + (Good Practices)
- Connecting researchers through ORCID + (Good Practices)
- Digital humanities + (Good Practices)
- Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity + (Good Practices)
- FOSTER - Fosteropenscience.eu + (Good Practices)
- Governance of research integrity: Options for a coordinated approach in Europe + (Good Practices)
- Grading the quality of evidence in clinical practice guidelines + (Good Practices)
- Image Integrity + (Good Practices)
- Institutional codes of conduct for research integrity + (Good Practices)
- Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct + (Good Practices)
- Legal rights of accused scientists + (Good Practices)
- Mental health in academia + (Good Practices)
- ORI - The Office of Research Integrity + (Good Practices)
- Open Science + (Good Practices)
- Plan S + (Good Practices)
- Reasonable standards for career advancement + (Good Practices)
- Research Integrity Advisors + (Good Practices)
- Research Integrity Committees + (Good Practices)
- Research ethics committee members' skills + (Good Practices)
- Research ethics committees + (Good Practices)
- Research integrity officers in Europe + (Good Practices)
- Responsible Research and Innovation - RRI + (Good Practices)
- Science policy + (Good Practices)
- Teaching sensitive and controversial issues in divided societies + (Good Practices)
- The impact of the GDPR on scientific data + (Good Practices)
- Whistleblower protection/rights + (Good Practices)
- Altmetrics + (Good Practices)
- Eigenfactor + (Good Practices)
- H-index + (Good Practices)
- Journal Impact Factor + (Good Practices)
- Journal Impact Factor based on the date of electronic publication + (Good Practices)
- SCImago Journal Rankings + (Good Practices)
- Peer review card game + (Good Practices)
- Research integrity training for PhD students + (Good Practices)
- Research integrity training for diverse disciplines + (Good Practices)
- Respectable and honest supervision ensures responsible and ethical research in the future. + (Good Practices)
- Responsible supervision + (Good Practices)
- Serious gaming in research integrity education + (Good Practices)
- Superb Supervision: integrity training for supervisors + (Good Practices)
- Supervision + (Good Practices)
- Supervision Guidelines + (Good Practices)
- The ConScience App - theatre play + (Good Practices)
- The Dilemma Game + (Good Practices)
- The learning curve - theatre play #MeTooAcademia + (Good Practices)
- Duplicate publications and secondary publications + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Predatory publishing + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Conflict of interest in peer review + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Hostile peer review + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Improper data use (a bias distorting research results) + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Inappropriate authorship + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Outcome reporting bias + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- P-value hacking + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Perverse incentives + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Publication bias (positive results) + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Self-plagiarism + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Spin of research results + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Conflict of interests + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Fabrication + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Falsification + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Polarized research + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Salami publication + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’) + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Plagiarism + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Editorial conflicts of interest + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Posing irrelevant research questions + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Turning a blind eye to breaches of integrity + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Research misconduct + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Non-disclosure of changes to the research design + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Inadequately handle or store data or (bio)materials + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Unfair reviewing + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Fake peer-reviewing + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- (re)submitting without consent of all authors + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Keeping inadequate notes of the research process + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Insufficiently reported study flaws and limitations + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Intellectual conflicts of interest + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Gender bias + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Inferring from P-values + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Inaccurate representation of results in the media + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Questionable Research Practices in Study Design + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Inappropriate study design + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Questionable Research Practices in Data Collection + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and Reporting + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Questionable Research Practices in Collaboration + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Non-reporting of negative findings + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Selective citation + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- The influence of pharmaceutical company on drug availability + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Ignoring substantial safety risks of the study to participants, workers or environment + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Not acknowledging contributors who do not qualify for authorship + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Funding (Sponsorship) bias + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Honorary or gift authorship + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Hypothesizing after the results are known (HARKing) + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Take no full responsibility for the integrity of the research project and its reports + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Conflict of interest: a research integrity and research ethics perspective + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Communicate results to the general public before a peer reviewed publication is available + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Be grossly unfair to your collaborators + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Poor mentoring or supervision of early career researcherers + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- CRISPR twins – an unethical practice + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Research collaboration + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Not asking permission from contributors for the wording of the acknowledgement + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- AI Generated Content + (Misconduct & Misbehaviors)
- Qualitative research + (Other)
- Preprint servers + (Other)
- Development and Value of National Research Integrity Codes + (Other)
- The decision on ice + (Other)
- Moral conflict and moral dilemma + (Principles & Aspirations)
- Values and norms + (Principles & Aspirations)
- Epistemic virtues + (Principles & Aspirations)
- Mertonian norms + (Principles & Aspirations)
- Ethics of ageing + (Principles & Aspirations)
- Cognitive dissonance and moral distress + (Principles & Aspirations)
- Dialogue versus debate + (Principles & Aspirations)
- Replicability in the Humanities + (Principles & Aspirations)
- Empathy in History Research and Education + (Principles & Aspirations)
- Dilemmas in daily practice + (Principles & Aspirations)
- Virtues in research integrity + (Principles & Aspirations)