LoginSign up

Related Themes (Related To Theme)

From The Embassy of Good Science
Please link to other related thematic pages to give more background


  • ⧼SA Foundation Data Type⧽: Page
previous 5002050100250500next 500
Showing 500 pages using this property.
'
'I am really sorry': Peer Reviewer Stole Text for Own Paper +
Peer review  +, Plagiarism  +
0
03 - Four Quadrant Approach: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity +
Cognitive dissonance and moral distress  +, Moral conflict and moral dilemma  +
04 - Moral Case Deliberation: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity +
Cognitive dissonance and moral distress  +, Moral conflict and moral dilemma  +
05 - REalistiC Decisions: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity +
Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct  +, Research Integrity Committees  +, Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +, …
06 - Teaching Research Ethics Tool : A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics +
Cognitive dissonance and moral distress  +, Moral conflict and moral dilemma  +
1
10 Things for Curating Reproducible and FAIR Research +
Computational reproducibility: safeguarding the backbone of science  +
3
3 Ways to Blow the Whistle +
Whistleblower protection/rights  +
A
A 24-year-old sociology paper found to have plagiarised a 1975 article +
Plagiarism  +
A Case Study about Anonymization and Secondary Use of Qualitative Data +
The impact of the GDPR on scientific data  +, Protecting research subjects  +
A Data Governance Framework for Ethnography +
Open Science  +, Data Practices and Management  +
A Japanese developmental biology center, scientific misconduct and suicide +
Fabrication  +, "Met de billen bloot" (airing your dirty laundry)  +
A Medical Ghostwriter’s Personal View +
Authorship criteria  +, Standards of authorship  +, Inappropriate authorship  +
A Review of the Impact of the TeGenero Trial on the Design, Conduct, and Ethics of FIM Trials +
Balancing harms and benefits  +, Informed consent  +, Research with humans  +
A University of Liverpool investigation determined that a former researcher there fabricated his data +
Fabrication  +
ALLEA Permanent Working Group Science and Ethics +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +, European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI)  +, Research Integrity Advisors  +, …
Academic Integrity Tutorial with Quiz +
Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas  +
Academic and research misconduct in the PhD: Issues for students and supervisors +
Supervision  +, Supervision Guidelines  +
Academic integrity at MIT, a handbook for students +
Plagiarism  +
Age-Old Conflicts +
Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals  +, Conflict of interests  +
An author realized a paper had plagiarized his thesis. It took the journal four years to retract it. +
Plagiarism  +
Anonymity Revisited +
Confidentiality  +, Informed consent  +, Privacy in research  +, …
Anticipate and Communicate. Ethical Management of Incidental and Secondary Findings in the Clinical, Research, and Direct-to-Consumer Contexts +
Incidental research findings  +
Artificial tracheas and severe research misconduct +
Research misconduct  +
Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content. +
Virtues in research integrity  +, Collaborative working  +, Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct  +, …
Author Misconduct: Not Just the Editors' Responsibility +
Responsible supervision  +, Confidentiality  +
Authorship Deserved, Not Earned: Research Ethics and Research Integrity Scenario +
Authorship criteria  +
Authorship and Intellectual Property +
Authorship criteria  +
Authorship: video +
Collaborative working  +
B
Baltimore Case - In Brief +
Responsible supervision  +
Banked Samples and HD Testing +
Informed consent  +
Becoming an Ethical Researcher +
Protecting research subjects  +
Bias in Historical Description, Interpretation, and Explanation +
F8127b19-a41a-4cfc-b829-7c72e91f578e  +
Bioethicists Call for Investigation Into Nutritional Experiments on Aboriginal People +
Research with humans  +
Biologist Spared Jail For Grant Fraud +
Fabrication  +
Biomedical Alliance in Europe (Biomed Alliance) Code of Conduct +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +
Blinded by Private Conflict – Choosing Ego Over Professionalism +
Responsible mentoring  +
Bothered and Bewildered But not Bewitched +
Collaborative working  +
C
COPE Cases +
Publishers - COPE guidelines  +, Predatory publishing  +
COPE seminar, webinar and ppt presentation +
Collaborative working  +, Peer review card game  +, Standards of authorship  +, …
Can a scientific paper be published anonymously? +
Privacy in research  +
Carlo Croce: data falsification and other scientific misconduct +
Research misconduct  +, Falsification  +
Case Studies For Small Group Discussion +
Whistleblower protection/rights  +, Standards of authorship  +, Conflict of interests  +, …
Case Study Videos +
Supervision  +, Authorship criteria  +, Peer review  +, …
Case Study: Beginning a Collaboration +
Collaborative working  +
Case report: incidental finding of a giant cardiac mass +
Incidental research findings  +
Case-based ethics instruction: the influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making +
Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors  +
Casuistry – is this RM, QRP or RCR? Three cases with dilemmas +
Research integrity training for PhD students  +, Workgroup of developers of RI training (NRIN)  +
Changing a grant proposal to meet the reviewers requests +
Peer review  +
Co-Authorship Conflicts +
Authorship criteria  +
Code of Good Scientific Practices of the Spanish National Research Council (CSIS) +
Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct  +, Responsible supervision  +, Publication  +
Cognitive dissonance and moral distress +
Virtues in research integrity  +
Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
Collaborative working  +, Cross-boundary collaborations  +, High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations  +, …
Collaborative working +
Cross-boundary collaborations  +, High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations  +
Committee On Publication Ethics (COPE) Guidelines +
Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities  +
Committee on Publication Ethics Guidelines on How to Handle Authorship Disputes +
Authorship criteria  +, Standards of authorship  +, Inappropriate authorship  +, …
Companion Guidelines on Replication & Reproducibility in Education Research: +
Replicability  +
Conflict of interests +
Standards of authorship  +, Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals  +, Conflict of interest in peer review  +
Conflicts of interest in citizen science +
Conflict of interests  +
Conflicts with Community Leaders +
Research with humans  +, Protecting research subjects  +
Copy and paste: A slow university investigation into serious accusations of misconduct benefits no one +
Virtues in research integrity  +, Plagiarism  +
Court Denies Appeal of HIV Fraudster’s 57-month Prison Sentence +
Research with animals  +
Covering Controversial Science: Improving Reporting on Science and Public Policy +
Inaccurate representation of results in the media  +
Cultural differences and communication in the lab +
Falsification  +
D
DATA MINDFULNESS: Making the most of your dissertation +
Data management plans  +
Danish National Strategy for Open Access +
Open access publishing: the new norm?  +
Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
Confidentiality  +, Informed consent  +, Privacy in research  +, …
Data fabrication in a rejected manuscript +
Data Practices and Management  +
Deception by Research Participants +
Research with humans  +
Declaration of Helsinki +
Balancing harms and benefits  +, Research with humans  +
Definition of plagiarism: Phrasing +
Plagiarism  +
Der Balanceakt +
Virtues in research integrity  +
Der Selbstauskunfts-Ansatz: Eine Reflexion über das Konzept des Guten in der Wissenschaft +
Virtues in research integrity  +
Dialogue versus debate +
Moral conflict and moral dilemma  +
Diner Pensant Workshop +
Supervision Guidelines  +, Research integrity training for PhD students  +, Responsible supervision  +
Disclosing Conflicts of Interest in Scientific Advice +
Conflict of interests  +
Dispute Over Primary Authorship +
Authorship criteria  +, Standards of authorship  +
Dubious Peer Reviews Lead to 10 Retractions +
Peer review card game  +, Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science  +, Peer review  +, …
Duty to Report Ethical Violations of Others +
Whistleblower protection/rights  +
E
ENERI Classroom +
European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI)  +, European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC)  +
ENERI Decision Tree +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +, European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI)  +, Research integrity officers in Europe  +, …
ENERI manual-research integrity and ethics +
European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI)  +, European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC)  +, Research ethics committees  +
Eager Researcher Signs Away Intellectual Rights Despite University Refusal +
Intellectual property rights in research collaborations  +
Edanz. Writing Point: How To Write About Your Study Limitations Without Limiting Your Impact +
Insufficiently reported study flaws and limitations  +
Epistemic virtues +
Virtues in research integrity  +
Ethical Code of Scientific Research in Belgium +
Balancing harms and benefits  +, Conflict of interests  +, Protecting research subjects  +, …
Ethical and Societal Foundations of Open Science +
Open Science  +
Ethical guidance for research with a potential for human enhancement +
SIENNA - Stakeholder-informed ethics for new technologies with high socio-economic and human rights impact  +
Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations +
Values and norms  +, Funders  +, Informed assent  +, …
Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations +
Values and norms  +, Funders  +, Informed assent  +, …
Ethics defined: a glossary +
European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC)  +, Research ethics committees  +
Ethics, Human Rights and HIV Vaccine Trials in Low-Income Settings +
Research with humans  +
European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Code of Ethics +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +
European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Code of Practice +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +
European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Code of Practice for Fieldwork Training +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +
European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Principles of Conduct for Archaeologists involved in Contract Archaeological Work +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +
European Association of Social Psychology (EASP) Code of Conduct +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +
European Astronomical Society (EAS) Ethics Statement and Guidelines for Good Practice +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +
European College of Neuropsychopharmacology  (ECNP) Code of Conduct +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +
European Commission Guidance on H2020 Program Ethics Self-assessment +
Research ethics committee members' skills  +, Research ethics committees  +
European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) Code of Conduct +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +
European Cystic Fibrosis Society (ECFS) Patient Registry Code of Conduct +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +
European Federation of Psychologists' Associations (EFPA) Meta-Code of Ethics +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +
European Federation of Psychologists' Associations (EFPA) Model-Code of Ethics +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +
European Geosciences Union (EGU) Code of Conduct +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +
European Mathematical Society (EMS) Code of Practice +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +
European Meteorological Society (EMS) Code of Practice for communicating knowledge on climate change to the public +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +
European Network for Research Evaluation in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (ENRESSH) +
Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities  +
European Network of Research Integrity Offices Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct +
Research Integrity Committees  +, Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +, European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI)  +
European Nuclear Society (ENS) Ethical Charter +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +
European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA) Standards of Conduct +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +
European Society for Opinion and Marketing Research (ESOMAR) International Code on Market, Opinion and Social Research and Data Analytics +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +
F
Failed Patenting Negotiations in Collaborative Research +
Intellectual property rights in research collaborations  +, Conflict of interests  +
Fake science: Who's to blame when the media gets research wrong? +
Inaccurate representation of results in the media  +
False results, premature infants and the CNEP trial +
Confidentiality  +
Faulty Drug Trials Tarnish Japan's Clinical Research +
AllTrials campaign  +, Falsification  +
Favoritism in the Editing Room +
Peer review  +
Federation of European Pharmacological Societies (EPHAR) Ethical Code of Conduct +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +
Federation of European Toxicologists and European Societies of Toxicology (Eurotox) Code of Ethics +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +
Final Findings of Scientific Misconduct +
Fabrication  +, Falsification  +
Finnish Guidelines on Doctoral Supervision and Review +
Supervision  +, Supervision Guidelines  +, Responsible supervision  +
Five simple rules to avoid plagiarism +
Research misconduct  +, Plagiarism  +
Forbidden Knowledge +
Confidentiality  +, Privacy in research  +
Fostering Integrity in Research +
Virtues in research integrity  +
Fourth retraction for neuroscientist sentenced for fraud +
Duplicate publications and secondary publications  +, Plagiarism  +
Framework to Enhance Research Integrity in Research Collaborations +
Collaborative working  +, Authorship criteria  +, (re)submitting without consent of all authors  +
Fraud, errors and gamesmanship in experimental toxicology: GM potatoes +
Inappropriate study design  +
From Case Management to Prevention of Scientific Dishonesty in Denmark +
Fabrication  +, Falsification  +
Funders +
AllTrials campaign  +, Non-reporting of negative findings  +, Conflict of interests  +
G
Geology Paper Has a Rocky Road is Now Retracted +
Retractions: correcting the scientific literature  +
German Research Foundation's Recommendations for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice +
Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct  +, Whistleblower protection/rights  +
Global Code of Conduct for Research in Resource-Poor Settings +
Collaborative working  +, Cross-boundary collaborations  +, High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations  +
Good Epidemiological Practice Guidelines +
Cross-boundary collaborations  +, High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations  +
Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Austria +
Research Integrity Committees  +, Research Integrity Advisors  +, Research integrity officers in Europe  +, …
Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Finland +
Research Integrity Committees  +, Research Integrity Advisors  +, Research integrity officers in Europe  +, …
Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Switzerland +
Research Integrity Committees  +, Research Integrity Advisors  +, Research integrity officers in Europe  +, …
Grey areas of plagiarism: 10 scenarios to discuss with students +
Research misconduct  +, Plagiarism  +
Guest Authorship, Mortality Reporting, and Integrity in Rofecoxib Studies +
Authorship criteria  +, Standards of authorship  +, Inappropriate authorship  +
Guideline for discussing work-related stress +
Mental health in academia  +
Guidelines for Evaluating Work in Digital Humanities and Digital Media +
Digital humanities  +
Guidelines for Responsible Data Management in Scientific Research +
Forensic Statistics to detect Data Fabrication  +
Guidelines for research institutions on adequate education and skills training +
The SOPs4RI project  +
Guidelines for research institutions on managing competition and publication pressure +
The SOPs4RI project  +
Guidelines for scientists on communicating with the media +
Inaccurate representation of results in the media  +
H
Handling of Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries: Early stages in the 1990's +
Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct  +, Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors  +, Research misconduct  +, …
Handling of Sexual Harassment Case Poses Larger Questions at Yale +
Privacy in research  +, Gender bias  +
Harvard Scientists Disciplined for Not Declaring Ties to Drug Companies +
Conflict of interests  +
Head of research integrity initiative in China alleged of reseach misconduct +
Legal rights of accused scientists  +
Herbicide Resistant Rice +
Balancing harms and benefits  +
History, Ethics and the Presidential Commission on Research in Guatemala +
Informed consent  +, Research ethics committees  +
How I Was Nearly Duped into 'Authoring' a Fake Paper +
Funders  +, Conflict of interests  +
How to be a good lab partner +
Collaborative working  +
Human Rights Education for Legal Professionals (HELP) Online Training +
Research with humans  +
I
INSPIRE Checklist +
The INSPIRE project  +
Image Manipulation Detection - Exercises +
Image Integrity  +, Digital humanities  +
Image manipulation as a general practice +
Image Integrity  +, Data Practices and Management  +
Image manipulation research +
Improper data use (a bias distorting research results)  +, Spin of research results  +
Inconsistent Findings Between Trainee and Researcher +
Supervision Guidelines  +, Responsible supervision  +, FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results  +, …
Industry involvement in scientific studies on SSRI's +
Fabrication  +, Falsification  +
Inexperienced researcher gives too much caffeine to subjects +
Research with humans  +
Infographic - SOPs4RI Guidelines on Responsible Supervision and Leadership +
Research integrity training for PhD students  +, Responsible supervision  +, Responsible mentoring  +, …
Infographic - SOPs4RI Research integrity education guidelines for research institutions +
The SOPs4RI project  +
Infographic-SOPs4RI Research integrity guidelines for research funders +
Funders  +, The SOPs4RI project  +, Industry funded research  +
Institutional Pathology and the Death of a Mentally Ill Young Man +
AllTrials campaign  +, Prospective registration of clinical trials  +, Informed consent  +, …
Institutional dealing with scientific misconduct +
Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct  +, Research misconduct  +
Integrity in scientific research videos +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +, Responsible supervision  +, Authorship criteria  +, …
Intellectual Rights Involving Multiple Institutions +
Collaborative working  +
Inter Academy Partnership Guidance on Doing Global Science +
Collaborative working  +, Cross-boundary collaborations  +, High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations  +
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Publication Recommendations +
Predatory publishing  +, Salami publication  +, Self-plagiarism  +, …
Introduction of Virtue Ethics to Research Integrity +
Epistemic virtues  +, Moral conflict and moral dilemma  +, Virtues in research integrity  +
Introduction to Research Integrity +
Virtues in research integrity  +
Introduction to Research Integrity and Good Scientific Practices +
Authorship criteria  +, FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results  +, Conflict of interest in peer review  +, …
Introduction to Responsible Supervision, Mentoring and Role-modeling +
Supervision  +, Supervision Guidelines  +, Responsible supervision  +, …
Introduction: Guidelines and Discrepancies +
Research with humans  +
Is the famous emeritus professor self-plagiarising? +
Self-plagiarism  +
Is there a reproducibility crisis in science? +
Research misconduct  +
It’s Still Plagiarism +
Inappropriate authorship  +, Plagiarism  +
J
Jailed for Faking Data +
Fabrication  +, Falsification  +
Jesse's Intent +
Informed consent  +, Improper data use (a bias distorting research results)  +, Conflict of interests  +
Journalist who fabricated his reports +
Fabrication  +
K
KU Leuven - Supervisor tips to promote research integrity +
Supervision  +, Supervision Guidelines  +, Responsible supervision  +, …
Kairos – A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy +
Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities  +
L
Legal Liabilities in Research: Early lessons From North America +
Research with humans  +
Limitations are not properly acknowledged in the scientific literature +
Insufficiently reported study flaws and limitations  +
Long Distance Collaboration +
Collaborative working  +
M
Mea Culpa: Scientific Misconduct - perspective of a research ethics board chair +
Research ethics committees  +
Misconduct Ruling is Silent on Intent +
Research misconduct  +
Misrepresenting the characteristics of research participants in psychiatric studies +
Research misconduct  +, Fabrication  +
Mistaken Claim of Authorship +
Authorship criteria  +, Standards of authorship  +
Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations +
Collaborative working  +, High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations  +, Intellectual property rights in research collaborations  +
Moral conflict and moral dilemma +
Cognitive dissonance and moral distress  +
Multiple submission +
Authorship criteria  +
N
Nanyang Technological University's Research Data Policy (Singapore) +
The impact of the GDPR on scientific data  +, FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results  +, Improper data use (a bias distorting research results)  +
Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity +
Research Integrity Committees  +, European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI)  +, Research integrity officers in Europe  +
Netherlands Position Paper on the Recognition and Rewards of Academics +
The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity  +
Netherlands Standard Evaluation Protocol for Research Assessments +
Research culture  +, The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity  +
Nine pitfalls of research misconduct +
Computational reproducibility: safeguarding the backbone of science  +
Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees - General Guidelines for Research Ethics +
Research ethics committees  +
Nutrition researcher selling supplements +
Conflict of interests  +
O
ORI Infographics +
Research Integrity Committees  +, Whistleblower protection/rights  +, Authorship criteria  +, …
Obstructive sleep apnoea +
Balancing harms and benefits  +
One PhD student, a retraction, and an unconvincing rebuttal +
Retractions: correcting the scientific literature  +
Online Posts Damage a Researcher's Reputation +
Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors  +
Online course: Teaching the Responsible Conduct of Research in Humans +
Research integrity training for PhD students  +
Open Access Policy at Czech Academy of Sciences +
Open Science  +
Organised Crime Against the Academic Peer Review System +
Peer review  +, Fake peer-reviewing  +
Organizing Academic Research Papers: Limitations of the Study +
Insufficiently reported study flaws and limitations  +
Outsourcing animal experimentation +
Research with animals  +
P
Path2Integrity "RI in Curricula" map +
Path2Integrity  +
Path2Integrity Campaign +
Networks and projects promoting research integrity  +, Path2Integrity  +
Path2Integrity Handbooks for Teachers and Trainers +
Path2Integrity  +
Path2Integrity Learning Cards +
Path2Integrity  +
Peer Review. The nuts and bolts +
Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities  +
Peer review +
F723d94e-5010-4c4a-ad26-cf56fce97a1f  +, Peer review  +, Hostile peer review  +
People Studying People: Research Ethics in Society +
Research with humans  +
Perioperative Mischief: The Price of Academic Misconduct +
Fabrication  +
PhD and Supervisor charter (KU Leuven) +
Supervision  +, Supervision Guidelines  +, Responsible supervision  +
Philosopher Earns 14th Retraction for Plagiarism +
Retractions: correcting the scientific literature  +
Pirated Idea for Research +
Conflict of interest in peer review  +
Plagiarism Charge for Romanian Minister +
Plagiarism  +
Plagiarism charge for Romanian minister - Scandal adds to fears that country’s research reform is in peril +
Plagiarism  +
Plagiarism in a PhD Thesis +
Plagiarism  +
Political points +
Publication bias (positive results)  +, Publication  +
Poor mentoring or supervision of early career researcherers +
Responsible mentoring  +
Position Paper on Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in Austria +
Science policy  +, Gender bias  +, Open Science  +
Postdoc randomly chose data during figure assembly +
Fabrication  +, Image Integrity  +
Potential figure manipulation with corresponding author uncontactable +
Data Practices and Management  +
Practical tools and strategies for researchers to increase replicability +
Replicability  +
Premature release of clinical trials data +
Industry funded research  +
Preparatory Reading: Introduction to Concepts & Themes +
Dialogue versus debate  +, Moral conflict and moral dilemma  +, Virtues in research integrity  +
Preprint servers +
Open access publishing: the new norm?  +, Post-publication peer review  +, FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results  +
Procrastinating Researcher Delegates Grant Reviews to Trainee +
Peer review  +, Fake peer-reviewing  +
Procrastinating Reviewer +
Fake peer-reviewing  +
Prominent Video Game-Violence Researcher Loses Another Paper to Retraction +
Retractions: correcting the scientific literature  +, Self-plagiarism  +
Protecting Research Subjects +
Protecting research subjects  +
Protecting research subjects +
Balancing harms and benefits  +, Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials  +
Protection of Research Participants +
Balancing harms and benefits  +, Informed consent  +, Privacy in research  +, …
Protocol Violations Putting Animal Subjects in Harm’s Way +
Research with animals  +
Psychologist made up sex bias results +
Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct  +, Research misconduct  +
Psychology Grad Student Faked Data +
Fabrication  +, Falsification  +
Psychology of misbehavior (in Dutch) +
Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors  +
Publication +
Peer review  +
Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct  +, Research Integrity Committees  +, Research ethics committees  +, …
Publishing complications and patient safety +
Informed consent  +, Protecting research subjects  +
Q
Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and Reporting +
Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors  +, Statistical pre-registration  +
Questionable Research Practices in Collaboration +
Collaborative working  +, Cross-boundary collaborations  +, High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations  +, …
Questionable Research Practices in Study Design +
AllTrials campaign  +, Prospective registration of clinical trials  +, Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors  +, …
R
Rainy Days for a Struggling Mentee +
Supervision  +, Supervision Guidelines  +, Superb Supervision: integrity training for supervisors  +
Rampant Plagiarism in Two Journals +
Plagiarism  +
Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct +
European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI)  +
Reflections on the Cleveland Clinic Study of The Batista Operation +
Peer review  +
Replicability +
Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’)  +
Replicability in the Humanities +
Replicability  +
Reporting Adverse Effects +
FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results  +, Improper data use (a bias distorting research results)  +
Reporting Findings in a Timely Manner +
Standards of authorship  +
Reproducibility and Replicability in Science +
Computational reproducibility: safeguarding the backbone of science  +
Reproducibility of methodology +
Post-publication peer review  +, Replicability  +
Research Data Management +
The impact of the GDPR on scientific data  +, FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results  +
Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
Supervision  +, Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct  +, Whistleblower protection/rights  +, …
Research Ethics +
European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC)  +, Research ethics committees  +, Protecting research subjects  +
Research Ethics: Zero Tolerance +
Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas  +, Fabrication  +, Falsification  +, …
Research Integrity & Research Ethics: Guidelines of the Austrian Science Funds +
Research with animals  +, Research misconduct  +
Research Integrity - Detecting and determining greyscales +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +, European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI)  +, Image Integrity  +, …
Research Integrity Practices in Science Europe Member Organizations +
Whistleblower protection/rights  +, European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI)  +, Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas  +
Research Integrity and Conflicts of Interest: The Case of Unethical Research-Misconduct Charges +
Research Integrity Committees  +, Conflict of interests  +, Research misconduct  +
Research Integrity in trying times: a scenario on the presentation and dissemination of information +
Retractions: correcting the scientific literature  +, Consent for publication (Author)  +, Communicate results to the general public before a peer reviewed publication is available  +
Research Integrity: Podcast Series +
European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI)  +, Authorship criteria  +
Research Problems at Australian University Hit the News +
Retractions: correcting the scientific literature  +, Conflict of interests  +
Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’)  +, Improper data use (a bias distorting research results)  +, Inappropriate study design  +, …
Research Reproducibility +
Computational reproducibility: safeguarding the backbone of science  +, Replicability  +
Research culture +
Responsible supervision  +, Gender bias  +
Research fraud on MMR vaccines +
Research with humans  +
Research integrity - what is means, why it is important and how we might protect it +
Research Integrity Committees  +, European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI)  +, Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas  +
Research metrics +
Altmetrics  +, H-index  +, Journal Impact Factor  +
Research misconduct +
Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors  +, Fabrication  +, Falsification  +
Research or Services? +
Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials  +, Ethical issues of involving children with disabilities in research  +
Research published by Hans Eysenck is unsafe +
Research with humans  +
Researcher 'Cherry Picked' Data, University Investigation Finds +
Improper data use (a bias distorting research results)  +
Researcher Accused of Breaching Research Ethics Faces GMC +
Funders  +, Research ethics committees  +
Researcher discovers paper published by co-author in another journal +
Standards of authorship  +
Researchers Call For the Release of Findings of a Misconduct Investigation +
Research misconduct  +
Researchers Pressured to Store Animal Subjects +
Research with animals  +
Responsible Research and Innovation resources for researchers and funders +
Responsible Research and Innovation - RRI  +
Responsible conduct of biomedical research : collaborative research +
Collaborative working  +, Cross-boundary collaborations  +, Authorship criteria  +
Responsible mentoring +
Supervision  +, Responsible supervision  +
Retracted WHO Reports on Opioid Guidelines +
Retractions: correcting the scientific literature  +
Reusing Biopsy Material in New Publications, Image Manipulation and Fraudulent Research Protocols +
Research misconduct  +, Fabrication  +, Falsification  +
Reviewer’s Déjà Vu, French Science Sleuthing Uncover Plagiarized Papers +
Plagiarism  +
Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science  +, Peer review  +, Publishers - COPE guidelines  +, …
Rights of Citizen Scientists +
Authorship criteria  +, Standards of authorship  +, Open Science  +
Robbing the Grave: Investigator Takes Ownership of Deceased Scholar’s Work +
Inappropriate authorship  +
Romanian Scientists Fight Plagiarism +
Plagiarism  +
Rules of Data-Sharing in Collaborative and Non-Collaborative Research +
FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results  +
Rules of Data-Sharing in Collaborative and Non-Collaborative Research +
FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results  +
S
SOPs4RI - Guidelines for research institutions on community building for a positive research culture +
The SOPs4RI project  +
SOPs4RI - Guidelines for research institutions on diversity and inclusion +
The SOPs4RI project  +
SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on defining and preventing unjustified interferences from funders, political and commercial actors +
Funders  +, Conflict of interest in peer review  +, Conflict of interests  +, …
SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on monitoring funded projects +
Funders  +, Monitoring funding processes  +, The SOPs4RI project  +
SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on the selection and evaluation of proposals +
Funders  +, The SOPs4RI project  +
SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of bachelor, master and PhD students +
The SOPs4RI project  +
SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of institutional research integrity stakeholders +
The SOPs4RI project  +
SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of post-doctorate and senior researchers +
The SOPs4RI project  +
SOPs4RI Guidelines on Supervision - PhD guidelines +
Responsible supervision  +, Respectable and honest supervision ensures responsible and ethical research in the future.  +, Poor mentoring or supervision of early career researcherers  +
Sabotage and the Federal Definition of Research Misconduct +
Research misconduct  +, Falsification  +
Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
Balancing harms and benefits  +, Confidentiality  +, Informed consent  +, …
Sample records for guideline development processes +
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity  +
Science and Surveillance: Western Institutions Consider Role in China’s Uighur Crackdown +
Research with humans  +
Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science +
Initiatives promoting research integrity  +, Research misconduct  +
Scientific Misconduct at an Elite Medical Institute: The Role of Competing Institutional Logics and Fragmented Control +
Research misconduct  +
Scientific Research: Dilemmas and Temptations (booklet of cases) +
Collaborative working  +, Authorship criteria  +, Research misconduct  +, …
Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel +
Fabrication  +, Falsification  +
Scientists in Chile Protest Mummy Study +
Research with humans  +
Selection bias in skull measurements +
Outcome reporting bias  +
Self Declaration Approach - a Reflection on the Varieties of Goodness in Research +
Virtues in research integrity  +
Self-plagiarism and suspected salami publishing +
Self-plagiarism  +
Self-plagiarism case prompts calls for agencies to tighten rules +
Self-plagiarism  +
Selling Out? Making Deals with Other Institutions +
The impact of the GDPR on scientific data  +, Data stewardship at TU Delft  +
Serious Accusation of Negligence of Ethical Principles in Human Sciences +
Confidentiality  +, Research with humans  +, Protecting research subjects  +
Sertifika +
Virtues in research integrity  +
Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Background Section +
Plagiarism  +
Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Duplicate Publication +
Self-plagiarism  +, Plagiarism  +
Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Magazine Surprise +
Plagiarism  +
Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Unauthorised Translation +
Plagiarism  +
Show Me The Money! +
Conflict of interests  +
Simultaneous Submission Leading to Duplicate Publication +
Duplicate publications and secondary publications  +, Research misconduct  +
Speculations and Ethical Concerns in the Conduct of Outsourced Clinical Trials in India +
Research ethics committees  +
Statistical Forensics. Check Rightmost Digits for Uniform Distribution +
Forensic Statistics to detect Data Fabrication  +
Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials +
Statistical pre-registration  +
Studying Vulnerable Individuals +
Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials  +, Conflict of interests  +
Successful and timely uptake of artificial intelligence in science in the EU +
AI Generated Content  +
Suspected image manipulation involving four journals +
Image Integrity  +, Data Practices and Management  +
Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences' Guideline on Authorship in Scientific Publications +
Authorship criteria  +, Standards of authorship  +, Not acknowledging contributors who do not qualify for authorship  +, …
Swiss Academy of Arts and Sciences Code of Conduct for Scientific Integrity r +
Collaborative working  +, Authorship criteria  +, Research culture  +, …
T
Technician Error Leads to Harm of Animal Subjects +
Research with animals  +
Ten short cases on publication ethics +
Authorship criteria  +, Standards of authorship  +, Inappropriate authorship  +, …
The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose +
Inferring from P-values  +
The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud +
Research misconduct  +, Fabrication  +, Falsification  +, …
The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing ‘Situated Ethics’ in the Field +
Informed consent  +, Research ethics committees  +, Research with humans  +
The Culture of Scientific Research in the UK +
Monitoring funding processes  +, Research culture  +, The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity  +
The Dutch Code on Prevention of Undue Influence through Conflicts of Interest +
Conflict of interests  +
The Dutch anthropologist making up data and papers +
Research with humans  +, Fabrication  +
The EQUATOR Network: Reporting guidelines +
Non-reporting of negative findings  +, Outcome reporting bias  +
The Epistemic Integrity of Scientific Research +
Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas  +
The Ethics of Collecting Genetic Data From Indigenous People +
Research with humans  +, The impact of the GDPR on scientific data  +, Improper data use (a bias distorting research results)  +
The Ethics of Pharmaceutical Research Funding: A Social Organization Approach +
Funders  +
The Ethics of Public Health Research on Less Expensive, Less Effective Interventions +
Research ethics committees  +
The Extent and Causes of Academic Text Recycling or ‘Self-Plagiarism’ +
Self-plagiarism  +
The Flemish Council for Scientific Integrity's Guidelines on Plagiarism in Funding Applications +
Monitoring funding processes  +
The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity +
Reasonable standards for career advancement  +
The Lab: Avoiding Research Misconduct +
Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct  +, Authorship criteria  +, Standards of authorship  +, …
The Legacy of the Hwang Case: Research Misconduct in Biosciences +
Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct  +, Research misconduct  +
The Middle Position +
Virtues in research integrity  +
The Nuremberg Code +
Informed consent  +
The Olivieri Debacle: Where Were the Heroes of Bioethics? +
Whistleblower protection/rights  +, Informed consent  +, Research ethics committees  +, …
The RESPECT Code of Practice for Socioeconomic Research +
The impact of the GDPR on scientific data  +
The Replication Crisis in Psychology +
Replicability  +
The Reward Alliance +
Reward campaign  +
The Rotterdam Dilemma Game +
Moral conflict and moral dilemma  +, Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas  +, The Dilemma Game  +
The Saga of Korean Women Who Provided Eggs for Embryonic Stem Cell Research +
Informed consent  +, Research with humans  +
The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) +
Reasonable standards for career advancement  +
The Suspect Questionnaire +
Plagiarism  +
The Swiss National Science Foundation and National Research Council's Regulations on scientific misconduct +
Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct  +, Research misconduct  +
The Swiss Report on Homeopathy: A Case Study of Research Misconduct +
Research misconduct  +
The Threat to Scientific Integrity in Environmental and Occupational Medicine +
Whistleblower protection/rights  +, Science policy  +, Monitoring funding processes  +, …
The Three Rs of Animal Research +
Research with animals  +
The Unfortunate Experiment +
Balancing harms and benefits  +, Informed consent  +
The Use of Students as Participants in a Study of Eating Disorders in a Developing Country: Case Study in the Ethics of Mental Health Research +
Research ethics committees  +, Research with humans  +
The Whistleblower and Penn: A Final Accounting of Study 352 +
Whistleblower protection/rights  +
The Wild West of Animal Experimentation +
Research with animals  +
The qualification portfolio (UMC Utrecht): from output to impact +
Reasonable standards for career advancement  +, The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity  +
The role of moral philosophy in the divide between science and non-science +
Informed consent  +, Research misconduct  +
Think. Check. Submit. +
Predatory publishing  +
Training modules and guidelines on mentorship +
Research integrity training for PhD students  +
Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
Supervision  +, Supervision Guidelines  +, Initiatives promoting research integrity  +, …
Traver paper: The Unique Case of a Published Delusion +
Retractions: correcting the scientific literature  +
U
U.S. Finds Misconduct by Ex-Researchers at Chicago and UCSF +
Falsification  +, Image Integrity  +
U.S. Gov’t Physicist Sentenced to 18 months in Prison for Fraud +
Fabrication  +, Falsification  +
U.S. gov’t researchers withdraw climate paper after using pseudonyms +
Standards of authorship  +
UK Research Council's Policy and Guidelines on Governance of Good Research Conduct +
Research misconduct  +
UK Research Integrity Office's Case Study Collection +
Research misconduct  +
University Investigation Finds Misconduct by Bone Researcher with 23 Retractions +
Retractions: correcting the scientific literature  +
University of Montana online research ethics course +
Research integrity training for PhD students  +
Unlicensed usage of medical devices on patients: a case of accusations +
Informed consent  +, Research with humans  +, Conflict of interests  +
Up, Up, and Away: Clinical Trials Go International +
Research ethics committees  +
V
VIRT2UE Certification +
Virtues in research integrity  +
VIRT2UE train-the-trainer program +
Cognitive dissonance and moral distress  +, Dialogue versus debate  +, Epistemic virtues  +, …
Values and norms +
Moral conflict and moral dilemma  +
Veterinary scientist fabricates data and manipulates images +
Research with animals  +, Fabrication  +, Image Integrity  +
Virtue Ethics under Current Research Conditions +
Cognitive dissonance and moral distress  +, Research misconduct  +
Virtues and Norms +
Moral conflict and moral dilemma  +, Virtues in research integrity  +
Virtues in research integrity +
Cognitive dissonance and moral distress  +, Moral conflict and moral dilemma  +
W
Wellcome Open Research +
Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities  +
Werte/Tugenden und Normen +
Moral conflict and moral dilemma  +, Virtues in research integrity  +
What Universities can Learn from one of Science’s Biggest Frauds +
Retractions: correcting the scientific literature  +, Research misconduct  +, Plagiarism  +
What happens when an ex-physicist writes about gender identity? +
Post-publication peer review  +, Gender bias  +, Selective citation  +
What my retraction taught me +
Retractions: correcting the scientific literature  +, Research misconduct  +
When Sociologists Deceive Their Subjects +
Informed consent  +
Withholding Study Purpose +
Informed consent  +, Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials  +
Working with Research Integrity - Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement +
Research Integrity Committees  +, European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI)  +, Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas  +
[
Collaboration In Research +
Collaborative working  +
Cross-boundary collaborations +
Collaborative working  +, High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations  +
High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations +
Collaborative working  +, Cross-boundary collaborations  +
SSH research as part of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research +
Collaborative working  +
Conflict of interest in peer review +
Conflict of interests  +
Conflict of interest: a research integrity and research ethics perspective +
Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals  +, Conflict of interest in peer review  +, Conflict of interests  +, …
Editorial conflicts of interest +
Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals  +, Conflict of interest in peer review  +, Conflict of interests  +
Intellectual conflicts of interest +
Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals  +, Intellectual property rights in research collaborations  +, Conflict of interest in peer review  +, …
Data management plans +
Data Practices and Management  +
FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results +
Open access publishing: the new norm?  +, Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science  +
How to select trustworthy repositories +
Data Practices and Management  +, Sharing and preserving data in repositories  +
Imputation of missing data in clinical trials +
Data management plans  +
Sharing and preserving data in repositories +
FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results  +, Data Practices and Management  +, Data management plans  +, …
“Five steps to decide what data to keep: a checklist for appraising research data” +
FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results  +, Data Practices and Management  +, Data management plans  +
Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals +
Conflict of interest in peer review  +, Conflict of interests  +
Industry funded research +
Funders  +, Monitoring funding processes  +, Intellectual property rights in research collaborations  +
Intellectual property rights in research collaborations +
Funders  +, Monitoring funding processes  +
Monitoring funding processes +
Funders  +
Sponsorship of drug and device studies by the manufacturing company +
Prospective registration of clinical trials  +, Industry funded research  +, Funding (Sponsorship) bias  +
Data stewardship at TU Delft +
EQIPD (Enhancing Quality in Preclinical Data)  +
Initiatives promoting research integrity +
European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI)  +, The INSPIRE project  +, Research culture  +, …
Integrity roadmap, Delft University of Technology +
The INSPIRE project  +
PhD-pizza - Gathering for PhD-candidates to talk freely +
The INSPIRE project  +
Research Integrity lunch meetings +
The INSPIRE project  +
Research culture awards (University of Glasgow) +
Research culture  +, Research culture awards (University of Glasgow)  +, Research culture statement (University of Glasgow)  +, …
Research culture group (University of Glasgow) +
Research culture  +, Research culture awards (University of Glasgow)  +, Research culture survey (University of Glasgow)  +, …
Research culture statement (University of Glasgow) +
Research culture  +, Research culture awards (University of Glasgow)  +, Research culture survey (University of Glasgow)  +, …
Research culture survey (University of Glasgow) +
Research culture  +, Research culture awards (University of Glasgow)  +, Research culture statement (University of Glasgow)  +, …
Reward campaign +
Inappropriate study design  +, Non-reporting of negative findings  +
The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity +
1386bef0-81e2-4c3b-bb65-673d2baead1c  +, FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results  +
Importance of healthy lifestyle +
Balancing harms and benefits  +
Dilemmas in daily practice +
Cognitive dissonance and moral distress  +, Moral conflict and moral dilemma  +
European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC) +
European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI)  +, Research ethics committee members' skills  +, Research ethics committees  +
European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI) +
Research Integrity Committees  +, European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC)  +, Research ethics committees  +
Networks and projects promoting research integrity +
European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI)  +, European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC)  +, The INSPIRE project  +
Path2Integrity +
Networks and projects promoting research integrity  +
Platform for Responsible Editorial Policies (PREP) +
Publishers - COPE guidelines  +, F3ddbf9b-e3c4-47b7-97cd-6239ce7a32c3  +
The INSPIRE project +
PhD-pizza - Gathering for PhD-candidates to talk freely  +, The Dilemma Game  +, Integrity roadmap, Delft University of Technology  +, …
Not asking permission from contributors for the wording of the acknowledgement +
Authorship criteria  +, Intellectual conflicts of interest  +, (re)submitting without consent of all authors  +
Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science +
Open access publishing: the new norm?  +
Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities +
Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science  +, Peer review  +, Post-publication peer review  +
Post-publication peer review +
Peer review card game  +, Peer review  +
AI Generated Content +
Plagiarism  +
Balancing harms and benefits +
Research with humans  +
Clarifying the aims of a research study +
Outcome reporting bias  +, Publication bias (positive results)  +, Spin of research results  +, …
Conducting research in high risk locations +
Balancing harms and benefits  +, Confidentiality  +, Informed consent  +, …
Confidentiality +
Informed assent  +, Informed consent  +, Privacy in research  +
Ethical issues in qualitative research +
Qualitative research  +
Incidental research findings +
Balancing harms and benefits  +, Informed consent  +, Research with humans  +
Informed assent +
Balancing harms and benefits  +, Informed consent  +, Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials  +
Informed consent +
Informed assent  +
Internet Research Ethics +
Confidentiality  +, Informed consent  +, Privacy in research  +, …
Privacy in research +
Confidentiality  +, Informed assent  +, Informed consent  +, …
Research with animals +
Research with humans  +, Research misconduct  +
Research with children +
Informed consent  +, Ethical issues of involving children with disabilities in research  +
Research with humans +
Balancing harms and benefits  +, Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials  +
Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials +
Prospective registration of clinical trials  +, Informed consent  +
Authorship criteria +
Standards of authorship  +, Inappropriate authorship  +, Plagiarism  +
Consent for publication (Author) +
Authorship criteria  +
Consent for publication (Participant) +
Confidentiality  +, Informed consent  +, Privacy in research  +, …
High Integration of Research Monographs in the European Open Science (HIRMEOS) +
Open access publishing: the new norm?  +, Digital humanities  +, Open access Publication in the European Research Area for Social Sciences and Humanities (OPERAS)  +
Initiative for Open Abstracts (I4OA) +
Open Science  +
Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC) +
Open access publishing: the new norm?  +, Initiative for Open Abstracts (I4OA)  +
Open access Publication in the European Research Area for Social Sciences and Humanities (OPERAS) +
Open access publishing: the new norm?  +, Digital humanities  +, High Integration of Research Monographs in the European Open Science (HIRMEOS)  +
Open access publishing: the new norm? +
F3ddbf9b-e3c4-47b7-97cd-6239ce7a32c3  +, Open Science  +
Publishers - COPE guidelines +
Whistleblower protection/rights  +, Retractions: correcting the scientific literature  +, Standards of authorship  +
Retractions: correcting the scientific literature +
Fabrication  +, Falsification  +, Plagiarism  +
Standards of authorship +
Conflict of interests  +
Communicate results to the general public before a peer reviewed publication is available +
Peer review  +
Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’) +
P-value hacking  +
Duplicate publications and secondary publications +
Publishers - COPE guidelines  +, Retractions: correcting the scientific literature  +, Self-plagiarism  +
Funding (Sponsorship) bias +
Improper data use (a bias distorting research results)  +, Non-reporting of negative findings  +, Outcome reporting bias  +, …
Hypothesizing after the results are known (HARKing) +
Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’)  +
Improper data use (a bias distorting research results) +
Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’)  +, P-value hacking  +
Inaccurate representation of results in the media +
Outcome reporting bias  +
Inferring from P-values +
Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’)  +, P-value hacking  +, Statistical pre-registration  +
Non-reporting of negative findings +
Publication bias (positive results)  +
Outcome reporting bias +
Improper data use (a bias distorting research results)  +, Non-reporting of negative findings  +, Falsification  +
P-value hacking +
Improper data use (a bias distorting research results)  +, Non-reporting of negative findings  +
Publication bias (positive results) +
Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’)  +, Non-reporting of negative findings  +
Salami publication +
Duplicate publications and secondary publications  +, Predatory publishing  +, Plagiarism  +
Selective citation +
Journal Impact Factor  +
Spin of research results +
Improper data use (a bias distorting research results)  +, Outcome reporting bias  +, Publication bias (positive results)  +
(re)submitting without consent of all authors +
F3ddbf9b-e3c4-47b7-97cd-6239ce7a32c3  +
Be grossly unfair to your collaborators +
Collaborative working  +
Fake peer-reviewing +
Peer review card game  +, Peer review  +, Hostile peer review  +
Gender bias +
Collaborative working  +, Reasonable standards for career advancement  +
Honorary or gift authorship +
Authorship criteria  +, Standards of authorship  +, Inappropriate authorship  +, …
Hostile peer review +
Peer review  +, Conflict of interest in peer review  +, Conflict of interests  +
Inappropriate authorship +
Standards of authorship  +, Conflict of interests  +
Not acknowledging contributors who do not qualify for authorship +
Authorship criteria  +
Research collaboration +
Collaborative working  +, Collaboration In Research  +
Self-plagiarism +
Retractions: correcting the scientific literature  +, Salami publication  +, Plagiarism  +
Take no full responsibility for the integrity of the research project and its reports +
Collaborative working  +
Turning a blind eye to breaches of integrity +
Collaborative working  +, Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct  +, Research Integrity Committees  +, …
Unfair reviewing +
Peer review  +, Conflict of interest in peer review  +, Hostile peer review  +
Inadequately handle or store data or (bio)materials +
FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results  +, Improper data use (a bias distorting research results)  +, Data stewardship at TU Delft  +
Keeping inadequate notes of the research process +
Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors  +
Ignoring substantial safety risks of the study to participants, workers or environment +
Balancing harms and benefits  +, Informed consent  +, Research with humans  +, …
Inappropriate study design +
Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’)  +, P-value hacking  +, Keeping inadequate notes of the research process  +
Non-disclosure of changes to the research design +
AllTrials campaign  +, Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’)  +, P-value hacking  +
Posing irrelevant research questions +
Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors  +
Retrieved from "https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Property:Related_To_Theme&oldid=8756"
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
More information

Your platform for research integrity and ethics

Privacy statementTerms of serviceTake down policyContact
Let us keep you posted

Twitter Logo Dark.svg

The EnTIRE and VIRT2UE projects have received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research programme under grant agreements N 741782 and N 787580.

5.1.6