Theme

From The Embassy of Good Science

Revision as of 17:44, 14 October 2021 by Admin (talk | contribs) (MWBot)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Jump to:navigation, search

Back

Themes

Learn about important Good Science themes that will stimulate awareness and dialogue around relevant issues or 'hot topics'. We also invite you to add or edit the pages in this section.

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

216 Themes ordered by recently added

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Cognitive dissonance and moral distress

Collaborative working

Collaboration In Research

Cross-boundary collaborations

High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations

SSH research as part of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research

Conflict of interests

Conflict of interest in peer review

Conflict of interest: a research integrity and research ethics perspective

Editorial conflicts of interest

Intellectual conflicts of interest

The influence of pharmaceutical company on drug availability

Data Practices and Management

Anonymisation and pseudonymisation

Data management plans

Data protection in a global pandemic (COVID-19)

FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results

Feedback of findings in genome-wide association studies

How to select trustworthy repositories

Imputation of missing data in clinical trials

Methods to increase data availability

Sharing and preserving data in repositories

“Five steps to decide what data to keep: a checklist for appraising research data”

Development and Value of National Research Integrity Codes

Dialogue versus debate

Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity

Epistemic virtues

Ethics of ageing

Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals

Industry funded research

Intellectual property rights in research collaborations

Monitoring funding processes

How to be a good lab partner

The ethics of managing a laboratory or research group

Mertonian norms

Moral conflict and moral dilemma

Dilemmas in daily practice

Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science

Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities

Post-publication peer review

Poor mentoring or supervision of early career researcherers

Preprint servers

Protecting research subjects

Balancing harms and benefits

Clarifying the aims of a research study

Conducting research in high risk locations

Confidentiality

Ethical considerations in dealing with human remains

Ethical issues in qualitative research

Ethical issues of involving children with disabilities in research

Incidental research findings

Informed assent

Informed consent

Internet Research Ethics

Privacy in research

Research with animals

Research with children

Research with humans

Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials

Authorship criteria

Consent for publication (Author)

Consent for publication (Participant)

High Integration of Research Monographs in the European Open Science (HIRMEOS)

Initiative for Open Abstracts (I4OA)

Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC)

Open access Publication in the European Research Area for Social Sciences and Humanities (OPERAS)

Open access publishing: the new norm?

Publishers - COPE guidelines

Retractions: correcting the scientific literature

Standards of authorship

Theme:B5de63bc-893f-489b-bb5e-2457ac04671e

Qualitative research

Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and Reporting

Communicate results to the general public before a peer reviewed publication is available

Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’)

Duplicate publications and secondary publications

Funding (Sponsorship) bias

Hypothesizing after the results are known (HARKing)

Improper data use (a bias distorting research results)

Inaccurate representation of results in the media

Inferring from P-values

Insufficiently reported study flaws and limitations

Non-reporting of negative findings

Outcome reporting bias

P-value hacking

Publication bias (positive results)

Salami publication

Selective citation

Spin of research results

Questionable Research Practices in Collaboration

(re)submitting without consent of all authors

Be grossly unfair to your collaborators

Fake peer-reviewing

Honorary or gift authorship

Hostile peer review

Inappropriate authorship

Not acknowledging contributors who do not qualify for authorship

Research collaboration

Self-plagiarism

Take no full responsibility for the integrity of the research project and its reports

Turning a blind eye to breaches of integrity

Unfair reviewing

Questionable Research Practices in Data Collection

Inadequately handle or store data or (bio)materials

Keeping inadequate notes of the research process

Questionable Research Practices in Study Design

Ignoring substantial safety risks of the study to participants, workers or environment

Inappropriate study design

Non-disclosure of changes to the research design

Posing irrelevant research questions

AllTrials campaign

Forensic Statistics to detect Data Fabrication

Preregistration of animal study protocols

Prospective registration of clinical trials

Statistical pre-registration

Replicability in the Humanities

Research culture

Connecting researchers through ORCID

Digital humanities

Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity

FOSTER - Fosteropenscience.eu

Governance of research integrity: Options for a coordinated approach in Europe

Grading the quality of evidence in clinical practice guidelines

Image Integrity

Institutional codes of conduct for research integrity

Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct

Legal rights of accused scientists

Mental health in academia

ORI - The Office of Research Integrity

Reasonable standards for career advancement

Research Integrity Advisors

Research Integrity Committees

Research ethics committee members' skills

Research ethics committees

Research integrity officers in Europe

Responsible Research and Innovation - RRI

Teaching sensitive and controversial issues in divided societies

The impact of the GDPR on scientific data

Whistleblower protection/rights

Research metrics

Journal Impact Factor

Journal Impact Factor based on the date of electronic publication

SCImago Journal Rankings

Research misconduct

Responsible mentoring

Peer review card game

Research integrity training for PhD students

Research integrity training for diverse disciplines

Respectable and honest supervision ensures responsible and ethical research in the future.

Responsible supervision

Serious gaming in research integrity education

Superb Supervision: integrity training for supervisors

Supervision Guidelines

The ConScience App - theatre play

The Dilemma Game

The learning curve - theatre play #MeTooAcademia

The decision on ice

Values and norms

Virtues in research integrity

Empathy in History Research and Education

Industry funded research

Sponsorship of drug and device studies by the manufacturing company

Informed consent

Informed consent in psychiatry

Initiatives promoting research integrity

"Met de billen bloot" (airing your dirty laundry)

Computational reproducibility: safeguarding the backbone of science

Data stewardship at TU Delft

Integrity roadmap, Delft University of Technology

PhD-pizza - Gathering for PhD-candidates to talk freely

Publication archive (Radboud University)

Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching

Research Integrity champions

Research Integrity lunch meetings

Research culture awards (University of Glasgow)

Research culture group (University of Glasgow)

Research culture statement (University of Glasgow)

Research culture survey (University of Glasgow)

Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas

Reward campaign

Secondary corrections

The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity

Mental health in academia

Importance of healthy lifestyle

Imposter Syndrome

Networks and projects promoting research integrity

COMET Initiative

EQIPD (Enhancing Quality in Preclinical Data)

European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC)

European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI)

Platform for Responsible Editorial Policies (PREP)

SIENNA - Stakeholder-informed ethics for new technologies with high socio-economic and human rights impact

The INSPIRE project

The SOPs4RI project

The TETRIAS project

Workgroup of developers of RI training (NRIN)

Not acknowledging contributors who do not qualify for authorship

Not asking permission from contributors for the wording of the acknowledgement

AI Generated Content

Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors

CRISPR twins – an unethical practice

Perverse incentives

Polarized research

Predatory publishing

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Retrieved from "https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Form:Theme&oldid=7472"

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

5.1.6